FA5587-15-R-0006.pdf

48 CONS/LGC - FA5587

BLDG 977, RAF LAKENHEATH

BRANDON IP27 9PN

01638 52 2414

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

11. DELIVERY FOR FOB

RFQ

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

IFB RFP

CODE

SEE ADDENDUM

BLOCK IS MARKED

DESTINATION UNLESS

12. DISCOUNT TERMS

(No Collect Calls)

13b. RATING

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

X

CODE

FA5587-15-R-0006 12-May-2015

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

01638521338

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

05:00 PM 13 May 2015

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV 3/2005)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER) 31c. DATE SIGNED

ADDENDA ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

22. UNIT 23. UNIT PRICE 24. AMOUNT21. QUANTITY

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

UNRESTRICTED

FAX: NAICS:

TEL:

CODE 18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BYOFFEROR

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TEL.

FA5587

SIZE STD:

9. ISSUED BY

FACILITY

CODE

17a.CONTRACTOR/

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

15. DELIVER TO CODE 16. ADMINISTERED BY

SEE SCHEDULE

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

NIKKOLE A STITES

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

0 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

19. ITEM NO. 20. SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

SEE SCHEDULE

TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND DELIVER ALL ITEMS

SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY ADDITIONAL SHEETS

SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED HEREIN.

SB

HUBZONE SB

SET ASIDE: % FOR

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

TEL: EMAIL:

COPIES

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

.OFFER DATED YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN 29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REFERENCE

8(A)

SVC-DISABLED VET-OWNED SB

EMERGING SB

X

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

SEE SCHEDULE

19. ITEM NO. 20. SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES 21. QUANTITY 22. UNIT 24. AMOUNT

PAGE 2 OF

23. UNIT PRICE

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT 41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV 3/2005) BACK

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

FA5587-15-R-0006

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 12 Months

BEST/HRSM FY16 RAFL

FFP

Base Enlisted Specialty Training and Base Level Human Resources System Management IAW the Performance Work Statement. 1 Oct 15 - 30 Sept 16 RAF Lakenheath.

FOB: Destination

SIGNAL CODE: A

NET AMT

0002 12 Months

BEST/HRSM FY16 RAFM

FFP

Base Enlisted Specialty Training and Base Level Human Resources System Management IAW the Performance Work Statement. 1 Oct 15- 30 Sept 16 RAF Mildenhall

1001 12 Months

OPTION BEST/HRSM FY17 RAFL

FFP

Base Enlisted Specialty Training and Base Level Human Resources System Management IAW the Performance Work Statement. 1 Oct 16 - 30 Sept 17 RAF Lakenheath.

1002 12 Months

OPTION BEST/HRSM FY17 RAFM

FFP

Base Enlisted Specialty Training and Base Level Human Resources System Management IAW the Performance Work Statement. 1 Oct 16- 30 Sept 17 RAF Mildenhall

2001 12 Months

OPTION BEST/HRSM FY18 RAFL

FFP

Base Enlisted Specialty Training and Base Level Human Resources System Management IAW the Performance Work Statement. 1 Oct 17 - 30 Sept 18 RAF Lakenheath.

2002 12 Months

OPTION BEST/HRSM FY18 RAFM

FFP

Base Enlisted Specialty Training and Base Level Human Resources System Management IAW the Performance Work Statement. 1 Oct 17 - 30 Sept 18 RAF Mildenhall.

3001 12 Months

OPTION BEST/HRSM FY19 RAFL

FFP

Base Enlisted Specialty Training and Base Level Human Resources System Management IAW the Performance Work Statement. 1 Oct 18 - 30 Sept 19 RAF Lakenheath.

3002 12 Months

OPTION BEST/HRSM FY19 RAFM

FFP

Base Enlisted Specialty Training and Base Level Human Resources System Management IAW the Performance Work Statement. 1 Oct 18 - 30 Sept 19 RAF Mildenhall

4001 12 Months

OPTION BEST/HRSM FY20 RAFL

FFP

Base Enlisted Specialty Training and Base Level Human Resources System Management IAW the Performance Work Statement. 1 Oct 19 - 30 Sept 20 RAF Lakenheath.

4002 12 Months

OPTION BEST/HRSM FY20 RAFM

FFP

Base Enlisted Specialty Training and Base Level Human Resources System Management IAW the Performance Work Statement. 1 Oct 19 - 30 Sept 20 RAF Mildenhall

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government

0002 Destination Government Destination Government 1001 Destination Government Destination Government 1002 Destination Government Destination Government 2001 Destination Government Destination Government 2002 Destination Government Destination Government 3001 Destination Government Destination Government 3002 Destination Government Destination Government 4001 Destination Government Destination Government 4002 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC

0001 POP 01-OCT-2015 TO

30-SEP-2016

N/A 48 SVS/SVMI (BASE LIBRARY) - F2P3V7

TERESA FORD

BLDG 907

UNIT 5185, BOX 70

APO AE 09461

238-4550

F2P3V7

0002 POP 01-OCT-2015 TO

30-SEP-2016

N/A 100 MSS/DPE (EDUCATION OFFICE) -

F3B301

TERESA FORD

EDUCATION SERVICES

BLDG 427

RAF MILDENHALL IP28 8NG

238-4550

F3B301

1001 POP 01-OCT-2016 TO

30-SEP-2017

N/A 48 SVS/SVMI (BASE LIBRARY) - F2P3V7

TERESA FORD

BLDG 907

UNIT 5185, BOX 70

APO AE 09461

238-4550

1002 POP 01-OCT-2016 TO

30-SEP-2017

N/A 100 MSS/DPE (EDUCATION OFFICE) -

F3B301

TERESA FORD

EDUCATION SERVICES

BLDG 427

RAF MILDENHALL IP28 8NG

238-4550

2001 POP 01-OCT-2017 TO

30-SEP-2018

N/A 48 SVS/SVMI (BASE LIBRARY) - F2P3V7

TERESA FORD

BLDG 907

UNIT 5185, BOX 70

APO AE 09461

238-4550

2002 POP 01-OCT-2017 TO

30-SEP-2018

N/A 100 MSS/DPE (EDUCATION OFFICE) -

F3B301

TERESA FORD

EDUCATION SERVICES

BLDG 427

RAF MILDENHALL IP28 8NG

238-4550

3001 POP 01-OCT-2018 TO

30-SEP-2019

N/A 48 SVS/SVMI (BASE LIBRARY) - F2P3V7

TERESA FORD

BLDG 907

UNIT 5185, BOX 70

APO AE 09461

238-4550

3002 POP 01-OCT-2018 TO

30-SEP-2019

N/A 100 MSS/DPE (EDUCATION OFFICE) -

F3B301

TERESA FORD

EDUCATION SERVICES

BLDG 427

RAF MILDENHALL IP28 8NG

238-4550

4001 POP 01-OCT-2019 TO

30-SEP-2020

N/A 48 SVS/SVMI (BASE LIBRARY) - F2P3V7

TERESA FORD

BLDG 907

UNIT 5185, BOX 70

APO AE 09461

238-4550

4002 POP 01-OCT-2019 TO

30-SEP-2020

N/A 100 MSS/DPE (EDUCATION OFFICE) -

F3B301

TERESA FORD

EDUCATION SERVICES

BLDG 427

RAF MILDENHALL IP28 8NG

238-4550

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.202-1 Definitions NOV 2013 52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-6 Restrictions On Subcontractor Sales To The Government SEP 2006 52.203-16 Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest DEC 2011 52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement

To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights

APR 2014

52.204-2 Security Requirements AUG 1996 52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber

Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-7 System for Award Management JUL 2013 52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance JUL 2013 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting NOV 2014 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance NOV 2014 52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and

Certifications.

DEC 2014

52.209-2 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations--Representation

DEC 2014

52.209-7 Information Regarding Responsibility Matters JUL 2013 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Items APR 2014 52.212-3 Alt I Offeror Representations and Certifications--Commercial Items

(MAR 2015) Alternate I

OCT 2014

52.217-9 Option To Extend The Term Of The Contract MAR 2000 52.222-29 Notification Of Visa Denial JUN 2003 52.223-10 Waste Reduction Program MAY 2011 52.224-1 Privacy Act Notification APR 1984 52.224-2 Privacy Act APR 1984 52.228-3 Worker's Compensation Insurance (Defense Base Act) JUL 2014 52.228-5 Insurance - Work On A Government Installation JAN 1997 52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors

DEC 2013

52.237-2 Protection Of Government Buildings, Equipment, And Vegetation

APR 1984

52.237-3 Continuity Of Services JAN 1991 52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995 52.245-9 Use And Charges APR 2012

252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

NOV 2011

252.203-7999 (Dev) Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements. (DEVIATION 2015- O0010)

FEB 2015

252.204-7000 Disclosure Of Information AUG 2013 252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product APR 1992 252.204-7004 Alt A System for Award Management Alternate A FEB 2014 252.204-7005 Oral Attestation of Security Responsibilities NOV 2001 252.204-7012 Safeguarding of Unclassified Controlled Technical

Information

NOV 2013

252.204-7015 Disclosure of Information to Litigation Support Contractors FEB 2014 252.205-7000 Provision Of Information To Cooperative Agreement Holders DEC 1991 252.209-7004 Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled By

The Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism

DEC 2014

252.209-7992 (Dev) Representation by Corporations Regarding an Unpaid Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law - Fiscal Year 2015 Appropriations

DEC 2014

252.215-7008 Only One Offer OCT 2013 252.222-7002 Compliance With Local Labor Laws (Overseas) JUN 1997 252.222-7007 Representation Regarding Combating Trafficking in Persons JAN 2015 252.225-7033 Waiver of United Kingdom Levies APR 2003 252.225-7041 Correspondence in English JUN 1997 252.225-7042 Authorization to Perform APR 2003 252.226-7001 Utilization of Indian Organizations and Indian-Owned

Economic Enterprises, and Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns

SEP 2004

252.232-7007 Limitation Of Government's Obligation APR 2014 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012

52.212-1 ADDENDUM

52.212-1 ADDENDUM

Addendum to 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors Proposal Preparation Instructions

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the offeror shall follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors shall meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factor or sub-factors. Failure to meet a requirement shall result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The proposal shall consist of three (3) separate parts; Part I - Technical Capability Proposal, Part II - Past Performance Information, and Part III - Price Proposal.

B. If offerors submit electronically, proposals shall be emailed to both nikkole.stites.1@us.af.mil & john.stacy.1@us.af.mil by the offer due date listed in block 8 of the SF 1449 (1600 GMT). Hand carried proposals must be delivered to the contracting office at Building 977, 1st Floor, RAF Lakenheath, United Kingdom, IP27 9PN.

mailto:nikkole.stites.1@us.af.mil mailto:john.stacy.1@us.af.mil

The sealed envelope or package used to submit your proposal shall show the time and date specified for receipt, the Solicitation Number, and the name and address of the offeror. Offerors are cautioned that RAF Lakenheath has visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass prior to entrance. SOME DELAY SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED WHEN HANDCARRYING PROPOSALS. Offerors shall allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and arrive at the proposal depository PRIOR to the time specified for receipt. Late proposals shall be processed in accordance with FAR 52.212-1(f) ―Late submission, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers. Per 52.212-1(2)(i)(A), it is the offeror‘s responsibility to ensure the proposal is sent to the correct Government email address. Please note that our email system has a 1MB limit for attachments.

Offerors may send their proposal using multiple emails and it is advised that number systems such as ―email 1 of 4 are used so that if requested by the offeror, we can confirm receipt. The requirements below for multiple copies do not apply to electronically submitted proposal.

C. Offerors shall clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts:

Part I - Technical Capability Proposal Part II - Past Performance Information Part III - Price Proposal

D. Further changes to the original clause 52.212-1.

(1) Paragraph 52.212-1(c), Period for Acceptance of Offers is tailored as follows: The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 120 calendar days from the day specified for receipt of offers.

PART I – TECHNICAL CAPABILITY PROPOSAL - Limited to no more than 50 pages, single spaces, Times New Roman font size 10, front and back printed (count as 2 pages), with one (1) inch margins, including title pages, table of contents, indeces, or appendices. Pages beyond the limit will not be evaluated.

Offerors that are not able to comply with the aforementioned conditions, will be determined as noncompliant with the solicitation requirements, and therefore may be removed from consideration for award. Technical Capability shall consist of three subfactors: i) Transition Plan, ii) Quality Control Plan, and iii) Mission Essential Services Plan.

i. Transition Plan – Illustrate in detail your plan for transitioning to new contract performance during the 30-day transition period by describing how you will successfully perform all requirements on the contract start date.

Your plan shall include:

a.) A detailed description and complete timeline of all transition activities necessary to begin successful performance on the performance start date of 1 October 2015 (Transition period begins 1 September 2015).

b.) Identify key positions with the intended associated qualifications with knowledge of military terminology relevant to the requirements in the PWS, certifications and clearances in an organizational chart that would support contract performance if awarded the contract in accordance with the Performance Work Statement.

c.) Thoroughly and clearly describe staff hiring and training processes that will be utilized to obtain adequate numbers of qualified personnel in effectively transitioning to perform the required levels of service as stipulated in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

d.) Thoroughly and clearly describe your plan to initiate and obtain security and secret clearances and other documentation (base, facility access, and Visas) IAW the PWS for all contracted employees performing under the contract if awarded.

ii. Quality Control Plan - Provide a detailed plan which demonstrates how you will effectively provide all services stated within the PWS in delivering quality service under the contract.

a.) At minimum, offeror’s Quality Control Plans shall propose surveillance and/or validation methods for each performance objective identified in the Services Summary table below. Each proposed surveillance and/or validation method shall be cross-referenced in the offeror’s Quality Control Plan with comprehensive procedures and associated descriptions that clearly demonstrate services will be provided at an acceptable level of quality in meeting all requirements of the PWS.

b.) Service Summary; Proposed Surveillance and/or Validation Method(s):

Performance Objective PWS

Paragraphs Performance Threshold/Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)

Government Surveillance Method

1 Management of the user accounts in PDS

1.2.2. a)New PDS accounts established for authorized users with no unauthorized users on the system.

AQL: 100% of the time.

What: authorization letters How: 100% review of PDS authorization file monthly Who: COR Re-inspection for non-compliance will occur no later than 30 days after initial inspection.

Standard(s):

Inspection applies to all standards

2 Provides PDS familiarization/training for new users and assistance when requested.

1.2.6. a)Provide service within 10 workdays upon receipt of official appointment letter.

AQL: 98% of the time.

What:

Familiarization/training for

PDS

How: 100% review of official appointment letters reviews monthly Who: COR Re-inspection for non-compliance will occur no later than 60 days after initial inspection.

Standard(s): Inspection applies to all standards

3 Provides releasable data to authorized DoD agency and directs non-DoD request to FOIA monitor.

1.2.10. a)Data provided only to authorize agencies IAW governing FOIA directives within 5 working days AQL: 98% of the time.

What: FOIA requests, Verify data provided to agencies not listed in Appendix 1 How: 100% review of FOIA data request monthly ensuring FOIA requests are completed Who: COR Re-inspection for non-compliance will occur no later than 60 days after initial inspection.

Standard(s): Privacy Act of 1974 and AFMAN 37-104

4 Ensure automated data reports are forwarded to appropriate MPS work center.

1.2.11. a)Non-recurring products are received by appropriate MPS work center within two

(2) duty days.

AQL: No more than 5 late reports per quarter.

What: View product request and response time.

Review completed documentation How: 100% quarterly reviews of product reports conducted Who: COR Re-inspection for non-compliance will occur no later than 60 days after initial inspection.

Standard(s): Inspection applies to all standards

5 Provides data and/or analysis when requested by MPS/CC or designated representative, to include but not limited, to recurring DISCOVER.

1.2.8.

and/or 1.2.9 a)PDS is available during duty hours or immediately notify MPS/CC or designated representative of system non-availability.

AQL: 95% of the time.

What: Review documentation received and sent to the MPS/CC or designated representative.

How: 100% reviews conducted monthly on system non-availability Who: COR Re-inspection for non-compliance will occur no later than 60 days after initial inspection.

Standard(s): Inspection applies to all standards

6 Ensure contract employees are trained on all active personnel data systems

1.2.14. a)Ensure Contractor Employees are trained on all active personnel data systems within 30 days.

AQL: 95% accurate and improved to 100% within 2 week notice.

What: Training of new Contractor Employees How: Within 30 Days of new personnel or data system: Review employee certification/training documentation for 100% compliance.

Who: COR Re-inspection for non-compliance will occur no later than 2 weeks after initial inspection.

Standard(s): Inspection applies to all standards

7 Assists Base Training customers with program management and training requests.

1.2.15. a)NLT 5 working days of customer inquiry respond/to track customer issue and responding.

AQL: 95% of the time.

What: Program management and training requests How: 100% review conducted monthly for program management and training request emails and responses Who: COR Re-inspection for non-compliance will occur no later than 30 days after initial inspection.

Standard(s): AFI 36-

8 Oversee the management of Training Status Code Actions.

1.2.16 a) Pull reports for monthly surveillance of Training Status Codes (TSC) actions affecting qualification and skill level upgrade to include contacting unit Unit Education and Training Managers (UETM) when coding concerns arise. AQL: 100% of the time.

b) Identify incorrect TSC.

AQL: No more than 5 discrepancies per month.

What: Base Status Code Roster How: 100% review conducted monthly Base Status Code Roster Who: COR Re-inspection for non-compliance will occur no later than 5 days after initial inspection.

Standard(s): AFI 36-2201

V3, PARA 3.1.15

9 Provide installation commander status of training for assigned units

1.2.15 a)Each quarter (4 times per year) provide installation commander with a Status of Training Summary as outlined in AFI 36-

2201 V3, PARA 3.1.9

AQL: Provide reports within 10 days of meeting 75% of the time.

What: Status ofTraining Slides How: 100% quarterly review of the Status ofTraining Slides provided to leadership Who: COR Re-inspection for non-compliance will occur no later than 5 days after initial inspection.

Standard(s): AFI 36-2201

10 Manage Base Ancillary Training Program

1.2.18.

1.2.15 1.2.26 a)Ensure total force awareness ancillary training is completed within prescribed timeliness.

AQL: Complete training within required timeframes 98% of the time.

What: Ancillary Training Reports.

How: 100 % monthly review of Review Ancillary Training Reports.

Who: COR Re-inspection for non-compliance will occur no later than 30 days after initial inspection.

Standard(s): AFI 36-2201

11 Schedule and hold quarterly UETM meetings to disseminate information on current and ongoing training program issues.

1.2.22 a)Within 10 work-days after the scheduled meeting, develop and distribute minutes required offices.

AQL: Provide reports within 10 days of meeting 98% of the time.

What: Meeting Minutes and dates How: Randomly inspection 100% of meeting minute reports & distribution Who: COR Re-inspection for non-compliance will occur no later than 30 days after initial inspection.

Standard(s): AFI 36-2201

V3, PARA 3.1.12.2,

3.1.12.5 & 3.1.12.4

12 Provides AFTC instruction for units without an assigned certified instructor and process completions in PDS.

1.2.23 a)Once instruction has been completed, update AFTC completions in PDS within 10 working days of receipt.

AQL: 95% of the time.

What: Instructors for AFTC courses How: 100% review quarterly to Verify courses taught for units with non- certified instructors and update of course completion.

Who: COR Re-inspection for non-compliance will occur no later than 30 days after initial inspection.

Standard(s): AFI 36- 2201

V3, PARA 3.1.14

13 Test control facility management.

1.2.25 a)Compliance with Air Force, MAJCOM and AFIADL Directives to prevent test compromise.

AQL: No major discrepanies and no more than one minor discrepancy per quarter.

What: Test control facility management How: 100% review quarterly on Completed and documented quarterly test inventory. Review test control procedures.

Who: COR Re-inspection for non-compliance will occur no later than 14 days after initial inspection.

Standard(s): AFI 36-2201

* With reference to proposed surveillance and/or validation methods, offeror’s shall comprehensively describe in their Quality Control Plan, respective procedures that clearly demonstrate associated services will provided at an acceptable level of quality in meeting all requirements of the Performance Work Statement.

iii. Mission Essential Services – This includes a method on how the contractor will provide mission essential services during a crisis or emergency outlined in the PWS paragraph 4.1.4. Contractor must illustrate how resources and personnel will be available and how the contractor intends to use them during crisis or emergency events.

PART II – PAST PERFORMANCE - Only references for recent and relevant type contracts and/or projects are desired for past performance evaluation (definitions of recency and relevancy can be found below in paragraph (i).

i. Quality and Satisfaction Rating for Contracts Completed in the Past Three Years: Offerors must submit recent and relevant contact information for up to three (3) contracts/projects. To be considered recent, services for a particular customer must have been provided within the last three (3) years. To be considered relevant, office administrative services or information management services must be similar services outlined in the PWS to include knowledge of military personnel terminology, similar contract cost, and complexity as the requirement in this solicitation. The contracting officer will be responsible for contacting the offeror’s points of contact and asking them to complete the Past and Present Performance Questionnaire. Multiple customer contacts can be provided for the same customer. There is no page limit for submissions of Past Performance. Copies of completed questionnaires submitted with the proposal by the offeror will be discarded and not considered in the evaluation.

ii. For each contract or project offerors must provide the following information:

a) Company/Division name

b) Service

c) Contracting Agency/Customer

d) Contract/Project Number(s)

e) Contract Dollar Value(s)

f) Period of Performance

g) Verified, up-to-date name, address, email, and telephone number of the primary customer point of contact and/or contracting officer

h) Description of characteristics or facts that pertain to the relevancy of previous contracts/projects with comparison to scope and performance of this contract in accordance with the relevancy guidelines in the above paragraph.

NOTE: If a customer point of contact cannot be reached, the Government may contact the offeror again and request an additional point of contact.

iii. Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor‘s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor.

iv. If a business teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past and present relevant contracts.

PART III – PRICE PROPOSAL - Offeror shall submit original and one (1) copy of the following:

i. Firm Fixed Priced Proposals: As prescribed by clause 52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT, the resultant contract will be Firm Fixed Priced. As such offeror’s are required to acknowledge in-writing that price proposals are firm-fixed-priced, without conditions.

ii. Complete blocks 12, 17a, and 30a, b, and c of the SF 1449. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the solicitation, with attachments. The solicitation constitutes the model contract.

All proposals shall be submitted in USD (United States Dollar).

iii. In addition to the aforementioned price information, insert proposed unit and extended prices in the associated contract line item number (CLIN) of the solicitation for each category of service and respective program year of the contract. The contracting officer has determined in response to this solicitation, there is a high probability that adequate price competition will be achieved. Upon initial examination of offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer’s opinion, adequate price competition exists, additional pricing data will not be required or requested. If however the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition does not exists, the price analysis techniques will be utilized to determine price reasonableness.

(End of provision)

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (DEC 2014)

(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 561110.

(2) The small business size standard is 500.

(3) The small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, other than on a construction or service contract, but which proposes to furnish a product which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(b)(1) If the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management, is included in this solicitation, paragraph (d) of this provision applies.

(2) If the provision at 52.204-7 is not included in this solicitation, and the offeror is currently registered in System for Award Management (SAM), and has completed the Representations and Certifications section of SAM electronically, the offeror may choose to use paragraph (d) of this provision instead of completing the corresponding individual representations and certifications in the solicitation. The offeror shall indicate which option applies by checking one of the following boxes:

(X) Paragraph (d) applies.

( ) Paragraph (d) does not apply and the offeror has completed the individual representations and certifications in the solicitation.

(c) (1) The following representations or certifications in SAM are applicable to this solicitation as indicated:

(i) 52.203-2, Certificate of Independent Price Determination. This provision applies to solicitations when a firm-fixed-price contract or fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment is contemplated, unless—

(A) The acquisition is to be made under the simplified acquisition procedures in Part 13;

(B) The solicitation is a request for technical proposals under two-step sealed bidding procedures; or

(C) The solicitation is for utility services for which rates are set by law or regulation.

(ii) 52.203-11, Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions. This provision applies to solicitations expected to exceed $150,000.

(iii) 52.204-3, Taxpayer Identification. This provision applies to solicitations that do not include the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management.

(iv) 52.204-5, Women-Owned Business (Other Than Small Business). This provision applies to solicitations that—

(A) Are not set aside for small business concerns;

(B) Exceed the simplified acquisition threshold; and

(C) Are for contracts that will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(v) 52.209-2; Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations--Representation.

(vi) 52.209-5; Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters. This provision applies to solicitations where the contract value is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

(vii) 52.214-14, Place of Performance--Sealed Bidding. This provision applies to invitations for bids except those in which the place of performance is specified by the Government.

(viii) 52.215-6, Place of Performance. This provision applies to solicitations unless the place of performance is specified by the Government.

(ix) 52.219-1, Small Business Program Representations (Basic & Alternate I). This provision applies to solicitations when the contract will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(A) The basic provision applies when the solicitations are issued by other than DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard.

(B) The provision with its Alternate I applies to solicitations issued by DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard.

(x) 52.219-2, Equal Low Bids. This provision applies to solicitations when contracting by sealed bidding and the contract will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(xi) 52.222-22, Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports. This provision applies to solicitations that include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.

(xii) 52.222-25, Affirmative Action Compliance. This provision applies to solicitations, other than those for construction, when the solicitation includes the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.

(xiii) 52.222-38, Compliance with Veterans' Employment Reporting Requirements. This provision applies to solicitations when it is anticipated the contract award will exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and the contract is not for acquisition of commercial items.

(xiv) 52.223-1, Biobased Product Certification. This provision applies to solicitations that require the delivery or specify the use of USDA-designated items; or include the clause at 52.223-2, Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under Service and Construction Contracts.

(xv) 52.223-4, Recovered Material Certification. This provision applies to solicitations that are for, or specify the use of, EPA- designated items.

(xvi) 52.225-2, Buy American Certificate. This provision applies to solicitations containing the clause at 52.225-1.

(xvii) 52.225-4, Buy American--Free Trade Agreements--Israeli Trade Act Certificate. (Basic, Alternates I, II, and III.) This provision applies to solicitations containing the clause at 52.225- 3.

(A) If the acquisition value is less than $25,000, the basic provision applies.

(B) If the acquisition value is $25,000 or more but is less than $50,000, the provision with its Alternate I applies.

(C) If the acquisition value is $50,000 or more but is less than $79,507, the provision with its Alternate II applies.

(D) If the acquisition value is $79,507 or more but is less than $100,000, the provision with its Alternate III applies.

(xviii) 52.225-6, Trade Agreements Certificate. This provision applies to solicitations containing the clause at 52.225-5.

(xix) 52.225-20, Prohibition on Conducting Restricted Business Operations in Sudan--Certification. This provision applies to all solicitations.

(xx) 52.225-25, Prohibition on Contracting with Entities Engaging in Certain Activities or Transactions Relating to Iran—Representation and Certification. This provision applies to all solicitations.

(xxi) 52.226-2, Historically Black College or University and Minority Institution Representation. This provision applies to solicitations for research, studies, supplies, or services of the type normally acquired from higher educational institutions.

(2) The following certifications are applicable as indicated by the Contracting Officer:

[Contracting Officer check as appropriate.]

(i) 52.204-17, Ownership or Control of Offeror.

(ii) 52.222-18, Certification Regarding Knowledge of Child Labor for Listed End Products.

(iii) 52.222-48, Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Labor Standards to Contracts for Maintenance, Calibration, or Repair of Certain Equipment--Certification.

(iv) 52.222-52 Exemption from Application of the Service Contract Labor Standards to Contracts for Certain Services--Certification.

(v) 52.223-9, with its Alternate I, Estimate of Percentage of Recovered Material Content for EPA- Designated Products (Alternate I only).

(vi) 52.227-6, Royalty Information.

(A) Basic.

(B) Alternate I.

(vii) 52.227-15, Representation of Limited Rights Data and Restricted Computer Software.

(d) The offeror has completed the annual representations and certifications electronically via the SAM website accessed through https://www.acquisition.gov. After reviewing the SAM database information, the offeror verifies by https://www.acquisition.gov/ submission of the offer that the representations and certifications currently posted electronically that apply to this solicitation as indicated in paragraph (c) of this provision have been entered or updated within the last 12 months, are current, accurate, complete, and applicable to this solicitation (including the business size standard applicable to the NAICS code referenced for this solicitation), as of the date of this offer and are incorporated in this offer by reference (see FAR 4.1201); except for the changes identified below [offeror to insert changes, identifying change by clause number, title, date]. These amended representation(s) and/or certification(s) are also incorporated in this offer and are current, accurate, and complete as of the date of this offer.

FAR Clause Title Date Change

Any changes provided by the offeror are applicable to this solicitation only, and do not result in an update to the representations and certifications posted on SAM.

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. A Lowest Price, Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection approach will be utilized during evaluation in accordance with FAR 13.106-2(b)(1), to include an assessment of offerors past performance. Tradeoffs between non-price factors (i.e. Technical/Past Performance) and price are not permitted, whereby proposals will be evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using the non-price factors. The following factors and respective sub-factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(1) TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

(a) Transition Plan

(b) Quality Control Plan

(c) Mission Essential Plan

Technical Capability will be evaluated and rated on an acceptable or unacceptable basis (e.g.

pass/fail), whereby unacceptability of any respective sub-factor will result in an unacceptable technical capability-rating.

(2) PAST PERFORMANCE

In addition, ratings for past performance will be assigned utilizing an evaluation basis of acceptable or unacceptable.

(3) PRICE

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.

Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

52.212-2 ADDENDUM

1. BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: The Government’s evaluation of offeror’s proposals will be conducted utilizing the evaluation factors of: 1. Price, 2. Technical Capability, and 3. Past Performance. Evaluation of these factors will utilize a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) evaluation approach, to include an evaluation of offeror’s past performance, utilizing procedures in accordance with FAR 13.5.

The Government intends to award a contract without formal discussions. Upon completion of the Government’s initial evaluation of proposals, exchanges with offerors may occur, for purpose of clarifications and communications in accordance with FAR 13.106-2(b)(1). The Government reserves the right to conduct formal discussions with offerors for the purpose of negotiations at any point during the evaluation if deemed in the best interest of the Government. Once discussions, if conducted, have been concluded, the Contracting Officer will request Final Proposal Revisions from each of the offerors remaining within the competitive range.

2. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD: Three (3) evaluation factors will be used to evaluate proposals: a) Technical Capability, b) Past Performance, and c) Price.

Part I – Technical Capability. Technical rating evaluation processes reflects the degree to which the proposed approach meets or does not meet the minimum performance or capability requirements through an assessment of the strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, and risks of a proposal. The government will evaluate technical proposals and the three (3) below listed sub-factors of Transition Plan, Quality Control Plan, and Mission Essential Plan utilizing the Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings chart listed below through assigning ratings of acceptable and unacceptable . An unacceptable rating for any of the below sub-factors will result in an unacceptable rating for this Technical Capability primary factor. Accordingly, under the LPTA source selection approach, offerors who receive an unacceptable rating for this factor may not be considered for award. Technical Rattings shall be evaluated against the following sub-factors:

(i) Transition Plan: Transition Plans by offerors will be evaluated to assess if they comprehensively address the transition activities prescribed by clause 52.212-1 that result in successful performance on the contract start date of 1 Oct 2015 (Transistion period begins 1 September 2015).

The acceptability of an offeror’s transition plan will be based upon whether the proposed information and associated activities reasonably demonstrate to the Government that successful performance will commence on the contract start date. As the Government intends to award a contract without discussions, offerors that do not provide sufficient information to clearly and comprehensively illustrate their plans for transitioning, may result in an unacceptable rating for this Technical Capability sub-factor, and therefore, such offerors may be removed from consideration for award.

(ii) Quality Control Plan (QCP): Quality Control Plans by offerors will be evaluated for completeness in thoroughly addressing the Services Summary performance objectives as identified in the addendum to clause 52.212-1, with relation to proposed surveillance and/or validation methods and associated descriptions thereof.

The acceptability of Quality Control Plans will be based upon whether the proposed quality control processes by the offeror, with reference to surveillance, and/or validation methods of each Services Summary performance objective, reasonably demonstrate to the Government that services will be provided at an acceptable level of quality in meeting all requirements of the Performance Work Statement. As the Government intends to award a contract without discussions, offerors that do not provide sufficient information to clearly and comprehensively illustrate their processes for controlling quality in meeting the requirements of the Performance Work Statement, may result in an unacceptable rating for this Technical Capability sub-factor, and therefore, such offerors may be removed from consideration for award.

(iii) Mission Essential Services – This includes a method on how the contractor will provide mission essential services during a crisis or emergency outlined in the PWS paragraph 4.1.4. Contractor must illustrate how resources and personnel will be available and how the contractor intends to use them during crisis or emergency events.

As a result of the government’s evaluation of the aforementioned Technical Capability sub-factors of Resources and Transition Plan and Quality Control Plan, and all associated elements accordingly, a determination of technical capability will be assigned using the following Technical Ratings chart:

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Part II – Past Performance

(i) The Government will evaluate Past Performance by reviewing questionnaires sent to the points of contact listed by offerors in their Past Performance proposal, and data independently obtained from other Government and commercial sources. The Government will assess recency (performed within the last three years) and relevancy (undertaking similar in size and scope) of associated projects and the offeror’s demonstration of ability to successfully perform.

(ii) Note that the past performance evaluation performed in support of this requirement does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the vendor’s past performance on past contracts;

rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts/projects.

NOTE: If a customer point of contact cannot be reached, the Government may contact the offeror again and request an additional point of contact.

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

Part III – Price Evaluation. The Government will evaluate prices submitted by offeror.

(i) Each offeror’s line item price will be verified by multiplying the quantities identified at the contract line item number (CLIN) level by the proposed unit price to confirm the extended amount for each CLIN (to include the base period AND the option years). The offeror’s total proposed price will be verified by adding base period CLINs and all option year CLINs. All proposals must be submitted in USD (United States Dollars).

a) As this requirement is a “commercial” service, that will result in a “firm-fixed-priced” contract, a comparison of offeror’s proposed, competitive prices will satisfy the requirement for price analysis. If a determination of reasonable pricing cannot be established through adequate price competition, the Government may use additional price analysis to determine price reasonableness.

The depth at which price analysis is conducted by the Government in determining price reasonableness, is left to the Government’s discretion. Price evaluation applied to FY20 Option Period proposed pricing will also be utilized for the potential of exercising Option to Extend Services clause 52.217-8. An offeror’s proposal constitutes acceptance of continued rates for the option period in which the clause is exercised by the government.

AWARD DETERMINATION: As a result of the Government’s evaluation, only those offerors whose proposals are assigned acceptable ratings for both non-price factors entailing Technical Capability and Past Performance, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. Under the LPTA evaluation process trade-offs will NOT be permitted between price, and the non-price factors of Technical Capability and Past Performance.

Additional Information for Offerors regarding the Government’s evaluation of proposals:

Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Items. Offeror’s may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, the relevance of past performance information or to resolve minor clerical errors). In addition, communications may be conducted regarding adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports an unacceptable rating or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. These communications will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revisions.

52.212-4 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS-- COMMERCIAL ITEMS (DEC 2014)

(a) Inspection/Acceptance. The Contractor shall only tender for acceptance those items that conform to the requirements of this contract. The Government reserves the right to inspect or test any supplies or services that have been tendered for acceptance. The Government may require repair or replacement of nonconforming supplies or reperformance of nonconforming services at no increase in contract price. If repair/replacement or reperformance will not correct the defects or is not possible, the Government may seek an equitable price reduction or adequate consideration for acceptance of nonconforming supplies or services. The Government must exercise its post-acceptance rights (1) within a reasonable time after the defect was discovered or should have been discovered; and

(2) before any substantial change occurs in the condition of the item, unless the change is due to the defect in the item.

(b) Assignment. The Contractor or its assignee may assign its rights to receive payment due as a result of performance of this contract to a bank, trust company, or other financing institution, including any Federal lending agency in accordance with the Assignment of Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 3727). However, when a third party makes payment (e.g., use of the Governmentwide commercial purchase card), the Contractor may not assign its rights to receive payment under this contract.

(c…