Attachment_2-Past_Perf_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 76 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USCGC ACTIVE (WMEC-618) Routine Dockside Repairs Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HSCG80-13-R-P45218
About this file
Attachment 2-Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_5.pdf | ||
| Amendment_4.pdf | ||
| Amendment_3-HSCG80-13-R-P45218.pdf | ||
| Amendment_2.pdf | ||
| HSCG80-13-Q-P45218-Amendment_1.pdf | ||
| RFP_HSCG80-13-R-P45218.pdf | ||
| SOW-RFP_HSCG80-13-R-P45218.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE -
Project Title:
Contract No:
Performance Period:
Contract Value:
Quality of Product or Service 0 1 2 3 4 5 N/
A
1. Quality of Product or Service – please rate
Comments for Quality of Product or Service
2. Cost Control – please rate
Comments for Cost Control
Timeliness of Performance
3. Timeliness of Performance – please rate
Comments for Timeliness of Performance
Business Relations
4. Business Relations – please rate
Comments for Business Relations
Subcontracts
Were Subcontractors Used? ____Yes _____No
Comments for Subcontracts
Customer Satisfaction
Was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction? Yes _____No
Comments for Customer Satisfaction
Past Performance information provided by:
The ratings used on the Contractor Performance Survey shall be used to evaluate Past Performance. See the description of ratings below.
Criteria Quality of Product or
Service
Cost Control Timeliness of
Performance
Business Relations
0 = Unsatisfactory Contractor is not in compliance and is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives
Contractor is unable to manage costs effectively
Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract
Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is not effective
1 = Poor Major problems have been encountered
Contractor is having major difficulty in managing costs effectively
Contractor is having major difficulty meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is marginally effective
2 = Fair Some problems have been encountered
Contractor is having some problems in managing costs effectively
Contractor is having some problems meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is somewhat effective
3 = Good Minor inefficiencies, errors have been identified
Contractor is usually effective in managing costs effectively
Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is usually effective
4 = Excellent Contractor is in compliance with contract requirements and or delivers quality products/service
Contractor is effective in managing costs and submits current, accurate, and completed billings
Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule
Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is effective
5 = Outstanding The Contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as “Excellent”
The Contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as “Excellent”
The Contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that justifies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as “Excellent”
The Contractor has demonstrated an outstanding performance level that satisfies adding a point to the score. It is expected that this rating will be used in those rare circumstances where contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as
“Excellent”
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .