Attachments_to_solicitation_M0026415R1028.pdf

Attachment 1 is the Instructions to Offerors within the solicitation.

(For clarification, The Perfromance Requirements Summary (PRS) is listed as Attachment 1 but that is an attachment to the Performance Work Statement (PWS.))

Attachment 2 is the Evaluation Factors for Award within the solicitation.

ATTACHMENT 3:

CAOCL QUALITY ASSURANCE

MONITORING FORM

SERVICE or STANDARD:

SURVEY PERIOD:

SURVEILLANCE METHOD (Check):

Random Sampling 100% Inspection Periodic Inspection Customer Complaint

LEVEL OF SURVEILLANCE (Check):

Monthly Quarterly As needed

PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS SAMPLED DURING SURVEY PERIOD: ______ %

ANALYSIS OF RESULTS:

Observed Service Provider Performance Measurement Rate: ______%

Service Provider’s Performance (Check): Meets Standards

Does Not Meet Standards

Narrative of Performance During Survey Period:

PREPARED BY: ___________________________________ DATE: _________________

Attachment 4: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

*Please denote if the vendor was either the Prime or Subcontractor in supporting your requirement.

Instructions:

Sections I through III are to be completed by the Offeror and provided to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror on a recent, relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, is to verify Sections I through III, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. The Offeror should also submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Sections I and II of all questionnaires as provided to assessors.

Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.

Sections III through VII are to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.

Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC Regional Contracting Office, National Capital

Region to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: kelly.e.bell@usmc.mil Because of the firewall at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Enterprise Email addresses are often filtered out. Please call (703.432.1668) to make sure your email was received.

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)

Solicitation Number M00264-15-R-1028

Project/Requirement Language & Culture Training and Education Support Services

Customer/Agency USMC, Center for Advanced Operational Culture Learning (CAOCL)

Project/Requirement

Description

Operational, technical, logistical, and programmatic support of CAOCL mission requirements. The main mission of the program is to ensure Marines deploy with an operational understanding of the local military and partner cultures and regional dynamics relevant to the mission with select Marines being language-enabled, in order to facilitate mission success.

II. Current or Historical Contract Information

Assessor: The information listed below is

Correct Incorrect

CONTRACTOR

NAME & ADDRESS:

Contract Number

Type of Contract

Initial Final

Contract Value

Performance Period /

Delivery Schedule

Project/Requirement

Description

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

Contracting Role PRIME SUBCONTRACTOR

Termination History Convenience Default N/A

III. Assessor Information

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Role Period of Involvement

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other (Specify)

IV. Evaluation Definitions

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

V. Performance Evaluation

1. Technical Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the technical capability of the contractor’s performance?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Un-satisfactory N/A

Technical

Performance

Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.

Exceptional Very

Good Satisfactory Marginal

Un-satisfactory N/A

Identified project tasks and provided continuous quality support

Understood performance objectives through a comprehensive approach

Identified mission areas, understood those priorities through execution

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

2. Schedule Performance / Timeliness

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Un-satisfactory N/A

Schedule /

Timeliness

Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Exceptional Very

Good Satisfactory Marginal

Un-satisfactory N/A

Completion of Contract or Task/Delivery Order

Meeting Milestones and

Schedules

Submitting Deliverables

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any schedule problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

3. Performance Execution & Management

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Un-satisfactory N/A

Performance

Execution &

Management

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Un-satisfactory N/A

Approach

Performance

Execution of Personnel

Management Approach – Demonstrated ability to provide and possess the capabilities and resources to establish and operate an efficient organization that is both responsive and flexible in meeting all project requirements

Performance Execution – Demonstrated ability to respond to performance-based work requirements necessary to provide products and/or services. Demonstrated experience which ensures suitable oversight and control of performance execution in a manner which ensured consistent quality of the performance tasks as per the project requirements

Management of Personnel – Proven ability to identify the responsibilities and roles of qualified and experienced personal to attain performance objectives, execution of processes and quality measures associated with executing strategy. Demonstrated approach for immediate action and remediation necessary to ensure the quality of the contract deliverables and timeliness of services delivery (i.e., process maturity, roles of responsible staff, degree of work breakdown structure (WBS) integration, and controls at both corporate and contract level under performance based operating procedures).

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management) on contract being assessed.

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

VII. General Comments:

Signature of Assessor Date

Attachment 5 and 6 are not included or required.

Attachment 7

Please reference and use Attachment 4, the Past Performance Questionnaire ans the “Past and

Present Performance Information” formated section.

ATTACHMENT 08 PAST PERFORMANCE CONSENT LETTER

SUBCONTRACTOR/TEAMING PARTNER CONSENT FORM FOR THE RELEASE OF PAST AND

PRESENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION TO THE PRIME CONTRACTOR

Past performance information concerning key personnel, subcontractors and teaming partners cannot be disclosed to a private party without the key personnel’s, subcontractor‘s or teaming partner‘s consent.

Because a prime contractor is a private party, the Government will need that consent before disclosing key personnel and/or subcontractor/teaming partner past and present performance information to the prime during exchanges. In an effort to assist the Government in assessing your past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following consent form be completed by the key personnel and/or major subcontractors/teaming partners identified in your proposal. The completed consent forms should be submitted as part of your Past Performance Volume.

SAMPLE CONSENT LETTER

Dear ________, (I/We) are currently participating as a (insert key personnel/subcontractor/teaming partner) with (insert prime contractor or name of entity providing proposal) in responding to the Quantico Marine Corps., Request for Proposal M00264-15-R-1028, Center for Advanced Operational Culture Learning.

(I/We) understand that the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value in source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process, (I am/we are) signing this consent form to allow you to discuss (my/our) past and present performance information with the prime contractor during the source selection process.

(Signature and Title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the company)

Company Name:

Address:

ATTACHMENT 09

Client Authorization Letter

[Addressee]

Dear "Client":

We are currently responding to the The Marine Corps Quantico, VA’s Regional Conrtacting Office’s

(RCO) RFQ No. M00264-15-R-1028 for the procurement of " Center for Advanced Operational Culture

Learning services.” The RCO is placing increased emphasis in their acquisitions on past performance as a source selection factor. RCO has asked the offeror to send Past Performance Questionnaires to customers to complete and send to the Contracting Officer. Please complete the attached Past Performance

Questionnaire and mail to Contract Specialist: Kelly Bell, 2010 Henderson Road Quantico, VA 22134 or kelly.e.bell@usmc.mil, within five (5) days of receipt of this letter.

If you are contacted by RCO for information on work we have performed under contract for your company, you are hereby authorized to respond to RCO inquiries.

Your cooperation is appreciated. Any questions may be directed to ________________.

Sincerely,