http //heron.nrl.navy.mil/contracts/4335_1.pdf

PDF 110 KB Posted

Attached to
Blossom Point Award Notice Correction Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N00173-13-R-JF01
Issued by
Department of the Navy Secretary of the Navy Office of Naval Research

About this file

Link to past performance questionaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Blossom Point Award Notice Correction, newest first.
File Type Posted
SF30_AMENDMENT_0009v2.pdf PDF
13_JF01_AMEND0008_POSTED_COPY.pdf PDF
N0017313RJF01_Amendment_0007_pdf_-_Adobe_Acrobat.pdf PDF
13-R-JF01_Pricing_Format.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
13-R-jf01_0004.pdf PDF
13-R-JF01_NRL_Past_Performance_Questioneer.pdf PDF
13-r-jfo1_0003.pdf PDF
13-R-JF01_ATTACH_L1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
13-R-jf01_0002.pdf PDF
SF30_AMENDMENT_OF_SOLIC_MODIFICATION_OF_CONTR.pdf PDF
SF_33_amend0001-p.pdf PDF
Block14_attachement_to_amend_0001.pdf PDF
PWS_CDRL_AMEND.pdf PDF
RFP_BPTFv8_7May13_amendv1.pdf PDF
BPTF_QAP_v5_final.pdf PDF
SF_33.pdf PDF
13jf01packet.pdf PDF
http //heron.nrl.navy.mil/contracts/13JF01.HTM HTM file
13jf01wage.pdf PDF
13jf01costsummary.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
BPTF_GFE_List_4-12-2013.pdf PDF
13jf01rfp_Sect_B.pdf PDF
13jf01pws.pdf PDF
DD254_PR81_4031_13_UPDATED.pdf PDF
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

HQ-NRL 4335/1 (Rev. 8-05) (Front)

PAST PERFORMANCE REPORT

SOLICITATION NO.

N00173 -

I. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION (Complete all information or mark N/A)

CONTRACTOR NAME SUBCONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT TO

CONTRACT NUMBER CONTRACT TYPE

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE INITIAL CONTRACT COST/PRICE CURRENT CONTRACT COST/PRICE

DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES PROVIDED

II. PREPARED BY

ORGANIZATION

NAME/TITLE TELEPHONE NUMBER

SIGNATURE DATE

III. RATING SCALE

RATING SCALE SCORING

EXCEPTIONAL - Exceeded many contractual requirements to the Government's benefit 4

VERY GOOD - Met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the Government's benefit 3

SATISFACTORY - Met contractual requirements 2

MARGINAL - Did not meet some contractual requirements 1

UNSATISFACTORY - Did not meet most contractual requirements 0

IV. PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS

A. PERFORMANCE HISTORY

Rate questions in accordance with the rating scale above, as applicable, by selecting one of the numbers.

1. ADHERENCE TO CONTRACT DELIVERY SCHEDULES?

4 3 2 1 0 N/A

7. SUBMISSION OF REQUIRED PROPOSALS IN A TIMELY MANNER?

2. TIMELY SUBMISSION OF REQUIRED REPORTS AND DOCUMENTATION?

4 3 2 1 0 N/A

8. RESPONSIVENESS TO TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS AND/OR CONTRACT

CHANGE ORDERS?

3. ACCURACY AND COMPLETION OF REPORTS AND DOCUMENTATION?

4 3 2 1 0 N/A

9. TIMELY, ACCURATE, AND APPROPRIATE CONTENT OF PROBLEM

TRACKING/REPORTING DOCUMENTATION?

4. ABILITY TO SOLVE CONTRACT PERFORMANCE PROBLEMS WITHOUT

EXTENSIVE GUIDANCE FROM GOVERNMENT COUNTERPARTS?

4 3 2 1 0 N/A

10. EFFECTIVENESS IN INTERFACING WITH GOVERNMENT'S STAFF?

5. DISPLAYED INITIATIVE IN MEETING REQUIREMENTS?

4 3 2 1 0 N/A

11. ADHERENCE TO THE KEY PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS THROUGHOUT

THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT?

6. COMMITTED ADEQUATE RESOURCES TO THE CONTRACT TO MEET THE

REQUIREMENT AND TO SUCCESSFULLY SOLVE PROBLEMS?

4 3 2 1 0 N/A

12. EFFECTIVE COORDINATION AND INTEGRATION OF SUBCONTRACTOR

MANAGEMENT?

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

4 3 2 1 0 N/A

4 3 2 1 0 N/A

4 3 2 1 0 N/A

4 3 2 1 0 N/A

4 3 2 1 0 N/A

4 3 2 1 0 N/A

B. TERMINATION HISTORY

1. HAS THE CONTRACT BEEN PARTIALLY OR COMPLETELY TERMINATED FOR DEFAULT OR CONVENIENCE? (If yes, explain below (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules.))

No Yes: Default Convenience

EXPLAIN "YES" ANSWER:

2. ARE THERE ANY PENDING TERMINATIONS? (If yes, explain and indicate the status below.)

No Yes

EXPLAIN "YES" ANSWER:

C. COST HISTORY

1. ADHERENCE TO THE ORIGINAL COST ESTIMATES/TARGETS?

No Yes

2. DID THE CONTRACTOR OVERRUN OR UNDERRUN THE CONTRACT AMOUNT? (If yes, explain reason for cost overrun or underrun below.)

Overrun UnderrunNo Yes:

EXPLAIN "YES" ANSWER:

WOULD YOU SELECT THIS FIRM AGAIN? (Explain)

HQ-NRL 4335/1 (Rev. 8-05) (Back)

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

solicitationno:
subcontractorconsultantto:
contracttype:
contractornumber:
initialcontractprice:
currentcontractprice:
periodofperformance:
contractorname:
organization:
nametitle:
signature:
telephone:
date:
historya1: Off
historya2: Off
historya3: Off
historya4: Off
historya5: Off
historya6: Off
historya7: Off
historya8: Off
historya9: Off
historya10: Off
historya11: Off
historya12: Off
historyb1a: Off
historyb1b: Off
descriptionofsupplies:
historyb2: Off
explainyesa:
historyc1: Off
historyc2a: Off
historyc2b: Off
explainyesb:
explainyesc:
selectfirmagain:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .