Attch_5_-_Volume_5_-_TYMX160008-_As-Built_Drawing-Reports-Publications.pdf
PDF 19 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Bldg 100 Structural Repairs Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA3016-16-R-0035
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA3016-16-R-0035 Attachment 5
VOLUME 5
APPENDIX C- As-Built Drawings1930 Original Construction APPENDIX D- Hazardous Material Reports APPENDIX E- US Department of Interior Preservation Brief 13 Historic Windows APPENDIX F- JBSA Historical Building Maintenance and Repairs.
APPENDIX G- Project Phasing APPENDIX H- Project Route/ Laydown Area
APPENDIX C
AS-BUILT DRAWINGS
APPENDIX D
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL REPORTS
LIMITED
ASBESTOS AND LEAD
INSPECTIONS
Building 100
Randolph Air Force Base, Texas for
Mr. Richard Cavada Tetra Tech
San Antonio, Texas by AEHS, Inc.
4402 Center Gate San Antonio, Texas 78217
(210) 656-9300 www.aehs-sa.com http://www.aehs-sa.com/
Asbestos and Lead Inspections
Building 100, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas
April 2010
AEHS, Inc.
Environmental, Health, and Safety Consulting
ASBESTOS AND LEAD INSPECTIONS
This report is divided into two sections corresponding to the consulting performed. The on-site consultations were performed by William E. Normington, MS, and Matthew E. Bishop. Bill Normington is a Texas Department of State
Health Services (TDSHS) licensed Asbestos Consultant and Lead Risk Assessor while Matt Bishop, CHSP, is a TDSHS licensed Asbestos Inspector/Management
Planner, Asbestos Project Manager, Lead Risk Assessor, Lead Project Designer and Mold Assessment Consultant. This project was under the overall direction of
Ronald M. Bishop, MPH, CIH. Ron Bishop is a TDSHS licensed Asbestos
Consultant, Lead Risk Assessor, Lead Project Designer, and Mold Assessment
Consultant as well as a Certified Industrial Hygienist, Certified Safety Executive, Registered Sanitarian, Diplomate in Environmental Health, and Registered
Environmental Professional, Registered Environmental Manager and Green
Consultant. This project is considered limited because destructive sampling did not occur.
A. ASBESTOS INSPECTION
1.1. GENERAL.
1.2. Construction materials containing asbestos have been used extensively in buildings because it possesses excellent properties for fire-proofing, insulation, and condensation control. Asbestos may be found in: (1) cement products; (2) spray applied or trowel applied materials on ceiling, walls, and other surfaces; (3) insulation on pipes, boilers, tanks, ducts, and other equipment; (4) vinyl floor tiles; (5) roofing; (6) flooring coatings; and (7) other miscellaneous products.
1.3. Friable materials are those materials that when dry can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Material that contains more than one percent asbestos by weight is considered to be asbestos containing material. Some of these asbestos-containing building materials are not considered friable now, but could become friable if not properly managed and maintained under an asbestos management program.
1.4. The concern about exposure to asbestos in buildings is based on evidence linking various respiratory diseases with occupational exposure in the shipbuilding, mining, milling, and fabricating industries. The presence of asbestos in a building does not mean that there is a significant health risk to building occupants. As long as asbestos-containing materials remain
April 2010
AEHS, Inc.
in good condition and are not disturbed, exposure is unlikely. Through proper control of building operations and maintenance activities, disturbance or damage to asbestos-containing materials is minimized, thus limiting the building occupant's exposure to airborne asbestos fibers.
1.5. Building alterations and/or demolition require knowledge of what materials contain asbestos and if they will be removed or disturbed during the project. Under the Clean Air Act, EPA has issued a National Emission Standard for Asbestos (40 CFR 61.140 - 61.156). This
Standard regulates reporting requirements, work practices, waste disposal, and emissions from facility modification and/or demolition operations. The Standard applies only to materials containing more than one percent asbestos. The State of Texas has adopted a set of regulations (25 TAC 295.31 - 295.70) known as "Texas Asbestos Health Protection Rules" which govern asbestos removal, encapsulation, or enclosure, including licensing and regulation, in all buildings of public occupancy or access. Any disturbance or removal of
ACBM in the building or facilities are subject to this Texas Statute.
2.1. BACKGROUND.
2.2. AEHS, Inc. was contacted by Mr. Richard Cavada, Tetra Tech, concerning the need for
Asbestos and Lead Inspections of Building 100, Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.
2.3. A proposal was submitted and accepted by Tetra Tech.
3.1. SCOPE OF WORK.
3.2. The inspection was performed on 22 and 27 April 2010 and consisted of visual assessments to determine the presence of suspect ACBM. Bulk samples of suspect ACBM
(materials which possibly contain asbestos, as determined by an accredited EPA AHERA
Building Inspector/Consultant) were collected. The visual inspection, bulk sampling, and inspection documentation was performed by William E. Normington [Asbestos Consultant -
(No. 10-5364)].
3.3. AEHS, Inc. is a TDSHS Licensed Asbestos Constant Agency (No.10-0335), PCM
Laboratory (No. 30-0295), and Training Provider (No. 00-0068).
3.4. The specific objectives of the survey were to:
Perform a visual inspection and physical assessment following the Asbestos
Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) protocol as a guideline to identify, quantify, and assess accessible friable and non-friable ACBM;
Collect and analyze bulk samples of suspect material for asbestos content and identification by an American Industrial Hygiene Association Accredited
Laboratory that is also licensed by the Texas Department of State Health Services;
April 2010
AEHS, Inc.
Ensure the technical quality of all work by using the AHERA protocol and a
TDSHS licensed consultant and inspector for the inspection.
ssue a final report that includes findings, bulk sample locations, and confirmed asbestos-containing building materials.
4.1. DESCRIPTION.
4.2. The inspections were limited to the interior and exterior of Building 100.
4.3. Building 100 is known as the Taj Mahal and was completed in 1931. It was officially dedicated as a Texas Historical Site landmark in 1976 and listed in the National Registry of
Historical Places in 1987.
5.1. INVESTIGATIVE METHODS.
5.2. Visual Inspection.
5.2.1. Building materials were inspected and assessed using the methods presented in the federal AHERA regulations (40 CFR, Part 763) as a guideline. The procedures mandated are considered the industry standard and are applied to all surveys performed by
5.2.2. The suspect ACBM consisted of stucco, window glazing, thermal system insulation on pipes, gutter mastic, roof mastic, duct mastic, two types of ceiling tile, three types of floor tile with mastic underneath, vibration (isolation) dampers, and expansion tank insulation.
5.2.3. Additionally, there was waste material located in an inaccessible location around the water tank that appeared to be “air-o-cell” insulation. Air-o-cell looks like corrugated cardboard and is found on straight lengths of pipes. It usually contains 50% to 90%
Chrysotile Asbestos. It was apparently left over from a previous abatement project.
5.3. Bulk Sampling.
5.3.1. Bulk samples of all homogeneous materials from identified functional spaces containing suspect ACBM were collected. A homogeneous material is defined as a surfacing material, thermal system insulation, or miscellaneous material that is uniform in use, color and texture. Examples of homogeneous materials include:
Pipe insulation produced by the same manufacturer and installed during the same time period;
Floor or ceiling tile of identical size, color and/or pattern;
April 2010
AEHS, Inc.
Sprayed-on acoustical ceiling materials located in contiguous areas; and
Trowelled on plaster of same texture and location.
5.3.2. A functional space is defined as any spatially distinct unit within a building that contains identifiable populations of current or previous building occupants. Examples of functional spaces include:
Office areas;
Storage (warehousing) areas; and
Living quarters.
The functional space concept is helpful in determining the use and occupancy of building areas containing confirmed ACBM. Knowing the types of occupants and their use of an area also may influence the selection of an asbestos management option and/or corrective action. If multiple corrective actions are necessary, the occupancy and use of individual areas may also become important factors when establishing the priority, or ranking, of each corrective action.
5.3.3. Prior to obtaining the samples, all friable suspect material are sprayed with amended
(surfactant added) water to minimize fiber release. Small pieces of the suspect material were sampled by cutting off a sufficient quantity of the wetted suspect material in an inconspicuous location and securing the sample in a plastic bag. Samples were extracted from the center of the wetted area. The tool used to collect the suspect sample was then cleaned to ensure no cross-contamination occurred between samples. A plastic bag was used to contain the samples of the suspect material and quickly sealed to prevent the escape of the material or the introduction of ACBM contamination from outside sources.
5.4. Bulk Sample Analysis.
5.4.1. All bulk samples collected during this survey were analyzed by Environmental
Hazards Services, Inc.’s Laboratory in Richmond, Virginia. Environmental Hazards
Services laboratory is accredited under the National Institute of Standards and
Technology’s National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) and the
American Industrial Hygiene Association. Additionally, the laboratory is a TDSHS licensed (No. 30-0188) Asbestos Laboratory (Polarized Light Microscopy). Their address, telephone number, and quality assurance review are depicted on their laboratory reports.
5.4.2. All asbestos samples were analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy/Dispersion
Staining (PLM/DS) techniques in accordance with methodology approved by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), method number 600/R-93/116. The percentage of asbestos present in the samples was determined on the basis of a visual area estimation as set forth in 40 CFR Part 763, Appendix A, Subpart F, Section 1.2 and 1.7.2.4. The lower limit of reliable detection for asbestos using the PLM/DS method is approximately
1% by volume.
April 2010
AEHS, Inc.
5.3.2.1. The Environmental Protection Agency considers materials with greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos content to be asbestos containing. Therefore, when asbestos containing building material (ACBM) appear in this report, it should be interpreted as meaning the sample(s) taken contained greater than (>1%) asbestos and is considered a regulated material. However, material that contains equal to or less than one percent is not considered to be asbestos containing material. If the results of sampling indicate that the asbestos containing material is a trace or up to 10% asbestos, the results must be verified by polarized light microscopy point counting or presumed to be asbestos. For this survey, AEHS personnel used their experience with similar materials.
5.3.2.2. When “No Asbestos Detected” (NAD) appears in this report, it should be interpreted as meaning no asbestos was observed in the sample material above the reliable limit of detection for the PLM/DS method.
5.3.2.3. The Texas Department of State Health Services requires a minimum of three samples to be collected from each homogeneous area. In order for a material to be considered negative, all samples must be negative. On the other hand, if one of the three samples is positive, then the material is considered positive.
6.1. RESULTS OF INSPECTION.
6.2. The laboratory results are at Appendix A. A summary is:
6.2.1. Domestic hot water line insulation throughout– 5% Chrysotile Asbestos.
6.2.2. Heating hot water line insulation throughout– 5% Chrysotile Asbestos, 20%
Amosite Asbestos.
6.2.3. Chilled water line insulation throughout – 30% Chrysotile Asbestos, 15% Amosite
Asbestos.
6.2.4. Expansion tank insulation (AH 2 & 3 Room) – 25% Chrysotile Asbestos.
6.2.5. Expansion tank insulation (Boiler Room) – 55% Chrysotile Asbestos.
6.2.6. Chiller insulation (AH 2 & 3 Room) – 30% Chrysotile Asbestos.
6.2.7. Vibration (Isolation) damper (AH 1) – 70% Chrysotile Asbestos.
6.2.8. HVAC black duct mastic throughout – 10% Chrysotile Asbestos.
6.2.9. Brown 9” x 9” floor tile and mastic underneath in the basement Communication
Room – 2% Chrysotile Asbestos floor tile and 4% Chrysotile Asbestos mastic.
April 2010
AEHS, Inc.
6.2.10. Grey 12” x 12” floor tile and mastic underneath this tile in the Command Post on the 2 nd
Level – 3% Chrysotile Asbestos floor tile and 5% Chrysotile Asbestos mastic.
6.2.11. Floor tile mastic underneath 12” x 12” white floor tile in the four toilets in the basement – 5% Chrysotile Asbestos.
6.2.12. Floor tile mastic underneath 12” x 12” white floor tile in the east chiller room – 3%
Chrysotile Asbestos.
6.2.13. Interior gutter mastic on 5
th level – 15% Chrysotile Asbestos.
6.2.14. Interior roof mastic on 5
level – 4% Chrysotile Asbestos.
6.2.15. Waste Air-o-Cell - Assumed
Note: The thermal system insulation is throughout the building while only an extremely small amount has previously been abated; therefore, all should be considered positive for asbestos as indicated herein:
domestic hot water lines run from the boiler room to all toilets above the ceiling tile in the basement, up chases, and above the plaster ceiling on the first level;
Heating lines run from the boiler room to the three air handlers in the basement and one on the 5 th level and to the radiators on the 2 nd and 3 rd levels; and
Chilled water lines run from the two chillers to all four air handlers.
6.3. No Asbestos Detected. The following sampled suspect ACM laboratory analyses indicated “NAD – No Asbestos Detected”:
Exterior Stucco, Exterior Window Glazing, Old Radiator Lines (tar and cork), 1’ x 1’ Ceiling Tile, Mastic under the 1’ x 1’ Ceiling Tile, 2’ x 2’ Ceiling Tile, Wall Plaster, Wallboard, April 2010
AEHS, Inc.
Float Mud, and
Cementitious HVAC Duct Mastic on Air Handlers 1, 2, and 3.
6.4. Photographs are at Appendix B and Drawings at Appendix C.
7.1. ASSESSMENT.
7.2. Friable Asbestos Material. All chilled and heated water line insulation should be considered friable asbestos as well as the mud on the chillers and the expansion tank.
Additionally, the Assumed Air-o-Cell waste material is considered to be friable asbestos.
7.3. Non-Friable Materials. All other positive asbestos containing material as indicated in paragraph 6.1, above.
8.1. RECOMMENDATIONS.
8.2. Maintain a copy of this report with the project files.
8.3. Abate the asbestos containing material, if it is to be disturbed, prior to any renovation using a TDSHS licensed Asbestos Abatement Company and Transporter employing TDSHS licensed/registered personnel.
8.4. File a TDSHS notification.
8.5. Employ a TDSHS licensed Asbestos Consultant to prepare specifications.
8.6. Employ a TDSHS licensed Asbestos Consultant Agency to provide Asbestos Project
Management and Air Monitoring.
9.1. COST ESTIMATES.
9.2. Abatement, Transportation and Disposal - $18,500.00
9.3. Notification - $500.00
9.4. Specifications - $1000.00
9.5. Project Management and Air Monitoring - $500.00 per day
April 2010
AEHS, Inc.
B. LEAD BASE PAINT
1.2. Background.
1.2.1. Inspections and risk assessments for lead base paint (LBP) hazards emerged in response to an insurance problem in the nation’s public housing programs after children in housing units throughout the nation were found to contain elevated blood lead levels.
When investigations pursued, the houses were found to contain LBP where deterioration was extensive and the children were ingesting the paint directly (chewing on the sills, etc.)
or indirectly by placing contaminated items into their mouths.
1.2.2. At the present time, many of the standards used in lead hazard assessments are not health-based standards. A limit that will not produce adverse health affects has not been established for lead content of paint, dust or in soil. This is due in part to differences in individual behavior, particularly with respect to hand-to-mouth activity. However, the limits that are established in the various standards will significantly reduce the health impacts. Also, these limits dictate requirements for action, if exceeded.
1.2.3. The reason lead base paint inspections are conducted for commercial facilities is to determine potential worker exposure and environmental insult during demolition and disposal of the wastes based on the lead content.
1.3. Standards. As indicated in the Table 1 below, there are various standards that currently define lead base paint. The applicable standards to this project include the OSHA requirements, for worker protection performing the renovation, and the environmental requirements for disposal of materials painted with lead base paint.
Table 1
Lead Standards
Standard/Regulation Level Remarks
Consumer Product Safety Commission 600 ppm
0.06% parts per million
% by weight
HUD – 24 CFR Part 35 0.5% by weight
1.0 mg/cm
NLLAP Accredited Lab
XRF
TELLR - Texas Environmental Lead
Reduction Rules 0.5% by weight
1.0 mg/cm
NLLAP Accredited Lab
XRF
OSHA - 29 CFR 1926.62 - Lead in
Construction; Interim Final Rule Any amount Worker Protection
EPA - 40 CFR 261 - Identification and
Listing of Hazardous Wastes 5 ppm TCLP
TCLP - Toxicity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure
April 2010
AEHS, Inc.
1.4. Lead Risk Assessment.
1.4.1. A Lead Risk Assessment is to determine, and then report on the existence, nature, severity, and location of lead base paint hazards in residential dwellings through on-site investigations. Normally, risk assessments determine the immediately available sources of lead in a dwelling and provides advice on long-term and/or short-term responses to any hazards found. In general, inspections measure lead base paint concentrations while risk assessments measure lead base paint hazards.
1.4.2. The specific differences between an Inspection and a Risk Assessment depicted in
Table 2, below:
Table 2
Inspections/Risk Assessments
Inspections Risk Assessments
Measure the concentration of lead in the paint on a surface-by-surface basis
Measure the level of lead in dust and soil and deteriorated paint
Identify the presence of lead base paint on all components Identity the location and nature of all lead base paint hazards (primary prevention)
Allow the owner to avoid treating paint that is not lead base paint
Consider information about past maintenance and management practices
Allow the owner to treat all lead hazards present
Limited Risk Assessment/Inspection A combination of the Inspection and Risk Assessment tailored to the specific renovations to be performed under the specifications.
2.1. APPROACH.
2.2. Limited Inspection. Limited lead base paint inspections were conducted on 22 and 27
April 2010 at the location as described in paragraph 4 of the Asbestos Section.
2.3. Credentials.
2.3.1. The Limited Inspection was performed by Matthew E. Bishop. Matt is a TDSHS certified Lead Risk Assessor (No. 2070727), which includes Lead Inspector, and Lead
Project Designer (No. 2090062).
2.3.2. AEHS, Inc. is a TDSHS certified/licensed Lead Firm (No. 21100283) and Lead
Training Provider (No. 20439)
2.4. Methodology. XRF measurements were taken at representative locations on interior painted surfaces in the area of concern. XRF Niton Model XLp 300A (Serial No. 10381) was
April 2010
AEHS, Inc.
used in the testing for lead base paint. Calibrations were performed prior to and after testing each building in accordance with Performance Characteristics Sheets (PCS). See Appendix D for a table of the results.
3.1. RESULTS.
3.2. Two hundred and twenty-two (222) measurements were made with the XRF for lead content.
3.3. The protocol for performing lead inspections is to first designate the sides as A, B, C, and
D. A is the primary street side of the building and the main entrance. The sides then rotate clockwise with C being the rear. Additionally, room equivalents are used unless there is an obvious difference in coating. This means that every single item is not measured for lead content but similar items are grouped. For example, a room with multiple windows will have one component (i.e., sash) on one window and it will apply to all window sashes, a window sill on one window and it will apply to windows, etc.
3.4. Base on the above protocol and the principal of grouping (per HUD and EPA), the following should be considered positive for lead base paint under OSHA:
3.4.1. East Basement.
o Ceiling o White Stucco Wall o Gray Wood Doors o Brown Wood Doors, Casings and Jambs o White Plaster Walls o White Metal Pipes o Gray Wood Doors and Jambs o Black Stair Risers
3.4.2. West Basement.
o Brown Wood Doors, Casings and Jambs o White Doors and Casings o White Metal Doors and Casings o Brown Wood Window Casings o Brown Exit Door o Dumbwaiter Door and Casing o Brown Wood Window Casings and Sashes o Brown Metal and Wood Doors
3.4.3. West Basement Mechanical Room.
o Red Metal Pulley o Red Metal Pipe o Gray Metal Doors o White Metal Door Jambs
April 2010
AEHS, Inc.
3.4.4. West Basement Restroom.
o White Wood Doors o White Metal Pipes
3.4.5. West Basement Generator Room.
o Gray Metal Pipes o Green Metal Doors o Brown Metal Pipes
3.4.6. West Basement Electrical Room.
o Beige Metal Doors
3.4.7. West Basement Landing.
o Green Wood Door o Black Metal Ladder
3.4.8. 1 st
Floor.
o White Plaster Walls o Brown Wood Doors o Brown Metal Door Jambs o White Elevator Door o White Elevator Walls
3.4.9. Room 219.
o Brown Wood Baseboards o White Metal Window Sashes
3.4.10. Theater.
o Black Metal Doors and Casings o Gray Concrete Steps and Treads o Black Metal Handrail o Plaster Walls o Black Wood Door Casings
3.4.11. 2 nd
Floor.
o Green Wood Doors, Casings and Jambs o Varnished Wood Door Jambs o Men’s Restroom Ceiling
3.3.12. Rooms. 300, 306, 307, and 313.
o White Metal Window Sashes
3.3.13. Tower.
o Black Metal Beams o White Metal Handrails o Black Metal Pipes o Brown Metal Window Sashes o Black Metal Spiral Stairs o Black Metal Handrails
4.1. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS.
4.2. The HUD/EPA guidance for target housing is 1 mg/cm
while the Toxic Characteristic
Leaching Procedure (TCLP) limit for lead is 5 parts per million (ppm).
4.3. The OSHA requirements, as promulgated in 29 CPR 1926.62 (Lead Standard for the
Construction Industry), considers any amount of lead as lead containing paint; however, any measured surface below 0.1 mg/cm should be considered negative for lead base paint.
4.4. Based on the measured results, it is likely that the debris from any renovation involving lead base paint will exceed the TCLP limit; therefore, a TCLP of the debris is required.
5.1. RECOMMENDATIONS.
5.2. Maintain a copy of this report with the project files.
5.3. Provide a copy of this report to the contractor.
5.4. Perform a TCLP analysis on a representative sample of the debris to determine the disposal methodology.
DISCLAIMER
This report, which contains inspections/measurements for hazardous material is given for the sole benefit of the aforementioned client (s). The client expressly confirms their understanding that the conclusions/ recommendations stated in this report are limited to and based solely upon the scope of the assignment, and samples and field measurements taken. In addition, the client understands that any field observations contained herein reflect the conditions present on the date and time of inspection. No representations or warranties are made or may be implied as to the validity of their applicability to any other days or times.
Ronald M. Bishop, MPH, CIH
ESH Consultant
May 7, 2010
ATTACHMENT A ASBESTOS LABRATORY RESULTS
Fax: Apr 28 2010 05:31pm P002/013
Page
C!!tnt Numbtc
Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C.
7469 Whltepine Rd
Richmond, VA 23237
Asbestos Bulk Analysis Report
Telephone: 800.347.4010 Report Number; 1Q-04.-02842
Client: AEHS Received Date; 04123/2010
4402 Center Gate An•lynd Daste: 04/26/2010
San Antonio. TX 78217 Reported Date: 04/26/1010
Project/TMt Address: RAFB 8100; SA, TX
45-6371 Laboratory Results fMNutulaG 210-69 F
100-01 White Chalky NAO 100% Non-Fibl'OU8
100-02 White Chalky; Gran. NAO 100% Non-Fibrous
100-03 White Chalky; Gran. NAO 100% Non-Flbroua
10--04-02642-004 100-04 Off-White Chalky NAO 100% Non-Ffbroua
1Q..()4-02842-005 100-05 OffWhlte Chalky NAO 100% Non-Fibrous
10-04-02842--006 100-06 Off-White Chalky NAO 100% Non-Fibrous
Lab Sample Number
Client Sample
Layer Type Lab Groaa Deacriptlon A9bestos
Fax; Apr 28 2010 05:31PI P003/013
Environmental Hazards Services, L.L.C
Client NumlMr. 45--5371
Project/Test Addf'ffs: RAFB 8100; SA, TX
"9port Number: 1Q-04--02842
!..ab Sample Cllent Sample Tw- Lab GrOM Dncriptlon AsbMto• other
Number Numw Matertala
1()-04-02842-007 100-07 Black Tar-Uke; Brown NAO 3% Flbrous Glass Cofic lllte 97% Non.-Flbrous
10-04-<l284Nl08 10Q.08 Black Tar-Like; Brown Cork-Like
NAO 3% Fibrous Gls&s 97% Non-Fibrous
10-04-02842-009 100.09 Black Tar-Like: Brown NAO 3% Fibrous Glasa Cork-Like 97% Noll-Fibrous
10-04-0.2842-010 100-10 Brown Fib. 65% callulose 10% Non-Fibrous
Total Asbutoa: 5%
10-04-02842-011 100-11 arown Fib. Did Not An8lyze (Positive Stop)
10-04-0Z64Z-012 100-12 Did Not Analyze (Posittve Stop)
100-13 Brown Fib. NAO 95% C6Uutose !5% Non-Fib!'Qus
100-14 Brown Fib. NAO 95% QJllulo$e 5% Non-Fibrous
100 1 Brown Fib. NAO 90% cellulose
Fax: Apr 28 2010 05:31PI P004/013
Cll•nt Number: 45-5371
Project/Teat AddrHa: RAFB 6100; SA, TX
Report Number: 1<J.-0.4--02642
Client Sample
Uytir Type Lab arose o..crlptlon Aebffto•
10--04-02642-016 100-16 Brown Adhes.; Fib. 9% Celluase
100-17 Brown Adhes.; Fib. NAO 95% CelllAose
100-18 Brown Adhes.;Fib. NAO 95% CQ!lulose
10-04·02642-019 100-19 Tan Fib. NAO 40% Cellulose 40% Fibrous Glass 20% Non-Fibrous
10--04-02842-020 100-20 Tan Fib. NAO 40% Celluk:>&e
10-0+02842-021 100-,21 Tan Fib. NAO 40% CeUulose 40% Fibrous Gla&s 20% Non-Flbroua
10--04-02842-022 100-22 White Powder 5% ChrysoUle 75% Non-Fibrous
Total be.to•:
20% Amo8lte
25%
10-04-02842-023 100·23 Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)
Fax: Apr 28 2010 05:31P• P005/013 cu.nt Number: 45-5371
Pro}ectlTest Addl'ffS: RAFB 8100; SA. TX
Report Number: 10..()4..02842
1Q-04..-02842-024 100-24 Old Not Analyze (Positive Stop)
10-0.f-02842-02 A 100-25 Tile Brown Vinyl 98% Non-Flbroua
Total Asbestoa: 2%
10-04-02842-0258 100-25 Mastic Bfack Adhes. 4% Chrysotfle 96% Non-Flbl'OU$
Total Asbestos: 4%
A 100-26 Tne Old Not Analyze (Positive Stop)
1Q.-04.02842-0268 100-26 Mastic Old Not Analyze (Poaltlve Stop)
A 100-27 Tiie Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)
10-04-02842-0278 100-27 Mastic Old Not Ana (Positive Stop)
10-04-02842-026 100-213 Off Whfte Chelky NAP 5% Collulose 10o/o Fibrous Clas.a 85o/a Non-Fibrous
10-04-02642-029 100-29 Beige Gran. NAO 100% Non-Fibrous
10--04-02842-030 100-30 Beige Gran. NAP 100% Non-Fibrous b hmple Client Sample Number Number
Fax: Apr 28 2010 05:32P• POOB/013
Client Numa.r: 45-5371
Report Number: 1()..()4..-02842
ProjeetJTut AddreH: RAFB B 100; SA. TX
Client sample Number
Other Materhll•
10-04-02842--031 100-31 Gray/Beige Fib. 30% Chrysotlle 30% Cenulose 5% Flbroue Glau 35% Non-Fll::lrol.Js
Total Asbestos: 30'1.
100-32 Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)
100 33 Did Not Analyze (Poeltlve Stop)
100-34 Beige Fib. 70% Chrysotlle 20% Cellulose 10% Norr-Fibrous
Total Asb..toa: 70%
10-04-02842-035 100-35 White Powder; Fib. 30% Chrysotile 5% Cellulose 15% Amoalta % Non-Fibrous
Tot.I Asbestos: 45%
10-04-02842-036 100-36 Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)
1O-Q.4-02842-037 10()-37 Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)
10-04-02842-038 100-38 Black Tar-Like; Sliver 10% Chrysotlle 2% Talc Foll-Like 88% Non-Fibrous
Total AsbHto•: 10%
10-04-02642-039 100-39 Oki Not Analyze (Positive Stop)
Fax : Apr 28 2010 05:32PI P007/013
Client Number: 45-5371
Environmental Hazards Services. L.LC
Report Number: 1Cl-04..Q2&42
Profft Address: RAFB 8100; SA, TX lab Sampl• Cllent Sample Layw T)'P9 Lab Gron Description AabRtoa Other
Number Number Materiala
10-04-02842-040 10040 Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)
10....()4-02842-041 100-41 Blad</Gray/Belge Fib. 2% Chrysotile 40% Qlllulose 10% Fibrous Glass 2!5% Non-Fibrous
Total Asbestos: 25%
10-04--02842-042 100-42 Di<! Not Analyze (Positive Stop}
1O-Q4--02842 043 100-43 Did Not A/'lal)'Ze (Poaitive Stop)
A 10()-44 Tiie Beige Gn. NAO 100% Non-Fibrous
10-04-02842-0449 10Q.44 MasUc Black Adhee. 3% Ctvysotlla 2% Cellulose 95% Non-Fibrous
A 100-45 Tile Beige Gran. NAO 100% Non-Fibrous
10-04-02842--0456 100-45 Old Not AnQfyze (Positive Stop)
A 100-46 Tiie Beige Gran. NAO 100% Non-Fibrous
10-04-02842-0468 100-46 Mastic Did Not Am1lyze (Positive Stop)
Apr 28 2010 05:32p1 POOS/013 Fax:
Jklf:l
Cltent Number: 45-5371
Report Number:
Project/Tftt Addresa: RAFB B100; SA. TX
Clfent Sample Number
Matllrl••
QC S.mple:
QC Blank:
83-NY-33-3478,29-FIBERGl.ASS
SRM 1866 FlberglasS
Reporting Limit: 1% Asbestos
Method: EPA Method 600/-93/116
Analyat: Melissa Boggs St.elnlger, Timothy Han'it Re-.d By Auttv>nzed Signatc; "> ·
Irma Fa.s:zewski
OAJQC Manager
The condition of the samples ana Wiii• arxieptable upon r90lllpt r laboratory protOcol urfflla otherwise notedon this Retulta the anliilfyti• cl s eubmltted by in. oll9nt. Sample locliildon, dHQ!ptlon, area, volume, etc., WM provided by ltle etJent. Thia J'8parl can be und by 1ha cti.nt to ci.tm ptOducr endo<tement by NVt.AP or any agency of tie U.S. Govemment. This report shal not be
191>roduce<l axe.pt In Ml, wlthOl.t the wrtt.,, corw.m of fle Envlronrnetttaf Hazards Ssrvlce, L.LC. Csllfomle Certlflcatlon #2319 f'ff ELAP
#11714. All lrtorm.tlon concerning Hml)llng loc::atlon, date, and time can be t'ound on Ct.In.qt-Custody. Envln:inm.ntat l-luardt Seivlcu, L.LC. does not perrgnn '¥1'/ eemple collection.
envtronmentaf Haurdl Services. LLC. mends rea'lllyslt by poht count (for m0f'8 quantl1lca11on) or Tra"9mllslon Ellac::tron My (TEM). (f«9l'll'lant:#d de*tlon cap@llltiw) fQr matedals ragulat8d by EPA NESHAP (N•tionel Emltslon Standerds for Haurdou•
AJr Potllltllnlll) and found 1D conmh i.s.than tan P'fl'<*nl (<10%} ubestot by pol.iad lfght mlcrotico;iy (PLM). Both aal'Vieu «re availabl9 for !ll:ldltlor1111 fee.
LEGENO: NAO • no "6eltos aetectfld
E0/600d mdzE SO OOl 9l Jdij l!I
----+-1ri-i--HH-1N :
,...,.,,............. \ µ
'-----4-4 H-ir-HHIM (u(ul,-1) ....... '!!: k --H-+-i-+-t-t-1-r-11
J! ' .1
1--. --+-i-+-+-+-t-t-i-r-tl : ·
1--4-
WU.
+-+-t-t-r-t--r-HMI I r-
1--.......,...-,..+..
KJil
-·• WW
-""""Q...1'11'
-+-+-++--t-t-"";-r- r
-llll'llWW
JI
£1 s--t--1"--t---t--t---+--r-
I I l---- -+-+-+-+-H-H-M
_g ,, it ii <::S..
.'3 ! IIJ H I '
EO/OOd wctze so OOl Sl Jd\l
: :I
I
I i 1 1 i l
I.-w 1 •t I - ' 1 ,fax:
Apr 26 2010 05:33pm P012/013 t r: f iiii1;J i JJ+.J-:i::ir-o6- f :l . J1 . Er .. &! <?> ftM l iI I , ftM.....c-.
I I .
&ll.MMCC...-l'lM -....... I :f I-0
KM
+--+--i-f---....j f l f -,c:
?o fl ar r I:
---+--+-----f
........ (L/Mn) ; i
n. (....., i J ·.
-1 l '
I Ii I-
U\ ?' I e:
I i m·
....._........._ _ _ _ I I
Cllttnt ...
fax: APr 29 2010 04:36p1 P002/009 er ronmental Hazards Services. L.LC.
7469 Whlteptne Rd
Riehmond, VA 23237
Asbestos Bulk
Telephone:800.7.4010 Report Number: 10.()4-03516
Client: AEHS
4402 Center Gate san Antonio, TX 78217
Rec.lved Date;
An•lynd.Date:
Reported Date:
04/28/2010
04/2912010
04/29/2010
PrJ>jactll'e•t AddrHS! RAFB 8100; SA, TX
455371 Laboratory Results
FgNumbtr:
210-666-8499 F
LIb $ample Cllent Semple umber Number
La.yer T Lab Orou De•crlptlon Other
Materials
10- 3515-001 1Q0..47 Black Tar.Like 15% Chrysotlla 80% Non-Fibrous
Total Aabest : 1%
10- l4-03515-002 100-48 Old Not Analyze (PosJtive S)
10- 4-03515-003 10()..49 Did Not An81yze (Positive Slop)
1O·P+-03615-004 100-50 Tan Fib.;Black Tar-I.Ike 4% Chrysotlle 30% Cellulose 10% Fibrous GllilU 56"/o Non-Fibrous
7% jctlrysotlle present In tar-like mater1al.
Tot.I Atibff tos: 4%
10-1 4-03 H5·005 100-51 Did Not Analyze (Posttfve Stop)
1O-i 3615-006 100-62 Did Not An111lyza (Poettlve Stop)
Fax: Apr 29 2010 04:36pm P003/009
Cll• M'lt Number. 45-5371 Report NumlMtt: 10-04-03515
Pr, ..,._v e.t Addreu: RAFB 8100; SA. TX u b Sample Client Sample Layw Type Lab Grau DMcrlptton A8batoa Other "'fumbet Number Meterta.I•
10..04-03515-007 100"'53 White Gran. NAO 100% Non-Fibrous
10-:>4--03315--008 10().M Gray Gran. NAO 100% Non-Fibrous
10.04-03515-009 10()-55 Grey G1111n. NAO 100% Non-FibroUS
10- 04..03515-010 100-66 White Fib. NAO 45% Cellulose
15. % Non-Flbroue
10-04..03!51!5·O11 100-67 White Fib. NAO 45% Cellulose
15% Non-Fibrous
10-)4..()3515-012 100-58 White Fib. NAO 45% Cellulose 40% Fibrous Gl&1sa 15% Non-Fibrous
10 b4·03515-013 100-59 White Chalky NAO 15% Cellulose 85% Non-Fibrous
10-)4-03515-014 100-60 White Chalky NAO 15% Celluloee 85% Non.-Fibrous
Fax; Apr 29 2010 04:3?pm P004/009
Cll lSnt Number: 45-5371 Report Number: 1Q-04-03615
Pn: Ject/Teet Addrus: RAe 0100; SA, TX u b Sampfe Client Sample lJtylll Type Lab Groaa DHerlptJon A..bestoe Other Numbftr Number Mat.rt.ls
10-04-0351 15 100-61 White Chalky NAO 15% Celluloee 85% Fibrous
10-D4-03515-016 100-62 White Gran. NAO 100% Non-Fibrous
10- i)4--03515..017 100..63 White Gran. NAO 100% Non-Fibrous
10·1 )4-03515-018 10()..64 White Gran. NAO 100% Non-Fibrous
10-< 4-03515-019 100-68 Gray Powdery; Fib. 55% Chrysotile 45% Non-Fibrous
Tota.IAsbestos: 55%
10-( 4·03515-020 100-69 Did Not Anlillyze (Positive Stop)
10-( 4-0351 -021 100-70 Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)
10-C 14-03515-022A 100-71 Tiie White Gran. NAO 100% Non-Fibrous
10-C"-03515-0228 100-71 Mestic Black Tar-Liko 5% Chrysotlle 95% Non-Fibrous
Total Aabeatoa: 5%
10-0-03515-02JA 100·72 Tile White Gran. NAO 100% Non-Fibrous f ax; APr 29 2010 04:37p; P005/009
Environmental Hazards Services, L.LC
CU nt Number: 4s-s371 Report Number. 10-04-03515
Pn act/Teat Address: R.AFB 9100; SA, TX u b Sample Client Sample
Number Number
Lay.tr Type Lab Gross Deacrlptlon other
10- 3515--0238 100-72 Mastic Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)
100-73 Tile White Gran. NAO 100% Non-Fibrous
1o,.1>4-03515-024B Mastic Did Not Analyze (Positive Stop)
10- )4-03515-025A 100-74 Tiie Gray Gran. 3% Chrysotile 97% Non-Ffbrous
Total Asb..tos: 3%
10-( 4-03515-0258 100-74 Mastic Black Tar-Like 5% Chrysotile 96% Non-Fibrous
Total Asbesto&: 5%
10...C --03515-026A 100-75 Tiie Did Not Analyze (Posit.Ive Stop)
10-C 4--03515 0268 100-.75 Mastic Old Not Analyze (Poaltive Stop)
1O·<14-03615-027 A 100-76 Tiie Did Not Analyze (P019ltlve Stop)
10-03515-0278 100-76 Mastic Dfd Not Analyze (Positive Stop)
45-5371
Environmental Hazards Services. L.L.C
Report Number: 10-04--03515
Ctlent Sampi.
NurnlMr
Materta,.
Fax; Apr 29 2010 04:31p1 POOS/009
QC S•mpl•:
49-M2-1998-1
SRM 1866 Flbel'glau
Sarni Hosn . Jltl. 'jy;'ft' · rtJng Limit: 1% Aastos
M ePA Method 600/R-931116
Revl.wed By Authorized Signatory: U Inns Ft1.sz9wskl
QA/QC Manager
The condition of tie N.fllPleS llNled was acceptsble upon naoelpt per labonltoly prctoc:ol ur1est othelwlte notedon thl• raport. Results t tne analyaie of umplea submitted by the dl.nt. Semple loe«tlon, dea<:ripllon, area, vclume, otc., wn provided by tie cllQlil Tt1ls report canmt be uhd by the cilant to claim pit)duot endOIUl'll..-it by NVlAP or any aganqy of hU.s. Government This lllport shal not be reproduced 11.Xeept In full, wlthott the wrt:ten coosent of Ile Environmental Hazards Service, L.L.C. caJlfomia Certitlcatll;f'1·#23161 NY a.AP #11714. All lnformatlori concemltlg umptlng Jocallon. data. .,,i;t Ume can be fo\lld ot1 Chem-of.Custody. Envlr'Omlenta£ Hazards S&rVlCM, L.LC. doee net perfotm any Ample eolltlotlon.
E.rlvlronnT•nUll Hazardt Selvlce:s, L.L.C.recommondll by pot\t count (for l'1lOlW .ocurat41 quwrtlllcatlon) Of TranamiHlon Electton
M(TEM), (for811hancad t;ietection bllltlet) for materlalt rwgulat&d by EPA NESHAP (Natlon11I E:miaa!Ol'I Stalndardt for Hazardoue Alt Pollutants) and found to corqn leu in.n ten psn:.nt (<1Oo/o) asbestos by Polarized light mlcrote0171 (PlM). Both servlca$ are avallabr. for an Qddltlonel fee.
LEGEND: NAO = no assest09 de&ieted
I ' .
soo/LOOd wdLE :vo ool 6l J : :I sootaoOd WdLE :o o oz sz Jd\i
I.
60016000 d wdL£ :vo ooz sz Jdl:i
ATTACHMENT B PHOTOGRAPHS
RANDOLPH AFB, Building 100
1. Domestic Hot Water
4. HHW above Ceiling Tile
7. Expansion Tank A/H Room
2. Heating Hot Water (HHW) 3. HHW above Ceiling Tile
5. HHW above Plaster Ceiling 6. Chilled Water Lines
8. Expansion Tank Boiler Rm 9. AH1, Vibration Dampers
10. Black HVAC Duck Mastic 11. Black HVAC 12. Black HVAC
13. Basement East RR FT 14. Comm Rm 9 in Brown FT 15. Chiller Rm FT
RANDOLPH AFB, Building 100
18. Gutter Mastic, 5
Level
20. Window Glazing
21. Boilers
16. Basement Hall FT 17. Basement West RR FT
19. Roof Mastic, 5
Level
22. Old Radiator Lines 23. Same, Tar and Cork 24. Radiator Holes and Line
25. 1x1 CT & Dot Mastic 26. 2x2 Ceiling Tile 27. Cementitious HVAC Mud
28. New Chiller 29. Red Line, Front Step
ATTACHMENT C DRAWINGS
First Level (Basement)
Positive Floor Tile and Mastic
Ed Positive Floor Mastic
Second Level (Ground Floor)
Positive Floor Tiie and Mastic
ATTACHMENT D XRF LEAD MEASUREMENTS
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE
No. Time Side Room Component Feature Substrate Condition Color Results PbC 1 4/22/10 7:18 6.21 2 4/22/10 7:19 Calibration Positive 1 3 4/22/10 7:19 Calibration Positive 1 4 4/22/10 7:20 Calibration Positive 1 5 4/22/10 7:22 A Exterior Wall Stucco Intact White Negative 0 6 4/22/10 7:23 A Exterior Door Wood Intact Brown Negative 0 7 4/22/10 7:23 A Exterior Door Casing Wood Intact Brown Negative 0.01 8 4/22/10 7:24 A Exterior Window Sash Metal Intact Brown Positive 11.6 9 4/22/10 7:25 A Exterior Flag Pole Metal Intact White Negative 0
10 4/22/10 7:26 A Exterior Step Concrete Intact Red Positive 0.6 11 4/22/10 7:27 A Exterior Vent Bars Metal Intact White Positive 2 12 4/22/10 7:28 B Exterior Wall Stucco Intact White Negative 0 13 4/22/10 7:30 B Exterior Hand Rail Metal Intact Black Negative 0 14 4/22/10 7:30 B Exterior Door Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0 15 4/22/10 7:31 B Exterior Door Casing Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.02 16 4/22/10 7:32 B Exterior Window Sash Metal Intact Brown Negative 0 17 4/22/10 7:33 B Exterior Door Metal Intact White Negative 0.09 18 4/22/10 7:34 B Exterior Gate Metal Intact Brown Positive 4.7 19 4/22/10 7:35 B Exterior Lift Metal Intact Brown Negative 0 20 4/22/10 7:35 B Exterior Hand Rail Metal Intact Brown Negative 0.01 21 4/22/10 7:36 C Exterior Wall Stucco Intact White Negative 0 22 4/22/10 7:36 C Exterior Pole Metal Intact Red Positive 0.2 23 4/22/10 7:37 C Exterior Steps Concrete Intact Red Positive 0.3 24 4/22/10 7:37 C Exterior Door Wood Intact Brown Negative 0 25 4/22/10 7:37 C Exterior Door Casing Wood Intact Brown Negative 0.07 26 4/22/10 7:40 C Exterior Window Sash Metal Intact Brown Negative 0.06 27 4/22/10 7:41 C Exterior Window Sash Metal Intact Brown Positive 0.17 28 4/22/10 7:41 B Exterior Door Wood Intact Brown Negative 0 29 4/22/10 7:41 B Exterior Door Casing Wood Intact Brown Negative 0.01 30 4/22/10 7:42 B Exterior Cooling Tower Metal Intact White Negative 0 31 4/22/10 7:43 B Exterior Cooling Tower Pipe Metal Intact White Negative 0 32 4/22/10 7:44 D Exterior Wall Stucco Intact White Negative 0 33 4/22/10 7:45 C Exterior Door Wood Intact Black Negative 0.01 34 4/22/10 7:45 C Exterior Door Casing Wood Intact Black Negative 0.03
No. Time Side Room Component Feature Substrate Condition Color Results PbC 35 4/22/2010 7:45 C Exterior Window Ledge Wood Intact Black Negative 0.11 36 4/22/10 7:46 C Exterior Hand Rail Metal Intact Black Negative 0 38 4/22/10 7:47 D Exterior Wall Stucco Intact White Null 0 39 4/22/10 7:48 D Exterior Wall Stucco Intact White Negative 0.01 40 4/22/10 7:48 D Exterior Door Metal Intact Brown Negative 0.06 41 4/22/10 7:48 D Exterior Hand Rail Metal Intact Brown Positive 0.6 42 4/22/10 7:49 D Exterior Door Metal Intact White Negative 0.01 43 4/22/10 7:50 D Exterior Floor Concrete Intact Red Negative 0 44 4/22/10 7:51 D Exterior Door Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0 45 4/22/10 7:51 D Exterior Door Casing Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.02 46 4/22/10 7:52 D Exterior Window Sash Metal Intact Brown Positive 4.6 47 4/22/10 7:53 D Exterior Grate Metal Intact White Negative 0.01 48 4/22/10 7:54 D Exterior Hand Rail Metal Intact Black Negative 0 49 4/22/10 7:58 A E. Basement Ceiling Concrete Intact White Positive 6.4 50 4/22/10 7:59 A E. Basement Wall Drywall Intact White Negative 0 51 4/22/10 7:59 A E. Basement Door Metal Intact Gray Negative 0 52 4/22/10 7:59 A E. Basement Door Casing Wood Intact Gray Negative 0 53 4/22/10 8:00 A E. Basement Door Jamb Wood Intact Gray Negative 0 54 4/22/10 8:00 A E. Basement Wall Stucco Intact Gray Null 0.05 55 4/22/10 8:00 A E. Basement Wall Stucco Intact White Positive 2 56 4/22/10 8:01 A E. Basement Conduit Metal Intact White Negative 0 57 4/22/10 8:01 B E. Basement Wall Drywall Intact White Negative 0 58 4/22/10 8:02 B E. Basement Window Casing Wood Intact White Negative 0 59 4/22/10 8:02 B E. Basement Door Casing Wood Intact Gray Negative 0 60 4/22/10 8:02 B E. Basement Door Jamb Wood Intact Gray Negative 0 61 4/22/10 8:02 B E. Basement Door Wood Intact Gray Positive 0.28 62 4/22/10 8:03 C E. Basement Wall Plaster Intact White Negative 0 63 4/22/10 8:03 C E. Basement Door Metal Intact Brown Positive 0.26 64 4/22/10 8:04 C E. Basement Door Casing Metal Intact Brown Positive 0.1 65 4/22/10 8:04 C E. Basement Door Jamb Metal Intact Brown Positive 0.21 66 4/22/10 8:04 C E. Basement Floor Concrete Intact Gray Negative 0 67 4/22/10 8:05 C E. Basement Column Concrete Intact White Negative 0.01 68 4/22/10 8:05 C E. Basement Door Metal Intact Gray Negative 0 69 4/22/10 8:06 C E. Basement Door Casing Metal Intact Gray Negative 0 70 4/22/10 8:06 D E. Basement Wall Plaster Intact White Positive 2.4 71 4/22/10 8:07 D E. Basement Pipe Metal Intact White Negative 0.05
72 4/22/10 8:07 D E. Basement Pipe Metal Intact White Null 0.08 73 4/22/2010 8:07 D E. Basement Pipe Metal Intact White Negative 0.5 74 4/22/2010 8:08 D E. Basement Door Wood Intact Gray Null 0.08 75 4/22/10 8:08 D E. Basement Door Wood Intact Gray Positive 0.12 76 4/22/10 8:08 D E. Basement Door Casing Wood Intact Gray Negative 0.04 77 4/22/10 8:09 D E. Basement Door Jamb Wood Intact Gray Positive 0.3 78 4/22/10 8:10 D E. Basement Stairs Riser Concrete Intact Black Positive 0.2 79 4/22/10 8:10 D E. Basement Hand Rail Metal Intact Black Negative 0.02 80 4/22/10 8:11 C E. Basement Door Panel Intact Varnish Negative 0 81 4/22/10 8:11 C E. Basement Door Casing Panel Intact Varnish Negative 0 82 4/22/10 8:11 C E. Basement Door Transom Panel Intact Varnish Negative 0.01 83 4/22/10 8:12 C E. Basement Door Jamb Panel Intact Varnish Negative 0 84 4/22/10 8:15 A W. Basement Wall Plaster Intact White Negative 0 85 4/22/10 8:15 A W. Basement Door Wood Intact Brown Positive 0.5 86 4/22/10 8:15 A W. Basement Door Casing Wood Intact Brown Positive 0.7 87 4/22/10 8:16 A W. Basement Door Jamb Wood Intact Brown Positive 0.3 88 4/22/10 8:16 A W. Basement Column Concrete Intact White Negative 0 89 4/22/10 8:18 B W. Basement Wall Plaster Intact White Negative 0 90 4/22/10 8:18 B W. Basement Door Wood Intact Brown Negative 0 91 4/22/10 8:18 B W. Basement Door Casing Wood Intact Brown Negative 0.05 92 4/22/10 8:19 B W. Basement Door Wood Intact White Positive 0.18 93 4/22/10 8:19 B W. Basement Door Casing Wood Intact White Positive 0.4 94 4/22/10 8:19 C W. Basement Wall Plaster Intact White Negative 0 95 4/22/10 8:20 C W. Basement Door Metal Intact White Positive 11.1 96 4/22/10 8:20 C W. Basement Door Casing Metal Intact White Positive 0.5 97 4/22/10 8:20 C W. Basement Hand Rail Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.03 98 4/22/10 8:21 C W. Basement Door Wood Intact Brown Negative 0 99 4/22/10 8:21 C W. Basement Door Casing Wood Intact Brown Negative 0
100 4/22/10 8:21 C W. Basement Door Jamb Wood Intact Brown Negative 0 101 4/22/10 8:22 C W. Basement Window Casing Wood Intact Brown Positive 0.8 102 4/22/10 8:22 C W. Basement Door Exit Wood Intact Brown Positive 4 103 4/22/10 8:23 C W. Basement Door Exit Casing Wood Intact Brown Negative 0.02 104 4/22/10 8:23 C W. Basement Door Exit Jamb Wood Intact Brown Negative 0.02 105 4/22/10 8:23 D W. Basement Wall Plaster Intact White Negative 0 106 4/22/10 8:23 D W. Basement Window Casing Wood Intact Brown Positive 0.4 107 4/22/10 8:24 D W. Basement Door Casing Wood Intact Brown Positive 0.5
108 4/22/10 8:24 D W. Basement Door Wood Intact Brown Positive 0.6 109 4/22/2010 8:24 D W. Basement Door Metal Intact Brown Positive 12.6 110 4/22/10 8:34 A 1st. Floor Wall Plaster Intact White Positive 0.18 111 4/22/2010 8:35 A 1st. Floor Chair Rail Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.01 112 4/22/10 8:35 A 1st. Floor Door Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.03 113 4/22/10 8:35 A 1st. Floor Door Casing Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.06 114 4/22/10 8:36 A 1st. Floor Door Jamb Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.01 115 4/22/10 8:37 A 1st. Floor Door Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0 116 4/22/10 8:37 A 1st. Floor Window Sash Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.01 117 4/22/10 8:37 A 1st. Floor Radiator Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0 118 4/22/10 8:38 A 1st. Floor Door Casing Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.01 119 4/22/10 8:38 A 1st. Floor Door Jamb Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.08 120 4/22/10 8:39 B 1st. Floor Wall Plaster Intact White Negative 0.06 121 4/22/10 8:39 B 1st. Floor Door Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0 122 4/22/10 8:39 B 1st. Floor Door Casing Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.03 123 4/22/10 8:40 B 1st. Floor Door Jamb Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.05 124 4/22/10 8:42 C 1st. Floor Wall Plaster Intact White Negative 0.03 125 4/22/10 8:42 C 1st. Floor Door Wood Intact Brown Positive 8.3 126 4/22/10 8:42 C 1st. Floor Door Jamb Metal Intact Brown Positive 8 127 4/22/10 8:43 C 1st. Floor Door Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0 128 4/22/10 8:43 C 1st. Floor Door Casing Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.01 129 4/22/10 8:44 D 1st. Floor Door Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.03 130 4/22/10 8:44 D 1st. Floor Door Casing Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0 131 4/22/10 8:45 D 1st. Floor Door Jamb Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.01 132 4/22/10 8:45 D 1st. Floor Wall Plaster Intact White Positive 0.2 133 4/22/10 8:48 D 1st. Floor Elevator Door Metal Intact White Positive 0.5 134 4/22/10 8:48 D 1st. Floor Elevator Wall Metal Intact White Positive 0.4 135 4/22/10 8:48 D 1st. Floor Elevator Door Metal Intact Brown Negative 0 136 4/22/10 8:52 C W. Basement Dumbwaiter Door Wood Intact Brown Positive 0.19 137 4/22/10 8:52 C W. Basement Dumbwaiter Casing Wood Intact Brown Positive 0.11 138 4/22/10 8:54 D W. Basement Window Sash Wood Intact Brown Positive 3.3 139 4/22/10 8:54 D W. Basement Window Casing Wood Intact Brown Positive 3.3 140 4/22/10 8:59 Calibration Negative 0.9 141 4/22/10 9:05 B 219 Window Sash Metal Intact White Negative 0 142 4/22/10 9:05 B 219 Baseboard Wood Intact Brown Positive 0.3 143 4/22/10 9:06 B 219 Radiator Metal Intact White Negative 0.02
144 4/22/10 9:07 B 219 Window Sash Metal Intact Black Negative 0 145 4/22/10 9:07 C 219 Window Sash Metal Intact White Positive 0.14 146 4/22/10 9:10 C W. Basement Mech. Pully Metal Intact Red Positive 0.2 147 4/22/10 9:11 C W. Basement Mech. Pipe Metal Intact Red Positive 0.5 148 4/22/2010 9:11 C W. Basement Mech. Pipe Metal Intact Gray Negative 0.04 149 4/22/10 9:12 C W. Basement Mech. Wall Brick Intact Gray Negative 0.09 150 4/22/10 9:12 C W. Basement Mech. Cage Wood Intact White Negative 0 151 4/22/10 9:13 C W. Basement Mech. Cage Door Wood Intact White Negative 0 152 4/22/10 9:14 A W. Basement Mech. Door Metal Intact Gray Positive 13 153 4/22/10 9:14 A W. Basement Mech. Door Jamb Metal Intact White Positive 20.5 154 4/22/10 9:17 A Theater Door Metal Intact Black Positive 7.5 155 4/22/10 9:17 A Theater Door Casing Metal Intact Black Positive 6.3 156 4/22/10 9:18 A Theater Steps Concrete Intact Gray Positive 0.16 157 4/22/10 9:18 A Theater Hand Rail Metal Intact Black Positive 4.8 158 4/22/10 9:19 A Theater Wall Plaster Intact Beige Positive 12.9 159 4/22/10 9:19 A Theater Baseboard Wood Intact Black Negative 0 160 4/22/10 9:20 A Theater Ceiling Plaster Intact White Positive 1.4 161 4/22/10 9:21 A Theater Door Wood Intact Black Negative 0 162 4/22/10 9:23 A Theater Door Jamb Wood Intact Black Negative 0 163 4/22/10 9:24 B Theater Door Metal Intact Beige Negative 0.06 164 4/22/10 9:25 B Theater Wall Plaster Intact Beige Negative 0 165 4/22/10 9:26 B Theater Door Metal Intact Beige Positive 19.2 166 4/22/10 9:26 C Theater Wall Plaster Intact White Positive 18 167 4/22/10 9:26 C Theater Window Sash Metal Intact White Negative 0.01 168 4/22/10 9:27 C Theater Stairs Tread Concrete Intact Gray Positive 0.13 169 4/22/10 9:27 C Theater Hand Rail Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.02 170 4/22/10 9:28 C Theater Door Wood Intact Black Negative 0.01 171 4/22/10 9:29 C Theater Door Casing Wood Intact Black Positive 0.16 172 4/22/10 9:29 C Theater Door Jamb Wood Intact Black Negative 0.05 173 4/22/10 9:29 D Theater Wall Plaster Intact Beige Positive 2 174 4/22/10 9:30 D Theater Door Metal Intact Beige Negative 0.08 175 4/22/10 9:33 C Landing W. Base Door Wood Intact Green Positive 9.6 176 4/22/10 9:35 C Landing W. Base Ladder Metal Intact Black Positive 3.8 177 4/22/10 9:40 A 2nd. Floor Window Sash Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0 178 4/22/10 9:40 A 2nd. Floor Door Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0 179 4/22/10 9:41 A 2nd. Floor Door Casing Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0
180 4/22/10 9:41 A 2nd. Floor Door Jamb Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.01 181 4/22/10 9:41 A 2nd. Floor Ceiling Plaster Intact White Negative 0.01 182 4/22/10 9:42 A 2nd. Floor Hand Rail Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.05 183 4/22/10 9:42 B 2nd. Floor Wall Plaster Intact White Negative 0.02 184 4/22/10 9:42 B 2nd. Floor Door Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0 186 4/22/10 9:43 B 2nd. Floor Door Jamb Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.01 187 4/22/10 9:44 C 2nd. Floor Wall Plaster Intact White Negative 0.06 188 4/22/10 9:44 C 2nd. Floor Door Wood Intact Green Positive 13.4 189 4/22/10 9:44 C 2nd. Floor Door Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.02 190 4/22/10 9:44 C 2nd. Floor Door Jamb Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.01 191 4/22/10 9:45 C 2nd. Floor Door Casing Wood Intact Varnish Negative 0.03 192 4/22/10 9:47 C 2nd. Floor Elect Panel Metal Intact Brown Negative 0.02 193 4/22/10 9:47 D 2nd. Floor Wall Plaster Intact White Negative 0 194 4/22/10 9:48 D 2nd.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .