Industry_Day_Slides_3APR17.ppt
PPT presentation 584 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MODELING, SIMULATION, AND ANALYSIS (MS&A) FOR SPACE AND CYBERSPACE CAPABILITIES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA2517-17-R-7003
About this file
Industry Day Slides 3APR17
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
MODELING, SIMULATION, AND ANALYSIS (MS&A) FOR SPACE AND CYBERSPACE CAPABILITIES has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Modeling, Simulation, and Analysis (MS&A) for Space and Cyberspace Capabilities (MSCC) Industry Day Chuck Schwarz, HQ AFSPC/A9XY Steve Wells, 21 CONS/LGCCB 3 April 2017
Overview
| MSCC is to provide objective and responsive Modeling, Simulation, and Analysis (MS&A) and decision support for space and cyberspace analyses. |
| Represents technical and support requirements for space and cyberspace analysis to include engineering/engagement, mission, and theater/campaign MS&A. |
| Development/modification of MS&A and decision support tools, and analysis of space and cyberspace capabilities that provide tactical, operational, and strategic level support to meet military and national objectives |
Bottom Line Up Front Single Award Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) CPFF, CR, and FFP CLINs Competitive Small Business set aside Five (5) Year Ordering Period w/ six (6) month option extension of services
STOVER, SCOTT A CIV USAF AFSPC AFSPC/A2/3/6 A3XR (SSACUAAA)
Program goals and objectives Development/modification of MS&A and decision support tools Analysis of space and cyberspace capabilities Support warfighter integration analysis efforts within the Space MS&A framework and analysis process
Examples Impact of Space Capabilities on Warfighting Operations Understand the key interactions between space, air, land, and maritime capabilities Development of an analysis framework to understand the resiliency of space capabilities over time in a contested environment
Requirements Current and New
Requirements Development MSSC II and MSSC Interim contracts
AVAC
Contract consolidation
Current Requirements
| Title | Contract Number | Value/Length | Expiration Date | Contract Type |
| MSSC II | FA8771-12-D-1009-SX01 | $5.5M/3 Years | 24 Jan 18 | Cost Plus Fixed Fee |
| MSSC Interim | FA8771-12-D-1009-SX04 | $6.5M/ 2 Years | 24 Jul 18 | Cost Plus Fixed Fee |
| AVAC | FA2517-13-C-9003 | $2.6M/5 Years | 25 Apr 18 | Firm Fixed Price |
Video networks as identified in the NORAD and USNORTHCOM IT (N-NC) Service Catalog.
New Requirement
Requirement determined NON-Commercial Secret/Top Secret (TS) Clearance and TS Facility Clearance required Security level, certifications, and Government unique requirements Consolidation of MSSC, MSSC Interim and AVAC Contracts North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541511 (Custom Computer Programming Service) with size standard $27.5M and Product Service Code R408, (Program Management/Support Services) Preponderance of work Previous contracts Best fit for the scope of work
Discuss OSD Memo – DFARS 207.170-2 “Consolidation of contract requirements” means the use of a solicitation to obtain offers for a single contract or a multiple award contract to satisfy two or more requirements of a department, agency, or activity for supplies or services that previously have been provided to, or performed for, that department, agency, or activity under two or more separate contracts.
Classifying the product or service being acquired in the industry whose definition, as found in the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Manual (available at http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html ), best describes the principal nature of the product or service being acquired;
Acquisition Way Ahead
Proposed acquisition strategy Competitive Small Business Set-Aside Performance Based Acquisition Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Critical Success Factors (CSFs), service target levels, and performance thresholds Single Award IDIQ contract Based on scope and complexity Projected orders are so integrally related Ordering Period Five (5) Year Ordering period: 1 June 2018 – 31 May 2023 Six (6) Month Extension of Services: 1 June 2023 – 30 November 2023 Industry Day One-on-one based on industry requests Government-Furnished Property or Equipment No Government-Furnished Property will be provided
Potential Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Structure
| CLIN 1000 – LABOR 3400 (MS&A) | CPFF | ||
| CLIN 2000 – LABOR 3400 (AVAC) | FFP | ||
| CLIN 3000 – LABOR 3600 | CPFF | ||
| CLIN 4000 – LABOR 3600 | FFP | ||
| CLIN 5000 – PROCUREMENT | CR | ||
| CLIN 6000 – OTHER DIRECT COST | CR | ||
| CLIN 7000 – DATA NOT SEPARTELY PRICED (NSP) | N/A |
CLIN structure is established as such in order to clearly differentiate between the duo types of Labor funding (i.e., two O&M CLINs) vice CLIN type (CPFF vice FFP) in an effort to reduce margin of error at time of funding, obligation and invoicing - ensuring FIAR compliance. The majority of the requirement is a CPFF contract type, which is suitable as the work effort does not allow for defining the requirements sufficiently and uncertainties do not permit costs to be estimated with sufficient accuracy.
The Contingency CLIN is requested in case of an emergency, Natural Disaster, and/or Acts of God. The contingency CLIN will be pre-priced for services in accordance with PWS paragraph 5.9.3; the pre-priced rates are based on 24/7 contingency support for one (1) day increments (15-day historical average length) which may be used up to six (6) times per year. The IDIQ contract will include a settlement clause for variances.
Best Value to the Government Subjective Trade Off (STO) Evaluation method Price will include a 5-year contract and 6-month Extension of Services Award to the offeror that provides the best overall value in terms of priced and non-priced factors Potential Evaluation Criteria:
Past Performance combined with mission capability is significantly more important than cost IAW FAR Clause 52.222-46, Evaluation of Compensation for Professional Employees will be conducted Technical Capability Factor Past Performance Factor Cost/Price Factor
Contract will be administered by 21CONS/LGCC Program Management support will be provided by AFSPC/A9XY Ordering will be centralized Task Orders Follow the same IDIQ CLIN Structure Solicited and awarded IAW FAR 16.505 May include option periods Not to exceed a two (2) year period of performance beyond the contract ordering period, i.e. 31 May 2025 (unless other than O&M funds) IAW AFI 63-138 There will be an appointed Primary and Alternate COR
| MILESTONES: | Estimated Completion |
| Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) | 10-Mar-17 |
| Formal Solicitation Release | 7-Jun-17 |
| Proposals Received | 6-Jul-17 |
| Release ENs | 2-Oct-17 |
| Final Proposal Revision | 16-Jan-18 |
| Contract Award | 1-Jun-18 |
Technical Considerations Applicable clauses will be included in contract (e.g. Data rights Safety, 508 Compliance, and Occupational Health) Evaluation of Compensation for Professional Employees – FAR 52.222-46 applies Business Considerations Non-commercial requirement Encourage Commercial practices and products Management Considerations 21 CONS will administer and HQ AFSPC/A9XY will manage this contract locally Other Significant Issues 60-Days mimimum Phase-in Period (e.g. Security clearances, Bldg. access, CAC cards), included in Program Management TO
Acquisition Way Ahead
CONTRACT OVERSIGHT AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Contract Oversight & Performance Evaluation
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan required COR will be responsible for assessing performance Alternate COR / SMEs to support COR
COR PM (COR TYPE B)
Refresher training COR oversight The CO will address unsatisfactory performance Monthly COSs provided by 10th of each month Inspection Methods Contractor Monitoring Monthly Reporting Observation/Surveillance Invoice Review/Acceptance Annual Execution Review Requirements Customer Feedback/Surveillance (Frequency Varies)
Refresher training is required every three (3) years, minimum of 8 or 16 hours COR specific training, and minimum of 1 hour ethics training annually
COR oversight established in the PWS to ensure performance meets standards and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.
Service Summary Items
| PEFORMANCE OBJECTIVE | PWS PARA | PERFORMANCE THRESHOLD | Assessment Method/Frequency |
| (SS-1) Provide accurate technical and analytical advice, guidance and products as required by individual task orders. | Pertinent PWS paragraph | Contractor receives no more than one (1) formal, validated customer complaints/contract discrepancy reports per year. Contractor successfully resolves any customer complaint within ten (10) working days of receipt or less time as specified in the task order. | Monthly, COR will evaluate customer feedback. |
100% Inspection of Deliverables.
(SS-2) Provide timely response to time-sensitive requirements, including short notice requirements and a large number of requirements in a short period (surge capability). Pertinent PWS paragraph Contractor receives no more than one (1) formal customer complaint/contract discrepancy report per year from all task orders. Monthly the COR will evaluate customer feedback
Periodic Assessment/Inspection.
100% Inspection of Deliverables
Service Summary Items
| PEFORMANCE OBJECTIVE | PWS PARA | PERFORMANCE THRESHOLD | Assessment Method/Frequency |
| (SS-3) Compliance with DD Form 254, Contract Security Classification Specification, to include proper handling, storage, transmission, and destruction of controlled unclassified information (CUI) and classified materials. | Pertinent PWS paragraph | No security violations or infractions. | Monthly, COR will evaluate compliance with DD 254, Contract Security Classification Specification, to include proper handling, storage, transmission, and destruction of classified. |
Periodic Assessment/ Inspection.
(SS-4) Requirements/ deliverables completed in an accurate, timely manner in compliance with individual PWS requirements.
Pertinent PWS paragraph No more than three late documents per year per task order and no more than 2 working days late. No more than two sets of corrections/edits and all corrections must be accomplished within two working days, or other such time periods as established in the task order. Monthly, COR will evaluate requirements/deliverables completed in an accurate, timely manner in compliance with individual task order requirements.
100% Inspection of Deliverables
Questions?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .