PastPPQ_ECLS_Attch_13.pdf
PDF 86 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Enterprise Contracted Logistics Services
- Solicitation number
- FA8555-16-R-0003
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
(WHEN COMPLETED) SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
RFP:
ATTACHMENT 13
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
Enterprise Contracted Logistics Support (ECLS)
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor:________________________________________________________________________
B. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________
C. Contract number: ______________________________________
D. Contract type: ______________________________
E. Role in the Program/Work Performed As:
_____ Prime _____ Subcontractor _____ Vendor/Supplier
F. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
G. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
H. Period of Performance:
1. Original MAX Contract $ Value (assuming all options exercised): ___________________
2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised): ____________________
3. Reason for difference (if applicable): ___________________
I. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
J. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
K. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
L. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or Agency name: __________________________________________________________ B. Address: _________________________________________________________________________ C. Customer or Agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________
D. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Name/Role of Evaluator Relative to Contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager, etc.)
B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number/email: ________________________________________________________
D. Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE RATING
B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL – During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level. Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur.
P PURPLE/VERY GOOD – During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.
G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.
Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level;
performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.
NOTE: In Section 4, should your response be other than “satisfactory (S),” please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” in Section 5 or on an additional sheet to this document (which is in word format). If supporting documentation is not provided for ratings that are other than “satisfactory,” the ratings will be considered to be unsubstantiated and will be interpreted as satisfactory.
Technical Performance E VG S M U N/A
1. Contractor’s experience working in a DoD supply chain management environment with international support requirements
2. Contractor’s experience in procuring DoD materials with cyber-security implications
3. Contractor’s capability to work with Government enterprise-level supply chain management systems (please list systems used)
4. Contractor’s capability to operate a DoD industrial warehouse (provide details on volume of storage and transportation services provided)
5. Contractor’s experience with technical sustainment related to technical data
Program Management E VG S M U N/A
1. Overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)
2. Contractor’s management of quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts
Program Management E VG S M U N/A
3. Contractor’s ability to resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance
4. Contractor’s response to emergency and/or surge situations (such as urgent shipping needs with less than 24 hours transport requirement)
5. Effectiveness of contractor’s materiel management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)
Transition E VG S M U N/A
1. Seamlessness of contractor’s transition of resources and personnel upon contract phase-in
2. Contractor’s effectiveness in maintaining continuity of mission support upon contract phase-out
Employee Retention/Attraction E VG S M U N/A
1. Contractor’s ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort
2. Contractor’s ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort
3. Contractor’s experience hiring and maintaining cleared personnel to satisfy TS/SCI and Secret requirements
Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___
No ___
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .