Attachment 3 J-L3 CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE SURVEY.pdf
PDF 26 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HQ0034-12-R-0002
- Issued by
-
DOD Washington Headquarters Service
About this file
J-L3 Contractor Performance Survey
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
HQ0034-12-R-0002
Construction Management Technical Support Services
ATTACHMENT J-L3
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE
See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY
CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
EVALUATION PERIOD: CONTRACT VALUE: $ _
1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your firm.
2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Outstanding (A), Very Good (B), Satisfactory (C), Poor (D), or Unacceptable (F). See next page for definition of ratings. For all ratings EXCEPT “Satisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.
Outstanding Very Good Satisfactory Poor Unacceptable
OVERALL PAST PERFORMANCE
RATING
Please provide an overall rating of the contractor’s past performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.
a.) Quality of Service:
Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence.
b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries:
Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.
c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)
Quality of key personnel and how well key personnel managed their portion of the contract.
Construction Management Technical Support Services
3. Would you hire this contractor to provide services for your organization in the future? _____ Please provide comments using additional pages, if desired.
Signed:__________________________________
Print Name: ______________________________
Construction Management Technical Support Services
PAST PERFORMANCE DEFINITIONS
The following definitions are to be used when assessing past performance:
OUTSTANDING/VERY LOW PERFORMANCE RISK (A)
No doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
VERY GOOD/LOW PERFORMANCE RISK (B)
Little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
SATISFACTORY/MODERATE PERFORMANCE RISK (C)
Some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
POOR/HIGH PERFORMANCE RISK (D)
Substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
UNACCEPTABLE/VERY HIGH PERFORMANCE RISK (F)
Extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
NEUTRAL (N)
The offeror, its subcontractors or team members and/or its key personnel have no significant performance record relevant or identifiable to the services to be performed.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .