L-2_Past_Performance_QuestionnaireV2.pdf

PDF 55 KB Posted

Attached to
Guardian Angel Tech Recovery Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8629-17-R-5003
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Wright Patterson Air Force Base

About this file

This document is the updated L-2 Pat Performance Questionnaire.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Guardian Angel Tech Recovery, newest first.
File Type Posted
Summary_of_Changes_Amend_0003_-_3_Oct_17.pdf PDF
Tech_Recovery_III_Section_L_LPTA_-_Revision_2.pdf PDF
Responses_to_Industry_Questions_-_3_Oct_17.pdf PDF
FA8629-17-R-5300_0003.pdf PDF
Summary_of_Changes_Under_Amendment_-_FA8629-17-R-5003_0002_-_26_Sep_17.pdf PDF
Responses_to_Industry_Questions_26_Sep_17.pdf PDF
L-5_Tech_Recovery_III_SRD_-_26_Sep_17.pdf PDF
FA8629-17-R-5003_0002.pdf PDF
L-4_Technical_Recovery_III_Pricing_Matrix_Protected_26_Sep_17.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Summary_of_Changes_-_FA8629-17-R-5003;_Amend_0001_-_18_Sep_17.pdf PDF
Responses_to_Industry_Questions_-_18_Sep_2017.pdf PDF
L-4_Technical_Recovery_III_Pricing_Matrix_Protected_18_Sep_17.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Tech_Recovery_III_Section_L_LPTA_-_18_Sep_17.pdf PDF
FA8629-17-R-5003_0001.pdf PDF
Tech_Recovery_III_Section_M_LPTA_-_18_Sep_17.pdf PDF
L-5_Tech_Recovery_III_SRD_-11_Sep_17_Signed.pdf PDF
L-2_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_-_18_Sep_17.pdf PDF
Responses_to_Questions.pdf PDF
ppi_tool.accdb —
Questions.pdf PDF
Tech_Recovery_III_Section_L.pdf PDF
L-1_PPI_Tool_Instructions.pdf PDF
Model_Delivery_Order.pdf PDF
Cover_Letter.pdf PDF
L-5_Tech_Recovery_III_SRD.pdf PDF
L-4_Technical_Recovery_III_Pricing_Matrix_Protected_20170425.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Tech_Recovery_III_Section_L.pdf PDF
L-2_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
L-7_Technical_Recovery_Current_Kit_Count.pdf PDF
L-3_Pricing_Cross_Reference_Matrix.pdf PDF
Tech_Recovery_III_Section_M.pdf PDF
Model_Contract.pdf PDF
General_Notes_for_Technical_Recovery_III.pdf PDF
L-6_Tech_Recovery_Proposal_Cross_Reference_Matrix_20170426.pdf PDF
Brand_Name_JA_.pdf PDF
Show all 35

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SECTION L, ATTACHMENT 2: Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

Please complete Questionnaire Sections 1-5 below.

WHEN COMPLETED, THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION

SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104.

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:

C. Contract number:

D. Contract type:

E. Was this a competitive contract?

F. Period of Performance:

G. Initial contract cost:

H. Current/final contract cost:

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, ie local, nationwide, worldwide, MAJCOM:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Evaluator’s name:

C. Evaluator’s title:

D. Evaluator’s phone/fax number:

E. Evaluator’s email:

F. Name of Company Being Rated:

G. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Level

B

BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL

The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

P

PURPLE/VERY GOOD

The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

G

GREEN/SATISFACTORY

The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Y

YELLOW/MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R

RED/UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE Unable to provide a score.

Training B P G Y R N TR1. Ability to develop realistic, mission based training scenarios.

TR2. Ability to conduct rescue training in the following disciplines:

Confined space, structural collapse, and light/heavy extrication.

TR3. Ability to conduct training courses safely and effectively.

SRD Compliance B P G Y R N

SRD1. Ability to procure equipment meeting contractual specifications.

SRD2. Ability to kit and deliver equipment to location both CONUS and OCONUS.

Annual Maintenance and Service Visits (AMSVs) B P G Y R N AMSV1 . Ability to perform maintenance to manufacturer specifications.

AMSV2 . Effectively track and report current and historical maintenance data including inventory levels using a data management system.

AMSV3. Ability to coordinate with operational units for scheduling.

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), P/VG (Purple/Very Good), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes Default Convenience Pending No Terminations

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor’s most negative aspects in the performance of the contract?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROMPT RESPONSE AND ASSISTANCE.

Please return this completed questionnaire no later than 15:00 EST on 01 September 2017 to: Email completed questionnaires to Lt Col John Wodochek john.wodochek@us.af.mil and Branden Jackson branden.jackson.1@us.af.mil mailto:john.wodochek@us.af.mil mailto:branden.jackson.1@us.af.mil

SECTION L, ATTACHMENT 2: Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PROMPT RESPONSE AND ASSISTANCE.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .