PPI_All_Jacobs_Response_2018FEB23REV_Inc_PJB_Markup2_18-03-06_Final.xls

58 KB Posted

Attached to
Construction of Structures and Facilities
Solicitation number
N4008518R8701
Issued by

About this file

From the source

PPI_All_Jacobs_Response_2018FEB23REV_Inc_PJB_Markup2_18-03-06_Final.xls

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_0006_SF30.pdf PDF
2nd_Site_Visit_Sign_In_Sheet.pdf PDF
Amendment_0005.pdf PDF
Amendment_0004.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_SIGN_IN_SHEET.pdf PDF
Attachment_C-_Price_Proposal_Form_Rev1.doc DOC document
Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
SF30.pdf PDF
Attachment_C_-_Price_Proposal_Form.doc DOC document
Attachment_A_-_Construc_Exp_Proj_Data_Sheet.docx DOCX document
Attachment_B_-_Past_Perf_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment_D_-_ODP_Request.xls XLS spreadsheet
Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Sheet1

Question No.Date ReceivedREFERENCEQUESTIONGOVERNMENT RESPONSEPosted on Amend No.
PageSectionPara.
11/24/1812SolicitationFactor 1 Corporate ExperienceCan past experience projects be submitted within the past 10 years in lieu of 7 years as indicated in the solicitation?Please see Amendment 0004 of the solicitation.4
22/6/1807 53 23Please provide a mil thickness and color of EPDM roof membrane.EPDM Membrane thickness - 90 mil. Color - roofing manufacturer's standard white factory coating.6
32/6/1807 53 23Would a comparable mil thickness and color of PVC membrane be acceptable?Substitution of the specified EPDM roofing system is not under consideration.6
42/15/18Page 502 41 002.1Is there a borrow pit on base for the required soil?A borrow pit has not been specified for the project, material used as backfill to fill basements shall be obtained from excavations necessary for the project construction.6
52/15/18Page 602 41 003.1.1Is it allowed to dispose of broken concrete on the base or must it be removed of base?Disposal of broken concrete on the base is acceptable pending NAVFAC approval and if material meets requirements specified elsewhere in specifications.6
62/19/18D-001 and DR-102Drawing D-001 provides a summary of asbestos containing material to be removed. However, it appears this listing of materials did not include all of the asbestos containing materials that are present on some sites. For example, at B2532, Drawing DR-102 note A2 indicates "remove basement walls 24" below final grade and break up basement floor slab for drainage" This floor contains asbestos flooring. Please advise how the asbestos containing materials present but not included in the Drawing D-001 list should be handled.No ACM shall be buried on site. If the contractor chooses to break up the basement floor slab for drainage and leave it on site, then the ACM floor tile shall be abated beforehand by the asbestos abatement contractor. Drawing D-001 provides a summary of Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) only. The RACM remediation shall be performed in accordance with the specifications and Contracting Officer Representative (COR) directions. ACM which are not identified as RACM may be removed with the general waste stream.
Contractor shall consult the Government's Hazardous Materials surveys which are available upon request in electronic format for full listing of all known ACMs.6
72/19/18Will the Government be providing characterization, transportation, manifesting, containers and disposal of PCB contaminated waste water?The government will not be providing characterization, transportation, manifesting, containers and disposal of PCB contaminated waste water. The Government will sign manifests provided by the Contractor.6
82/27/1802 41 002.1.a/3.1.4/3.3.1/3.3.6/3.5.1/3.5.3/3.5.4At the last site visit, someone asked if there are any landfills or solid fill sites on base. In Spec Section 02 41 00, Paragraph 2.1.a says “Fill material (soils) shall be waste products from demolition or deconstruction until all waste appropriated for this purpose is consumed.” Paragraph 3.1.4 says “Pavement and slabs designated to be recycled and utilized in this project shall be moved, ground, and stored as directed by the Contracting Officer. Pavement and slabs not to be used in this project shall be removed from the installation at Contractor’s expense.” Where does one find which pavements and slabs are “designated” to be recycled? Paragraph 3.3.1 says that “all materials and equipment removed and not reused or salvaged, shall become property of the contractor and shall be removed from Government property.” Paragraph 3.3.6 says “Dispose of unsalvageable and non-recyclable noncombustible material in the disposal area designated by the Contracting Officer.” If a disposal area has been designated on the installation for this type of material, where is the area located? This statement from paragraph 3.3.6 seems to conflict with the statement from paragraph 3.3.1, so which is correct? Paragraph 3.5.1 says “Dispose of …. Other non-salvageable materials ….as contractually specified in the Waste Management Plan.” Since the contractor will be responsible for developing and submitting the Waste Management Plan, how can it be referenced in the RFP as providing contractually specified guidance? Paragraph 3.5.3 says “Transport noncombustible materials removed from demolition and deconstruction structures to designated spoil areas on Government property.” If spoil areas have been designated on Government property, where are they located? Paragraph 3.5.4 says “Transport waste materials removed from demolished and deconstructed structures , except waste soil, from Government property for legal disposal. Dispose of waste soil as directed.” Again, has a site been designated for disposal of waste soil? Based on the above excerpts from spec section 02 41 00, this specification is confusing at best, and will probably lead the bidders to believe they can dispose of soils and other unsalvageable and non-recyclable materials at disposal sites on base that have not been designated and may not exist. Please provide clarification**2018FEB28**Jacobs Proposed Response: - (2.1.a) Pavements and slabs may be used as fill material provided the material meets the criteria specified in 31 23 00.00 20 EXCAVATION AND FILL. (3.1.4) No pavement and slabs have been designated to be recycled – recycling of these materials will be at the contractors discretion. - (3.3.1) Section is applicable. (3.3.6) There are no disposal areas designated on the installation, section 3.3.6 will not apply to the project and will be deleted. (3.5.3) There are no disposal areas designated on the installation, section 3.5.3 will not apply to the project and will be deleted. - (3.5.1) Section just points out that contractor is contractually required to develop a Waste Management Plan and meet all federal, state and local regulations. (3.5.4) Section is applicable as written – non-contaminated soil shall be disposed of in the fill/embankment necessary for the project construction if it meets the earthwork specification, otherwise it shall be removed off of government property.6Delete text "**2018FEB28**Jacobs Proposed Response:"
92/27/18drwg D-001Demo Gen Note 3On drawing D-001, Demolition General Note #3 says “Dispose of debris, rubbish, scrap, and other non-salvageable material as specified in the Waste Management Plan.” Since the Waste Management Plan is to be developed by the contractor how can it be referenced to specify the disposition of demolition and construction debris?As specified in Section 01 74 19, the Contractor is to develop and implement the Waste Management Plan as approved by the Contracting Officer Representative. Demolition General Note #3 intent is to flag this disposal is to be included in the Waste Management Plan.6
102/27/18drwg D-001Haz Mat Note 1On drawing D-001, Hazardous Material Remediation Note #1 says “Locations and approximate volume of asbestos, LBP, and PCBs are identified in the Government hazardous material surveys previously completed at all sites and are available upon request.” Shouldn’t this information be provided to the bidders during the bidding phase?Information is available by CDRom upon request as stated in the contract documents.6
112/27/18drwg DR10402 61 23 and 02 84 33Keynote A5On Drawing DR104, Keynote A5 references Specification Sections 02 61 23 and 02 84 33 regarding PCB removal. However ; Specification Section 02 61 23 is not included in the specifications, but probably should be since the scope does include removal and disposal of soils suspected to be contaminated with PCBsReference to specification section 02 61 23 is to be eliminated from KeyNote A5/ Sheet DR104.6
122/27/1802 84 33AttachmentAt the end of Specification Section 02 84-33 there is an Attachment titled PCB After Sampling Report and appears to be a table of contents for a report, but do not see where this attachment is referenced or where its purpose is identified.This the the report template referenced in paragraph 1.7.7 Closeout Report.6
132/27/18drwg C-111Keynote 1On Drawing C-111, Keynote #1 indicates that Light Duty Asphalt Pavement is to be in the old building footprint after Building 66 is demolished. Since this area will be subject to heavy truck and forklift traffic, the Light Duty Asphalt Pavement will not withstand the anticipated traffic and should be replaced with something more substantial.Light Duty Asphat Pavement requirement is correct for the B66 building area.6
142/27/18drwgs VR-101, VP-101, VP-102Note 3Drawings VR-101, VP-101, and VP-102 all have a Note #3 that says “All utilities shown in gray are per maps and not field verified.” Since the pdf drawings provided in the RFP are all black and white or shades of gray, it is difficult to determine where this note appliesThe note applies to utilities that are lighter gray such as the sanitary line on drawing VR-101 (located in grid C1 of the drawing).6
152/27/18drwg G-006On Drawing G-006, what is the significance of the parallelogram with text “XCOAX” drawn around approximately the south half of the existing Building 1884Reference drawing TP001, keynotes 4 and 5 for requirements for new and existing coax cable6
162/27/1801 31 23.13 20According to the Submittal Register, there will be many submittals that will most likely be sent to IPT and/or Jacobs for review. It seems like the new eCMS tool may come in real handy for this and other purposes. Thus, the eCMS Specification Section 01 31 23.13 20 should be added to the specifications since we will all likely be expected to comply with this new requirement.This section is not required for this project.6
172/26/18FR001Note 11 on sheet FR001 say piping is to be cut grooved. The type of system being called out are wet systems. Can wet system piping be roll grooved for 1-1/2" diameter piping and larger?Project to be bid as noted. Alternate potential costs saving can be addressed through the change process once the project is awarded.6
182/26/182528 31 76Will the contractor be required to provide a DTX16 Transmitter and Antennae kit for the Plating Building and another one for the Receiving Building?A DTX16 Transmitter and Antennae kit is required for the Plating Shop. An additional DTX16 Transmitter and Antennae kit is required for the Receiving Building. Please note that an additional DTX16 Transmitter and Antennae kit is required for Building 122.6
192/26/1812,2228 31 76Section 28 31 76 appears to specify both scrolling LED Text Displays to show text matching voice message being played and Remote LED Text Displays to show "Evacuate" and "Announcement" for mass notification signage. Please confirm what MNS signage and messages will be required.Scrolling LED Text Displays are not required. Remote LED Text Displays are to spell out "EVACUATE" and "ANNOUNCEMENT".6
202/26/1828 31 76Please verify that the Horn Strobes in Plating Building should be white with FIRE in red.Project to be bid as noted. Final colors to be confirm during submittal process.6
212/26/1828 31 76Please verify that the Speaker Strobes in Receiving Building should be white with ALERT in red.Project to be bid as noted. Final colors to be confirm during submittal process.6
222/27/18A-60308 95 001.4.aThe door schedule on sheet A-603 indicates openings 115, 116B, 117, 123 & 126 are to be blast doors with 90 minute fire label. Specification section 08 95 00 indicates "Doors will become dislodged from the structure, Category IV" . (Reference also paragraph 1.10.1.b.2 and 2.1.1.e) Per UL Fire Label procedures, the rated doors must remain latched for th duration. Theis would bean performance should follow Category II or better under UFC 4-010-01. Please clarify the requirements for these blast doors.Per the UFC 4-010-01 the doors shall meet or exceed Category IV requirements for the specified blast loading. The doors shall also meet UL requirements noted in the specifications.6
232/27/18If the blast doors in previous question are allowed to become dislodged after a blast load for either Category III or IV, who assumes the liability should a person in or adjacent to the opening receive a serious or fatal energy. The blast door manufacturers will not assume this liability nor provide a quote with this condition.Per the UFC 4-010-01 the buidling is classified as an inhabitated building and requires a Very Low Level of Protection (VLLOP) and the doors shall meet or exceed Category IV requirements. Per UFC 4-010-01 Table 2-1, the potential building damage/performance, the potential door hazards, and potential injury are noted for all Levels of Protection including the specified VLLOP.6
242/27/1808 95 001.9.aPlease provide the blast load in terms of either a static or dynamic Pr peak reflected load. For example, the blast load should be stated as ‘Withstand ___ PSI Pr peak reflected load for a duration of _____ msec, impulse of ____ psi-msec.
The blast loading as specified in 08 95 00 Part 1.9.a as “Explosive Weight II at 90 feet standoff distance” is not adequate for a blast door manufacturer to analyze construction.Reflected Peak Pressure = 5 psi, Impulse = 27 psi-ms, duration = 10.8 ms.6
252/27/189 67 23.143.6.3.gSpecifications for the "Spark Proof Conductive Flooring", EPX-3 indicates the basis of design and lists three acceptable "or equal" manufacturers. Would the Government add General Polymers/Sherwin Williams Sprark Proof Conductive Flooring to the list of acceptable "or equal"manufacturers?General Polymer/Sherwin Williams is an acceptable manufacturer, providing proposed products meet the specifications requirements.6
262/26/183228 31 763.6.2.1Specifications require 5 days of factory training at the manufacturing facility for Gorvernment. There is a cost for each individual that we must account for in our estimate. Please confirm how many individuals will require training.Factory training to be provided for one individual.6
272/26/183128 31 76Will a certified DB METER be required for Intelligibility testing in Plating Building?A certified DB Meter will be required for testing of the audible notification appliances within the Plating Shop.6
282/26/1826 27 14Specifications appear to based on the current Schneider Electric AMI metering system in use on base. Please confirm that the Schneider Electric AMI metering System is what is required.Use of Schneider Electric AMI Metering system is highly recommended in order to match the existing system. Other manufacturers will be considered, provided the products and system meet the specifications and all required components can be integrated into existing Schneider Electric mesh metering to provide a fully operational system. Confirmation should be provided by NAVFAC / Crane.6
292/26/18PR111Note 4 on PR11 describes vent pipe and future associated fan mut maintain minimum 10' clearance from opening to the K-LINE. Does this note only apply to the one location where note 4 appears on the floor plan or is it "typical" like notes 1, 2, & 3 on the same sheet? Also, please confirm that the "Future" fan is not part of this project scope of work.Note 4 is "typical" like notes 1, 2, & 3 on the same sheet. The "Future" fan is not part of this project scope of work.6
302/27/1821153132.1Is Air Master Systems, Inc. an acceptable manufacturer for Laboratory Fume Hoods? Product information attached to email.Air Master Systems, Inc is an acceptable manufacturer, providing proposed products meet the specifications requirements.6
312/27/1841231002.2Is Air Master Systems, Inc. an acceptable manufacturer for Metal Casework? Product information attached to email.Air Master Systems, Inc is an acceptable manufacturer, providing proposed products meet the specifications requirements.6

&LSOLICITATION NO. N40085-18-R-8701

PROJECT TITLE/LOCATION: CAAA Ammunition Production, Shipping and Receiving Facilities

&CPRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY FORM

&LJuly 2011

Sheet2

Sheet3

File details come from the government source that posted it.