Attachment_L-4_Questions_and_Answers_A0002.pdf

L-4 Questions and Answers (Q&A) N00030-16-R-0037, Amendment 0002

Question 1: Who is the incumbent?

Response 1: CLIN 0001 (and Option CLINs 0004, 0007, and 0010) were previously procured under contract N00030-13-C-0021, with Systems Planning and Analysis, Inc. (SPA); and services similar to Option CLIN 0002 (and Option CLINs 0005, 0008, and 0011), and Option CLIN 0003 (and Option CLINs 0006, 0009, and 0012) were previously procured under a contract that is not releasable to the public.

Question 2: The SOW references classification by subsection in CLIN 0001, CLIN 0002, and CLIN 0003. Is it the government’s intention that only personnel at the highest classification level be allowed to work on tasking in support of those subsections?

Response 2: The solicitation is revised to restate the classification level of the work and the requirements for personnel to perform the work.

Question 3: For tasking in RFP N00030-16-R-0037, can you please confirm the government’s intent of various classification levels for the effort?

Response 3: The solicitation is revised to restate the classification level of the work and the

Question 4: To produce Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) material, a SCIF will need to be maintained. Will the government allow these construction and maintenance costs to be charged as an ODC?

Response 4: No. As may be necessary, a Government provided SCIF will be provided as noted in the DD254.

Question 5: As per section L.3.3, L.6.2, and M.1.3 para 4: Offeror personnel proposed and assigned to support option CLIN 0002 (and if exercised, option CLINs 0005 0008, 0011) must have Top SECRET/SCI clearance (i.e., Top Secret (TS) clearance with access to Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) at time of award.” Please confirm the requirement of work for SCI clearance.

Response 5: The solicitation is revised to restate the classification level of the work and the

L-4 Questions and Answers (Q&A) N00030-16-R-0037, Amendment 0002

Question 6: Section L-6.3.3 Section II: Personnel, page 86. The RFP states, “The offeror shall provide resumes for all key personnel proposed by the offeror (to include name, titles, qualifications, education, experience, technical expertise, and Security Clearance level); and letters of commitment of all key personnel proposed, but who are not currently employed by the offeror or subcontractors. For this solicitation, Key Personnel are defined as all individuals proposed to perform the contract and are of a non-administrative nature.” The relative importance of the Personnel factor based on the RFP statement at Section M is understood.

Given the number of resumes that the Offeror must submit, would the government confirm that personnel resumes will not be counted against the Technical Volume page count?

Response 6: The solicitation remains unchanged.