Atch_6_Pre-Site_visit_Q&A.pdf
PDF 123 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Replace Transformers Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4613-17-R-0007
About this file
Atch 6, Pre Site Visit Q&A
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA4613-17-R-0007-0004.pdf | ||
| Atch_10,_Used_Oil_Report_1151&1152A_2_May_17.pdf | ||
| Atch_9,_Post_Site_Visit_Q&A_2_May_17.pdf | ||
| Atch_1,_SOW_Rev1_1_May_17.pdf | ||
| FA4613-17-R-0007-0003.pdf | ||
| Atch_8_Spec_Oct_16.pdf | ||
| FA4613-17-R-0007-0002.pdf | ||
| Atch_1,_SOW_4-14-17.pdf | ||
| FA4613-17-R-0007-0001.pdf | ||
| Atch_3,_WD.pdf | ||
| Atch_1,_SOW_2-13-17.pdf | ||
| Atch_5,_Form_66.pdf | ||
| FA4613-17-R-0007_Solicitation_10_Mar_17.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 6 FA4613‐17‐R‐0001 Amendment 01, Pre Site Visit Q&A, (Q1) The contractor is to provide (2) PME switches SG‐D‐001 AND SG‐D‐002. Detail B on E‐301 indicates only a S&C PMH‐11 or equal will be approved, should this be a changed to a PME switch?
(A1) The specification should read for PME switches or equivalent in lieu of PMH switch or equivalent.
(Q2) Page 5 of the SOW (7)(b) 4‐ 500 KCMIL conductors are to be installed in new 1 ½ conduit, should this be 3 ½ as the minimum size for 4‐ 500 KCMIL conductors is 3 ½ conduit? Can 4” inch conduit be used instead of 3 ½ ?
(A2) The specification should read 3 ½ instead of 1 ½ and 4 conduit can be used. SOW updated see Rev 1 dated 14 April 2017
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .