AMS_Q_&_A_2.pdf

FA7022-17-R-0005

AFTAC Mission Services (AMS)

No.

Reference Pg.

No.

Para No. Issue/Comment Question Government Response

1 Major Subcontractor Define the term “major subcontractor” as used in L.3.3.2 and L.3.3.3

Any subcontractors, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners who are proposed to perform 15 percent or more of the proposed effort based on the total proposed price or perform aspects of the effort the offeror considers critical to overall successful performance.

2 Proposed Subcontractors

Does the Government require a sealed fully disclosed cost proposal from the offerors proposed subcontractor(s)/teaming partners?

No – however if offeror elects to subcontract a portion of this effort, please provide a copy of your analysis as required by FAR 15.404-3.

3 RFP Section L.3.0 Vol I - Administrative

32 L.3.1.2 Section B

Section B- complete pricing information in Section B of model contract

This is a five (5) year ordering vehicle with a total maximum of $20M, $5M per order. Without insight into the requirements for all potential task orders and the breakdown between R&D labor, O&M labor and travel, how can the offeror complete the CLINs in Section B? The RFP provided attachment 5 combines CLINs 0001 and 0002, with no breakdown of labor between the CLINs. Will the Government remove the requirement in L.3.1.2?

Use attachment 5 to reach your total estimated price for the combined labor of CLINS 0001 and 0002, enter that price in CLIN 0001 of schedule B and enter “See CLIN 0001” in CLIN 0002.

RFP Section L.3.0 Vol I - Administrative

32 L.3.1.4 Section G

Section G- complete the “fill-in” required in the Contractor’s Contract Administration, in

There is no “fill-in” in Section G. Will the Government revise this section to add the “fill-in” or remove the requirement in L.3.1.4?

Requirement removed

Section G.

5 RFP Section L.3.0 Vol I - Administrative

32 L.3.1.5 Section H

Section H- Acknowledge of address content of Section H

There is no Section H in the RFP. It is also not included on the SF33 in block 11 Table of Contents, Part I – The Schedule. Will the Government remove the requirement in L.3.1.5?

Requirement removed

6 RFP Section L.6.0 Vol IV – Price (Factor 3)

36 L.6.1. General Instructions

L.6.1.1 CLIN

structure for pricing

- CLIN 0003 travel

L.6.1.1. states—Travel under CLIN 0003 will be cost reimbursement (no fee) and will be provided by the government as a not-to-exceed (NTE) amount. Will the government please provide the NTE travel amount for inclusion in the TEP?

Included in updated ATCH 6

– Total Evaluated Price

7 RFP Section L.6.2 Vol IV and L.7.0 Vol V

38 L.6.2.(3) Vol IV Organization and L.7.0 Vol V Task Order 1

Cost/Price Proposal for Task Order 1

Section 3 of Volume IV Organization requires the offeror provide a price proposal for Task Order 1.

Volume V Task Order 1 requires a written technical proposal and price proposal. Does the Government want the price proposal for Task Order 1 included twice – once in Vol IV Section 3 and again in Vol V?

No – the price proposal requirement has been clarified in paragraph L.7.0

8 RFP Section K Attachment 6

Attachment 6, Total Evaluated Price

Please provide the correct Attachment 6. The excel file titled ATCH_6_Total_Estimated_Price is similar to Attachment 4, Labor Category Rates for Task Orders. This spreadsheet will not calculate a TEP.

Correct ATCH 6 provided with the amended RFP and these questions & answers

9 RFP Section K Attachment 4

Attachment 4 Labor Category Rates for Task Orders

There are two excel files titled Labor Category Rates for Task Orders, Attachment 4. One is named ATCH 4 and one is named ATCH 6. The ATCH 6 file includes an average annual workload estimate. Is this file to be completed? If so, what attachment # should it be?

Disregard the old ATCH 6 – it was provided erroneously

10 RFP Section L.5.0 Vol III – Past Performance

35 L.5.1 General Consent letters Along with the information required in this paragraph, the offeror shall submit a consent letter executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information to the offeror so the offeror can respond to such information. Is a consent letter required if no teaming partner past performance inputs are

No submitted as part of Vol. 3?