DTRA Cooperative Threat Support Services Industry Day July 15 2009.ppt
PPT presentation 5 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HDTRA1-10-R-0003
- Issued by
-
Defense Threat Reduction Agency
About this file
Industry day slides
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| CT A AS Amendment | — | |
| HDTRA1-10-R-0007 AAS RFP QAs FINAL 12Mar10.pdf | ||
| CTA ASRFPamend(1).pdf | ||
| Attachment L-1 PPP Information | — | |
| Attachment L-2 PPPQ(1).doc | DOC document | |
| Past perf. form L-1 CT A AS.pdf | ||
| PPPQ L-2 CT A AS.pdf | ||
| ATT 3 CTAAS Award fee plan.doc | DOC document | |
| FY2010 CTR Annual Report to Congress.pdf | ||
| CTRAAS Final RFP L-M(1).pdf | ||
| Industry Day Q A.doc | DOC document | |
| Exh A B CTA ASCDRLS.pdf | ||
| CTRAAS Final RFP A-K(1).pdf | ||
| ATT 6 CT AAS Socio-Economic Commitment.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| CTAASFINALRFP(2).rtf | RTF text file | |
| ATT 4 TRSC PROPERTY 9-3-09.pdf | ||
| ATT 1 CTA AS DD254.pdf | ||
| Org Sources Sought Doc.pdf | ||
| Transition Plan.pdf | ||
| CTR A AS SecH.pdf | ||
| DRAFT L M.pdf | ||
| A AS SOO.pdf |
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
UNCLASSIFIED
Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) Support Services Contract Overview
Mr. Michael Donaldson Contracting Officer
Mr. Jeff Schmidt Project Manager
July 15, 2009
Agenda
| Opening remarks |
| CTR Mission |
| CTR Program Areas |
| Acquisition Information |
| Questions and Answers |
Purpose
| Continuing market research efforts |
| Provide opportunity for industry to ask questions |
| Allow industry to provide feedback on planned acquisition |
Rules of Engagement
| Industry day is for informational purposes only and will not be binding upon DTRA or the U.S. Government |
| If possible, submit questions in writing |
Use cards provided Responses will be posted in FedBizOpps and DTRA’s Acquisition Topics website Follow-up questions can be emailed to Rick.Teal@DTRA.Mil
Current A&AS Contract
| Awarded July 2005 |
| Primary activity at Ft. Belvoir, VA area |
| Cumulative value approximately $127.2M, with another $40.8M additional planned for the final year of the contract. |
| Current A&AS contract ends July 31st, 2010 |
| Currently includes 26 overseas personnel to support DTROs and program areas (a mix of US citizens and local nationals) |
General Requirements
| Contractor shall be physically located not more than 20 minutes from Headquarters Complex, Fort Belvoir, VA |
| Facility requirements |
Off-site facility – capable of holding multiple meetings/conferences, as well as housing contractor workforce Four 15 person & a 150 person conference room Meeting support: trip books, slides/graphics, minutes, exit cables CTR Office may provide office space for 25 A&AS personnel at Headquarters Complex
Could be reduced by ongoing DTRA study International travel, primarily to Former Soviet Union, required
Factors Affecting Support Service Scope CTR Program Office has limited organic:
Logistics personnel Project Support Supporting engineers and scientists Limited program control capability
Program financial analysis Strategic planning Program planning & status tracking Cost Performance Report Analysis
Areas Supported OSD/Eurasia OSD/Policy Program Office and OSD Oversight Offices
CTR Program Office
SOAE/SNAE
WMD/PPI
NWSS
BTRP
CWE
CTI
Required Support Capabilities & Skills
| Program Support | Technical | Analysis & Plans |
| Transportation/Shipping/Logistics |
Export Licensing Project Management DTRO Support Overseas Project Mgt Support Cost Estimating PPBE Support/Financial Mgt Training/Development Admin KPP Tracking/Management
Administrative Support Travel/Passport/Visa/Cable Support Records Management Tasker Mgt Administrative Assistance Conference/Meeting Support Graphics IT Mgt/Security/Acquisition Construction Engineering Civil Engineering Human/Veterinary/Life Sciences Expertise Nuclear Engineering Chemical Engineering Biological Engineering CBN Weapons Expertise Security System Expertise Missile Propellant Expertise WMD Proliferation Prevention Expertise HAZMAT Expertise Industrial Engineering Biosecurity/Biosafety/Laboratory Mgt Risk Mgt Defense Acquisition Expertise Systems Engineering Land/Maritime Border Security expertise Customs Inspection expertise C3 expertise Acquisition Logistics Strategic Planning Requirements Analysis Policy Analysis Capability Assessments Concepts Analysis Audits & Examinations Language Translation Process Improvement Test and Evaluation Arms Control Treaty Assmt Strategic Communications
Supports all Acquisition Phases
| CTR programs/projects spans the full life cycle |
| Support intimately tied to all activities associated with |
planning, execution, and oversight of program activities across life cycle
CTR Overview Mr. Hunter Lutinski
Deputy Director, Cooperative Threat Reduction
Expectations of the Contractor
“We must ensure that terrorists never acquire a nuclear weapon. This is the most immediate and extreme threat to global security. One terrorist with one nuclear weapon could unleash massive destruction. Al Qaeda has said it seeks a bomb and that it would have no problem with using it. And we know that there is unsecured nuclear material across the globe… So today I am announcing a new international effort to secure all vulnerable nuclear material around the world within four years.”
April 5, 2009
REMARKS BY PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
Prague, Czech Republic
Cooperative Threat Reduction The mission of the CTR program is partnering with willing countries to reduce the threat of WMD and related materials, technology, and expertise including providing for the safe destruction of Soviet era WMD, associated delivery systems, and related infrastructure.
Evolution of A&AS Requirements
| CTR evolving to include Proliferation Prevention Initiatives and Border Security, and rapid growth of Biological Threat Reduction |
| Potential expansion outside of the FSU |
| Future CTR expansion will require: |
Cost control through innovative business practices Management emphasis on proactive problem solving Anticipation of CTR needs and proactive action Increased emphasis on Systems Engineering
Need to understand DTRA as a whole, plus how CTR interacts in intra and interagency environment.
Must be able to rapidly surge to integrate CTR 2.0 characteristics.
Implementing Agreements
Diplomatic Instruments Agreement Between USA and
ARTICLE XXV
1. This Treaty, including its Annexes, shall remain in force for 15 days unless superseded earlier by as subsequent agreement to purchase equipment and services for the purposes of eliminating silo ICBMs. If the Parties so decide, this Treaty shall be extended for a period of five years. Upon expiration of the five years, the Treaty shall be subject to review and extension for successive five year periods in accordance with the procedures governing the initial extension, and it shall remain in force for each agreed five year period of extension unless it is superseded by a subsequent agreement on the elimination of silo ICBMs.
2. A standing body, the Joint Compliance and Inspection Commission, shall periodically review the viability of this treaty in light of changing circumstances. Said review shall occur not less than five years after entry into force and every five years thereafter.
Requirements Definition Contracting Process Execution/ Delivery
Scoping Instruments Contractual Agreements Agreement Between DoD and
ARTICLE XXV
1. This Treaty, including its Annexes, shall remain in force for 15 days unless superseded earlier by as subsequent agreement to purchase equipment and services for the purposes of eliminating silo ICBMs. If the Parties so decide, this Treaty shall be extended for a period of five years. Upon expiration of the five years, the Treaty shall be subject to review and extension for successive five year periods in accordance with the procedures governing the initial extension, and it shall remain in force for each agreed five year period of extension unless it is superseded by a subsequent agreement on the elimination of silo ICBMs.
2. A standing body, the Joint Compliance and Inspection Commission, shall periodically review the viability of this treaty in light of changing circumstances. Said review shall occur not less than five years after entry into force and every five years thereafter.
Equipment Services Training
Authorization/Appropriation Certification Notification Agreement Obligation Reports Audits and Examinations Disbursement Request for Assistance Umbrella Agreements DOD CTR Process
CONTRACT
A - SCHEDULE
The Contractor shall deliver the following goods or services in accordance with the Statement of Work (Section J, Attachment #1) and the contract provisions within 90 days of sward. This contract includes the following goods and services:
0001 Silo dismantlement construction services for elimination of the Kyrgyz site
0002 Silo dismantlement construction services for elimination of the Zhjakev site.
0003 Scrap salvage of usable material designated by COTR for salvage at the Kyrgyz site
0004 Scrap salvage of usable material designated by the COTR for salvage at the Zhjakev site
B PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
All work called for under this contract shall be performed at the silo ICBM sites designated and within the Republic
DoD
BUDGET
CTR Program Areas
| Strategic Offensive Arms Elimination |
| Nuclear Weapons Safety & Security |
| Biological Threat Reduction Program |
| WMD Proliferation Prevention |
| Chemical Weapons Elimination |
CTR Funding ($ in millions) Ongoing efforts: EUCOM Azerbaijan Georgia Russia Ukraine Armenia
CENTCOM
Uzbekistan Kazakhstan
Completed Work Albania
CTR Scorecard Ukraine, Kazakhstan, & Belarus are Nuclear Weapons Free Amounts in Former Soviet Union circa. 1994
Reductions a/o Jun 18, 2009 13300 Target*
Warheads Deactivated ICBM Silos Eliminated ICBM Mobile Launchers Destroyed Bombers Eliminated Nuclear ASMs Destroyed SLBM Launchers Eliminated SLBMs Eliminated SSBNs Destroyed Nuclear Test Tunnels/Holes Sealed ICBMs Destroyed
Nuclear Weapons Storage Site Security Upgrades Biological Monitoring Stations Built & Equipped Nuclear Weapons Transport Train Shipments
89.0 CWDF Design (Percent Completed) CWDF Construction (Percent Completed) *Date of Projection: 12/31/08 Percent Achieved 88.9% 67.7% 86.8 53.6% 100% 100% 87.5% 88.3% 88.6% 100% 71.6% 100% 32.7% 100% 89.0%
Recent Accomplishments Completed Bratislava Nuclear Security Initiative in Partnership with NNSA Completed Russian Chem Weapons Destruction Facility Completed 1st corridor of Ukraine/Moldova border security Commissioned Zonal Diagnostic Laboratories Eliminated Albania’s stockpile of chemical weapons Eliminated full inventory of SS-24 missiles in Russia
Chemical Weapons Destruction Facility (Shchuch’ye, Russia) Chemical Weapons Elimination
| U.S. funding $1.039 billion |
| International partners also providing assistance |
| Joint Schedule: completion in 2010 |
- Designed to eliminate 5449 metric tons of nerve agent
- Construction of facility nearing completion; will help enable RF to meet Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) commitment
Chemical Weapons Elimination Potential Future Requirements Support a Non-FSU Country to secure and destroy Chemical Weapons
Stockpile Assessment, Security and Accountability Stockpile Destruction Destruction planning, system design, construction, operation, dismantlement, waste disposition, site remediation Continue or expand RF CWE support
Technical support for operations Construction support for Kizner
Chemical Weapons Elimination Support Service Requirements Range of Support Services
Project management, DoD/CTR acquisition process expertise, engineering expertise, chemical weapons destruction expertise Situational Awareness: Chemical Weapons Proliferation Risks, Country Stockpiles, OPCW and CWC trends
Biological Threat Reduction Program (BTRP) Mission
To counter the threat of bioterrorism and prevent the proliferation of biological weapons (BW) related technology, pathogens and expertise Objectives
Enhance partner states’ capacity to Detect, diagnose, report, and respond to bio-terror attacks and potential pandemics Consolidate especially dangerous pathogen research and strains into a minimal number of safe, secure facilities per country Prevent the sale, theft, diversion or accidental release of BW-related materials, technology and expertise by improving biosafety and security Facilitate strategic research relationships
BTRP - Desired Outcomes
| Enhance partner countries’ capabilities to: |
| Comply with World Health Organization’s International Health Regulations as well as World Organization for Animal Health’s reporting guidelines |
| Have a disease surveillance, detection, diagnosis, and reporting system that is safe, secure and sustainable |
| Have consolidated all extremely dangerous pathogens (EDPs) and associated research in safe and secure facilities |
| Identify all indigenous human and animal EDPs |
| Ensure developed capabilities are sustainable within partners current and future operating budgets |
BTRP Support Service Requirements Range of Support Services
Acquisition Management: Project Management, Systems Engineering, Contract Development, Management & Oversight, Test & Evaluation, PPBES/Financial Life Sciences: Veterinary, Human Clinical, Public Health, Epidemiology, Vector Surveillance/Entomology, Basic and Applied Bio Research Engineering: Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, Construction, HVAC, Bio-containment Others: Information Technology, Biological Safety and Security, Regulatory Analysis, Training Management, Logistics and Sustainment
BTRP – Magnitude of Services Current:
Projects Operational in 7 FSU Nations 1 country < 1 year, 3 countries ~ 10 Years Various levels of engagement Project Areas – require multiple integrated efforts Bio-security/Bio-Safety/Disease Surveillance Cooperative Bio Research No current BW Infrastructure Elimination
Future:
NAS Recommends adding 2 country per year for next 5 years – outside FSU OSD CTR Policy already preparing for work in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kenya and Uganda South East Asia also being discussed Expect even greater interagency and international coordination
Weapons of Mass Destruction – Proliferation Prevention Initiative (WMD-PPI) Mission: Safeguard the United States and it’s allies by cooperatively developing the capabilities of recipient states to prevent the transfer of WMD, related materials, technology, and expertise from suppliers to hostile States, or non-State actors.
Integrated Radar and Automated Identification Systems Surveillance Equipment/Training WMD Detection/Interdiction Night Vision and Thermal Optics Patrol Vessel Upgrades Maritime/Land Border and Fissile Radioactive Material Proliferation Prevention
WMD-PPI Support Service Requirements Range of Support Services
Provide technical, acquisition, and subject matter expertise in Land/Maritime Border Security, Customs inspection, C3, and WMD Proliferation Prevention Support site visits, conferences, and meetings Assist in the preparation for all reviews, to include:
Acquisition Strategy Reviews (ASR), Milestone Decision Reviews (MDR), Implementation Program Management Reviews (IPMRs), and Executive Reviews (ERs) Provide “reach-back” support to help fill support requirements not available with in-house skill sets Provide financial support for budget and execution of CTR funds
Strategic Offensive Arms Elimination
| Eliminate: |
| SS-25 ICBM systems |
| SLBM launchers/missiles |
| SS-18 systems |
| SS-19 systems |
| Remove spent fuel from SSBN reactors |
| Decommission SS-18 silos |
Liquid Propellant ICBM & Silo Elimination (RF) SLBM Launcher Elimination/ SSBN Dismantlement (RF) Liquid Propellant SLBM Elimination (RF) Solid Propellant ICBM/SLBM & Mobile Launcher Elimination (Russian Federation - RF) Bomber & Air-Launched Cruise Missile Elimination (Ukraine)
Objectives Strategic Offensive Arms Elimination
Assist Russian Federation (RF) dismantle strategic nuclear weapon delivery systems and associated infrastructure in accordance with Umbrella and Implementing Agreements and START Provide incentives for FSU states to reduce Soviet-legacy nuclear forces, thus reducing chances for proliferation or use Assist RF to meet Moscow Treaty commitments by end of 2012
Strategic Nuclear Arms Elimination
Assist Ukraine with safe storage of 160 solid rocket motors (SRM) from dismantled SS‑24 ICBMs in accordance with Umbrella and Implementing Agreements and START Provide funding for empty motor cases after propellant is removed
SOAE/SNAE Program Conclusion
| Well-defined programs |
| Mature, smoothly running projects |
| Strong relationships with RF/Ukraine partners |
| Impact of post-START agreement may result in a more aggressive elimination schedule |
SOAE Support Service Requirements
Range of Support Services
Provide technical, acquisition, and subject matter expertise in dismantlement and elimination of strategic nuclear weapon delivery systems Support site visits, conferences, and meetings Assist in the preparation for all reviews, to include:
Acquisition Strategy Reviews (ASR), Milestone Decision Reviews (MDR), Implementation Program Management Reviews (IPMRs), and Executive Reviews (ERs) Provide “reach-back” support to help fill support requirements not available with in-house skill sets
Secure Storage Warhead Nuclear Weapons Safety & Security
| Facilitate warhead movement to secure storage & dismantlement facilities |
| Enhanced security, control, and accounting of warheads at 24 storage sites |
Security Systems at NW Storage sites Missile Removed and Transported
Dismantlement
Fissile Material Container Supercontainer NW Transportation & Railcar
Nuclear Weapons Safety & Security Nuclear Weapons Storage Security (NWSS)
Enhance security during storage of Russian strategic and tactical nuclear warheads that have been removed from operational use Nuclear Weapons Transportation Security (NWTS)
Assist Russian Federation (RF) Ministry of Defense (MOD) in shipping nuclear warheads to dismantlement locations or to more secure sites for storage while awaiting further shipment to dismantlement.
Active NWSS Projects Far East Training Center (FETC)
Training facility and maintenance depot in the Russian Far East for all branches of MOD involved with providing security for WMD, specifically supporting the operators, maintainers, and system administrators of the approved “objective suite” of physical security equipment. Final stages of construction.
Sustainment
Joint project in cooperation with the DOE to provide spare parts and maintenance capability to ensure fielded SSE equipment is maintained and operates to design standards.
SATC-Expansion
Expand student facilities and training capabilities at the Security Assessment and Training Center in cooperation with DOE.
NWS&S Program Conclusion
| Well defined |
| Mature programs |
| Exclusive to Russia |
| Well established relationships with the Russian MOD, 12th Main Directorate (Nuclear) |
| Some new initiatives possible |
| Cooperative efforts with DOE in some areas |
| Existing programs projected through 2012 |
| Impact of a post-START agreement or other political arrangements unknown |
NWSS Support Service Requirements
Range of Support Services
Provide technical, acquisition, and subject matter expertise in Nuclear Weapons Security, Safety and Transportation Support site visits, conferences, and meetings Assist in the preparation for all reviews, to include:
Acquisition Strategy Reviews (ASR), Milestone Decision Reviews (MDR), Implementation Program Management Reviews (IPMRs), and Executive Reviews (ERs) Provide “reach-back” support to help fill support requirements not available with in-house skill sets
Defense and Military Contacts
| Support defense and military cooperation with the objective of preventing proliferation |
| More than 200 events annually |
| Annual budget: $8M |
Armenia Azerbaijan Georgia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Moldova Russia Tajikistan Ukraine Uzbekistan
CTR Program Integration – Acquisition Management Support Acquisition Management Process
- Support Director’s goal of acquisition excellence
Provide advice and assistance to CT workforce on acquisition matters
| Support Pre-Award Processes |
| Support Post-Award Processes |
Risk Mgt Systems Engineering Project reviews
EVM
Project/performance management
| Schedule/coordinate major reviews |
| Be proactive in the identification of improvements to acquisition processes |
CTR Program Integration – Financial Management Assist in provision of CTR related financial management services
Reviews CTR operating programs for resource adequacy, obligation and expenditure tracking, and potential problem areas Weekly/Monthly reports on execution activity CTR-level budget formulation and defense of budget submissions Work with OUSD (Comptroller), OSD (Policy), OSD (AT&L-NCB), and other review authorities on all financial management matters, including DTRA & OSD Budget Execution Reviews Manage workflow of Procurement Requests Contract/accounting reconciliation Year end closeout/start-up Drafts CTR Program Performance Reports (PART)/Annual Report Drafts Management Control plans/Annual Statement of Assurance
CTR Program Integration – Operations
| Process Improvement/Organizational Development |
| Information Management |
Information security Records management International Travel Support
Booking Trips Drafting Cables Passport/Visa Coordination
| Property Management |
| Information systems management |
IT acquisition expertise CTR Portal Management/Maintenance Help Desk Function at Off-Site Facility Tasker Management Training and Educational Development
Scope/Magnitude of Services Total CTR FY2010 Support: 195 FTEs
Program Area Support
| BTRP: Approximately 53 (CONUS) FTE and support from 10+ FTE forward in country. |
| CWE: 4 FTEs |
| NWSS: 12 FTEs |
| SOAE: 20 FTEs |
| WMD-PPI: 15 FTEs |
| CTI-Ops: 28 FTEs |
| CTI-Acq: 5 FTEs |
| CTI-Finance: 15 FTEs |
Contracting Approach
| Michael Donaldson – Contracting Officer |
| Rick Teal – Contracts Specialist |
| Jeff Schmidt – Project Manager |
Anticipated Contract Structure
| Full and Open Competition |
| Contract Type: To be announced during solicitation. |
Subcontracting Goals
| Procurement will be an unrestricted solicitation |
| Procurement will include minimum Small Business (SB) and Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) subcontracting goals |
| SB goal will include Historically Black Colleges and Universities/Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) |
| Goals will be based on a percentage of total contract value |
| Sections L and M of the Solicitation will contain explanation of SB and SDVOSB minimum goals under Socio-Economic Commitment evaluation provisions |
Proposal Content
| Technical Proposal |
| Management Plan/Proposal |
| Cost/Price Proposal |
| Past Performance Proposal |
| Oral Presentations Possible |
Contract Award
The Government anticipates awarding without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed necessary
Tentative Acquisition Schedule
| Sources Sought Synopsis | June 2009 | ||
| Draft RFP Release | Sept 2009 | ||
| Final RFP Release | Oct 2009 | ||
| Proposals Due | Nov 2009 | ||
| Contract Award | April 2010 | ||
| Contract Start | July 2010 |
Administrative
| FedBizOpps official posting site (www.fbo.gov) |
| DTRA website for information (http://www.dtra.mil/be/business_opp/procurement/acq_procopp.cfm) |
| E-mail address for all communications between contractors and government prior to award is Rick.Teal@DTRA.Mil |
Questions/Comments Today - Submit Questions on cards provided
Hand to a Government representative, or place in box in back of the room After today, direct all Questions to:
email: Rick.Teal@DTRA.Mil Questions/Answers will be posted periodically to FedBizOpps
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .