PP_QUESTIONNAIRE.doc

DOC document 73 KB Posted

Attached to
TINKER AFB Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8101-12-R-0002
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Air Force Sustainment Center

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to TINKER AFB Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER), newest first.
File Type Posted
Questions_and_Answers-_Round_3.docx DOCX document
Amendment_6.doc DOC document
Questions_and_Answers-Round_2.docx DOCX document
05_110020_A03.dwg DWG drawing
110020_SABER_Seed_SOW_-_Amendment_1.pdf PDF
Amendment_5.doc DOC document
110020_M01_Amend_1.pdf PDF
SABER_SEED_PROJECT(Bid_Sheet).docx DOCX document
Table_2.2(Revised).docx DOCX document
08_110020_M01.dwg DWG drawing
110020_A03_Amend_1_(1).pdf PDF
04_110020_A02.dwg DWG drawing
Amendment_4.doc DOC document
3001-POST-A87.DWG DWG drawing
Questions_and_Answers-Round_1.docx DOCX document
06_110020_A04.dwg DWG drawing
ATT_2_Q19_AF66.pdf PDF
PRICING_SCHEDULE.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
08_110020_M01.dwg DWG drawing
07_110020_M00.dwg DWG drawing
03_110020_A01.dwg DWG drawing
01_110020_G01.dwg DWG drawing
Asbuilts_(1).pdf PDF
02_110020_A00.dwg DWG drawing
110020_SABER_Seed_DWG.pdf PDF
FA8101-12-R-0002-0003_Amendment.doc DOC document
Proposal_Due_Date_Extension_Amendment_II.doc DOC document
Above_Ceiling_Tile_2.JPG JPG image
Utility_Closet.JPG JPG image
Proposal_Due_Date_Extension_Amendment_I.doc DOC document
SABER_Sign_in_Sheet.pdf PDF
Restroom.JPG JPG image
Sinks _Tiled_Wall.JPG JPG image
Ceiling_Tile_Above_Sinks.JPG JPG image
110020_SABER_Seed_DWG.pdf PDF
SABER_Seed_SOW_1.pdf PDF
CONSENT_LETTER.doc DOC document
FA8101-12-R-0002.pdf PDF
WD_OK120032_dtd_03_Aug_12.pdf PDF
PARTNERING_Agmt.doc DOC document
PP_COVER_LETTER.doc DOC document
PPIS.doc DOC document
Atch_1_-_Tile_Example_SABER_Seed.jpg JPG image
Atch_2_-_Seed_Project_Asbuilts_portion.pdf PDF
SABER_SPEC_TABLE_OF_CONTENTS.pdf PDF
CLIENT_AUTHORIZATION_LTR.doc DOC document
Combined_Spec.pdf PDF
TAFB_SABER_SOW_12_March_2013.pdf PDF
Draft TAFB SABER SOW 9 May 12.pdf PDF
Draft SOW Letter.pdf PDF
Show all 50

TINKER AFB Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA8101-12-R-0002

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Completed this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:_______________________________

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: ________________________________ C. Contract number: ____________________________ D. Contract type: _______________________________ E. Was this a competitive contract? _______________________________ F. Period of performance: ________________________________ G. Initial contract cost: __________________________________ H. Current/final contract cost: _______________________________ I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:______________________________________________________

J. Description of service provided: _________________________________

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: ___________________________________________________ B. Customer or Agency description (if applicable): ___________________________________ C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands: ___________________________________________________________________________

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: _______________________________________________ B. Evaluator's phone/email address: _______________________________________________________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE
Rating/Definition
G
GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Y
YELLOW/MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
R
RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N
NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.
G
Y
R

N

Technical Performance

T1 Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.

T2. Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts

T3 Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts

T4 Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements

T5 Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures

G
Y
R

N

Program Management

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

P4. Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements

P5. Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management

P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

Transition/phase-in

T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

Employee Retention/Attraction

E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.

Cost Performance C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Y (Yellow/Marginal) or R (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

2. (a) Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience; and/or are there any pending terminations?

(b) If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.)

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

1. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

2. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

3. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

4. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature

Date: __________________________ Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:

7858 5th Street, Suite 1

ATTN: Mr. Andrew Lucas or 2Lt Corey Ostrowski

Tinker AFB, OK 73145 Or e-mail to: andrew.lucas@tinker.af.mil cory.ostrowski@tinker.af.mil Telephone: 405-739-4190 and/or 405-739-4035

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .