MSCC_Industry_Day_Slides_3APR17.pdf

Modeling, Simulation, and Analysis (MS&A) for Space and

Cyberspace Capabilities (MSCC) Industry Day

Chuck Schwarz, HQ AFSPC/A9XY Steve Wells, 21 CONS/LGCCB

3 April 2017

Overview

MSCC is to provide objective and responsive Modeling, Simulation, and Analysis (MS&A) and decision support for space and cyberspace analyses.

Represents technical and support requirements for space and cyberspace analysis to include engineering/engagement, mission, and theater/campaign MS&A.

Development/modification of MS&A and decision support tools, and analysis of space and cyberspace capabilities that provide tactical, operational, and strategic level support to meet military and national objectives

• Bottom Line Up Front

• Single Award Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)

• CPFF, CR, and FFP CLINs

• Competitive Small Business set aside

• Five (5) Year Ordering Period w/ six (6) month option extension of services

Program goals and objectives Development/modification of MS&A and decision support tools Analysis of space and cyberspace capabilities Support warfighter integration analysis efforts within the Space MS&A framework and analysis process

Examples Impact of Space Capabilities on Warfighting Operations Understand the key interactions between space, air, land, and maritime capabilities Development of an analysis framework to understand the resiliency of space capabilities over time in a contested environment

Requirements Current and New

Requirements Development MSSC II and MSSC Interim contracts

AVAC

Contract consolidation

Current Requirements

Title Contract Number Value/Length Expiration Date

Contract Type

MSSC II FA8771-12-D-1009-SX01 $5.5M/3 Years 24 Jan 18 Cost Plus Fixed Fee

MSSC

Interim FA8771-12-D-1009-SX04 $6.5M/ 2 Years 24 Jul 18 Cost Plus Fixed Fee

AVAC FA2517-13-C-9003 $2.6M/5 Years 25 Apr 18 Firm Fixed Price

New Requirement

• Requirement determined NON-Commercial

• Secret/Top Secret (TS) Clearance and TS Facility Clearance required

• Security level, certifications, and Government unique requirements

• Consolidation of MSSC, MSSC Interim and AVAC Contracts

• North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code

541511 (Custom Computer Programming Service) with size standard $27.5M and Product Service Code R408, (Program Management/Support Services)

• Preponderance of work

• Previous contracts

• Best fit for the scope of work

Acquisition Way Ahead

Proposed acquisition strategy

• Competitive Small Business Set-Aside

• Performance Based Acquisition

• Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Critical Success Factors (CSFs), service target levels, and performance thresholds

• Single Award IDIQ contract

• Based on scope and complexity

• Projected orders are so integrally related

• Ordering Period

• Five (5) Year Ordering period: 1 June 2018 – 31 May 2023

• Six (6) Month Extension of Services: 1 June 2023 – 30 November 2023

• Industry Day

• One-on-one based on industry requests

• Government-Furnished Property or Equipment

• No Government-Furnished Property will be provided

• Potential Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Structure

• CLIN 1000 – LABOR 3400 (MS&A) CPFF

• CLIN 2000 – LABOR 3400 (AVAC) FFP

• CLIN 3000 – LABOR 3600 CPFF

• CLIN 4000 – LABOR 3600 FFP

• CLIN 5000 – PROCUREMENT CR

• CLIN 6000 – OTHER DIRECT COST CR

• CLIN 7000 – DATA NOT SEPARTELY PRICED (NSP) N/A

CLIN structure is established as such in order to clearly differentiate between the duo types of Labor funding (i.e., two O&M CLINs) vice CLIN type (CPFF vice FFP) in an effort to reduce margin of error at time of funding, obligation and invoicing - ensuring FIAR compliance. The majority of the requirement is a CPFF contract type, which is suitable as the work effort does not allow for defining the requirements sufficiently and uncertainties do not permit costs to be estimated with sufficient accuracy.

• Best Value to the Government

• Subjective Trade Off (STO) Evaluation method

• Price will include a 5-year contract and 6-month Extension of

Services

• Award to the offeror that provides the best overall value in terms of priced and non-priced factors

• Potential Evaluation Criteria:

• Past Performance combined with mission capability is significantly more important than cost

• IAW FAR Clause 52.222-46, Evaluation of Compensation for Professional Employees will be conducted

• Technical Capability Factor

• Past Performance Factor

• Cost/Price Factor

• Contract will be administered by 21CONS/LGCC

• Program Management support will be provided by AFSPC/A9XY

• Ordering will be centralized

• Task Orders

• Follow the same IDIQ CLIN Structure

• Solicited and awarded IAW FAR 16.505

• May include option periods

• Not to exceed a two (2) year period of performance beyond the contract ordering period, i.e. 31 May 2025 (unless other than O&M funds) IAW AFI 63-138

• There will be an appointed Primary and Alternate COR

MILESTONES: Estimated Completion

Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) 10-Mar-17 Formal Solicitation Release 7-Jun-17 Proposals Received 6-Jul-17 Release ENs 2-Oct-17 Final Proposal Revision 16-Jan-18 Contract Award 1-Jun-18

• Technical Considerations

• Applicable clauses will be included in contract (e.g. Data rights Safety, 508

Compliance, and Occupational Health)

• Evaluation of Compensation for Professional Employees – FAR 52.222-46 applies

• Business Considerations

• Non-commercial requirement

• Encourage Commercial practices and products

• Management Considerations

• 21 CONS will administer and HQ AFSPC/A9XY will manage this contract locally

• Other Significant Issues

• 60-Days mimimum Phase-in Period (e.g. Security clearances, Bldg. access, CAC cards), included in Program Management TO

CONTRACT OVERSIGHT AND

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Contract Oversight & Performance Evaluation

• Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan required

• COR will be responsible for assessing performance

• Alternate COR / SMEs to support COR

• COR PM (COR TYPE B)

• Refresher training

• COR oversight

• The CO will address unsatisfactory performance

• Monthly COSs provided by 10th of each month

• Inspection Methods

• Contractor Monitoring

• Monthly Reporting

• Observation/Surveillance

• Invoice Review/Acceptance

• Annual Execution Review Requirements

• Customer Feedback/Surveillance (Frequency Varies)

Service Summary Items

PEFORMANCE

OBJECTIVE

PWS

PARA

PERFORMANCE THRESHOLD Assessment Method/Frequency

(SS-1) Provide accurate technical and analytical advice, guidance and products as required by individual task orders.

Pertinent

PWS

paragraph

Contractor receives no more than one (1) formal, validated customer complaints/contract discrepancy reports per year. Contractor successfully resolves any customer complaint within ten (10) working days of receipt or less time as specified in the task order.

Monthly, COR will evaluate customer feedback.

100% Inspection of Deliverables.

(SS-2) Provide timely response to time-sensitive requirements, including short notice requirements and a large number of requirements in a short period (surge capability).

Pertinent

PWS

paragraph

Contractor receives no more than one (1) formal customer complaint/contract discrepancy report per year from all task orders.

Monthly the COR will evaluate customer feedback

Periodic Assessment/Inspection.

100% Inspection of Deliverables

Service Summary Items

PEFORMANCE

OBJECTIVE

PWS

PARA

PERFORMANCE THRESHOLD Assessment Method/Frequency

(SS-3) Compliance with DD Form 254, Contract Security Classification Specification, to include proper handling, storage, transmission, and destruction of controlled unclassified information (CUI) and classified materials.

Pertinent

PWS

paragraph

No security violations or infractions.

Monthly, COR will evaluate compliance with DD 254, Contract Security Classification Specification, to include proper handling, storage, transmission, and destruction of classified.

Periodic Assessment/ Inspection.

(SS-4) Requirements/ deliverables completed in an accurate, timely manner in compliance with individual PWS requirements.

Pertinent

PWS

paragraph

No more than three late documents per year per task order and no more than 2 working days late. No more than two sets of corrections/edits and all corrections must be accomplished within two working days, or other such time periods as established in the task order.

Monthly, COR will evaluate requirements/deliverables completed in an accurate, timely manner in compliance with individual task order requirements.

100% Inspection of Deliverables

Questions?