Attachment_5_Present_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

(WHEN COMPLETED) SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104. FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

RFP FA8552-18-R-0005

ATTACHMENT 5

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Degraded Visual Environment

PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ABOUT YOURSELF:

Name/Signature and Role Relative to Contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager):___________________________________________________________________________________________________ Agency or Business:

Address:

Telephone No. _______________________________ FAX No. ____________________________________

Return your completed questionnaire either electronically via email or by mail to William V. Walton or Leigh Ann Taylor. See Section L of the solicitation for appropriate email address or mailing address.

NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND SHALL NOT BE

RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.

Part I. SPECIFIC PROGRAM INFORMATION.

Contractor/Business: ____________________________________________ CAGE Code: __________

Program Title and Brief Description:

Role in the Program/Work Performed As: _____Prime _____Subcontractor _____Vendor/Supplier

Contract Number: ________________________________ Number of Years?: Basic:________ Option: _________

Contract Type(s): List all applicable contract types, i.e. Firm-Fixed-Price, Time & Materials, Cost, etc._________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PART II. GENERAL PROGRAM INFORMATION.

Period of Performance:

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable)

Contract Dollar Value:

1. Original MAX Contract $ Value (assuming all option exercised):________________________________________________________

2. Current MAX $ Value (assuming all options exercised):

3. Primary Causes of Changes:

NOTE: In Part III., should your response be other than “satisfactory,” please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” on page 4 of 5 or on an additional sheet to this document (which is in word format). If supporting documentation is not provided for ratings that are other than “satisfactory,” the ratings will be considered to be unsubstantiated and will be interpreted as satisfactory.

PART III. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS.

Please check the appropriate rating for each of the following questions:

N/A=Not Applicable U=Unsatisfactory M=Marginal S=Satisfactory V=Very Good E=Exceptional

N/A U M S V E

1. Extent to which Company’s products and/or services met the specification /performance requirements:

2. Configuration Management (first product delivered same as last):

3. Quality of Completed Product:

4. Overall management of subcontracting efforts:

5. Quality of Technical Manuals or Commercial Manuals:

6. Customer’s Satisfaction with warranty response times and corrective actions:

7. Adequate Number of Dedicated Resources For Your Program:

8. Timely recognition and notification of administrative, engineering, production, problems affecting the program:

9. Company performed independently without significant customer direction/oversight?

10. Monitoring of Program Schedules and Critical Milestones:

11. Completed Work on Time:

12. Extent to which small businesses, veteran-owned small businesses, small disadvantaged businesses and other socio-economic business sectors were utilized in the performance of the contract

13. Has action been initiated to cancel or terminate the contract for default? If yes, explain.

14. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.

15. Describe the contractor’s or company’s strong and/or weak points identified as a result of technical performance and any technical performance risk identified during the life of the contract.

16. If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain.

17. Do you feel you “got what you paid for” ? Please explain.

18. Additional Remarks.

RFP NUMBER FA8552-18-R-0005

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM

E EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.

NOTICE TO QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONDENTS: Please do not include this page when returning the completed questionnaire.