Attachment_J.4_Directive_102-01.pdf

PDF 198 KB Posted

Attached to
DHS Joint Requirements Council Operations and Requirements Analysis Support Services
Solicitation number
HSHQDC-17-R-00006 rev.
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 4 - DHS Directive Number 102-01, Acquisition Management Directive

View the file

Other files

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

7/28/2015

Departmental Unity of Effort'', April 22, 2014

G. Secretary Johnson Memorandum for OHS Leadership, "OHS Joint Requirements Council", June 26, 2014

IV. Responsibilities

A. The Chief Acquisition Officer (CAO) exercises overall management, administration, and oversight of the Department's acquisition policies and procedures.

The CAO responsibilities include, but are not limited to:

1. · Managing the direction of acquisition policy for OHS, including implementation of acquisition policies, regulations, and standards;

2. Serving as the Acquisition Decision Authority (ADA), for Level 1, Level 2, and other specified acquisitions;

3. Designating Component Acquisition Executives (CAEs); and

4. Chartering and designating the chair and membership of Executive Steering Committees (ESCs) when established for major acquisitions.

B. Component Heads nominate the CAE to oversee Component acquisition management in accordance with Department policies and procedures and ensure sound management, review, support, approval, and oversight of all acquisition types within their respective organizations.

C. The Under Secretary for Science and Technology (USST) provides scientific, engineering, and analytical support for strategic acquisition investments and resource decisions including:

1. Supporting the assessment of programmatic requirements, and alternatives;

2. Supporting the Department's acquisition process, particularly with regard to requirements development, analytic processes, use of standards, systems engineering, and technology readiness; and

3. The USST Director, Operational Test and Evaluation develops and prescribes test and evaluation policy and processes, provides Operational Test and Evaluation oversight within the Department, and is a member of the ARB providing an independent assessment of test and evaluation progress and status for OHS acquisition programs.

D. The Assistant Secretarv for Policv supports acquisition and management via the OHS Strategic Requirements Planning Process, develops Integrated Planning Guidance, and ensures acquisitions support the OHS Quadrennial Homeland Security Review Report, the OHS Strategic Plan, and other appropriate successor documents.

- 2 Directive 102-01 Revision # 03

E. The Acquisition Decision Authority is the official for each acquisition who is responsible for ensuring compliance with this Directive by reviewing and approving the movement of acquisitions through ALF phases after they meet the applicable criteria established in the implementing Instruction to this Directive.

F. OHS Line of Business Chiefs responsibilities are established in accordance with applicable law, delegation letters, and as appropriate within this Directive's implementing Instructions, manuals, guidebooks, and/or equivalent. These chiefs are members of the ARB and include, but are not limited to, the OHS Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Information Officer, the Chief Procurement Officer, Chief Human Capital Officer, Chief Security Officer, and the Chief Readiness Support Officer.

G. The Component Acquisition Executive is, excluding when the CAE resides in the Department's Management Directorate, the Component's senior acquisition official.

The senior acquisition official in the Department's Management Directorate is the CAO.

The CAE is responsible for implementation, management, and oversight of the Component's acquisition processes and as appropriate coordinating those processes with contracting and procurement processes established by the Head of Contracting Activity. Other CAE responsibilities are as set forth per the CAE Designation Memorandum and as described in the implementing Instructions to this Directive.

H. The Executive Director, Office of Program Accountability and Risk Management (PARM), as delegated by the CAO, manages OHS-wide acquisition program policy, governance and oversight. Principal duties include;

1. Developing and maintaining acquisition program management policy, procedures, and guidance processes;

2. Monitoring the CAE structure to assess adequacy of staffing compliance with Departmental policies and instructions;

3. Advising and providing requirements to the Department Acquisition Career Manager on certification standards for all acquisition program management disciplines;

4. Providing technical support and assistance to Department acquisitions and acquisition personnel;

5. Serving as the OHS executive agent, ARP coordinator and ARB Executive Secretariat with approval authority on selected acquisition documentation; and

6. Overseeing the Department's acquisition program portfolio to monitor each investment's cost, schedule, and performance targets.

I. An Executive Steering Committee CESC) may be established by the CAO to provide support and guidance to major acquisitions between Acquisition Decision Events

(ADE).

- 3

J. The OHS Joint Requirements Council (JRC) provides oversight of the OHS requirements generation process, harmonizes efforts across the Department, and makes prioritized recommendations to the Deputies Management Action Group (DMAG) for those validated requirements.

V. Policy and Requirements

A. Acquisition Lifecycle Framework (ALF)

OHS has adopted the ALF to assure consistent and efficient acquisition management, support, review, and approval throughout the Department. The ALF applies to the acquisition of capital assets, service contracts, IAAs and IGAs. The ALF interlinks the Department's requirements process (in coordination with JRC/DMAG), the resourcing process, (i.e., Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution) and other processes such as systems engineering and enterprise architecture. The ALF is a four-phase process through which a program progresses in order to deliver or field a new product or capability. The four phases, as shown in Figure 1, are: 1) Need, 2) Analyze & Select, 3) Obtain, and 4) Produce/Deploy, Support and Dispose.

The progression through the phases includes Acquisition Decision Events (ADEs) where the ADA decides whether the proposed acquisition meets certain requirements necessary to move .on to the next phase. The ALF process is detailed in an implementing Instruction accompanying this Directive. These documents collectively serve as the Department's primary acquisition processes.

·---~ 1

Collection Point for Gaps and Needs

1: Validate Needs

<> Legend

"'Acquisition Decision Event

(ADE)

2A

2A:Approve Program

28: Approve Supporting Projects I Contracts

2C: Approve Low Rate Production or

Incremental Dellvery

3: Produce and Deploy Program Products

Figure 1. The OHS Acquisition Lifecyc/e Framework

B. Acquisition Review Board and the Acquisition Review Process

With respect to acquisitions, the ARB oversees executable business strategy, resources, management, accountability, and alignment to strategic initiatives. The ARB supports the ADA in determining the appropriate direction for an acquisition at the ADEs.

ADA approval at each ADE is required for an acquisition to proceed to the next phase in the acquisition lifecycle.

-4

The Acquisition Review Process is followed to prepare for an ARB and to ensure appropriate implementation of the decisions made at the ARB. At the outset of the acquisition lifecycle, PARM works with Department stakeholders, the PM for the acquisition, and the Component's CAE organization to identify the key acquisition decisions to be made and the critical issues to be resolved.

C. Acquisition Levels and the Acquisition Decision Authority ·

The CAO classifies acquisitions into different levels (Major and Non-major), which determine the extent and scope of required project and program management, as well as the specific official who serves as the ADA. Levels are determined by the lifecycle cost of the program. The different acquisition levels, dollar thresholds, and ADA are detailed in this Directive's implementing Instruction.

An acquisition program/project may be raised to a higher acquisition level by the CAO if (a) its importance to DHS's strategic and performance plans is disproportionate to its size; (b) it has high executive visibility; (c) it impacts more than one OHS Component;

(d) it has significant program or policy implications; or (e) the Deputy Secretary, CAO, or ADA otherwise recommends an increase to a higher acquisition level.

D. Reporting Requirements

All acquisitions are to comply with the necessary OHS periodic reporting process for their acquisition level as described in the implementing Instruction to this Directive.

VI. Questions

Address any questions or concerns regarding this Directive to the Executive Director, PARM.

7;? e-/;c 1 Date I

Under Secretary for

- 5

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .