04_-_Past_and_Present_Performance_Questionaire_Sheet.pdf

PDF 42 KB Posted

Attached to
Asbestos & Lead Based Paint Abatement ID/IQ Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA3020-18-R-0012
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

Past Performance Questionaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Asbestos & Lead Based Paint Abatement ID/IQ, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment_3.pdf PDF
Amendment_2.pdf PDF
FA3020-18-R-0012_Amendment_1.pdf PDF
RFP_FA3020-18-R-0012_Asbestos_IDIQ.pdf PDF
01_-_VNVP_149202_Specifications_-_SOW.pdf PDF
01_-_VNVP_149202_ACM-LBP_IDIQ_Package.pdf PDF
RFP_FA3020-18-R-0012_Asbestos_IDIQ.pdf PDF
06_-_SAFB_Form_151_-_Base_Pass.pdf PDF
02_-_Price_Exhibit_-_Blank_FINAL.pdf PDF
02_-_Price_Exhibit_-_Blank_FINAL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
05_-_SF_LLL.pdf PDF
07_-_SWP3_Checklist.pdf PDF
03_-_TX180326Wichita.pdf PDF
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

A4 - 1

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please complete the requested information below:

Contract Owner/Customer : ________________________________ Company/Organization____________________________________ Telephone Number: _______________________________________ Email address:____________________________________________ Address: __________________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: ____________________________________

Contract Number: __________________________ Dollar Amount: _________________

Contract Period or Dates of Performance: ______________________

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

B. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E G S M U N Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

A4 - 2 which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

contractor were effective.

actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor: E G S M U N

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Developed realistic progress schedules.

13. Met established project schedules.

14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

15. Was responsive to contract changes.

16. Provided adequate project supervision.

17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

A4 - 3

The contractor: E G S M U N

23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

24. Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO

Remarks:______________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it.