Attachment 12-Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Schriever Air Force Base Single Award Task Order IDIQ Contract Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA255021R0019
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1-SATOC General RequirementsV2.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6-WD CO20210008 01-01-2021 HIGHWAY.pdf | ||
| Attachment 9-SATOC_CRM.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 10-Key Personnel Resume Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 11-TO Specific Tech Requirements 17-4401.pdf | ||
| Draft Solicitation - FA255021R0019.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3-Div01Specifications.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7-WD CO20210022 01-15-2021 BUILDING.pdf | ||
| Attachment 8-Submittal_Register_Template.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 14-TO Specific Price Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 13-SATOC Fee Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2-SATOC Design Guide.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5-WD CO20210004 03-05-2021 RESIDENTIAL.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4-WD CO20210002 03-05-2021 HEAVY.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SAFB CONSTRUCTION SATOC
A. UGENERAL INFORMATIONU: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
| Your Name | Position/Duty Title | Organization | Phone | Contracting Officer’s Name | Phone | Construction Inspector’s Name | Phone | Contract Number | Project Title | Brief Description of Work | Location of Performance | Period of Performance | Total Price | ||||
| Contractor performed as the ☐Prime Contractor | ☐Sub-Contractor | ☐Key Personnel |
Did the contractor provide any design capabilities under this project?__________________________________
On what date was Beneficial Occupancy granted?__________________________________
Was work performed within a Restricted Area?
If so, was work constructed and accredited to current UFC 4-101-05 and ICD/ICS 705 Standards?
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
B. UPERFORMANCE INFORMATIONU: Choose the appropriate rating that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF “EXCEPTIONAL”, “MARGINAL” OR “UNSATISFACTORY”
Performance Ratings Matrix
Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Neutral
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor in regards to quality: |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
| 1. |
| Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts |
| 2. |
| Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance |
| 3. |
| Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance |
| 4. |
| Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance) |
The contractor in regards to schedule/timeliness of performance:
| 5. |
| Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address in the comment section below) |
| 6. |
| Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract |
The contractor in regards to customer satisfaction:
| 7. |
| To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? |
| 8. |
| Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication) |
| 9. |
| To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? |
| 10. |
| Overall customer satisfaction |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor in regards to management/personnel/labor: |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
| 11. |
| Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? |
| 12. |
| Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort |
| 13. |
| Government Property Control |
| 14. |
| Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel |
| 15. |
| Utilization of Small Business concerns |
| 16. |
| Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines |
| 17. |
| Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes |
| 18. |
| Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) |
The contractor in regards to Cost/Financial Management:
| 19. |
| Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? |
| 20. |
| Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client |
| 21. |
| If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back- up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns) |
| 22. |
| Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in the comments section below. |
| Yes |
| No |
| 23. |
| If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below. |
| Yes |
| No |
| 24. |
| Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain in the comments section below. |
| Yes |
| No |
| The contractor in regards to Safety/Security: |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
| 25. |
| To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.) |
| 26. |
| Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. |
General:
| 27. |
| Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues). |
| 28. |
| Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) |
| 29. |
| Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) |
| 30. |
| In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
Please provide comments for any rating of “Exceptional”, “Marginal” or “Unsatisfactory”:
Other Remarks:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .