FA441720R0004 Attch 4 - PPQ.pdf

PDF 321 KB Posted

Attached to
CP1033735, SOF Alter STTS Vehicle/Watercraft Maintenance Areas, Bldg. 90540
Solicitation number
FA441720R0004
Issued by

About this file

This document is a past/present performance questionnaire template for a federal solicitation to alter a building at Hurlburt Field, Florida. The template requests information on the respondent, including company details and contact information. It also asks the respondent to provide performance ratings on a scale from exceptional to unsatisfactory for the contractor's quality, schedule, management, small business utilization, and regulatory compliance on a previous project. The respondent is asked to note any liquidated damages assessed and whether they would rehire the contractor. The related federal contract opportunity is for solicitation number FA441720R0004 to furnish all labor, equipment, and materials necessary to alter building 90540 for the Special Tactics & Training Squadron Vehicle/Watercraft Maintenance areas at Hurlburt Field for the Department of the Air Force Special Operations Command. Completed questionnaires must be returned by the closing date and time of the solicitation.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FA441720R0004

ATTACHMENT 4

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR 3.104 Page 1

03 Feb 2020

SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

1. Contractor’s Name and Address:

2. Point of Contact:

3. Phone Number:

4. Contract Number: Contract Type:

5. Period of Performance:

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To Be Completed By Evaluation Respondent)

1. Respondent’s Company Name & Address:

2. Respondent’s Name:

3. Phone Number: Fax Number:

E-Mail:

4. Award Amount: Final Amount:

5. Project Title: Project Number:

7. Period of Performance:

Start Date: End Date:

6. Brief Project Description:

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FA441720R0004

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR 3.104 Page 2

SECTION C: EMAIL COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO:

Contract Specialist: Jaysen Cortez

Email: jaysen.cortez.1@us.af.mil

Contracting Officer: Marlena Perez

Email: marlena.perez@us.af.mil

THIS FORM MUST BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN: The closing date and time of solicitation.

SECTION D: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose letter on the scale that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY UNSATISFACTORY OR MARGINAL RATINGS.

E V S M U N

Exceptional (Outstanding)

Very Good (Above Average)

Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Available

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear, or were, satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective, or were not fully implemented does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective

No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FA441720R0004

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR 3.104 Page 3

1. QUALITY: Access conformance to contract requirements, specifications and standards of Good Workmanship. Provided effective quality control which resulted in a quality finished product.

☐ Exceptional ☐Very Good ☐Satisfactory ☐Marginal ☐Unsatisfactory ☐Not Available

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

2. SCHEDULE: Developed realistic progress schedules and completed the project within the established schedule.

3. MANAGEMENT: Provided experienced superintendent, managers, and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements. Adequately coordinate and controlled performance of subcontractors.

Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems. Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith. Provided timely resolution of punch list items and closeout documentation. Provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FA441720R0004

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE – SEE FAR 3.104 Page 4

4. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS: Contractor complied with terms and conditions for Small Business Participation. Achieved Small Business Goals.

5. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE: Contractor complied with Financial, Environmental, Safety, and Reporting Requirements. Contractor was compliant with labor standards, posting of EEO, labor rates, minimum wage.

Payrolls were completed properly and received in a timely matter. Paid subcontractors in a timely manner Contractor had an adequate safety plan and it was implemented properly. No safety discrepancies were noted.

6. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: Was the contractor assessed liquidated damages? ☐YES ☐NO

(If Yes, briefly explain the circumstances)

7. Based on the contractor’s overall performance, would you rehire this contractor? ☐YES ☐NO

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:

Signature of Respondent: ________________________________________________________ Date: ________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .