Amendment_0002_Q A.docx
DOCX document 27 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 120MM Precision Extended Range Munition (PERM)
- Solicitation number
- M67854-15-R-6007
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
Amendment 0002 - Questions and Answers
View the file
Other files
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION M67854-15-R-6007
Questions and Answers – Amendment 0002
| Item No. |
| Document |
/Section
| Paragraph/Reference |
| Question/Issue/Concern |
| Response |
| 1 |
| Attachments |
| Section J – Attachment 9 |
| In the “Message to assessor:” paragraph, the last sentence states: “Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: margot.haycook@usmc.mil NLT 2 JULY 2015 – is it correct to assume that this date should be the proposal due date of 17 July 2015? |
| Yes, Amendment 002 will replace the existing Attachment with a revised version which states in the Message to the assessor”…NLT July 17, 2015* (or current proposal due date) * - The company who has provided you with this form will notify you if the due date is different from the date stated. |
| 2 |
| Solicitation Document |
| Amendment 0001 Section L-6.5, 6th paragraph, Copy of Past Performance Questionnaires Previously Distributed, 1st sentence |
| 1st sentence states: Offeror shall provide a copy of all questionnaires distribute with your proposal. The contractor assumes that the copies of the Past Performance Questionnaires previously distributed will not count in the Past Performance and Small Business Volume Page count. Does the Government concur? |
| Yes, Amendment 002 will clarify the volume requirements at Section L-4.4 NOTE: ***Volume 3 by addition of the following sentence: “Supporting date/information (e.g. Past Performance Questionnaires, key subcontractor letters of consent) shall not be included in the page limit. |
| 3 |
| Solicitation Document |
| Amendment 0001, L-4.2, last sentence states: The proposal must demonstrate that the Offeror possesses the capability to plan, organize, and deliver the PERM Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) effort in coordinated, technically competent fashion that is timely and cost efficient. |
The Contractor assumes that the sentence should state…Projectile, 120 Millimeter: Precision Extended Range Munition (PERM), XM1109 effort…
Does the Government concur?
Yes, Amendment 002 will correct Section L-4.2 by striking the reference to EMD and replacing with…Projectile, 120 Millimeter: Precision Extended Range Munition (PERM), XM1109 effort…
| 4 |
| Solicitation Document |
| Amendment 0001, L-6.1.1, 3rd sentence and L-6.1.1.1, 1st sentence |
L-6.1.1 states: The Letter of Transmittal shall include any exceptions taken to the specified format prescribed herein or any contingent terms and conditions included in the proposal, and the certificate provided at L-6.1.1.1.
L-6.1.1.1 states: Offeror’s shall execute and include the following Certification in the Executive Summary unless exceptions and/or assumptions have been identified.
The Contractor assumes that L-6.1.1.1 should state: …include the following Certification in the Letter of Transmittal…
Does the Government concur?
Yes, Amendment 002 will correct L-6.1.1.1 Certification 1st sentence by striking “Executive Summary” and replacing with “Letter of Transmittal…”
| 5 |
| Solicitation Document |
| Solicitation page 46, FAR Clause 52.215-20 |
Amendment 0001, L-6.4.1.1.1 and L-6.4.1.1.2, 1st sentence states: The Offeror shall provide cost summaries pursuant to the requirements of Table 15-2 of FAR 15.408, defined to the level 3 Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and cost element level.
The Contractor assumes that the Government is referencing Table 15-2 of FAR 15.408 for formatting purposes as identified in I-General Instructions with the exceptions of sections A.(9), B., C.(1), and H. as they are specific to Certification of Cost or Pricing Data due to the Contractor not being required to certify Cost or Pricing Data.
Does the Government concur?
Yes, the reference is for formatting purposes only.
| 6 |
| Solicitation Document – Attachments |
| Amendment 0001 Section J- Attachment 8 Pricing Matrix |
CLIN’s 2000, 3000, 4000, and 5000 Canisters & Dunnage, PROPOSED RANGE QUANTITY The Contractor assumes the minimum quantity should be 250 versus 100 to match CLIN 2000 PERM Production Rounds _Ordering Period 2 as well as for CLINs 3000, 4000 and 5000.
Does the Government concur?
Yes, Amendment 0002 will replace the current Section J – Attachment 8 Pricing Matrix and will correct the minimum quantity for the Canisters & Dunnage to match the PERM round quantities minimum of 250.
| 7 |
| Solicitation Document |
| Section L-6.5 Volume 3 Past Performance and L-6.6 Volume 3 Small Business Participation content requirements and page count limitation given in L-4.4 Table L-1 Volume Requirements |
| The Contractor questions the 10 page limit given in paragraph L-4.4 for both Volume 3 subparts: Past Performance and Small Business Participation. To be compliant with requirements, the contractor believes a minimum of 30 pages is needed to concisely address both subparts. The 30 pages would exclude pages for key subcontractors’ letter(s) of consent and the copy of past performance questionnaires distributed. |
| Amendment 0002 clarifies the items excluded in the page count from Volume 3, see item number 2 above. With the correction to exclude certain items from the page count the Government will increase the page count for Volume 3 in Table L-1 from 10 to 15. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .