4.8.2020 Ammendment.docx
DOCX document 13 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PRESSURE VESSEL
- Solicitation number
- FA9101-20-Q-0026
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 4.7.2020 RFI Clarification.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4.2.2020-FA9101-20-Q-0026- ANSWER TO CLARIFICATION RFIs.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA9101-20-Q-0026 Final answers to RFI.2.docx | DOCX document | |
| VCT01619.01 W19 Dryer_Page_2.jpg | JPG image | |
| FA9101-20-Q-0026 Final answers to RFI.docx | DOCX document | |
| VCT01619.01 W19 Dryer_Page_1.jpg | JPG image | |
| VCT01619.01 W19 Dryer_Page_3.jpg | JPG image | |
| FA9101-20-Q-0026 Pressure Vessel Combined Synopsis Solicitation.docx | DOCX document | |
| Final-15027-20-001A Supply New Code Stamped Pressure Vessel for the W19 Dryer SOW.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
4.8.2020 Amendment
Q. We completely understand the sections of code, with an air receiver that can be categorized under ‘non-corrosive service’ is one thing, the part that caused the question is the internal corrosion allowance of 1/16” per section 3.11F of the specification. If it can be categorized at noncorrosive service then why is there an internal corrosion alliance?
Please advise if the corrosion allowance can be removed?
· A.- Do not remove the corrosion allowance requirement.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .