Attachment_3_Present_Past_Performance_Relevancy_Table.pdf

RFP FA8552-18-R-0005

ATTACHMENT 3

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY TABLE

(To be Completed by Offeror/Joint Venture Member/ and Critical Subcontractor)

(Complete for each effort identified for evaluation in the PPI Tool)

Request the offeror/joint venture member/and Critical Subcontractor complete a separate Relevancy Table for each effort identified for evaluation in the PPI Tool. This table, in addition to the information provided by the offeror in the PPI Tool, will assist the PCO in evaluating the relevancy of the proposed effort to the instant requirements.

Offerors/joint venture members shall only complete column three. Offerors’/joint venture members’ answers are applicable only to the efforts identified in the PPI Tool, not the offeror’s proposed solutions to the instant effort.

Please be as specific as possible with the fill-in information provided.

Contractor:

Cage Code:

Contract Number:

Program Title:

Contr Agency/Customer:

Category

Proposed Effort (Note: GOVT has completed this column)

(DO NOT CHANGE)

Fill-in for the Effort Identified in para. B Above (Offeror/joint venture member/critical subcontractor completes)

The effort in para B. required:

1. Nature of Business Area(s) Involved

Integration of a Degraded Visual Environment (DVE) system;

Modification of rotary wing aircraft

2. Required Levels of Technology

Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 7 or above

3. Materials and Production Processes

Kit material and production quality processes implemented

4. Performance Location Facility 1: Integration/ Engineering effort Facility 2: Production

5. Contract Type(s) CPFF, FFP

6. Quantities produced, # repaired or other quantitative data

Quantity of kits produced per month

7. Program Similarity Integration of COTS hardware;

Integration of COTS DVE system

8. Program Complexity Hardware and software integration; modifications to exterior of aircraft

9. Program Phase Integration, Production

10. Extent of subcontractor involvement

Number of subcontractors and percentage of work performed

Was this contract effort (as identified above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous Robins AFB procurement. Yes No . If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.