PP_QUESTIONNAIRE.doc
DOC document 73 KB Posted
- Attached to
- TINKER AFB Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8101-12-R-0002
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
TINKER AFB Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA8101-12-R-0002
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Completed this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 3.104
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor:_______________________________
B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: ________________________________ C. Contract number: ____________________________ D. Contract type: _______________________________ E. Was this a competitive contract? _______________________________ F. Period of performance: ________________________________ G. Initial contract cost: __________________________________ H. Current/final contract cost: _______________________________ I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:______________________________________________________
J. Description of service provided: _________________________________
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name: ___________________________________________________ B. Customer or Agency description (if applicable): ___________________________________ C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands: ___________________________________________________________________________
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name: _______________________________________________ B. Evaluator's phone/email address: _______________________________________________________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
| CODE |
| Rating/Definition |
| G |
| GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Y |
| YELLOW/MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| R |
| RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| N |
| NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score. |
| G |
| Y |
| R |
N
Technical Performance
T1 Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.
T2. Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts
T3 Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts
T4 Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements
T5 Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures
| G |
| Y |
| R |
N
Program Management
P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)
P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
P4. Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements
P5. Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations
P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts
P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)
P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management
P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer
P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.
Transition/phase-in
T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.
T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.
Employee Retention/Attraction
E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.
E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.
Cost Performance C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs
C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs
C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur
C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting
1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Y (Yellow/Marginal) or R (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
2. (a) Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience; and/or are there any pending terminations?
(b) If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.)
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
1. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?
2. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?
3. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
4. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature
Date: __________________________ Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Mailing Address:
7858 5th Street, Suite 1
ATTN: Mr. Andrew Lucas or 2Lt Corey Ostrowski
Tinker AFB, OK 73145 Or e-mail to: andrew.lucas@tinker.af.mil cory.ostrowski@tinker.af.mil Telephone: 405-739-4190 and/or 405-739-4035
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .