FA4417-08-R-0023 Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 139 KB Posted

Attached to
Repair HVAC System, Bldg 90729, Control Tower Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4417-08-R-0023
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Special Operations Command

About this file

FA4417-08-R-0023 Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 4

FA4417-08-R-0023

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

1. Contractor’s Name and Address:

2. Point of Contact:

3. Phone Number:

4. Contract Number: Contract Type:

5. Project Title:

6. Period of Performance:

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To Be Completed By Evaluation Respondent)

1. Respondent’s Company Name & Address:

2. Respondent’s Name:

3. Phone Number: Fax Number:

E-Mail:

4. Contract Number: Contract Type:

5. Award Amount: Final Amount:

6. Project Title:

7. Period of Performance:

8. FAX or Email COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO: 1st Special Operations Contracting Squadron/LGCB, 350 Tully St, Bldg 90339, Hulburt Field, FL 32544-5810, Attention: TSgt Ron Wilson, FAX : (850) 884-1272. Ronald.wilson@hurlburt.af.mil

THIS FORM MUST BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN: 12 Aug, 4:00P.M. local time.

9. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

1 2 3 4 5 6

Unsatisfactory Marginal None Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional

Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.

There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.

No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.

Performance met contract requirements.

There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner

1. Developed realistic progress schedules and completed the project within 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A the established schedule.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

2. Provided experienced superintendent, managers, and supervisors, with 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements.

3. Adequately controlled performance of subcontractors. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

4. Provided effective quality control which resulted in a quality finished product . 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

5. Provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.

6. Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.

7. Provided timely resolution of punch list items and closeout documentation. 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

8. Was the contractor assessed liquidated damages? YES NO (If Yes, briefly explain the circumstances)

9. Based on the contractor’s overall performance, would you rehire this contractor? YES NO

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING _

Signature of Rater: Date: _

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .