Attachment_06_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire...docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
Security Maintenance and Sustainment Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
M67854-16-R-0505
Issued by
United States Marine Corps

About this file

Attachment 06

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Security Maintenance and Sustainment, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment_02.pdf PDF
Attachment_03_-_Labor_Category_and_Supply_Pricing_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_12_-_Required_Performance_Metrics...docx DOCX document
F001_CDRL_WeeklyVehicleMileageLog.docx DOCX document
Amendment_01.pdf PDF
QA_Part2..docx DOCX document
Q A__Part1.docx DOCX document
Attachment_07_-_Personnel_Qualifications...docx DOCX document
A001_CDRL_EquipmentSuppliesDeliveryReport.docx DOCX document
E001_CDRL_MonitoringReport.docx DOCX document
Attachment_01_-_PAP...doc DOC document
Attachment_12_-_Required_Performance_Metrics...docx DOCX document
D001_CDRL_SchematicsDiagrams.docx DOCX document
Attachment_05_-_Past_Performance_Data...docx DOCX document
Attachment_13_-_Sample_Tasks...docx DOCX document
C001_CDRL_TestInspectionReport.docx DOCX document
Attachment_08_-_Resume_Format...docx DOCX document
Attachment_04_-_COR_Rating_Table_for_Performance.docx DOCX document
Attachment_10_-_SF_LLL.pdf PDF
Attachment_03_-_Labor_Category_and_Supply_Pricing_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B001_CDRL_WeeklyAccomplishmentReport..docx DOCX document
Attachment_14_-_Site_Visit_Attendee_Roster.docx DOCX document
Attachment_02_-_Non-Disclosure_Agreement_Form.docx DOCX document
Attachment_11_-_Daily_Metrics...docx DOCX document
Attachment_09_-_Wage_Determinations...docx DOCX document
RFP_M67854-16-R-0505.docx DOCX document
16-R-0505_PRESOLICITATION.docx DOCX document
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 06

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

TO: FACSIMILE:

PHONE: EMAIL:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. _______________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation basis, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by 06 May 2016 @ 1100 Eastern Standard Time to Ms. Britni Jones and Ms. Norene Jones. Information can also be sent via facsimile to the attention of Britni Jones / Norene Jones at 703-432-3131. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Britni Jones
Contract Specialist

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing/faxing is provided below.

Marine Corps Systems Command Attn: Ms. Britni Jones / Ms. Norene Jones 2200 Lester Street Bldg. 2204 Quantico, Va 22134

From: (Name and Address of Organization) __________________________________________________

__________________________________________________
(Point of Contact Name)__________________________________________________
(Facsimile/Phone Number)__________________________________________________
(E-mail Address)__________________________________________________
To(Point of Contact Name)Britni Jones/Norene Jones
(Facsimile Number)(703) 432-3131
(E-mail Address)britni.jones@usmc.mil

norene.jones@usmc.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organization.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .