08-R-0023 Amend 0004 Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 49 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair HVAC System, Bldg 90729, Control Tower Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4417-08-R-0023
About this file
FA4417-08-R-0023 Amendment 0004 Revised Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 08-R-0023 RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS 18 Aug 08.pdf | ||
| 08-R-0023 Amendment 0004.pdf | ||
| 08-R-0023 Amendment 0004 Rev Drawings E-1 2 and 4.pdf | ||
| Past Performance Questionnaire 08-R-0023 Amend 0003.pdf | ||
| 08-R-0023 Amendment 0003.pdf | ||
| 08-R-0023 Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Past Performance Questionnaire 08-R-0023 Amend 0002.pdf | ||
| Questions for Repair HVAC Control Tower Bldg 90729 7-28-08.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001.doc | DOC document | |
| FA4417-08-R-0023 Attachment 2 - Specifications.pdf | ||
| FA4417-08-R-0023 Attachment 5 - Financial Reference Sheet.pdf | ||
| FA4417-08-R-0023 Attachment 3 - Drawings.pdf | ||
| FA4417-08-R-0023 Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| FA4417-08-R-0023 Solicitation.pdf | ||
| FA4417-08-R-0023 Attachment 1 - Wage Rates.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 4
FA4417-08-R-0023
Past/Present Performance Questionnaire
Section A: Contractor Information
1. Contractor’s Name and Address:
2. Point of Contact:
3. Phone Number:
4. Contract Number:
Contract Type:
5. Project Title:
6. Period of Performance:
Section B: Respondent information (To Be Completed By Evaluation Respondent)
1. Respondent’s Company Name &
Address:
2. Respondent’s Name:
3. Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail:
4. Contract Number:
Contract Type:
5. Award Amount:
Final Amount:
6. Project Title:
7. Period of Performance:
C. FAX or EMAIL COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO: 1st Special Operations Contracting Squadron/LGCB, 350 Tully St, Bldg 90339, Hulburt Field, FL 32544-5810, Attention: Lt Kathryn Davis, FAX : (850) 884-1272. kathryn.davis@hurlburt.af.mil THIS FORM MUST BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN: 22 August 2008, 4:00P.M. local time.
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Marginal |
| None |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Exceptional |
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive. |
| Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner |
1. Developed realistic progress schedules and completed the project within
1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A the established schedule.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Provided experienced superintendent, managers, and supervisors, with the technical and administrative abilities to meet requirements.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Adequately controlled performance of subcontractors.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. Provided effective quality control which resulted in a quality finished product.
1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A COMMENTS/REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5. Provided submittals in a timely manner. Submittals were well researched and clearly identified the proposed item.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. Identified problems as they occurred. Suggested approaches to resolving problems.
1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A Displayed initiative and cooperation in solving problems. Provided adequate information and pricing for change orders and negotiated them in good faith.
COMMENTS/REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. Provided timely resolution of punch list items and closeout documentation.
1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A COMMENTS/REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. Was the contractor assessed liquidated damages?
YES
NO
(If Yes, briefly explain the circumstances)
9. Based on the contractor’s overall performance, would you rehire this contractor?
YES
NO
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING ___________________________________________________
Signature of Rater: ________________________________________________________ Date: ________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .