FA8650-13-R-4016-PastPerf-Quest.doc

DOC document 72 KB Posted

Attached to
AFRL/RYD Maintenance & Fabrication of Experimental Processing & Test Equipment Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8650-13-R-4016
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Research Laboratory

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to AFRL/RYD Maintenance & Fabrication of Experimental Processing & Test Equipment, newest first.
File Type Posted
Questions_ _Answers_5_16_13.doc DOC document
RFP_Amd_0003_5_20_2013.pdf PDF
RFP_Amd_0003_Atch_6_Extended_Pricing_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA8650-13-R-4016-0002-Atch6.xls XLS spreadsheet
FA8650-13-R-4016-0002-Q As.doc DOC document
FA8650-13-R-4016-0002.pdf PDF
FA8650-13-R-4016-0001-Atch8.txt TXT text file
FA8650-13-R-4016-0001-Atch6.xls XLS spreadsheet
FA8650-13-R-4016-0001-Atch3.pdf PDF
FA8650-13-R-4016-0001-Atch1.doc DOC document
FA8650-13-R-4016-0001-Attendees.doc DOC document
FA8650-13-R-4016-0001.pdf PDF
FA8650-13-R-4016-0001-Q As.doc DOC document
FA8650-13-R-4016-Site-Visit.doc DOC document
FA8650-13-R-4016-RFP.pdf PDF
FA8650-13-R-4016-QASP.doc DOC document
FA8650-13-R-4016-Consent.doc DOC document
FA8650-13-R-4016-Req-Perf-Info.pdf PDF
FA8650-13-R-4016-HistLab-Cats.doc DOC document
FA8650-13-R-4016-Ext-Price-Wkst.xls XLS spreadsheet
FA8650-13-R-4016-CDRLs.pdf PDF
FA8650-13-R-4016-PWS.doc DOC document
Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: ______________________________________________________________________________

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________

C. Contract number: _______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: _________________________

J. Description of service provided:______________________________________________________________

SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: _________________________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _______________________________________________________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: _________________________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: ______________________________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ___________________________________________________________________

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE

PERFORMANCE LEVEL

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

B
P
G
Y
R
N

Technical Performance

T1 Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.

T2. Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts

T3 Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts

T4 Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements

T5 Ability to implement current standard practices, Preventative Maintenance/ Preventative Maintenance Inspection Program, user training, etc.

T6 Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures, training

Program Management

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements

P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

P7. Effectiveness of material management

P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management

P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

B
P
G
Y
R
N

Transition/phase-in

T/PI1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T/PI2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

Employee Retention/Attraction

E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.

Cost Performance

C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), P/VG (Purple/Very Good), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___

No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract? ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature

Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:

AFRL/RQKE

Attn: Jackie Perkins

2310 Eighth Street, Bldg. 167

Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433-7108 Or FAX to:

937-255-8100

AFRL/RQKE, Attn: Jackie Perkins

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .