Sect L Atch 2 - Weapon System Integrity Matrix 24 Feb 10.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 249 KB Posted Feb 24, 2010

Attached to: KC-X Tanker Modernization Program Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: FA8625-10-R-6600
Issued by: Department of the Air Force Materiel Command

About this file

From the source

Sect L Atch 2 - Weapon System Integrity Matrix 24 Feb 10.xlsx

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to KC-X Tanker Modernization Program, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
KC-X RFP Questions and Answers 25 Jun 10.pdf	PDF	Jun 25, 2010
Sect J Atch 7 - VIQ Matrix 18 Jun 2010.pdf	PDF	Jun 24, 2010
Sect J Atch 9 - Option Matrix 18 Jun 2010.pdf	PDF	Jun 24, 2010
Reference Library Summary.pdf	PDF	Jun 24, 2010
Sect M Evaluation Factors for Award 18 Jun 2010.pdf	PDF	Jun 24, 2010
Reference Library 24 Feb 2010 Revision 2.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Jun 24, 2010
Sect J Atch 3 - Production SOO 18 Jun 2010.pdf	PDF	Jun 24, 2010
Sect L Instruction to Offerors 24 Jun 2010.pdf	PDF	Jun 24, 2010
Sect L Atch 1 - Correlation Matrix 18 Jun 2010.pdf	PDF	Jun 24, 2010
Sect L Atch 17 - MILCON Evaluation Plan 18 Jun 2010.pdf	PDF	Jun 24, 2010
KC-X RFP Questions and Answers 28 May 10.pdf	PDF	May 28, 2010
KC-X RFP Questions and Answers 18 May 10.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2010
FA8625-10-R-6600 Amend 0003.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2010
Sect J Atch 2 - EMD SOO 4 May 10.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2010
Sect L - Instructions to Offerors 4 May 10.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2010
Sect L Atch 1 - Correlation Matrix 4 May 10.pdf	PDF	May 18, 2010
Sect L Atch 17 - MILCON Evaluation Plan 22 Apr 10.pdf	PDF	Apr 29, 2010
Sect J Exhibit A - A086 22 Apr 10.pdf	PDF	Apr 29, 2010
Sect L Instruction to Offerors 22 Apr 10.pdf	PDF	Apr 29, 2010
Sect J Atch 3 - Prod SOO 22 Apr 10.pdf	PDF	Apr 29, 2010
Sect L Atch 18 - PPI Tool.mdb	MDB file	Apr 29, 2010
Sect L Atch 1 - SOO - Sec L - Sec M Correlation Matrix 22 Apr 10.pdf	PDF	Apr 29, 2010
Reference Library 24 Feb 10 Revision 1 - 20100429.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 29, 2010
Sect L Atch 3 - Cost Price Evaluation Workbook 22 Apr 10.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 29, 2010
KC-X RFP Questions and Answers 29 Apr 10.pdf	PDF	Apr 29, 2010
Amendment 1.pdf	PDF	Mar 11, 2010
Sect L Atch 1 - Correlation Matrix 24 Feb 10.pdf	PDF	Feb 24, 2010
Sect L Atch 4 - Requirements Prioritization 24 Feb 10.pdf	PDF	Feb 24, 2010
Sect J Atch 1 - SRD 24 Feb 10.pdf	PDF	Feb 24, 2010
Sect J Atch 8 - TMCR - TM-86-01N 24 Feb 10.doc	DOC document	Feb 24, 2010
Sect L Atch 14 - Past Performance Questionnaire Tracking Record 24 Feb 10.pdf	PDF	Feb 24, 2010
Sect L Atch 11 - Past Performance Questionnaire Cover Letter 24 Feb 10.pdf	PDF	Feb 24, 2010
Sect J Exhibit A - EMD NON-OMIT CDRLs 24 Feb 10.docx	DOCX document	Feb 24, 2010
Sect L Atch 9 - Past Performance Factsheets 24 Feb 10.pdf	PDF	Feb 24, 2010
Sect J Atch 9 - Option Matrix 24 Feb 10.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Feb 24, 2010
Sect J Atch 7 - VIQ Option Matrix 24 Feb 10.docx	DOCX document	Feb 24, 2010
Sect L Atch 12 - Past Performance Client Authorization Letter 24 Feb 10.pdf	PDF	Feb 24, 2010
Sect L Atch 3 - Cost Price Evaluation Workbook 24 Feb 10.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Feb 24, 2010
Sect J Exhibit C - Prod NON-OMIT CDRLs 24 Feb 10.docx	DOCX document	Feb 24, 2010
Sect L Atch 7 - IFARA Data Input Package 24 Feb 10.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Feb 24, 2010
Sect M - Eval Factors for Award 24 Feb 10.pdf	PDF	Feb 24, 2010
Sect L Atch 16 - CEO Certification Letter Template 24 Feb 10.pdf	PDF	Feb 24, 2010
Sect J Atch 4 - DD254 24 Feb 10.pdf	PDF	Feb 24, 2010
Sect L Atch 10 - Past Performance Questionnaire 24 Feb 10.pdf	PDF	Feb 24, 2010
Reference Library 24 Feb 10.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Feb 24, 2010
Sect J Atch 3 - Prod SOO 24 Feb 10.pdf	PDF	Feb 24, 2010
Sect L Atch 17 - MILCON Evaluation Plan 24 Feb 10.pdf	PDF	Feb 24, 2010
Sect J Atch 6 - IMP 24 Feb 10.docx	DOCX document	Feb 24, 2010
Sect J Atch 5 - AFMC Form 158 24 Feb 10.pdf	PDF	Feb 24, 2010
FA8625-10-R-6600 24 Feb 10.pdf	PDF	Feb 24, 2010

Show all 50

KC-X Tanker Modernization Program has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Preamble “Preamble” to System Integrity Documents

The attached tables provide guidance in developing a life cycle approach to product integrity during design, development, and production, and throughout system sustainment.

WSI-I is a summary table of the product integrity activities required for a weapon system. WSI-II through AVIP-II define life cycle product integrity activities/tasks for specific technical products/areas: weapon system, airframe structures, engine/propulsion, air vehicle mechanical equipment and subsystems, and avionics. These worksheets are used to develop and implement design integrity. These tables may be tailored to the individual program and should be flowed down to lower tier suppliers. When used in conjunction with the ITO's Section L&M form the basis to implement weapon system integrity at the program level. This approach should then be reflected in the contractual documentation for government to prime and prime to sub-contractors (i.e, SOW, IMP, specification(s), contractual program reviews, product acceptance criteria, etc). It is highly encouraged that key design qualification results be incrementally added to the verification section of the contractual specifications (via reference to test and/or analysis reports, etc) prior to the completion of the system verification review (SVR) or equivalent.

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT D. Releaseable to DoD and DoD contractors.

The Drop down menu lists are located below the table on each sheet. Items A through S of the drop down list may be tailored by the offeror to address their specific Standard Operating Propecdures (SOPs) or related activities to the Air Force Integrity Programs. The drop down menus appear next to the cells labeled "baseline" and "KC-X" within each Integrity Program's table II.

FA8625-10-R-6600	Section L, Attachment 2
24 Feb 2010	Page &P of &N

WSI - I

	WSI Tasks & Elements
	This table is an update to Table I of MIL-HDBK-515, Weapon Systems Integrity Guide. It is summary of the types of activities that constitute System Integrity design. The implementation of these tasks are detailed within each of the Integrity process MIL-STDs, MIL-HDBKs, and/or Guidance Documents. This table is not to be placed on contract.
Access WSI documents	Preliminary Planning & Design Information	Design Analyses & Development Tests	Full Scale Testing	Force Management Data Package	Force Management
System Criteria	Modeling & simulation results available	Soaftware & Hardware metrics defined & Implemented	Functional requirements verified by qualification results	SW development environment/resources/tools	Assess current fleet health
	System speification approved	Interoperatibility ICDs and IERs established	Flight Test EIRT complete	Product acceptance criteria availalble	Define configuration (A/C and parts)
	Computing system & software requirements baselined	Functional requirements allocated	Configuration documents current and complete	HW &SW products configuration baseline
	Analysis of alternatives complete	System & software test plans developed	Test facilities and resources sufficient	Formal product baseline established
Planning and Coordination	Master Plan with schedule established	Master Plan updated	Master Plan updated	Master Plan updated	Master Plan updated
	Corrosion Prevention & Control Plan established	Corrosion Prevention & Control Plan implemented
	Diagnostic capability established	Diagnostic requirements allocated
	Reliability & Maintainability program plan established	Reliability & Maintainability program plan available
Design Criteria	Design criteria established	Design criteria updated from analysis	Design criteria updated from test results	Life limits & maintenance requirements adjusted for changes in criteria	Field operation monitored for loads and usage
	- Service life	Installed design criteria defined
	- Usage
	- Loads
Characterizing the Environment	Environment characterized	Environments defined for installed locations	Environment surveys conducted	Life limits & maintenance requirements adjusted for changes in environments	Field operation monitored for environments
Characterizing Materials	Critical product characteristics identified	Properties identified	Materials selected	Material application and selection decisions
	Critical material characteristics identified	Select materials based on critical characteristics

Characterizing Production and Quality Manufacturing plan initiated Mfg plan updated Mfg plan implemented Repair process

			Baseline manufacturing processes identified	Key characteristics and processes defined	Manufacturing process control levels established
- Tolerance sensitivity quality control established for critical parameters	Key characteristics and processes
			Quality control capabilities identified	Variability requirements established	Process control levels verified	List of non-conformities (production inspection log)
				Quality control capabilities updated	Quality control levels verified
					Deviation & waiver tracking system established
		Identification and Tracking of Critical Items	Items classified per criticality	Critical Items Identified	Critical item controls & tracking system implemented	Critical Items list updated	Critical Items managed
			Critical Item controls & tracking plan established
		Analysis	Reliability & maintainability reqts established and allocated	Analysis completed for	FMECA updated	Reliability & maintainability predictions updated	Estimated stress to actuals compared for
			Functional FMECA conducted	- Performance/Functional		FMECA updated	- Loads, usage and environments
				- Strength			- Life estimate
				- Durability			- Lead the fleet evaluation for service life extension
				- Damage tolerance
				- Environment
				- Flutter
				- Failure modes and effects
				- Reliability & maintainability
				- HRI

Test and Demonstrations		Component development tests conducted for high risk items	JRMET/ORMET	Relaibility & maintainability prediction updated with test/field data
		Diagnostic testing defined	Tests completed for	FMECA updated with test/field data
			- Performance/ Functional	Relaibility & maintainability prediction updated with test/field data
		FRACAS implemented	- Strength
			- Durability
			- Damage tolerance
			- Environment
			- Flutter
			- Reliability & maintainability
			- Failure modes and effects
			- Diagnostics
Life Management	Operation/support concept defined	Life limited items identified	Life limited items updated	Final analyses documented	Tracking systems in place for
	Individual air vehicle tracking program plan established	Scheduled maintenance & inspection actions identified	Scheduled maintenance actions updated	Loads/Environment spectra survey documented	- Individual Aircraft Tracking Data
	Data storage, analysis, and tools defined	Individual air vehicle tracking requirements established	Individual air vehicle tracking program implemented	Individual air vehicle tracking program updated	- Repairs/removals
	Force Maintenance Plan established	Force Maintenance Plan available	Force Data Maintenance Package draft	Force Data Maintenance Package available	- Inspections
					- Overhauls
					Force Maintenance implemented
					Force Data Maintenance Package updated

FA8625-10-R-6600	Section L, Attachment 2
24 Feb 2010	Page &P of &N

https://www.en.wpafb.af.mil/setools/web_base_tools.asp

WSI - II

Completion Schedule for WSI Tasks & Elements

Access WSI documents

This table is a supplement to MIL-HDBK-515 and the Technical Reviews/Audits for Aeronautical Weapon System Guide. It identifies, by phase, the system level tasks needed to be completed to allow the contributing Integrity processes to be implemented. This table should be tailored to reflect the type of acquisition and system maturity and is intended to aid in identifying IMP items and exit criteria for technical reviews/audits. Since Weapons System Integrity addresses acquisition and sustainment, it is necessary to involve all integrity stakeholders when defining activities, roles, and responsibilities. Supporting information is provided in Military Handbook 515 and the Technical Review/Audits Guide. In the event of a conflict or disagreement with the information in this table and Military Handbook 515, this table takes precedent."

MILESTONES >>>	Pre MS A	A	B							C
ACQ PHASES >>>	Concept Refinement	Technology Development	System Development & Demonstration							Production & Deployment	Operations & Support
REVIEWS & AUDITS >>>		SRR	SDR [SFR]	SSR	PDR	CDR	TRR	FCA [SVR]	PRR	PCA
		System Requirements Review	System Design Review [a.k.a. System Functional Review]	Software Specification Review	Preliminary Design Review	Critical Design Review	Test Readiness Review	Functional Configuration Audit [a.k.a. System Verification Review]	Production Readiness Review	Physical Configuration Audit
WSI TASKS

(similar MIL-HDBK-515)

>>>

Design Information

Design Analysis & Development Tests

Full Scale Testing

Force Management Data Package

Force Management

System Criteria

1. JCIDS Analyses available

1. System Architecture/CONOPS defined

1. Interoperability requirements defined

1. CSCI requirements, including derived requirements and interfaces/IERs, defined and baselined

1. Interoperability ICDs and Information exchange requirements (IERs) top level design completed

1. Interoperability ICDs and IERs design complete

1. Completed/approved test plans, descriptions, procedures, and cases

1. Review of qualification results verifies functional reqmt's (Cat 1) have been achieved and documented

1. Verify Manufacturing plans complete

1. Verify the as-built configuration matches the Category 3 definition

Baseline

KC-X

2. Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) available

2. Modeling & Simulation trade results

2. Information exchange requirements (IERs) established

2. Rigorous software development process defined and controlled which supports safety critical processing

2. Integration and test facilities req'ts defined and initial system & software test plans defined

2. Integration & test facility design complete (hardware and software) sufficient to support integration and test

2. Completed identification & coord. of required test resources

2. Establish system/software fitness for intended use - e.g resolution of DRs

2. Verify build-to packages work/inspection instructions, and process specs match Cat 3 dwgs

2. Review/document variances, approved changes

Baseline

KC-X

3. Analysis of Alternatives initiated

3. Analysis of Alternatives updated

3. Integration facilities identified

3. System/Software engineering environment defined and mature, including design, code and test tools

3. Requirements allocation analysis supports JCIDS CDD

3. Category 2 information complete and traceability verified across product supplier tree

3. Verify previous software, component, subsystem, & system test results acceptable

3. Review and document all variances

3. Quality management system in place including QA policies/ procedures

3. Establish formal product baseline

Baseline

KC-X

4. Preliminary Sys Performance Spec approved (Cat 1 information)

4. Category 1 allocation status & specification tree defined

4. Integrated block/build OFP release process defined

4. Category 1 requirements and spec tree baselined

4. Category 3 hardware drawing release 90% complete

4. Test risk assessment and mitigation results at acceptable level for start of test

4. Version Description Document indicating compatible software and hardware components verified

4. Assessment of capability, capacity: Manuf Ops, Subcontracts & Mat'l, Product Design and Test, Tooling

4. Software design and product definition data (documentation) complete, verified and baselined against the as-built software configuration

Baseline

KC-X

5. System Interfaces Studies evaluated

- Preliminary functional baseline for H/W, S/W, and firmware all levels

5. Traceability of software requirements to higher tier specification defined

5. Initial Category 2 information defined to support Category 1

5. Risk assessment and system/software metrics support CDR maturity assessment

5. First Flight EIRT actions resolved

5. Verify product acceptance criteria are defined and complete

Baseline

KC-X

6. Sys Rqmts sufficiently detailed to enable system functional define & decomposition

5. Analysis of alternatives updated

6. Phased hardware and software metrics defined and implemented

6. Draft Category 3 hardware drawings defined to support Category 1 & 2

6. Analysis of Alternatives validates CDR design

6. Test article configuration and facilities defined and controlled and sufficient to support testing within the defined schedule

Baseline

KC-X

7. CS&S level software requirements defined in system Specification

6. Computer systems and software architecture defined which supports safety critical processing (partitioning, redundancy, fault tolerance)

7. Software verification requirements defined

7. Analysis of Alternatives/trade options updated to reflect PDR

7. Critical Safety Items and Critical Application Items identified

7. DR/problem reports support readiness for system level testing

Baseline

KC-X

8. Draft Product Support Plan

8. Software detailed designs, including detailed interfaces defined supporting safety critical function requirements

Baseline

KC-X

9. Software and hardware metrics statused

9. System and software test plans and descriptions complete

Baseline

KC-X

10. Risk management plan and SE metrics defined and linked to EVMS

Baseline

KC-X

11. Software test and integration plans defined for all software levels of test and integration

Baseline

KC-X

12. Software top-level designs defined supporting safety critical function requirements

Baseline

KC-X

13. Rigorous software development process which supports safety critical processing implemented

Baseline

KC-X

Planning and Coordination

1. Initial software size, schedule, and effort estimated

1. WSI master plan and schedule identified

1. WSI Master Plan Available

1. Update software size, effort, and schedule estimates

1. WSI Master Plan updated

Baseline

KC-X

- Applicable IP identified

2. Integrated test plan available

2. Analyze and verify compatible software size, effort and schedule baseline

2. Integrated Test Plan updated

2. Integrated Test Plan completed

Baseline

KC-X

2. Integrated test plan identified

3. WSI corrosion control plan available

3. Update CS&S risks and integrate into program risk assessment

3. Corrosion plan update

3. Corrosion plan completed

Baseline

KC-X

3. WSI corrosion control plan identified

4. Reliability & Maintainability program plan available

4. Reliability & Maintainability program plan updated

4. Reliability & Maintainability program plan completed

Baseline

KC-X

4. Reliability & Maintainability program plan identified

5. Logistics support plan draft available

5. Logistics support plan updated

Baseline

KC-X

5. Logistics support plan identified

6. FRACA system identified

6. JRMET/ORMET Charter identified

6. JRMET/ORMET Charter updated

Baseline

KC-X

6. Software development size, schedule, and effort estimate refined

7. Reliability growth test plan identified

7. Reliability growth test plan updated

Baseline

KC-X

7. Analyze and verify compatible software size, effort and schedule baselines

8. FRACA system available

Baseline

KC-X

8. Initial Computer Systems and Software (CS&S) risks identified and integrated into program risk management process

9. Hardware and Software resource-loaded schedules defined

Baseline

KC-X

Design Criteria

1. Mission Profiles defined

1. Flight envelop defined

1. Flight envelop completed

1. Update operational employment

Baseline

KC-X

2. Design service life defined

- Tactics/maneuvers defined

2. Usage completed

Baseline

KC-X

3. Ground operation/usage defined

- Egress/Ingress defined

3. Ground operations completed

Baseline

KC-X

- Operating to flight hour ratios

2. Usage defined (SGR, Mission mix, etc.)

4. Threat effects completed

Baseline

KC-X

- Battle field operations/conditions

- Internal/external stores mix

Baseline

KC-X

- Training

3. Ground operations defined (maintenance, training, ground idle, etc.)

Baseline

KC-X

4. Threat effects defined (e.g., External EMI, EMC, EMP, Lightening, Directed Energy, Weapons, etc)

Baseline

KC-X

Characterizing the Environment

1. Environmental Criteria Document defined

1. ECD updated

1. ECD completed

1. Update operational environment

Baseline

KC-X

- Natural Environment

- Bay by bay design crit

2. Shelter environment completed

Baseline

KC-X

- Induced Environment

2. Shelter environment updated

3. Storage environment completed

Baseline

KC-X

- Basing

3. Storage environment updated

Baseline

KC-X

- Shelters

Baseline

KC-X

2. Shelter environment defined

Baseline

KC-X

3. Storage environment defined

Baseline

KC-X

Characterizing Materials

1. List of Preliminary Key Characteristics identified

Baseline

KC-X

2. Quality control levels identified for:

a. Safety of flight items

		Baseline
		KC-X
		b. Mission critical items
		Baseline
		KC-X
		c. Durability critical items
		Baseline
		KC-X
Characterizing Production and Quality	1. MFG effects of critical parts defined		1. System and Software Engineering Environment sustainment plan to address issues of DMS and Technology refresh established
	Baseline		Baseline
	KC-X		KC-X
	2. Quality assurance plan defined
	Baseline
	KC-X
Identification and Tracking of Critical Items		1. Critical items database defined		1. Critical items database updated	1. Critical items database completed
		Baseline		Baseline	Baseline
		KC-X		KC-X	KC-X
				2. Critical parts control/tracking implemented
				Baseline
				KC-X
Analysis	1. Reliability growth requirements defined	1. R&M baseline comparable items identified		1. R&M baseline completed	1. Reliability growth analysis completed					1. Update ESS, HALT, HAAS selection and criteria
	Baseline	Baseline		Baseline	Baseline					Baseline
	KC-X	KC-X		KC-X	KC-X					KC-X
	2. FMECA requirements defined	- ESS, HALT, HASS selection & criteria		2. Air Vehicle FMECA completed	2. Air Vehicle FMECA completed					2. Field data analysis
	Baseline	Baseline		Baseline	Baseline					Baseline
	KC-X	KC-X		KC-X	KC-X					KC-X
	3. Reliability & maintenance allocations, assessments, and analysis (RMAAA) defined	2. R&M requirements allocated		3. R&MAAA completed	3. R&MAAA completed
	Baseline	Baseline		Baseline	Baseline
	KC-X	KC-X		KC-X	KC-X
	4. Diagnostic requirements defined	3. Diagnostic requirements allocated		4. R&M flight test & Operational database defined	4. R&M flight test & operational database updated
	Baseline	Baseline		Baseline	Baseline
	KC-X	KC-X		KC-X	KC-X
Test and Demonstrations	1. Integrated test requirements and resources identified	1. Integrated test resources defined	1. S/SEE performance and readiness verified for use	1. Integrated test resources updated	1. Integrated test resources finalized	1. JRMET activities	1. JRMET activities	1. JRMET activities	1. JRMET activities	1. ORMET activities
	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline
	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X
	2. Reliability demonstrations identified	- Verified facility capabilities		2. Reliability demonstration list updated	2. Reliability demonstration list finalized				2. ORMET activities
	Baseline	Baseline		Baseline	Baseline				Baseline
	KC-X	KC-X		KC-X	KC-X				KC-X
	3. Maintainability demonstrations identified	- Accept/reject criteria		3. Maintainability demonstration list updated	3. Maintainability demonstration list finalized
	Baseline	Baseline		Baseline	Baseline
	KC-X	KC-X		KC-X	KC-X
		- Test environment
		Baseline
		KC-X
		2. Reliability demonstration list updated
		Baseline
		KC-X
		3. Maintainability demonstration list updated
		Baseline
		KC-X
Life Management	1. Data tracking requirements for life usage defined	1. On-board data collection system defined		1. On-board computing resource requirements defined	1. Air Vehicle data parameters defined					1. Force Maintenance implemented
	Baseline	Baseline		Baseline	Baseline					Baseline
	KC-X	KC-X		KC-X	KC-X					KC-X
	2. On-board data collection & analysis requirements defined	2. Off-board data collection & Storage system defined		- Processing, storage, and analysis tools, etc.	- Environmental, etc.
	Baseline	Baseline		Baseline	Baseline
	KC-X	KC-X		KC-X	KC-X
	3. Off-board data analysis & storage requirements defined	3. Force Management plan updated		2. Off-board computing resource requirements defined	2. Force Management plan updated
	Baseline	Baseline		Baseline	Baseline
	KC-X	KC-X		KC-X	KC-X
	4. Initial Force Management Plan defined	4. Life-cycle software support data requirements defined		- Processing, storage, and analysis tools, etc.	3. Force Data Management Package Drafted
	Baseline	Baseline		Baseline	Baseline
	KC-X	KC-X		KC-X	KC-X
				3. Force Management plan updated
				Baseline
				KC-X
				4. Force Management package outlined
				Baseline
				KC-X

REVIEWS & AUDITS >>>		SRR	SDR [SFR]	SSR	PDR	CDR	TRR	FCA [SVR]	PRR	PCA
ACQ PHASES >>>	Concept Refinement	Technology Development	System Development & Demonstration							Production & Deployment	Operations & Support
MILESTONES >>>	Pre MS A	A	B							C

FA8625-10-R-6600	Section L, Attachment 2
24 Feb 2010	Page &P of &N

../../../../../516AESW1/A3GLOBE/kcx-eval/RFP--FA8625-10-R-6600/4-Final%20RFP/Documents%20and%20Settings/cochrarb/cochrarb/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/cochrarb/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/Documents%20and%20Settings/vesciodl/Local%20Settings/Documents%20and%20Settings/wagnergj/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/OLK74F/WSIhttps://www.en.wpafb.af.mil/setools/web_base_tools.asp WSI-II System Criteria defs The information below is additional information related to the WSI - II tab.

FA8625-10-R-6600	Section L, Attachment 2
24 Feb 2010	Page &P of &N

ASIP - II 1530C

Completion Schedule for ASIP Tasks & Elements

Accesss ASIP Documents

This table shows the general alignment between: 1) Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP) Tasks & Elements [as specified in MIL-STD-1530C], 2) phases of major acquisition programs, and 3) major technical reviews and audits. This table is intended to aid in identifying IMP items and exit criteria for technical reviews. Creation of an ASIP program MUST follow the direction provided by MIL-STD-1530C, AFPD 63-10, and AFI 63-1001.

MILESTONES >>>

ACQ PHASES >>>

Technology Development

System Development & Demonstration

Production & Deployment

Operations & Support

REVIEWS & AUDITS >>>

SRR

SDR [SFR]

SSR

PDR

CDR

TRR

FCA [SVR]

PRR

PCA

System Requirements Review

System Design Review

[a.k.a. System Functional Review]

Software Specification Review

Preliminary Design Review

Critical Design Review

Test Readiness Review

Functional Configuration Audit

[a.k.a. System Verification Review]

Production Readiness Review

Physical Configuration Audit

ASIP TASKS >>> (per MIL-STD-1530C)

I - Design Information

II - Design Analysis & Development Testing

III - Full Scale Testing

IV - Certification & Force Management Development

V - Force Management Execution

5.1.1 ASIP Master Plan

5.2.1 Materials & Joint Allowables

5.2.6 Damage Tolerance Analysis

5.2.8 Corrosion Assessment

5.3.1 Static Tests

5.3.3 Flight Tests

5.4.2 Strength Summary & Operating Restrictions

5.5.1 Individual Aircraft Tracking (IAT) Program

Baseline

KC-X

5.1.2 Design Service Life and Design Usage

5.2.2 Loads Analysis

5.2.7 Durability Analysis

5.2.9 Sonic Fatigue Analysis

5.3.2 First Flight Verification Ground Tests

5.3.4 Durability Tests

5.4.3 Force Structural Maintenance Plan (FSMP)

5.5.2 Rotorcraft Dynamic Component Tracking (RDCT) Program

Baseline

KC-X

5.1.3 Structural Design Criteria

5.2.3 Design Service Loads Spectra

5.2.11 Aeroelastic & Aeroservolelastic Analysis

5.2.10 Vibration Analysis

5.3.6 Damage Tolerance Tests

5.4.6 Rotorcraft Dynamic Component Tracking (DCT) Program Development

5.5.3 Loads/Environment Spectra Survey (L/ESS)

Baseline

KC-X

5.1.4 Damage Tolerance & Durability Control

5.2.4 Design Chemical/Thermal Environment Spectra

5.2.13 Survivability Analysis

5.3.7 Climatic Tests

5.4.5 Individual Aircraft Tracking (IAT) Program Development

5.5.4 ASIP Manual

Baseline

KC-X

5.1.5 Corrosion Prevention & Control

5.2.5 Stress Analysis

5.2.15 Production NDI Capability Assessment

5.3.8 Interpretation & Evaluation of Test Results

5.4.4 Loads/ Environment Spectra Survey (L/ESS) Program Development

5.5.5 Aircraft Structural Records

Baseline

KC-X

5.1.6 Nondestructive Inspection Program

5.2.12 Mass Properties Analysis

5.2.16 Initial Risk Analysis

5.4.1 Certification Analysis

5.5.6 Force Management Updates

Baseline

KC-X

5.1.7 Selection of Materials, Processes, Joining Methods, & Structural Concepts

5.2.14 Design Development Tests

5.5.7 Recertification

Baseline

KC-X

REVIEWS & AUDITS >>>

SRR

SDR [SFR]

SSR

PDR

CDR

TRR

FCA [SVR]

PRR

PCA

ACQ PHASES >>>

Technology Development

System Development & Demonstration

Production & Deployment

Operations & Support

MILESTONES >>>

FA8625-10-R-6600	Section L, Attachment 2
24 Feb 2010	Page &P of &N

Notes:

1. Position of ASIP Elements corresponds to intended time of (initial) completion. Updates to initially completed ASIP Elements may be required. Refer to MIL-STD-1530C Table II for additional guidance.

2. Numbers preceding ASIP Element titles refer to the applicable MIL-STD-1530C paragraph.

https://www.en.wpafb.af.mil/setools/web_base_tools.asp

PSIP - II

Completion Schedule for PSIP: Engine Structures Tasks & Elements

Access PSIP Documents

This table shows the general alignment between: 1) Propulsion System Integrity Program (PSIP): Engine Structures, Performance and Operability, and Controls and Subsystems Tasks & Elements [as specified in MIL-STD-1783B], 2) phases of major acquisition programs, and 3) major technical reviews and audits. This table is intended to aid in identifying IMP items and exit criteria for technical reviews. Creation of an PSIP should use the guidance provided by MIL-STD-1783B. Supporting information is provided in MIL-STD-1783B. In the event of a conflict or disagreement with the information in this table and MIL-STD-1783B, this table takes precedent.

MILESTONES>>>

ACQ PHASES>>>

Technology Development

System Development And Demonstration

Production & Deployment

Operations & Support

ENGINE REVIEWS & AUDITS >>>

SRR

SDR [SFR]

SSR

PDR

CDR

TRR

FCA [SVR]

PRR

PCA

System Requirements Review

System Design Review [a.k.a. System Functional Review]

Preliminary Design Review

Critical Design Review

Test Readiness Review

Functional Configuration Audit [a.k.a. System Verification Review]

Production Readiness Review

Physical Configuration Audit

Engine Structues TASKS >>>

I- Design Information and Development Planning

II - Design Characterization and Analysis

III - Component & Subsystem Tests

IV - Ground & Flight Engine Tests

V - Engine Life Management

Requirements: - Specification

ENSIP Master Plan Update

Component Tests:

Core Engine Tests:

Data Acquisition & Processing

Ground Tests:

- Thermal

DADT Controls

Structural Maintenance Plan Updates

Baseline

KC-X

Requirements: - Interface

Duty Cycle

Materials Characterization

- Strength

- Flutter

Test Limits

- Strength

Structural Maintenance Plan

Usage Surveys

Baseline

KC-X

Requirements:

- Regulatory

- Cost

Design Development Tests

Detailed Analyses:

- Vibration

- Aeromechanics

Special Test Equipment

- Durability

Individual Engine Tracking

Baseline

KC-X

Requirements management

Preliminary Analysis:

Durability

- Durability

- Thermals

Test Plan

- Damage Tolerance

Updated Analyses

Baseline

KC-X

Technical Reviews

- Thermal

Damage Tolerance

- Damage Tolerance

Instrumentation

- Accelerated Mission Testing

Lead the Force

Baseline

KC-X

PSIP Master Plan

- Strength

Strength

- Containment

- Aeromechanical & Clearances

Analytical Condition Inspections

Baseline

KC-X

- Containment

- Foreign Object Damage

- Rotor dynamics & Impedance

Updated ENSIP Master Plan

Baseline

KC-X

- Aeromechanics

- Ingestion

Baseline

KC-X

- Rotor dynamics

- Mass Properties

Baseline

KC-X

- Vibration

Flight Test:

Baseline

KC-X

- Loads

- Nacelle Temperatures

Baseline

KC-X

- Mass Properties

- Installed Vibration

Baseline

KC-X

Installed engine inspectability

- Deterioration

Baseline

KC-X

Manufacturing Process Controls

Validated Analyses:

Baseline

KC-X

- Strength

Baseline

KC-X

- Vibration

Baseline

KC-X

- Durability

Baseline

KC-X

- Damage Tolerance

Baseline

KC-X

ENSIP Master Plan Update

Baseline

KC-X

NDI Demonstration

Baseline

KC-X

Component and Core Test Results

Baseline

KC-X

REVIEWS & AUDITS >>>

SDR [SFR]

SRR

SSR

PDR

CDR

TRR

FCA [SVR]

PRR

PCA

MILESTONES >>>

Technology Development

System Development And Demonstration

Production & Deployment

Operations & Support

ACQ PHASES >>>

Completion Schedule for PSIP: Performance and Operability Tasks & Elements

Access PSIP Documents

MILESTONES>>>

ACQ PHASES>>>

Technology Development

System Development And Demonstration

Production & Deployment

Operations & Support

ENGINE REVIEWS & AUDITS >>>

SRR

SDR [SFR]

SSR

PDR

CDR

TRR

FCA [SVR]

PRR

PCA

System Requirements Review

System Design Review [a.k.a. System Functional Review]

Software Specification Review

Preliminary Design Review

Critical Design Review

Test Readiness Review

Functional Configuration Audit [a.k.a. System Verification Review]

Production Readiness Review

Physical Configuration Audit

ENSIP TASKS >>> (per MIL-HDBK-1783B CN2)

I- Design Information and Development Planning

II - Design Characterization and Analysis

III - Component & Subsystem Tests

IV - Ground & Flight Engine Tests

V - Engine Life Management

Initial Analysis

Updated Analysis

Rig Test Matirx

Full Scale Ground Test Matix

Flight Manual

Requirements: - Specification

Operating Envelope

Baseline

KC-X

Rig Test Descriptions

Tansient Response

Acceptance Test Procedures

Requirements: - Interface

Operating Environment

Baseline

KC-X

Rig Tests As Needed

Starting

Test Cell Calibrations

Requirements: - Regulatory

- Cost

Environmental Emissions

fan rigs

Baseline

KC-X

Stall Lines

Test Cell Data Reduction

Requirements management

Internal Environement

compressor rigs

Baseline

KC-X

Augmentor Tests

New Engine Trending

Technical Reviews

Inlet/Engine Compatibility

combustor sector and full annular rigs

Baseline

KC-X

Failure Detection and Accommodation

Pacer Program

PSIP Master Plan

Installation Demands

turbine cascade tests

Baseline

KC-X

Accelerated Mission Test

Overhauled Engine Trending

Exhaust System Compatibility

augmentor piliting and flameholder rigs

Baseline

KC-X

Alternate Fuels

V/STOL Installations

subscale nozzle tests

Baseline

KC-X

Operating Environments and Ingestion Tests

Survivability

Baseline

KC-X

Environmental Tests

Performance Model Development

Baseline

KC-X

Survivability Tests

Requirements Assessment

Baseline

KC-X

Inlet/Engine Compatibility

Risk Assessment

Baseline

KC-X

Shared System Testing

Failure Detection & Accommodation

Baseline

KC-X

Integrated Flight Propulsion Control Tests

Transient Simulation Development

Baseline

KC-X

Exhaust System Compatibility

Control Schedule Development

Baseline

KC-X

V/STOL Compatibility

Limits Assessment

Baseline

KC-X

Propeller/Rotor Compatibility

Stability

Baseline

KC-X

Jet Blast Deflectors

Stability Audit

Baseline

KC-X

Flight Tests

Baseline

KC-X

REVIEWS & AUDITS >>>

SRR

SDR [SFR]

SSR

PDR

CDR

TRR

FCA [SVR]

PRR

PCA

MILESTONES >>>

Technology Development

System Development And Demonstration

Production & Deployment

Operations & Support

ACQ PHASES >>>

Completion Schedule for PSIP: Controls and Subsystems Tasks & Elements

Technology Development

System Development And Demonstration

Production & Deployment

Operations & Support

SRR

SDR [SFR]

SSR

PDR

CDR

TRR

FCA [SVR]

PRR

PCA

System Requirements Review

System Design Review [a.k.a. System Functional Review]

Software Specification Review

Preliminary Design Review

Critical Design Review

Test Readiness Review

Functional Configuration Audit [a.k.a. System Verification Review]

Production Readiness Review

Physical Configuration Audit

I- Design Information and Development Planning

II - Design Characterization and Analysis

III - Component & Subsystem Tests

IV - Ground & Flight Engine Tests

V - Engine Life Management

Initial Analysis

Updated Analysis

Component Testing

Requirements: - Specification

Interface Definition

Circuit Breadboards

Electromagnetic Effects

Component Improvement Support

Baseline

KC-X

Baseline

KC-X

Baseline

KC-X

Requirements: - Interface

Functional Performance

Proof & Burst

Flight Test Installation Effects

Engineering Change Support

Baseline

KC-X

Baseline

KC-X

Baseline

KC-X

Requirements: - Regulatory

- Cost

Control law development

Environmental

Field Service Evaluation

Baseline

KC-X

Requirements management

Response and Stability

Vibration

Life Extension

Baseline

KC-X

Technical Reviews

Control System Models

Thermal Shock

Pacer Program

Baseline

KC-X

PSIP Master Plan

Fault Accommodation

Reliability Demo

Individual Engine Tracking

Baseline

KC-X

Computer Resources

Fit Checks

Overhaul/Repair

Baseline

KC-X

Power Usage

Subsystem Testing

Baseline

KC-X

Environmental Effects

Control Systems Rig

Baseline

KC-X

Software Development

Lubrication System Rig

Baseline

KC-X

Installation Effects

Initial EMI Checkout

Baseline

KC-X

Component Sizing

C&S Bench Qualification

Baseline

KC-X

Mechanical/Thermal Loads

Software Testing

Baseline

KC-X

Material Characterization

Logic Development

Baseline

KC-X

Damage Tolerance

Module Level

Baseline

KC-X

Vendor Selections

Code Development

Baseline

KC-X

Box (Control) Level

Baseline

KC-X

SRR	SDR [SFR]	SSR	PDR	CDR	TRR	FCA [SVR]	PRR	PCA
Technology Development	System Development And Demonstration							Production & Deployment	Operations & Support
A	B							C

FA8625-10-R-6600	Section L, Attachment 2
24 Feb 2010	Page &P of &N

Notes:

1. Position of ENSIP Elements corresponds to intended time of completion

Notes:

1. Position of PSIP Elements corresponds to intended time of completion

../../../../../516AESW1/A3GLOBE/kcx-eval/RFP--FA8625-10-R-6600/4-Final%20RFP/Documents%20and%20Settings/cochrarb/cochrarb/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/cochrarb/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/Documents%20and%20Settings/cochrarb/wagnergj/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/OLK74F/ENSIP../../../../../516AESW1/A3GLOBE/kcx-eval/RFP--FA8625-10-R-6600/4-Final%20RFP/Documents%20and%20Settings/cochrarb/cochrarb/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/cochrarb/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/Documents%20and%20Settings/cochrarb/wagnergj/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/OLK74F/ENSIP

MECSIP - II

Completion Schedule for MECSIP Tasks & Elements

Access MECSIP Documents

This table shows the alignment between: 1) MECSIP Tasks & Elements [as described in MIL-STD-1798A], 2) phases of major acquisition programs, and 3) major technical reviews and audits.

MILE-STONES >>>

ACQ PHASES >>>

Technology Development

System Development & Demonstration

Production & Deployment

Operations & Support

REVIEWS & AUDITS >>>

SRR

SFR [SDR]

SSR

PDR

CDR

TRR

FCA [SVR]

PRR

PCA

System Requirements Review

System Functional Review

[a.k.a. System Design Review]

Software Specification Review

Preliminary Design Review

Critical Design Review

Test Readiness Review

Functional Configuration Audit [a.k.a. System Verification Review]

Production Readiness Review

Physical Configuration Audit

MECSIP TASKS (per MIL-HDBK-1798A)

II - Design Analysis & Development Tests

III - Full Scale Testing

IV - Force Management Data Package

V - Force Management

Planning and Coordination

--Master Plan and Schedule Est.

--Master Plan and Schedule Upd.

--Master Plan (revisions)

Baseline

KC-X

Design Criteria	--Design Service Life/Design Usage Est.	--Finalized CSCI Reqs Est.	--Design Service Life/Design Usage Complete	--Design Criteria Upd. for Test Results	--Design Criteria Upd. for Survey Results	--Design Criteria Upd. for Lessons Learned	--Design Criteria Upd. for Lessons Learned
	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline
	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X
	--Design Criteria Est.		--Design Criteria Definitions Comp.	--Software Requirements Comp.
	Baseline		Baseline	Baseline
	KC-X		KC-X	KC-X
	--Software Reqs Est.		--Software Requirements Upd.
	Baseline		Baseline
	KC-X		KC-X
Characterizing the Environment	--Installed Location Environments Est.		--Installed Location Criteria Upd. for Subsystems Based on ECD for Compartment Temperatures, Transmissibility and Vibration, etc	--Installed Location Criteria Comp. for Subsystems Based on ECD for Compartment Temperatures, Transmissibility and Vibration, etc	--Environment Surveys Conducted	--Environment Monitored for Accumulated Stresses	--Environment Monitored for Accumulated Stresses
	Baseline		Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline
	KC-X		KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X
						--Life Limited Items Monitored	--Life Limited Items Monitored
						Baseline	Baseline
						KC-X	KC-X
Characterizing Materials	--Material Characteristics Impacting Durability Identified		--Unsubstantiated Materials Closure Plan Comp.	--Characterization of Materials Comp.
	Baseline		Baseline	Baseline
	KC-X		KC-X	KC-X
	--Material Database Est.		--Material Characterization Database Upd.
	Baseline		Baseline
	KC-X		KC-X
	--Initial Material Characterization for Corrosion Control/Prevention		--Material Database Upd.
	Baseline		Baseline
	KC-X		KC-X
			--Materials Characterized for Corrosion Control/Prevention
			Baseline
			KC-X
Characterizing Production and Quality	--Materials and Process (M&P) Selection/Characterization Reqs Est.		--Results of M&P Tests Available	--QC Levels for Integrity Critical Hardware Components Upd.	--QC Levels for Integrity Critical Hardware Components Comp.	--Manufacturing Plan Implemented	--Individual Aircraft Tracking Data
	Baseline		Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline
	KC-X		KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X
	--Materials and Processes that Impact Durability Ident.		--QC Levels for Integrity Critical Hardware Components Est.	--QC Levels for Candidate Materials and Manufacturing Processes Upd.	--QC Levels for Materials and Manufacturing Processes Comp.	--Repair Process Controlled
	Baseline		Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline
	KC-X		KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X
			--QC Levels for Candidate Materials and Manufacturing Processes Est.	--List of Final Key Characteristics	--Manufacturing Plan Implemented	--Part Screening
			Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline
			KC-X	KC-X	KC-X	KC-X
			--DOE Complete and Candidate M&P Selected for Development		--Process Control Levels Verified	--QC Monitoring
			Baseline		Baseline	Baseline
			KC-X		KC-X	KC-X
			-- List of Prelim Key Characteristics Available		--QC Levels Verified
			Baseline		Baseline
			KC-X		KC-X

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 14, 2017.