Amendment_0004_Changes_Sections_L&M.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to make additional changes to Sections L and M

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 12

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 20-Jul-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X HQ003417R0089

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

13-Jun-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

19-Jul-2017

CODE

WHS - ACQUISITION DIRECTORATE

1225 SOUTH CLARK ST, SUITE 1202

ARLINGTON VA 22202-3909

HQ0034 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

HQ003417R0089

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

SECTION L

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN

2017) ADDENDUM

GENERAL

In order to maximize efficiency and ensure fairness during the proposal evaluation process, all Offerors must comply with the following instructions for proposal format and content. Proposals that do not comply with these instructions may be considered non-responsive and may render the Offeror ineligible for award. The Government may reject any or all proposals if such action is in the public interest, accept an offer other than the lowest priced proposal, and waive informalities and minor irregularities in proposals received. The Offeror shall submit documentation illustrating its approach for satisfying the requirements of this solicitation. Proposals must be clear, coherent, and prepared in sufficient detail for effective evaluation of the Offeror’s proposal against the evaluation criteria.

Offerors that qualify the proposals or otherwise take exception to the solicitation’s terms may be deemed ineligible for award.

The Government intends to award without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined to be in the Government’s best interest. If discussions are held the government may establish a competitive range for efficiency purposes.

IDIQ: The Government intends to award a single IDIQ contract and will evaluate prices for reasonableness IAW the PWS and as indicated in the Price Factor.

Task Order 0001: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s prices for reasonablenss IAW the PWS for Task Order 0001 and as indicated in the Price Factor. Task Order 0001 will be issued at the time the IDIQ is awarded.

A. PROPOSAL VOLUME REQUIREMENTS

The following are further descriptions of the information that shall be provided with the proposal:

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION CHART PAGE LIMITS

VOLUME I

ADMINISTRATIVE – Cover Letter, Representations & Certifications, Tax Identification Number, CAGE Code and DUNS Number, Evidence of Facility Clearance, and Completed FAR clauses/provisions:

(1) 52.204-8 Annual Representations and Certifications

(2) 52.204-20 Predecessor of Offeror

(3) 52.209-2 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations-

-Representation.

(4) 52.209-5 Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters.

(5) 52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic

(6) 52.209-11 Representation by Corporations Regarding an Unpaid

Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law

(7) 52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications - Commercial Items

No Page Limit

VOLUME II

FACTOR 1 – KEY PERSONNEL AND STAFFING PLAN – Attachment:

Resumes and Commitment Letters, if Offeror desires to submit

Maximum of 10 pages

*If Offerors decide to submit resumes and commitment letters then documents shall be submitted as an

Attachment to the Key Personnel/Staffing Plan and will not be counted against the 10 page limit.

VOLUME III

FACTOR 2 – TECHNICAL APPROACH/CAPABILITY

Technical Subfactors:

a. Preventive Maintenance Plan

b. Quality Control Plan (QCP)

c. Contingency Support

d. Subcontracting Plan

Maximum of 40 pages

Maximum of 10 pages

Maximum of 10 pages

VOLUME IV

FACTOR 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE 3 references No page limit

VOLUME V

FACTOR 4 – PRICE (Completed SF1449 and Attachment Price Schedule- Excel) No page limit

Instructions for Proposal Submittal: Proposals submitted in response to the solicitation shall be formatted as follows:

(1) Text – Text shall be single-spaced, with a minimum one-inch margin all around. Pages shall be numbered consecutively. Pages submitted in excess of the page limitations stated throughout this document will be removed and not evaluated. (This does not include cover pages, tables of contents, tables, or attachments.) Text and graphics portions of the electronic copies shall be in a format readable by Adobe (PDF) or MS Word 2010.

(2) Font Size – Text shall be 11-point font size. Bolding, underlining, and italics may be used to identify topic demarcations or points of emphasis. Graphic presentations and attachments, including tables, are subject to the same font size and spacing requirements.

(3) Labeling –Each volume shall be submitted in separate files, identified by the Volume Number.

(4) Pricing Data – All pricing information shall appear within the Offeror’s “Price Schedule,” in MS Excel format (See Section F, below, for instructions) and SF1449 CLINs. Pricing information shall not be included anywhere within the other volumes.

(5) Proposal Submission:

All offerors shall submit one (1) original and four (4) copies of the following:

- Volume I: Administrative

- Volume II: Key Personnel and Staffing Plan

- Volume III: Technical Approach and Capability

- Volume IV: Past Performance

- Volume V: Price

Binder clips are the preferred method of binding proposal volumes. However three ring binders are also acceptable. All proposal submissions to the solicitation shall be in separate volumes corresponding to the evaluation factors identified in the above Proposal Submission Chart.

Proposals can be hand-delivered, submitted via FEDEX, United States Postal Service (USPS), or another commercial carrier; however, the use of USPS is not recommended as a single method of submission.

Proposals shall be submitted by the date/time indicated on page 1, block 8 of the solicitation (SF1449) to the address below:

Washington Headquarters Services, Acquisition Directorate ATTN: Ms. Brittney Cowan & Ms. Brittany Turner Acquisition Directorate – EFCD 1225 South Clark St., Suite 1202 Arlington, VA 22202

Questions: All offerors shall submit their solicitation questions via email to the following contracting personnel:

Brittney Cowan: brittney.j.cowan.civ@mail.mil Brittany Turner: brittany.l.turner16.civ@mail.mil

QUESTION SUBMISSSION DEADLINE: Thursday, 6 July 2017 a 1:00 PM (Eastern) Email Subject line: HQ0034-17-R-0089 Electrical Preventive Maintenance Services

Any proposal received after the exact time specified for receipt shall be treated as a late submission in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.212-1.

B. ADMINISTRATIVE (VOLUME I)

The offeror shall provide a cover letter. The cover letter shall identify RFP (HQ0034-17-R-0089), date of submittal, acknowledgement of any amendments, the offeror’s name, address, Taxpayer ID number, CAGE code, contact information, and the PWS being quoted. Cover letters will not count against any page limitation. The cover letter shall clearly state the length that the proposal remains open and in effect, which mailto:brittney.j.cowan.civ@mail.mil mailto:brittany.l.turner16.civ@mail.mil shall be at least 120 days from the proposal due date. The Administrative Volume shall include completion of all FAR and DFARS clauses identified in the Proposal Submission Chart above.

The NDA is not required to be submitted with the proposal. Contractor employees must complete a NDA form prior to commencement of work.

C. KEY PERSONNEL AND STAFFING PLAN (VOLUME II)

The Offeror shall submit sufficient information for the Government to make a comprehensive evaluation of its key personnel and staffing plan proposal in meeting the requirements listed in the PWS for successful performance.

The key personnel and staffing plan volume shall include i.) The Staffing Plan shall outline the following staffing plan elements: personnel title, PWS tasks assigned by PWS section number, labor category, clearance level, number of hours proposed, and position duties/responsibilities. The Staffing Plan shall include a personnel matrix that identifies experience requirements and education/certification levels. The Staffing Plan must also address the Offeror’s ability to meet security requirements. The Staffing Plan shall demonstrate how the Offeror will ensure personnel coverage during the absence of sick and personal leave of employees.

ii.) If the Offeror desires to submit resumes and commitment letters, these shall be submitted as an Attachment to this volume.

D. TECHNICAL APPROACH /CAPABILITY (VOLUME III).

The technical volume shall include:

i.) Technical approach/capability submission shall demonstrate how the Offeror’s proposed approach and capabilities will comply with Government tasking and requirements throughout the performance period. Offeror’s submission shall include the following elements within this volume.

a. Preventive Maintenance Plan (PWS Section 5.7.3)

b. Quality Control Plan (QCP) (PWS Section 1.6.1)

c. Contingency Support (PWS Section 5.5) ii.) Subcontracting plan: The subcontracting plan shall outline the following criteria: the extent to which such firms are specifically identified in proposals, the extent of a commitment to use such firms, and the complexity and variety of the work small firms are to perform. If the prime offeror is a small business then a subcontracting plan is NOT required. However, a statement must be enclosed within the proposal identifying the prime offeror as a small business and is not required to submit a subcontracting plan.

Proposals that omit or merely reiterate tasks under the PWS may be rejected.

E. PAST PERFORMANCE (VOLUME IV)

The government is requesting that the offeror provide three (3) recent and relevant past performance contract references. Past performance contract references shall come from the prime or subcontractor offeror.

Recent: The three references must be on-going or completed within the previous three (3) years of the date of this solicitation (not before June 12, 2014). To be considered, any contract currently being performed shall have at least one year of performance as of the proposal due date.

Relevant: Each reference shall demonstrate how your performance is similar in scope, magnitude and complexity to each PWS task 5.1 through 5.7.

In the past performance reference include contract/delivery order number, contract type, program name, total contract cost, contract dates, short description of work performed, and names, email addresses and valid telephone numbers for the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), and Contracting Officer's Representative (COR).

F. PRICE FACTOR (VOLUME V)

The IDIQ and all future task orders will be firm-fixed-price. The Offeror shall submit the Attachment: Price Schedule (Excel) with all areas (CLINs, performance periods, each tab) completed in order for its price proposal to be deemed responsive.

Price Schedule Tabs:

• CLINs: Offeror shall complete the CLINs IAW the intended contract structure for task order 0001. The amounts and totals shall be calculated properly.

• LCAT_TO_0001: Offeror shall complete the labor categories for task order 0001, ensuring the fully-burdened hourly rates, monthly rates are identified and the yearly amounts are completed and calculated properly.

• LCAT_IDIQ: Offeror shall complete the labor categories IAW their proposed personnel for each performance period. Offeror shall ensure the quantity of FTEs and the fully-burdened hourly rates are complete for each labor category. Should the Offeror choose to include additional personnel, based on its approach, please insert additional LCATs with each corresponding performance period. Offeror’s shall include the PWS sections (column titled “PWS mapping”) that each labor category aligns with as well.

This section has no page limit.

(End of addendum)

SECTION M

52.212-2 EVALUATION—COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

ADDENDUM

EVALUATION FACTORS

1) BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD

Unless all offers are rejected, the Government intends to award a single, firm fixed price Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract to the responsible Offeror whose offer, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to be the best overall value, price and other factors considered. The Government may select for award the Offeror whose price is not necessarily the lowest, but whose technical proposal is more advantageous to the Government and warrants the additional cost (Tradeoff Source Selection see FAR 15.101-1). Offerors must satisfy the requirements described in the Performance Work Statement (PWS), as well as other Request for Proposal (RFP) requirements. Proposals that take exception to any requirement may be deemed to be unacceptable.

2) EVALUATION FACTORS

The evaluation will be based on a complete assessment of the Offeror’s proposal. Proposals shall be evaluated on the following factors listed below. Factor 1: Key Personnel/Staffing Plan is significantly more than Factor 2:

Technical Approach/Capability and Factor 3: Past Performance. Factor 2: Technical Approach/Capability is more important than Factor 3: Past Performance. Factor 2: Technical Approach/Capability, Factor 3: Past Performance are significantly more important than Factor 4: Price.

• Factor 1 – KEY PERSONNEL and STAFFING PLAN

• Factor 2 – TECHNICAL APPROACH and CAPABILITY

• Factor 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE

• Factor 4 – PRICE

Factor 1: Key Personnel/Staffing Plan The Government will evaluate the extent that the proposed staffing plan has a) a complete staffing plan addressing all elements indicated in the instructions, b) key personnel matrix (meet the minimum qualifications experience, education/certification levels), c) addressed its ability to meet security requirements, and d) demonstrated how the Offeror will ensure personnel coverage during employee leave, as specified in PWS section 1.6.11.

Factor 2: Technical Approach/Capability The Government will evaluate the adequacy of the Offeror’s approach and understanding of the requirements specified in the solicitation and all attached documents, as demonstrated by the proposed technical approach and capabilities. Elements of this evaluation include:

i.) Technical Approach/Capability: The Government will evaluate the extent that the proposed technical approach/capability adequately meets the tasking and requirements throughout the performance period.

The technical approach and capability will also be evaluated based on the following elements:

• Preventive Maintenance Plan (PWS Section 5.7.3)

• Quality Control Plan (QCP) (PWS Section 1.6.1)

• Contingency Support (PWS Section 5.5) ii.) Subcontracting Plan: The Government will evaluate the Small Business Participation Plan of the offeror’s proposal in accordance with the following criteria:

• The extent to which such firms are specifically identified in proposals

• The extent of commitment to use such firms

• The complexity and variety of the work small firms are to perform

• If the prime offeror is a small business then a subcontracting plan is NOT required.

However, a statement must be enclosed within the proposal identifying the prime offeror as a small business and is not required to submit a subcontracting plan.

Factor 3: Past Performance The Government will evaluate how well the offeror has performed on contracts that have been determined to be both recent and relevant to the PWS.

Past performance is a measure of the degree to which the Offeror satisfied its customers in the past and complied with Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, as identified as the Prime Contractor or direct employee or consultant. The Government may contact some, all or none of each Offeror’s customers to ask whether: (1) the Offeror is capable, efficient, and effective; (2) the Offeror’s performance conformed to the terms and conditions of its contract; and (3) the Offeror was reasonable and cooperative during performance; (4) the Offeror was committed to customer satisfaction; (5) the Offeror was able to hire and retain qualified personnel to the satisfaction of the customer; and (6) if they would select the same Contractor or a different Contractor, given the opportunity.

The Government may also use other information available from other sources to evaluate an Offeror’s past performance, which may include, but not limited to: Past Performance Questionnaire, Federal, State and local Government agencies, Better Business Bureaus, published media, electronic databases such as the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Constructions Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS), Architect/Engineer Contract Administration Support System (ACASS). The Government reserves the right to limit or expand the number of references it decides to contact and to contact references other than those provided by the Offeror.

** A relevant project is defined as:

- A contract for the maintenance of high-voltage electrical equipment

- The total contract value is between $5,000,000 to $15,000,000 during a 5-year period or $1,000,000 to $3,000,000 annually

- The offeror must be the prime contractor or subcontractor

- The three references must be on-going or completed within the previous three (3) years of the date of this solicitation (not before June 12, 2014). If the referenced contract has expired, the end date of the contract performance must have occurred within the last one year from the date of the proposal submission deadline.

-If the referenced contract is an active contract at the time of proposal submission, the start date of the contract performance must have occurred no less than one year from the date of the proposal submission deadline.

The Government will focus its evaluation on the following areas: (1) The offeror’s track record of failure rate of the equipment being maintained (2) The offeror’s track record for reliable responses to unexpected equipment failures

(3) The offeror’s track record of contract management (e.g. cost management, personnel management, level of customer intervention required) (4) The referenced customer’s willingness work with the offeror again on similar, future projects

Using the method as described in this section, the Government will assign a rating that indicates its level of confidence in the offeror’s ability to successfully perform the proposed contract requirements based on its performance on similar contracts in the past.

In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom no information on past performance is available, the Offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Factor 4: Price The Government will perform a price analysis to determine the reasonableness of the offeror’s price proposal.

Reasonableness may be based on one or more of the price analysis techniques in FAR 15.404-1 including, but not limited to, comparison to the Independent Government Estimate (IGE), comparison to other offers, and/or comparisons to commercial prices. For a price to be reasonable, it must represent a price to the government that a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business. Normally, price reasonableness is established through adequate price competition, but may also be determined through cost and price analysis techniques as described in FAR 15.404. The offeror’s proposed approach must be consistent with the price proposal. As part of the price evaluation, proposals may be reviewed to identify any significant unbalanced pricing in the Price Schedule. In accordance with FAR 15.404-1(g), Unbalanced Pricing, a proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government. Price will not be scored or receive an adjectival rating. The Government will determine if the offeror's proposed price reflects the offeror's understanding of the requirements and if the proposed price is consistent with the offeror's proposal.

For evaluation purposes only, the total evaluated price for task order 0001 is the sum of the total prices submitted for

(a) the base period, (b) all option periods, and (c) the six-month extension authorized by FAR clause 52.217-8. The labor mix (categories, hours, rates) will be evaluated for consistency IAW the Offeror’s approach for all of the IDIQ’s performance periods. For purposes of determining the evaluated price for the six month 52.217-8 extension, the total price is calculated as one-half of the total price of the final option year. The Government may determine that a proposal is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

3) RATING METHODS

a. FACTOR 1 KEY PERSONNEL/STAFFING PLAN

Factor 1 Rating Scheme:

Volume II each proposal shall be given a single rating identified in Table 1 that most accurately describes the Offeror’s proposal for Factor 1 using the adjectival rating.

Table 1. Key Personnel and Staffing

Rating Description

Outstanding

Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good

Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal

Proposal had not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

b. FACTOR 2 TECHNICAL APPROACH/CAPABILITY:

Volume III of each proposal shall be given a single rating identified in Table 2 that most accurately describes the Offeror’s proposal for Factor 2 using the adjectival rating.

Factor 2: Rating Scheme: The technical approach and capability evaluation rating identified in Table 2 that reflects the degree to which the proposed approach meets or does not meet the threshold performance or capability requirements through an assessment of the relative strengths, deficiencies, significant weaknesses, and risks of a proposal.

Table 2. Technical Approach and Capability

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good

Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal

Proposal had not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

c. FACTOR 3 PAST PERFORMANCE:

Volume IV of each proposal shall be given a single rating identified in Table 2 that most accurately describes the Offeror’s proposal for Factor 2 using the past performance confidence assessment rating.

Factor 3: Rating Scheme:

There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, and relevancy.

Step 1 – Recency. The first step is to evaluate the recency of the offeror's past performance. Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant, and is critical to establishing the relevancy of past performance information. Performance of each reference must be on-going or completed within the previous three (3) years of the date of this solicitation (not before June 12, 2014).

Step 2 – Relevance. The second step is to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection. The relevancy rating evaluates the aspects of an offeror's history of contract (or subcontract) performance that would provide the most context and give the greatest ability to measure whether the offeror will successfully satisfy the current requirement. There are four levels of relevancy as shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Past Performance Relevancy Rating Method Rating Definition Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

In the case of offerors for which there is no information on past contract performance or where past contract performance information is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past contract performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv).) In this case, the offeror's past performance is unknown and will be assigned a performance confidence rating of “Neutral Confidence”, shown in table 4.

Table 4. Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Method

Substantial Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

d. FACTOR 4 PRICE:

Volume V the price factor will not receive a rating, but the evaluated price must be found to be fair and reasonable in order to be eligible for award. The pricing evaluation will be based on price analysis techniques found in FAR 15.404-1 to determine if they are fair and reasonable. Price analysis will be used to determine the total evaluated price to support the selection of the best overall valued offer. For evaluation purposes, the total evaluated price will be:

1. The total prices submitted for Task Order 0001’s base period and all additional ordering periods (Attachment Price Schedule), proposed labor mix for the IDIQ, and completed SF1449 CLINs.

2. An amount equal to one-half the final option year price (6 months) to cover the cost of the potential option under FAR 52.217-8.

3. Attach the Completed SF1449

(End of addendum)

Electrical Preventive Maintenance Services Attachments List:

• Attachment J-1 – Equipment Listing

• Attachment Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)

• Attachment Past Performance Questionnaire

• Attachment Price Schedule

• Attachment PWS Electrical IDIQ

• Attachment PWS Task Order 0001

• Attachment Q&A (HQ003417R0089)_Revised_20170713

• Attachment Site Visit Attendees List_20170712

(End of Summary of Changes)