EMC Firm Performance Questionaire.docx

Solicitation No. GS-11P-12-MK-C-0005, Construction of National Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial, Washington, DC

Attachment 1- FIRM’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

TO BE COMPLETED BY FIRM OFFEROR for the EISENHOWER MEMORIAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR

1. FIRM’S NAME & ADDRESS:

4. CONTRACT NO. (if applicable):

5. CONTRACT START DATE / COMPLETION DATE:

6. CONTRACT VALUE AT AWARD / FINAL VALUE:

2. CLIENT’S NAME AND ADDRESS:

7. TYPE OF CONTRACT:

8. PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD:

3. PROJECT NAME / LOCATION:

9. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:

Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.

TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE (REFERENCE)

10. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION ( Project Manager/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION:

b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. EVALUATOR’S FAX NUMBER:

d. EVALUATOR'S E-MAIL ADDRESS: e. MONTHS OF PERFORMANCE

MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:

Did the construction project have any of the following characteristics?

The project was for new construction, which included foundation excavation and underground utility construction.

The project site was in a congested city-center location with limitations on site access and deliveries, had restricted staging of materials, and required maintaining pedestrian and traffic flow around the site.

The project included the installation of artwork and major decorative stonework (not including pavers), the cost of which was at least $5 million.

The scope of the artwork and major decorative stonework was included within the General Contractor’s contract and not procured and installed under separate contract by others not under the General Contractor’s control.

The project scope included components/finishes requiring coordination of multiple highly-skilled crafts and trades, such as stone masons, stone carvers, decorative ironworkers, artisans, or sculptors.

The project was constructed to meet or exceed a high standard of quality and reflects that goal.

The project included extensive landscape and hardscape construction, such as a park, plaza, or public square, covering at least two (2) acres.

The project included the planting of mature specimen trees with a caliper size greater than ten inches (10”).

Questions:

Experience:

1. What was the actual work performed by the firm? Who were the Project Executive and Project Manager for the project?

2. Were there any notable problems with this Contractor's performance, such as construction- or contract-related matters that the firm could not resolve, etc.?

A. What are the company’s strong points, or what did you like about them?

B. What are the company’s weak points, and what do you like least about them?

C. If you had a choice, would you contract with the firm again? Why or Why not?

6. Do you know of any other projects performed by this firm?

Performance:

[Using the following scale, please rate the following areas of performance.]

EX- Excellent: Contractor exceeded all requirements - The contractor significantly exceeded, in all aspects, the requirements in the contract; entirely favorable and represents a low risk.

VG- Very Good: Contractor exceeded most requirements - The contractor met and, in some cases, exceeded the contract requirements; more favorable than unfavorable and represents slight risk.

G- Good: Contractor met only minimum requirements - The contractor met the requirements in the contract; neither favorable nor unfavorable and represents neutral risk.

M- Marginal: The contractor failed to meet some of the requirements in the contract; more unfavorable than favorable and represents some risk.

U- Unacceptable: Contractor failed to meet some or all of the requirements in the contract; entirely unfavorable and represents high risk.

NO- Not Observed

1. How well did the Contractor manage and maintain the project schedule?

Rating: ________

Comments:___________________________________________________________________

2. How well did the Contractor manage and maintain the project budget and control costs?

Rating: ________

Comments:________________________________________________________________

3. How well did the Contractor manage and maintain project quality?

Rating: ________

Comments:________________________________________________________________

4. How responsive was the Contractor to your contract requirements?

Rating: ________

Comments:___________________________________________________________________

5. In summary would you choose to describe the quality of their services and overall performance as:

____ a. (EX);

____ b. (VG);

____ c. (G);

____ d. (M); or

____ e. (U).