M67854-14-R-000101.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to extend the due date and time for offers. Proposal response time is hereby extended until 10:00 am, local time, January 6, 2014. Questions will be answered and additional changes will be issued in a subsequent amendment. See following pages.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

S 1 10

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 02-Dec-2013

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X M67854-14-R-0001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-Oct-2013

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

02-Dec-2013

CODE

MARCORSYSCOM CT028

ATTN:STACEY R. COOLICAN

105 TECH PARKWAY

STAFFORD VA 22556

M67854 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

M67854-14-R-0001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

Offerors must have a minimum SECRET Facility Clearance (FCL) in order to respond to this RFP, because the RFP includes an annex (information) classified at the SECRET level which will be released only to Offerors possessing the appropriate facility clearance. All classified material must be handled in accordance with the DD 254, the

National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) (DoD 5220-22-M), and Industrial Security

Regulation (DoD 5220.22-R).

L.1 Government Rights

The Government reserves the following rights with regard to award:

L.1.1 Award Without Discussion

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and make award without discussions. Offers should contain the

Offeror(s) best terms. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions and request proposal revisions, if it is determined to be necessary. If a competitive range is established, the Government may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

L.1.2 No Award

The Government reserves the right not to make an award as a result of this Request for Proposal (RFP) if such award is determined contrary to the best interest of the Government.

L.1.3 Single or Multiple Award(s)

It is the Government’s intent to award multiple contracts but reserves the right to award one (1) or no contracts. An

Offeror will only be eligible to receive one (1) award and shall not submit more than one (1) proposal in response to this RFP. It is the Government’s intent to award multiple contracts to separate Offeror(s) competing independently that do not share a common parent, do not have a parent/subsidiary relationship with the other awardee(s), and are not affiliated (as defined in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 19.101) of the other awardee(s).

L.1.4 Incorporation of Offers into Contract

Portions of the successful Offeror(s) technical and/or price proposal may be incorporated into the contract. Where portions of the Offeror(s) technical and/or price proposal are incorporated into the resulting contract, the successful

Offeror(s) will be responsible for delivering in accordance with both the Statement of Work (SOW) and the provisions of its offer.

L.1.5 Reserved

L.1.6 Offeror(s) Point of Contact

Offeror(s) shall provide a single point of contact for the person responsible for this offer, to include name, title, address, telephone number and e-mail address.

L.1.7 Classified Document Request

1. Completion of a Form DD-254 will be required in order to validate Facility Clearance prior to delivery of classified material. Please submit completed DD 254 to Stacey Coolican at

Stacey.coolican@usmc.mil with a copy to Renee Staton at renee.staton@usmc.mil.

mailto:Stacey.coolican@usmc.mil mailto:maria.britton@usmc.mil

2. Questions related to these secure documents shall be routed through the proper channel of Offeror’s

Facility Security Officer (FSO).

3. Offeror(s) not submitting a proposal or who withdraw their proposals must destroy or return classified material generated or received under this RFP not later than 30 days after the opening of proposals.

4. Offeror(s) submitting a proposal that is not accepted by the Government or does not result in a contract award have 30 days after notification to destroy or return classified information.

L.1.8 Solicitation Questions/Comments

All questions concerning the RFP shall be submitted to Stacey Coolican at Stacey.coolican@usmc.mil with a copy to Renee Staton at renee.staton@usmc.mil. Government responses to questions may be posted to the FedBizOpps website as an amendment to the solicitation. Answered questions will not disclose the Offeror’s identity. Questions are due no later than 20 November 2013 10:00 hours, Local Time. The Government may not consider questions received after that date and time. Offeror(s) may not direct questions concerning this RFP to technical personnel at

Program Manager Advanced Amphibious Assault (PM AAA) or other United States Government personnel (i.e.

USMC, PEO, DoN, LOGCOM, CD&I). All questions shall be submitted via email with the subject line [M67854-

14-R-0001 Questions] and in the format in Attachment 17 – RFP Question Matrix. No questions will be answered that are posed via telephone or fax or not in accordance with Attachment 17. Attachment 17 shall be in Excel format and editable without password protection.

L.1.9 Notice of Contract Support

The Government reserves the right to utilize the services of CACI to assist with administrative and training support.

It is anticipated that the CACI will be involved throughout the course of the proposal evaluations and may provide

Administrative and Training support to the proposal evaluation team. These representatives will only be used from an administrative and training support perspective and will not, under any circumstances, evaluate or rank proposals, assign any ratings or otherwise act in a decision-making or evaluation capacity. All such personnel will be required to execute a statement (a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)) to preserve and protect any proprietary information disclosed to them during the course of the proposal evaluation.

Submission in response to this RFP constitutes Offeror’s agreement and permission for the use of the aforementioned company for administrative and training support. Offerors shall contact Jennifer Nickolas at CACI at (703) 486-3266 x1058 or jnickolas@caci.com to initiate execution of an NDA directly between the

Offeror and CACI. Proposals received without a fully executed NDA between CACI and the Offeror may be deemed unacceptable and unawardable.

L.1.10 Contract Type

The Government reserves the right to award multiple Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contracts for the AAV Survivability

Upgrade Design. If any options are exercised, one (1) single Offeror will be selected to continue the EMD

Prototype Builds, LRIP and test support options.

L.2 RFP Points of Contact

The RFP points of contact are the Contracting Officer, Stacey Coolican (Stacey.coolican@usmc.mil) and

Contract Specialist, Renee Staton (renee.staton@usmc.mil).

L.3 Submission of Offers

Offers shall be received by 10:00 hours, local time, on 6 January 2014. Responses to this solicitation may be submitted via courier or hand delivery (in person).

Proposals may be delivered either (1) hand-carried, or (2) via third party courier service, such as US mail, FedEx, UPS, or similar service provider. All proposals shall be delivered sealed/unopened.

(1) Hand-carried submissions of proposals shall be delivered to:

Commanding General

Marine Corps Systems Command

Attn: PEO-LS/PM AAA/Stacey Coolican (Contracts)

105 Tech Parkway mailto:Stacey.coolican@usmc.mil mailto:maria.britton@usmc.mil mailto:jnickolas@caci.com mailto:Stacey.coolican@usmc.mil mailto:maria.britton@usmc.mil

Stafford, VA 22554

Offerors shall have the security officer on duty contact one (1) of the individuals below for delivery. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to present a receipt for signature of hand carried proposals (between the hours of 0700 and 1500, local time) to one (1) of the following individuals:

Stacey Coolican, Contracting Officer

Dave Hance, Contracting Officer

Renee Staton, Contract Specialist

(2) All proposals delivered via 3 rd party courier service shall be addressed as follows:

Commanding General

Marine Corps Systems Command

Attn: PEO-LS/PM AAA/CT028 - Stacey Coolican

2200 Lester Street

Quantico, VA 22134

Offerors are advised that proposals sent by conventional United States Postal Service (USPS) are NOT routed directly to the address above. Therefore, the possibility that a proposal sent via USPS will not comply with the stated closing date/time exists. In such case, the proposal will be considered a "late submission."

Proposals, revisions, or modifications submitted via electronic means (email, fax or the Federal Business

Opportunities Website) will not be evaluated or considered for award.

Electronic portions of proposals shall not be encrypted or password protected.

L.4 Late Submissions

Any proposal, modification, or revision received at the Government office designated after the exact date and time specified for receipt of offers may be considered “late”. The Government will follow the procedures in FAR 15.208 should a proposal be received after the date and time specified for receipt of proposals.

L.5 Instructions for Submittal of Proposals

Offeror(s) shall submit a proposal that clearly and concisely describes and defines the Offeror(s) response to the objectives/requirements contained in the RFP. Unnecessary elaboration or other presentations beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal are not desired. Elaborate artwork, expensive paper or bindings, and expensive visual or other presentation aids are neither necessary nor desired. The proposal shall contain all the pertinent information in sufficient detail in the area of the proposal where it contributes most critically to the discussion of the same information. When necessary, the Offeror(s) shall refer to the initial discussion and identify its location within the proposal. Offeror(s) should identify risks inherent in their proposal, techniques used to mitigate those risks, and where such techniques were successfully employed in other contracts.

All information necessary for the review and evaluation of a proposal must be contained in the proposal Volumes set forth below. Section M of the RFP sets forth the evaluation criteria and delineates the factors and sub-factors to be evaluated and their relative order of importance. The Offeror(s) proposal, as required by this section, shall be evaluated as set forth in Section M of the RFP. The Government will not assume Offeror(s) possess any capability, understanding, or commitment not specified in its proposal. It is an Offeror’s responsibility to submit a well-written proposal, with adequately detailed information which clearly demonstrates an understanding of and the ability to comply with the RFP requirements to allow for a meaningful review.

Alternate proposals are NOT authorized. Objections to any terms or conditions of the RFP may make the

Offeror(s) proposal unacceptable.

Pages shall be 8 ½ x 11”, with at least one (1) inch margins on all sides, using Times New Roman font with a

12 point size type or larger for all body text. Text used in graphics shall use Times New Roman font with a minimum of 8 point size type or larger; graphics must be able to be printed and copied in pure black and white.

Fold out pages shall count as two (2) pages. Graphics shall count towards page limitations. Pages shall be consecutively numbered. Each page of the proposal should be affixed with the following legend: “Source Selection

Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.” It is to be noted that only Government representatives will be performing evaluations of proposals. Offeror(s) shall submit three (3) identical copies of the Technical/Past Performance

Volume (Binder) and eight (8) electronic copies on Digital Video Disc (DVD) or CD/CD ROM and shall be in

Microsoft (MS) Office, Version 2007 compatible and MS Project 2010. Proposals shall not be submitted in PDF.

Offerors shall submit three (3) identical copies of the Price Volume and four (4) electronic copies on a DVD or

CDs/CD ROM. All hardcopy Volumes shall be placed in separate hard back 3-ring binders and labeled for ease of identification.

It is to be noted that no price information shall be contained within the Technical/Past Performance Volume.

Price information shall be contained only in the Price Volume.

Electronic spreadsheet files (workbooks) shall be MS Excel Office 2007 compatible. Workbooks shall include all formulas, functions, macros, computations and equations used to compute the proposed amounts. There shall be no cell references to data or links to files not included in the Price Volume. For each Workbook, all rows, columns, cells and worksheets shall be visible (object.visible=true). Zero height/zero width rows/columns in Worksheets are not acceptable. Worksheet cells formatted with the font color equal to the fill color are unacceptable. Print image files or pictures (for example, a picture of an Excel spreadsheet embedded in a Word document) or files containing only values are not acceptable.

Offeror(s) are responsible for providing adequate documentation to enable a thorough evaluation of the proposal.

Offeror(s) shall make a clear statement in their proposal that the proposal is valid for no less than 120 calendar days from the closing date of its offer.

L.6 Submission of Classified Information

Classified information shall not be submitted as a part of the proposal. Do not submit any classified information in response to this solicitation.

L.7 Executive Summaries (Limited to two (2) pages for each volume)

Offeror(s) shall provide an executive summary of its proposed Concept Design, to include Engineering, Management, Energy Approaches and Past Performance that it will use to fulfill all contract requirements in the

Technical/Past Performance Volume. Offeror(s) shall also provide an identical copy of the executive summary in the Price Volume. The information contained in the executive summaries will neither be considered as part of the volumes nor will it be evaluated. The executive summaries will not be counted in the overall proposal page count.

L.8 Proposal Volumes

Offeror(s) must clearly possess the capacity and expertise to meet the Government’s requirements. The Government intends to select the Offeror(s) whose proposal demonstrates the best value in fulfilling the requirements identified herein. The Offeror(s) proposal shall consist of the following two (2) Volumes:

Volume I Technical/Past Performance

Volume II Price

L.9 Volume I – Technical/Past Performance (Limited to 120 pages)

The Offeror(s) shall deliver a Technical/Past Performance Volume addressing every topic below:

Factor Subfactor

Engineering Design & Systems Engineering Approach

Manufacturing Approach

Management Program Management

Logistics Approach

Test Support

Energy No subfactor

Past Performance Relevancy

Confidence

L.9.1 Engineering

L.9.1.1 Design and Systems Engineering Approach

Offeror(s) shall describe their design that balances the requirements in the AAV Survivability Upgrade Performance

Specification with the Government Average Procurement Unit Cost (APUC) target while minimizing the risk in meeting the program schedule. The tiers in the AAV Survivability Upgrade Performance Specification are provided to communicate the relative importance of the requirements. Offeror(s) shall describe the application of Systems

Engineering (SE) processes across the acquisition life cycle as an integrating mechanism for balanced solutions addressing capability needs, design considerations, risk management, and constraints, as well as limitations imposed by technology, budget, and schedule. Offeror(s) shall describe the SE approach, methodology and activities they propose to effectively design system products that meet the requirements in the AAV Survivability Upgrade

Performance Specification. The description shall, at a minimum, include the following:

1) Offeror(s) shall describe the key capabilities of their proposed design. Capability discussion shall be unclassified.

2) If Offeror(s) has/have conducted previous trade studies or invested Independent Research and Design

(IRAD) funds, the Offeror(s) shall describe how the results of trade studies and IRAD efforts are utilized in their proposed design.

3) Offeror(s) shall demonstrate their understanding of the AAV Survivability Upgrade System Specification, the ability to successfully meet the requirements defined in the AAV Survivability Upgrade System

Specification and the ability to complete the effort as stated in the SOW and attachments.

4) Offeror(s) shall describe the Systems Engineering (SE) approach that it will use to manage the AAV

Survivability Upgrade design process. The Offeror(s) shall describe where this approach has been used successfully on similar existing or past design efforts, if applicable.

5) The Offeror(s) shall describe the company’s Quality Management System that it will use during the execution of the AAV Survivability Upgrade program. The Offeror(s) shall describe where the company has successfully used this process on similar or past design efforts, if applicable.

6) Offeror(s) shall describe the company’s Risk Management System as part of the SE approach that it will use to manage the AAV Survivability Upgrade design process. Offeror(s) shall also identify risks inherent in their design concept, techniques used to mitigate those risks, and where such techniques were successfully employed in other contracts.

7) Offeror(s) shall describe the ability to simultaneously manage complex Systems Engineering, Quality

Engineering, Requirements Management, Risk Management, and Configuration Management activities.

L.9.1.2 Manufacturing Approach

Offeror(s) shall deliver an overview of their proposed manufacturing approach for vehicle integration, manufacture, and the manufacturing risk(s) of the proposed upgrade. The manufacturing approach shall include the following:

1) Offeror(s) shall clearly and specifically identify those items being assessed as manufacturing risk (s), and their current Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL), using the criteria and processes identified in the MRL

Deskbook (see http://www.dodmrl.com/MRL_Deskbook_V2_2.pdf);

2) For any element that is assessed below the target MRL, Offeror(s) shall identify the current MRL and provide supporting rational for the assessment and plans to achieve MRL 6 by PDR and MRL 8 by

Production Readiness Review (PRR);

3) Offeror(s) shall describe the proposed supply chain management approach, including flow down requirements and subcontractor/supplier management;

4) Offeror(s) shall describe the manufacturing quality management approach;

5) Offeror(s) shall describe the manufacturing management approach to include:

a) materials planning

b) make/buy decisions

c) long lead

d) ability to produce defect-free equipment that meets specifications on time

L.9.2 Management

L.9.2.1 Program Management

Offeror(s) shall deliver an overview of their approach to manage performance of contract requirements. Offeror(s) must demonstrate a management approach that includes well-thought out program management structure and processes, appropriate delegation of authority, and project schedule planning. Offeror(s) description of their program management will include at a minimum the following:

1) Organization and internal management policies and procedures that will be used to initiate and manage contract tasks, including agreements with all subcontractors (this should address agreements that Offeror(s) have in place at the time of contract award).

2) A top level organizational chart that shows the organization of the project team including identification of subcontractors proposed for this effort.

3) Definitions of roles and responsibilities of the management entities within the Offeror(s) overall organization and project organization. Discussion of the authority of all responsible management positions identified by the organizational description including describing the role of the Program Manager who should have authority to direct, control, commit, and manage resources to fulfill the contract requirements.

4) Offeror(s) shall provide an overall integrated project schedule on 11” x 17” paper and on a separate CD using MS Project 2010. The project schedule does not count towards the Technical/Past Performance

Volume’s overall page limit. The Government intends to use this Project Schedule for assessing your company’s progress toward fulfilling SOW requirements. The Project Schedule shall:

a) Illustrate how your company will successfully complete the required work;

b) Address Project Phases, Project Tasks, Milestones, Reviews, and Contract Data Requirements List

(CDRL) Deliveries;

c) Be traceable to and consistent with the AAV Survivability Upgrade draft Integrated Master Plan (IMP) provided in the RFP.

5) It is the Government’s intent that small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone small business, small disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business concerns will have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in contract performance consistent with its efficient performance. Offeror(s) shall demonstrate that it is subcontracting at least

36.7% of its total proposed dollars to small businesses. The Offeror shall provide an individual small business subcontracting plan (ISR) demonstrating it will meet the DoD Small Business Subcontracting goals established for FY 2013 as provided below:

Small Business - 36.7% of prime contracting dollars awarded to "small businesses"

SDB - 5 % of the Primes subcontracting plan

WOSB - 5 % of the Primes subcontracting plan

HUBZone - 3 % of the Primes subcontracting plan

SDVOSB - 3 % of the Primes subcontracting plan http://www.dodmrl.com/MRL_Deskbook_V2_2.pdf

16% of the 36.7% should be subcontracted to the aforementioned socio-economic categories. The remaining 20.7% can be subcontracted to traditional small businesses, Veteran Owned Small Business

(VOSB); HBCU/MIs and/or AbilityOne (NIB/NISH) concerns.

The aforementioned small business subcontracting goals information can be found at:

http://www.acq.osd.mil/osbp/gov/sbProgramGoals.shtml

L.9.2.2 Logistics Approach

The Offeror(s) shall describe their management and technical processes to be used for developing logistics requirements. Offeror(s) description of their logistics approach shall, at a minimum, include the following:

1) Logistics Management Information (LMI):

a) Analyses to be conducted to generate LMI data

b) Approach to be used to maintain configuration control of the logistics data

c) Describe the approach to applying the GEIA-STD-0007 data protocol and transfer criteria and current status of implementation

2) Supportability Analyses:

a) Approach to be used to affect weapon system design to meet logistics requirements

b) Identification of the tools to be used to manage logistics efforts

c) Describe the method, extent and application of any Life-Cycle Modeling and Simulation to be used to measure/project Availability, Reliability, Logistics demands and efficiencies, and Cost

d) Describe what Corrosion Prevention and Control (CPAC) measures are planned or have been implemented for system design for vehicle operations in a salt water marine environment

3) Supply Support:

a) Approach to be used to meet product support requirements

b) Identification of the tools to be used to manage product support efforts

L.9.2.3 Test Support

The Offeror(s) shall describe their approach to support Government testing. Potential test locations include US

Army Aberdeen Test Center, MD; USMC Amphibious Vehicle Test Branch, CA; Yuma Proving Ground, AZ; US

Army Engineer and Research Development, MS; and Camp Pendleton, CA. The notional test schedules are provided in Attachment D. Offeror(s) description of test support shall, at a minimum, include the following:

1) Describe the ability to provide the requisite Operator and Maintainer training to all Government-appointed personnel in support of all Government testing and refurbishment periods.

2) Describe the ability to provide the requisite support to all Government test reviews and meetings.

3) Describe the ability to provide the requisite qualified personnel and materials to support testing and timely repairs during all Government testing and refurbishment periods.

L.9.3 Energy

The Offeror(s) shall describe their approach to promote waste reduction, source reduction, energy efficiency, and maximum practicable recovered material content.

L.9.4 Past Performance (Limited to Nine (9) Pages)

Offeror(s) shall provide three (3) references of current or previous relevant projects (prime or major sub) that address the table below. Each past performance reference shall be limited to three (3) pages in length. The

Government may contact those references during the evaluation process to verify relevant experience and level of performance. The Government may, at its discretion, obtain and evaluate information from sources other than those provided by the Offeror(s).

http://www.acq.osd.mil/osbp/gov/sbProgramGoals.shtml

Offeror(s) shall submit the past performance references in the following format:

Section Content

Section 1 – Basic Past

Performance Information

1.1 Name of past performance effort

1.2 Name of contracting agency (include POC and e-mail address)

1.3 Contract number

1.4 Contract type

1.5 Initial contract value

1.6 Total contract value

1.7 Period of performance

1.8 List of key subcontracts and the estimated portion, and description, of work performed by subcontractors

1.9 Customer Point of Contact (POC)

1.10 Customer POC phone and e-mail

Section 2 – Relevance to

Current USMC AAV

Survivability Upgrade

Requirement

2.1 Describe the work products and/or services delivered to the customer under this past performance.

2.2 Demonstrate the relevance by describing how this past performance correlates with the USMC AAV Survivability Upgrade

Requirements (i.e. SOW requirements) in terms of:

i. Scope,

ii. Period of Performance, and

iii. Complexity

Section 3 - List of Proposed

Personnel that worked on this

Past Performance reference

3.1 List your proposed personnel who worked on this cited past performance

3.2 Identify their role/responsibility and utilization on cited past performance effort

3.3 Identify their role/responsibility on current proposed effort

Note: Incomplete or inaccurate reference contact information may result in the evaluators not being capable of obtaining the necessary information to factor into the evaluation process. Offeror(s) are required to ensure the Point of Contact information is accurate and up-to-date.

L.9.5 Proposal Qualifications, Restrictions and/or Assumptions (Not Counted towards Volume Page

Limitations)

Offerors shall provide any proposal qualifications, restrictions, and/or assumptions associated with its proposal. If there are no proposal qualifications, restrictions or assumptions, then so state affirmatively (i.e. “The Offeror has no qualifications, restrictions or assumptions associated with submission of its proposal”). Please note: (1) This section shall be identical to the information present in the Pricing Volume, and (2) Proposal qualifications, restrictions or assumptions may result in the rejection of your proposal.

L.10 Volume II – Price (Unlimited Pages)

There are no page limits for the Price Volume. Offeror(s) shall provide a firm fixed price for all CLINs except option CLINs 0103 and 0205 (ODCs). CLINs 0103 and 0205 will be based on the NTE amount provided in Section

B. Please note: Offerors awarded a contract, will have the opportunity to reduce pricing for CLINs 0200 – 0206 via a revised proposal submitted in response to CDRL A067 30 days prior to CDR and shall not exceed the NTE.

Offerors shall provide the following in the Price Volume:

L.10.1 Executive Summary (identical to Executive Summary in the Technical/Past Performance Volume.

L.10.2 Prices – Provide your company’s price for each CLIN listed in the RFP.

L.10.3 Proposal Qualifications and Restrictions – Provide any proposal qualifications or restrictions associated with your proposal. Please note: This section shall be identical to the information present in the Technical/Past

Performance Volume and may result in the rejection of your proposal

L.10.4 Point of contact information for the person responsible for the offer, to include name, title, telephone number and e-mail address

L.10.5 One (1) complete, signed and dated contract cover page

L.10.6 Company name, address, CAGE code, DUNS and small business size status

L.10.7 Nonrecurring/Recurring cost Basis of Estimates (BOEs)[Labor, Material, Other], the Cost and Software

Data Reporting (CSDR) Plan Work Break Breakdown (WBS) for the base contract (Design and Development

Phase), the Prototype Build Option, and Prototype Testing Support. Each BOE shall include the Ground Rules and

Assumptions (to include Learning Curve Applications), Sources, Gross Methodology (analogy, parametric, extrapolation from actuals, bottoms-up, etc.), and be time-phased. All cost shall be in TY dollars to align to the contract price and developed in Microsoft Excel 2007 or 2010 version with formulas.

L.10.8 Overview of approach to fulfill Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) requirements to include:

a) Describing the process to be used to satisfy the requirements of the DoD 5000.04-M-1, CSDR Manual, and the Government-approved CSDR plan for the proposed contract

b) Demonstrating how Contractor Cost and Data Reporting (CCDR) will be based, to the maximum extent possible, upon actual cost transactions and not cost allocations

c) Demonstrating how the data from its accounting system will be mapped into the standard reporting categories required in the CCDR data item descriptions

d) Describing how recurring and nonrecurring costs will be segregated

e) Providing comments on the adequacy of the CSDR contract plan and related Resource Distribution

Table

f) Submission of the DD Form 1921, Cost Data Summary Report, and DD Form 1921–1, Functional

Cost-Hour Report

CSDR reporting will be required for subcontractors at any tier with a subcontract that exceeds $50

Million. The Offeror shall identify, by providing comments on the Resource Distribution Table, the subcontractors, or, if the subcontractors have not been selected, the subcontracted effort in this category.

L.10.9 Proposal Qualifications, Restrictions and/or Assumptions (Not Counted towards Volume Page

Limitations)

Offerors shall provide any proposal qualifications, restrictions, and/or assumptions associated with its proposal. If there are no proposal qualifications, restrictions or assumptions, then so state affirmatively (i.e. “The Offeror has no qualifications, restrictions or assumptions associated with submission of its proposal”). Please note: (1) This section shall be identical to the information present in the Pricing Volume, and (2) Proposal qualifications, restrictions or assumptions may result in the rejection of your proposal.

L.11 Pre-Proposal Conference

The Government intends to hold a one-day a Pre-Proposal Conference starting at 8:00 am, local time, on 14

November 2013 at 105 Tech Parkway, Stafford, Virginia. The Pre-Proposal Conference will be limited to interested prime contractors only with a maximum of two (2) participants per prime contractor. Visit requests shall be submitted via email to the PCO (stacey.coolican@usmc.mil with a copy to renee.staton@usmc.mil) for coordination. Requests shall be submitted no later than 1400 hours, local time, on 7 Nov 2013.

(End of Summary of Changes) mailto:stacey.coolican@usmc.mil mailto:renee.staton@usmc.mil