2018.02.20_Q&A_Master_Log.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Israel ATGHS Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HTC71118QC001
About this file
Questions and Answers
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_0002.pdf | ||
| Israel_Preproposal_Conference.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Conformed_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| 2018.02.21_PP_conference_minutes.pdf | ||
| Amend_001.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_updated_PWS.pdf | ||
| Attch_3_PP_Survey.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attch_1_PWS.DOCX | DOCX document | |
| Attch_2_PP_Cover_Letter.pdf | ||
| RFP_Cover_Letter.pdf | ||
| Attch_4_Contract_Information_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2018.02.02_HTC711-18-Q-C001.pdf | ||
| Pre-proposal_Instructions.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Question # | Par. Ref | Quick Reference | Question | Date | Government Answer |
| 1 | SF1449, Pg. 3, Para. 1 | Pricing | For CLIN’s 1001, 2001, 3001, 4001, and 5001; Should offerors enter $0.00 for Unit Prices and Amounts? | The description states this CLIN is being used as a placeholder, so there is no need to price this CLIN. | |
| 2 | SF1449, Pg. 4, Para. 2 | Reimbursable Costs | In the event that exceptional parking or RON fees be incurred, will they be considered reimbursable costs for aircraft covered under this contract? | No. | |
| 3 | SF1449, Pg. 6, Para. 2, CLINs X007 | Pricing | What should be used as a Unit Price for these reimbursable CLINs? | A solicitation amendment will be posted to update this information. | |
| 4 | SF1449, Pg. 21, Para.2, CLINs 5002 | Pricing | The quantity states 12 months; however the description states 10 months. Should this be priced for 10 or 12 months? | The solicitation amendment will be updated to correct the quantity to 10 months. | |
| 5 | SF1449, Pg. 42, Para. 2 | Requirements | We noticed that the requirements for the preparation of the proposal for this solicitation differ somewhat from others in that there are no page limitations, assigned font, pitch, or paper size (ex. 8.5x11” or A4). Was this intentional? | Documents will be electronic. A formal technical proposal is not required; therefore, the Government has not restricted the page numbers, font, paper size, etc. | |
| 6 | PWS, Pg. 17, Para. 9 | Definition | Is it possible to clarify what does it mean “excluding Aircraft Ground Services”? as it might contradict MOG 1 as we understand it. | Aircraft Ground Services reference paragraphs 1.11 through 1.11.7. can be provided to multiple aircraft simultaneoulsy as these services are not considered when determining the Working Maximum on Ground (WMOG), all other PWS servcies resulting in physical activity at the aircraft or services en-route to and from the aircraft will be considered with determining the WMOG, e.g. cargo loading/unloading, and passenger and baggage loading/unloading. | |
| 7 | PWS, Pg. 2, Para. 1 | Definition | Does the Government interpret the requirement of a working MOG of one aircraft to mean: a) MOG=1 aircraft at each station, Ovda and Ben Gurion simultaneously? b) MOG=1 aircraft at either Ben Gurion or Ovda? | a) MOG = 1 aircraft at each station simultaneously. | |
| 8 | SF1449, Pg. 45, Para. 2 | Past Performance | As on other contract that we’ve seen from USTRANSCOM, should no Past Performance information be received for a company by the due date, will that competitor’s Past Performance rating default to Satisfactory? | Refer to FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv), In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. | |
| 9 | SF1449, Pg. 45, Para. 2 | Past Performance | For a competitor with no Past Performance data in CPARS due to the size or nature of their previous contracts berated as Satisfactory if no Past Performance Questionnaires for that company are received? | Refer to FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv), In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. | |
| 10 | GATES | Is there requirements to use GATES included in the PWS? | No. | ||
| 11 | COR Office Space | Does office space for the COR need to be provided? | No. | ||
| 12 | PWS references: 1.3.4.1., 1.3.4.4., 1.3.5.2., 1.3.5.7., and 1.3.6.3. | Cargo Storage | What are the cargo storage requirements, lease costs are associated? | Provided PWS paragraph references which indicate the storage requirements which are included under the Base Monthly Services CLIN (PWS paragraphs 1.3.4.1., 1.3.4.4., 1.3.5.2., 1.3.5.7., and 1.3.6.3.) Storage fees can NOT be invoiced. | |
| 13 | Past Performance Survey, Para. B | Past Performance | Who is the Past Performance Survey respondent for the current ongoing ATGHS contract? | The Contracting Officer. | |
| 14 | Past Performance Survey, Para. A | Past Performance | Is the Past Performance Survey also relevant for contracts with commercial companies? | Yes. | |
| 15 | Past Performance Survey | Past Performance | Can a copy of the survey be sent back to the company. | No. | |
| 16 | SF1449, Pg. 39 - 40 | DFARS 252.237-7023 | Will the government clarify which services listed in attachment 1, Performance Work Statement, are considered to be essential contractor services and as such should be included in the Continuation of Mission Essential Services Plan. | All performance requirements in the PWS are Mission Essential, with the understanding that when Israel shuts down the airport(s), it may prevent the contractor from providing services. | |
| 17 | SF1449, Pg. 43 | Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 | There do not appear to be any attachments labeled "Past Performance Questionnaire". Will the government confirm the requested Past Performance Questionnaire is intended to be the Past Performance Survey (Attachment 3)? | Yes, the past performance questionnaire and the past performance survey are the same document. | |
| 18 | SF1449, Pg. 44 | Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 | We understand the reference to the Past Performance Questionnaire to instead be the Past Performance Survey. Will the government clarify where specifically on the Past Performance Survey offerors are to include information as to the teaming arrangement, if proposed? | You should include the teaming arrangement information in your past performance proposal. | |
| 19 | SF1449, Pg. 45 | Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 | Is the Continuation of Mission Essential Services Plan not an evaluated element of the offeror's submission? | There is a requirement to provide a Continuation of Mission Essential Services Plan but it will not be evaluated. | |
| 20 | |||||
| 21 | |||||
| 22 | |||||
| 23 | |||||
| 24 | |||||
| 25 | |||||
| 26 | |||||
| 27 | |||||
| 28 | |||||
| 29 | |||||
| 30 |
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it.