QUESTIONS_FOR_FA4626_(002)_(Rev_1)_Group_B.docx

DOCX document 15 KB Posted

Attached to
Add Anti Ram Cables Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4626-16-R-0005
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Global Strike Command

About this file

Questions set 2

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Add Anti Ram Cables, newest first.
File Type Posted
QUESTIONS_and_ANSWERS_Group_E.docx DOCX document
QUESTIONS_and_ANSWERS_Group_D.docx DOCX document
COMBINED_FINAL_DRAWINGS.pdf PDF
Updated_Specs_MAF_Anti-Ram_Cables.pdf PDF
Anti_Ram_Amendment_2.pdf PDF
QUESTIONS_and_ANSWERS_Group_C.docx DOCX document
Anti_Ram_Questions_(Rev1)_Group_A.docx DOCX document
Pre-Proposal_Sign_In_and_Agenda_9_June_2016.pdf PDF
CE_Pre-Proposal_Slide_Show.pptx PPTX presentation
Anti_Ram_Amendment_1.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_Specs.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_-Drawings.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_-Base_Entry.pdf PDF
Attachment_8_-Past_Performance_Questionaire.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-Schedule_of_Drawings.pdf PDF
Anti_Ram_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attchment_9_-Subcontractor_Consent.doc DOC document
Attachment_7_-Special_Contract_Requirements.pdf PDF
Attachment_2-Submittal_Schedule.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_wage_determinations.pdf PDF
Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR

FA4626-R-0005 Anti-Ram Cables Group B 13 Jun 2016

1. Temporary gate is supplied by the government. It must be same voltage, phase, and amperage as existing one as the circuit is used to run the temporary gate. Is control box on same side?

A: In the meeting it was talked about that the temp gate could be fed by the existing gate power and could be run temporarily to either side that would be required to make the temp gate functional. The fence will need to be modified to gain access to the control box side in order for it to work on either side of the road.

2. What is voltage, phase, and amperage of ex. gate?

A: 208 VAC single phase, 20 amp circuit.

3. Can we feed the temporary gate on the surface with SO cord?

A: SO cord would be acceptable provided NEC requirements for temporary wiring is followed and the cable is protected/routed from traffic.

4. Are unused pipes between pull boxes just to be capped and left in pull boxes?

A: Yes

5. There are to be no splices in pull boxes. It should be pipe all the way even in pull boxes correct?

A: The conduits terminate/initiate in their respective pull boxes (power and communication), but there will be no wire splicing allowed in the pull boxes.

6. There are 4 pull boxes joined by the new ductbank. We will have to core drill all the small pipes that enter from the building and those that exit to the new gate. Do you want some nipples out now for future work? It will cost a lot more to put in later. If wanted we would need to know size, quantity and location.

A: No, not at this time. We currently would not know size, quantity or location.

7. Conduit in pull boxes is rigid with pvc coating. Is new underground conduit the same?

A: Yes.

8. We are to tie posts to existing cathodic ring(which we have done many times) per detail 1 and 5 on sheet CX-505, yet specification 264200 is for a new system to be installed. Can we just install per details 1 and 5 on sheet CX-505 and show inspector?

A: Yes, install per details and show the inspector.

9. Note 5 and 7 on sheets ES-401 through ES-405 mention attaching to a cathodic grounding rod, yet it is an existing cable per detail 5 on sheet CX-505. Can grounding rod be removed and the word cable put in its place?

A: Yes, it is cathodic protection cable, not grounding rod. The drawings will be updated in the forthcoming addendum.

10. Detail 3 on sheet CX-504 calls out for a 4” pvc with (4) 1-1/4” pvc coated rigid conduits in it.

1-1/4 pvc coated rigid is 1.74 inches in diameter, and four will not fit in the 4” pvc. The couplings will be even larger. Same for the communication conduit with ¾” and 1” in it. This detail should be the 6” pvc. Will it be changed to read 6” pvc?

A: This question will be addressed in the forthcoming amendment.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .