RSC_007.pdf

PDF 87 KB Posted

Attached to
CVN-74 FY17 PIA Preservation
Solicitation number
N4523A-17-R-0001
Issued by

About this file

Government Response to Request for Specification Clarification Number 007.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REQUEST FOR SPECIFICATION CLARIFICATION

DATE OF REQUEST: 21 October 2016 QUESTION NO: 007

REQUIREMENT:

USS JOHN C STENNIS (CVN 74) FY17 PIA, Preservation REQUISITION NO.: N4523A-17-R-0001

ITEM NO: RFP, Section L.4, Subfactor C.1 ISSUING OFFICE POC (CODE 441):

TITLE: Technical Experience

Charles R. Smith: (360) 633-9342, Charles.r.smith@navy.mil;

Melvin Tiglao: (360) 476-1356 Melvin.tiglao@navy.mil

PARA. NO: C.1 PAGE NO: 64, 65 CONTRACTOR:

PLANNER’S NAME: n/a ATTACH. NO: n/a CONTRACTOR POC & PHONE:

CONTRACTOR QUESTION: (ONE QUESTION PER PAGE)

Relevant past performance is defined on page 65 as experience with preservation AND structural repair work on US Navy nuclear vessels. However, no mention of required structural capabilities or technical approach is listed in technical experience section of Technical Proposal Subfactor C.1 on page 64. Is structural repair experience a requirement for this effort?

DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE

SPEC CHG: N DWG/REF CHG. N RQMTS CHG: N MAT'L CHG: N

TECHNICAL REVIEW: SERIAL NO:

Structural repair experience is a requirement for this effort.

Statement of Work

Page four of 73, C.1 Scope of Work states, “…perform depot level preservation and associated structural repair services…” and, “Additional work includes… structural repair work (associated with the preservation process)…”

Instructions to Offerors

Page 64 of 73, Volume I, Factor 1, Subfactor C, “Technical experience is required for the Government to use as an indicator for the offerors probability to perform the contract successfully, and shall include information sufficient for the Government to ensure that your company has:”; “Successfully completed at least two (2) contracts or projects within the past five years under NAICS code 336611, demonstrating the required capabilities and experience to successfully work on U.S. Navy nuclear vessels to accomplish”;

“Accomplish surface preparation and preservation…”

Page 65 of 73, Relevancy Information states, “In order to be considered relevant, past performance must equate to preservation and structural repair work on US Navy nuclear vessels performed under NAICS code

336611.”

Evaluation Factors for Award

Page 72 of 73, Volume I, Factor 1, Subfactor C, 1.e.ii., states, “whether or not the provided information is verifiable and substantiates that your company has… the required technical capabilities and experience to successfully… Accomplish surface preparation and preservation…”

Page 72 of 73, Factor 2, Basis of Evaluation, 1.b., states, “In order to be considered relevant, past performance must equate to preservation and structural work on US Navy nuclear vessels performed under

NAICS code 336611. Relevant past performance effort will clearly have involved scope, magnitude and complexity similar to that which this solicitation requires.”

Surface preparation may include minor structural repairs. Any structural repair performed under the resulting contract will be categorized as minor structural repair and considered as incidental to the preservation effort required. Furthermore, relevant past performance for proposed subcontractor(s) may be submitted.

ALL REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATION MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE ISSUING

OFFICE POC NO LATER THAN THE DATE & TIME IDENTIFIED IN THE REQUEST

FOR PROPOSAL.

mailto:Melvin.tiglao@navy.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .