Linguist_PPQ_Attach_6.pdf

Attachment 6

Past Performance Questionnaire

Solicitation Number: FA7037-16-R-0001

1. The contractor who provided this questionnaire to you is submitting a proposal to AMIC Det 2/PK. We have a requirement for a contractor to provide Linguist/Analyst Support Services to 25 AF and its subordinate units.

For the actual performance of this contract, TS/SCI clearances are required. The period of performance on this contract is four years (one 12 month base and three 12 month option years).

2. The proposed work scope includes but is not necessarily limited to:

Provide personnel, equipment, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and services necessary to provide foreign language linguist and analyst services in support of United States (U.S.) Forces operations.

Perform all phases of collecting, interpreting, translating, and performing analysis of mission data.

Provide global and cryptologic language training

3. All responses to the questionnaire are to be provided directly to the Government contracting officer listed below. Responses routed through the offeror will not be accepted.

4. Please complete this questionnaire. Handwritten responses are sufficient. If you need more space than that provided, please attach additional pages or write on the back, ensuring that the additional information is identified by generating paragraph identification. Responses will be treated as source selection sensitive information; your name will not be provided to the contractor. Only the substance of your response may be provided to the contractor.

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive Information IAW FAR 3.104. Fax or e-mail the completed questionnaire by 3 Jun 13 to:

25 AF/AMIC Det 2

ATTN: Carissa Lechner, Contracting Specialist

102 Hall Blvd, Ste 268 San Antonio, TX 78243

Voice: Commercial (210) 977-5457; DSN 969-5457

FAX: Commercial (210) 977-6414; DSN 969-6414

Email: Carissa.Lechner@us.af.mil

Company Responding To RFP:

Company Completing Questionnaire:

Name of Person Completing questionnaire:

Title of Person Completing questionnaire:

Address of Person Completing questionnaire:

Phone Number of Person Completing questionnaire:

E-mail of Person Completing questionnaire:

Contract Number:

Subcontract #:

Period of Performance:

Current Contract Value:

Subcontract Value:

1. Please assign one of the following adjectival ratings to each question during your assessment:

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional Not

Applicable Performance did not meet most contractual requirements.

There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.

There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.

Performance met contract requirements.

There were some minor problems.

Corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit.

Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner

Unable to provide a score.

Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

1- Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

2- Marginal: Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.

3 – Satisfactory: Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems.

Corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

4 – Very Good: Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.

5 – Exceptional: Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.

N/A Not Applicable: Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

2. For each response, please include a narrative with appropriate and specific examples for each of the assessment elements. Please check the appropriate rating for each applicable past performance service area.

ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS

Adjectival Rating 1 2 3 4 5 N/A

a. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in screening/processing linguist for assignment to

OCONUS locations in a timely manner?

Comments:

b. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in recruiting and retaining quality linguists?

c. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall ability in providing OCONUS On-Site Management?

d. How would you rate this Contractor’s overall ability to provide linguists who have the skills to translate, interpret, and/or transcribe, IAW contract requirements?

e. How would you rate this Contractor’s overall ability to provide analysts who have the skills to produce quality analytical reports IAW contract requirements?

Comments

f. How would you rate this Contractor’s ability to manage the overall contract effectively and efficiently?

g. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to transition resources and linguists?

h. How would you rate this Contractor’s effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning in/out resources and linguists?

i. To what extent did the Contractor demonstrate reasonable and cooperative management behavior?

j. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to manage sub-contractors?

k. How would you rate this Contractor’s responsiveness to contract requirements and changes?

l. How would you rate this Contractor’s overall ability to effectively manage project cost/price?

m. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to submit timely and accurate invoices?

n. How would you rate this Contractor’s ability to forecast accurate costs and meet realistic cost projections?

o. Did the contractor provide adequate safeguards and security to protect sensitive information and processes?

YES NO

p. Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again?

YES NO

q. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.