Atch_7_-_Past_Performance_Questionairre.pdf

For Official Use Only

When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Section L Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 7

The 45th Space Wing of the Air Force, 45th Contracting Squadron is in the process of competitively selecting a source for a “Repair Building Envelope” Single Award, Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity, Task Order

Construction Contract.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 30 Jul 18. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to patricia.bates@us.af.mil, kristin.doty@us.af.mil AND rhonda.davis.4@us.af.mil or by hand and

Mailed to:

45th Contracting Squadron/PKAC

ATTN: Rhonda Davis/Patricia Bates/Kristin Doty

14640 Hanger Road

CCAFS/Bldg 1704, MS 2037

Patrick AFB, FL. 32925-2206

Please call Rhonda Davis at (321) 853-0981 if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

PATRICIA A. BATES

Contracting Officer

1 Atch

Past Performance Questionnaire http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:patricia.bates@us.af.mil mailto:rhonda.davis.4@us.af.mil

For Official Use Only Page 2 of 7

Section 1: Contract Identif ication

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Address:

C. Contractor Cage Code:

D. Contract Number:

E. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

F. Program Title:

G. Brief Program Description:

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

M. PRIMARY POINTS OF CONTACT: (The offeror/joint venture member/critical subcontractor is responsible for exerting its best efforts to ensure that current information is provided for all individuals.)

Name and Office Symbol Phone Number FAX Number

1. Procuring Contracting Officer/Contract Negotiator or equivalent

2. Program/Project Manager or

3. Administrative Contracting Officer/Contract Specialist or

For Official Use Only Page 3 of 7

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identif ication

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identif ication

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided.

Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

For Official Use Only Page 4 of 7

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Technical Performance E V S M U N/A

T1. How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the specification?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

T2. How adequate/effective were the contractor’s environmental safety procedures?

Program Management E V S M U N/A

P1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

P2. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

P3. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?

P4. How well did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of subcontracted efforts?

For Official Use Only Page 5 of 7

Employee Retention / Attraction E V S M U N/A

E1. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort?

E2. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?

Quality E V S M U N/A

Q1. How was the quality of the project and did the contractor demonstrate competence that lead to a higher quality project?

Regulatory Compliance E V S M U N/A

R1. Did the contractor meet or exceed all terms and conditions of the contract, to include compliance with financial, environmental, safety, and labor regulations and all reporting requirements in the contract terms and coditions?

Schedule E V S M U N/A

S1. Did the contractor submit a reasonable schedule, adhere to the approved schedule, and or manage work and issues that resulted with completion of the project on or before the contract completion date?

SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I

[ click and select an item ] award to him today given that I had a choice.

REMARKS:

For Official Use Only Page 6 of 7

1. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

2. Use this space to address any aspect about this program considered unique. Describe quality awards or certifications that indicate the offeror possesses a high-quality process for developing and producing the product/service required.

3. Additionally, for those efforts where you are cognizant of unfavorable and/or marginal past performance ratings/reports previously assessed by customers or clients, but feel that significant progress has been made but not yet credited or formally documented, provide the program name, contract number, customer location and a narrative explaining "fixes" made to date, or any other information regarding the unfavorable/marginal assessment. This narrative portion is limited to one (1) additional page beyond the Past Performance Information sheet required page limitation. It is not presumed that performance has been perfect. Rather, the proposal should contain evidence of the offeror's/joint venture member’s/critical subcontractor’s ability to isolate the root causes of problems and should describe programs or actions taken to resolve those causes. Demonstrated corrective actions (not just planned or promised), and the overall work record will be considered. Problems not addressed, but found by the Government during the evaluation of the information in this volume, will be assumed to still exist. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/ circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.

4. Was this contract effort (as identified in paragraph B. above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous 45 SW PAFB/CCAFS procurement? Yes No . If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:

45 CONS/PKAC

Attention: RHONDA DAVIS

14640 Hanger Road

CCAFS/Bldg 1704, MS2037

Patrick AFB, FL 32925-2206

E-Mail to: Rhonda Davis at rhonda.davis.4@us.af.mil, kristin.doty@us.af.mil, AND patricia.bates@us.af.mil.

PLEASE NOTE: The Government is not bound by the offeror's opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained.

mailto:rhonda.davis.4@us.af.mil mailto:kristin.doty@us.af.mil mailto:patricia.bates@us.af.mil

For Official Use Only Page 7 of 7

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104