J_-_13_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_-_SPEARHEAD.docx

DOCX document 2 MB Posted

Attached to
USNS SPEARHEAD ROH/DD Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N32205-17-R-4150
Issued by
Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command

About this file

J-13 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to USNS SPEARHEAD ROH/DD, newest first.
File Type Posted
17-R-4150_SOLICITATION_FINAL.docx DOCX document
N32205-17-R-4150_amendment_2.docx DOCX document
n32205-17-R-4150_amendment_1.docx DOCX document
Spearhead_RFC_14.doc DOC document
final_solicitation_to_amendment_one.docx DOCX document
Spearhead_RFC_23.doc DOC document
Spearhead_RFC_20_21_22.doc DOC document
Spearhead_RFC_18.doc DOC document
Spearhead_RFC_19_resp.doc DOC document
Spearhead_RFC_11_12_13.doc DOC document
Spearhead_RFC_14.doc DOC document
SPEARHEAD_RFC_008.doc DOC document
Spearhead_RFC_15_16_17.doc DOC document
Spearhead_RFCS_009-0011.doc DOC document
Spearhead_RFCS_CONSOLIDATED.doc DOC document
SPEARHEAD_RFC_1.doc DOC document
J-4_GOVERNMENT_FURNISHED_PROPERTY.pdf PDF
J_-_2_Category_A_Items_-_FINAL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J_-_7_MSC_Ship_Repair_Facility_Survey_-_SPEARHEAD.docx DOCX document
J_-_12_Past_Performance_Data_-_SPEARHEAD.doc DOC document
J_-_11_Dry_Dock_Evaluation_Form_-_SPEARHEAD.docx DOCX document
J_-_3_Category_B_Items_-SPEARHEAD.xls XLS spreadsheet
J_-_10_Interport_Differential_-_SPEARHEAD.doc DOC document
J_-_9_Disclosure_of_Lobbying_Activities_-_SPEARHEAD.doc DOC document
J_-_8_Request_for_Spec_Clarification_-_SPEARHEAD.doc DOC document
17-R-4150_SOLICITATION_FINAL.docx DOCX document
USNS_SPEARHEAD_-_Sources_Sought_Notice.doc DOC document
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment J-13

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION, 9 August 2017 at 12:00 pm E.T. to Ms. Norma Rehbein. Information can also be sent via e-mail attention of Ms. Norma Rehbein at norma.rehbein@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Norma Rehbein
Contract Officer

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing/faxing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: Ms. Norma Rehbein

Bldg SP-64 471 C Street Naval Station Norfolk, VA 23511-2419

From: (Name and Address of Organization) __________________________________________________

__________________________________________________
(Point of Contact Name)__________________________________________________
(Facsimile/Phone Number)__________________________________________________
(E-mail Address)__________________________________________________
To(Point of Contact Name)Ms. Norma Rehbein
(Facsimile Number)(757) 443- 5888
(E-mail Address)norma.rehbein@navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .