EP2AE _MRQ Rev 2 - 27 Jan 10.xls
XLS spreadsheet 92 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MULTIPLE IDIQ CONTRACTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING, PROGRAMMING, AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES (EP2AE) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA0021-10-R-0001
About this file
EP2AE - Market Research Questionnaire (Rev 2) dated 27 Jan 10
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| EP2AE - Status Update Notice 1 dated 2 Jul 10.doc | DOC document | |
| EP2AE - Qs Rs 44b - 54 | — | |
| EP2AE - Submission Requirements | — | |
| EP2AE - Primary Labor Categories.doc | DOC document | |
| EP2AE - Q R 12- 44 - 28 Jan 10.doc | DOC document | |
| EP2AE - Submission Requirements.doc | DOC document | |
| EP2AE - Official Notice 13 Jan 10.tif | TIF image | |
| SS-RFI Q R 11 -11 Posted 5 Nov 09.doc | DOC document | |
| SS-RFI Q R 1-10 Posted 3 Nov 09.doc | DOC document | |
| Market Research Questionnaire15 Oct 09.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| sf330_f 1 .pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Re: FA0021-10-R-0001 *** Revision 2 Dated: 27 Jan 10 *** | Other than SB | Yes | |||
| SB | No | ||||
| Reply To: | HQ AFSOC/A7KQ | Submitted By: | Company Name: | SDB | N/A |
| Attn: Judith F. Smith, Contracting Officer | POC: | 8A | 1 | ||
| 427 Cody Ave., Bldg 90333 | Title: | WSB | 2 | ||
| Hurlburt Field, FL 32544-5434 | Address: | SDVOSB | 3 | ||
| City, State. Zip: | VOSB | 4 | |||
| E-mail: judith.smith@hurlburt.af.mil | E-mail: | HUBZONE | 5 | ||
| Phone: (850)884-2474 Fax: (850)884-2476 | Phone Number: | 6 | |||
| Fax Number: | 7 | ||||
| Company Information | 8 | ||||
| Years in Business: | 9 | ||||
| DUNS No: | 10+ | ||||
| Cage Code: | |||||
| Business Size for NAICS 541310: | |||||
| Average number of employees: | > 75% of proposed individuals have partnered or teamed together | ||||
| Average number of professional employees: | > 50% of proposed individuals have partnered or teamed together | ||||
| Average annual revenue: | > 25% of proposed individuals have partnered or teamed together | ||||
| Firms primary NAICS: | < 25% of proposed individuals have partnered or teamed together | ||||
| Business representation: | No | ||||
| 1.0 Professional Qualifications | 90% "Exceptional" or Better | ||||
| 1.1 Professional Credentials * To be considered minimally qualified, the prime contractor must currently employ (as of 21 Dec 09) at least one (each) professionally credentialed architect or engineer, AICP certified planner, and registered environmental manager. | 90% "Very Good" or Better | ||||
| Number of in-house registered architects (not-subcontracted) | 90% "Satisfactory" or Better | ||||
| Number of in-house registered engineers (not-subcontracted) | 90% "Marginal" or Better | ||||
| Number of in-house AICP certified planners (not-subcontracted) | 90% "Unsatisfactory" or Better | ||||
| Number of in-house registered environmental managers (not-subcontracted) | N/A | ||||
| 1.2 How many credentialed professional project managers does the prime contractor currently employ full-time (not subcontracted) with recent (within 3-years) work experience in the primary task areas? | |||||
| Environmental Planning (Environmental Impact Analysis Process as defined in 32CFR, Part 989) | Within 60 miles of Cannon AFB | ||||
| Environmental Planning (Base Comprehensive Planning as defined in AFI 32-7062) | Within 60 miles of Hurlburt Field | ||||
| Programming as defined in AFI 32-1021, AFI 32-1022, AFI 32-1032, AFI 32-6002 | Within 200 miles of Cannon AFB | ||||
| Architect-Engineering (Title 1) Services | Within 200 miles of Hurlburt Field | ||||
| 1.3 Are the prime contractor's credentialed professional project managers (architects & engineers) registered in the states in which the work is anticipated to be performed? | Within Southeastern US | ||||
| Florida | Within Southwestern US | ||||
| Georgia | Outside SE or SW US | ||||
| New Mexico | N/A | ||||
| North Carolina | |||||
| Pennsylvania | > 75% of proposed individuals have partnered or teamed together | ||||
| Washington | > 50% of proposed individuals have partnered or teamed together | ||||
| 1.4 Does the prime contractor intend to subcontract any of the work in the primary task areas? | > 25% of proposed individuals have partnered or teamed together | ||||
| Environmental Planning (Environmental Impact Analysis Process as defined in 32CFR, Part 989) | < 25% of proposed individuals have partnered or teamed together | ||||
| Environmental Planning (Base Comprehensive Planning as defined in AFI 32-7062) | |||||
| Programming as defined in AFI 32-1021, AFI 32-1022, AFI 32-1032, AFI 32-6002 | |||||
| Architect-Engineering (Title 1) Services | |||||
| 1.5 Are the proposed subcontractor(s) credentialed professionals (architects & engineers) registered in the states in which the work is anticipated to be performed? | |||||
| Florida | |||||
| Georgia | |||||
| New Mexico | |||||
| North Carolina | |||||
| Pennsylvania | |||||
| Washington | |||||
| 2.0 Specialized Experience and Technical Competence of the Prime Contractor, Subcontractor and/or Team Members | |||||
| 2.1 Does the prime contractor perform all of the primary tasked listed in this RFI? | |||||
| Environmental Planning (Environmental Impact Analysis Process as defined in 32CFR, Part 989) | |||||
| Environmental Planning (Base Comprehensive Planning as defined in AFI 32-7062) | |||||
| Programming as defined in AFI 32-1021, AFI 32-1022, AFI 32-1032, AFI 32-6002 | |||||
| Architect-Engineering (Title 1) Services | |||||
| 2.2 Has the prime contractor had successful, recent work (within 3-years), for the Air Force in the primary task areas? * To answer yes to this question, a firm must have completed the work under the company name provided above as the prime or subcontractor performing at least 50% of the requirement. | |||||
| Environmental Planning (Environmental Impact Analysis Process as defined in 32CFR, Part 989) | |||||
| Environmental Planning (Base Comprehensive Planning as defined in AFI 32-7062) | |||||
| Programming as defined in AFI 32-1021, AFI 32-1022, AFI 32-1032, AFI 32-6002 | |||||
| Architect-Engineering (Title 1) Services | |||||
| Briefly define the project scopes and your firm's responsibilities, to include percentage of work performed, related to past performance listed above for each of the primary task areas. Only provide two examples for each of the task areas listed. Provide the following information for each project: |
* Project Title:
* Contract/Task Order Number:
* Contracting Officer (Name & Phone Number):
* Awarded Project Cost:
* Final Project Cost:
* Original Estimated Completion Date:
* Actual Completion Date:
| * Brief Description of Scope including firms roll in completing overall scope | Provide response on SF 330 Part I (f). Limited response to 8 pages; 1 page per project; limit 2 projects per task area. Submit in Section V of response. | ||
| 2.3 Has the proposed subcontractor(s) had successful, recent work (within 3-years), for the Air Force in the primary task areas? | |||
| Environmental Planning (Environmental Impact Analysis Process as defined in 32CFR, Part 989) | |||
| Environmental Planning (Base Comprehensive Planning as defined in AFI 32-7062) | |||
| Programming as defined in AFI 32-1021, AFI 32-1022, AFI 32-1032, AFI 32-6002 | |||
| Architect-Engineering (Title 1) Services | |||
| Briefly define the project scopes and the subcontractor's responsibilities, to include percentage of work performed, related to past performance listed above for each of the primary task areas. Only provide two examples for each of the task areas listed. Provide the following information for each project: |
* Project Title:
* Contract/Task Order Number:
* Contracting Officer (Name & Phone Number):
* Awarded Project Cost:
* Final Project Cost:
* Original Estimated Completion Date:
* Actual Completion Date:
* Brief Description of Scope including firms roll in completing overall scope
| * Identify percentage of work performed, e.g., 35%, 40% etc. | Provide response on SF 330 Part I (f). Limited response to 8 pages; 1-page per project; limit 2 projects per task area. Submit in Section VI of response. | |||||
| 2.4 Has the prime contractor partnered, or teamed, with these subcontractor(s) in the past 3-years to perform work for the Air Force in the primary task areas? | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Environmental Impact Analysis Process as defined in 32CFR, Part 989) | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Base Comprehensive Planning as defined in AFI 32-7062) | ||||||
| Programming as defined in AFI 32-1021, AFI 32-1022, AFI 32-1032, AFI 32-6002 | ||||||
| Architect-Engineering (Title 1) Services | ||||||
| 2.5 Have individual team members proposed to work on this contract partnered, or teamed, together on projects for the Air Force within the scope of the primary task areas? | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Environmental Impact Analysis Process as defined in 32CFR, Part 989) | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Base Comprehensive Planning as defined in AFI 32-7062) | ||||||
| Programming as defined in AFI 32-1021, AFI 32-1022, AFI 32-1032, AFI 32-6002 | ||||||
| Architect-Engineering (Title 1) Services | ||||||
| > 35% of proposed subcontractors are SB | ||||||
| 3.0 Past Performance | > 29% but < 35% of proposed subcontractors are SB | |||||
| 3.1 Has the prime contractor or proposed subcontractor(s) received a "Marginal" or "Unsatisfactory" rating in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) within the last 3-years for Air Force work in the primary task areas? * Firms receiving "Marginal" or "Unsatisfactory" scores in PPIRS on AF projects within the past 3-years are required to identify the contract & TO # (if TO) and provide comments for each rating (not to exceed 15 lines each) in Part I, Section H, of the SF 330. Comments shall not exceed 2-pages. Submit in Section VIII of response.. | > 24% but < 30% of proposed subcontractors are SB | |||||
| 3.2 Prime contractor's PPIRS ratings for Air Force projects completed in the past 3 years. | > 19% but < 25% of proposed subcontractors are SB | |||||
| Quality of Product/Service | > 14% but < 20% of proposed subcontractors are SB | |||||
| Schedule | > 9% but < 15% of proposed subcontractors are SB | |||||
| Cost Control | > 4% but < 10% of proposed subcontractors are SB | |||||
| Business Relations | > 4% but < 5% of proposed subcontractors are SB | |||||
| Management of Key Personnel | < 5% of proposed subcontractors are SB | |||||
| 3.3 Proposed subcontractor #1 (Insert Company Name) PPIRS ratings for Air Force projects completed in the past 3-years. | None | |||||
| Quality of Product/Service | ||||||
| Schedule | 100% of qualified SB proposed are within 60 miles. | |||||
| Cost Control | > 75% of qualified SB proposed are within 60 miles. | |||||
| Business Relations | > 50% of qualified SB proposed are within 60 miles. | |||||
| Management of Key Personnel | > 25% of qualified SB proposed are within 60 miles. | |||||
| 3.4 Proposed subcontractor #2 (Insert Company Name)PPIRS ratings for Air Force projects completed in the past 3-years. | < 25% of qualified SB proposed are within 60 miles. | |||||
| Quality of Product/Service | No qualified SB proposed are within 60 miles | |||||
| Schedule | ||||||
| Cost Control | > 10% over expected costs of qualified large businesses. | |||||
| Business Relations | > 8% over expected costs of qualified large businesses. | |||||
| Management of Key Personnel | > 6% over expected costs of qualified large businesses. | |||||
| 3.5 Proposed subcontractor #3 (Insert Company Name)PPIRS ratings for projects completed in the past 3-years. | > 4% over expected costs of qualified large businesses. | |||||
| Quality of Product/Service | > 2% over expected costs of qualified large businesses. | |||||
| Schedule | No cost savings expected | |||||
| Cost Control | Increased cost to use qualified small businesses | |||||
| Business Relations | ||||||
| Management of Key Personnel | ||||||
| 4.0 Capacity to Accomplish the Work: Proof of capacity to accomplish the work in the required time, and capacity to accomplish multiple task orders simultaneously is essential. | ||||||
| 4.1 Provide the number of Task Orders (TOs), within the primary task areas listed in this RFI, the firm has completed in-house (not subcontracted) in the past 3-years within the contract performance period (and/or delayed at no fault to the contractor). | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Environmental Impact Analysis Process as defined in 32CFR, Part 989) | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Base Comprehensive Planning as defined in AFI 32-7062) | ||||||
| Programming as defined in AFI 32-1021, AFI 32-1022, AFI 32-1032, AFI 32-6002 | ||||||
| Architect-Engineering (Title 1) Services | ||||||
| 4.2 Provide number of TOs, within the primary task areas listed in this RFI, the firm has completed in-house (not subcontracted) simultaneously during a single performance period within the past 3-years. | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Environmental Impact Analysis Process as defined in 32CFR, Part 989) | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Base Comprehensive Planning as defined in AFI 32-7062) | ||||||
| Programming as defined in AFI 32-1021, AFI 32-1022, AFI 32-1032, AFI 32-6002 | ||||||
| Architect-Engineering (Title 1) Services | ||||||
| 4.3 Provide the number of TOs, within the primary task areas, proposed subcontractors have completed in the past 3-years within the contract performance period (and/or delayed at no fault to the contractor). | ||||||
| The Government assumes prime contractors will only provide one subcontractor per primary task area if not accomplished "in-house.". | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Environmental Impact Analysis Process as defined in 32CFR, Part 989) | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Base Comprehensive Planning as defined in AFI 32-7062) | ||||||
| Programming as defined in AFI 32-1021, AFI 32-1022, AFI 32-1032, AFI 32-6002 | ||||||
| Architect-Engineering (Title 1) Services | ||||||
| 4.4 Provide number of TOs, within the primary task areas listed in this RFI, proposed subcontractors have completed simultaneously during a single performance period within the past 3-years. | ||||||
| The Government assumes prime contractors will only provide one subcontractor per primary task area if not accomplished "in-house.". | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Environmental Impact Analysis Process as defined in 32CFR, Part 989) | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Base Comprehensive Planning as defined in AFI 32-7062) | ||||||
| Programming as defined in AFI 32-1021, AFI 32-1022, AFI 32-1032, AFI 32-6002 | ||||||
| Architect-Engineering (Title 1) Services | ||||||
| 4.5 Based on the primary tasks identified, what percentage of work do you anticipate subcontracting to small business? | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Environmental Impact Analysis Process as defined in 32CFR, Part 989) | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Base Comprehensive Planning as defined in AFI 32-7062) | ||||||
| Programming as defined in AFI 32-1021, AFI 32-1022, AFI 32-1032, AFI 32-6002 | ||||||
| Architect-Engineering (Title 1) Services | ||||||
| 5.0 Location: For purposes of scoring this criteria, the southeastern United States is defined as AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, MS, NC, SC, and TN. The southwestern United States is defined as: AZ, CO, NM, OK, TX, and UT. | ||||||
| Location of prime contractor's office(s) with primary administrative responsibility proposed for this contract. | ||||||
| Location of more than 50 percent of the proposed subcontractors (SB or LB) offices with production responsibility proposed for this contract. | ||||||
| 5.1 What percentage of qualified small business identified in question 2.6 are located within 60 miles of Cannon AFB, NM or Hurlburt Field, FL? | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Environmental Impact Analysis Process as defined in 32CFR, Part 989) | Cannon AFB | |||||
| Hurlburt Field | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Base Comprehensive Planning as defined in AFI 32-7062) | Cannon AFB | |||||
| Hurlburt Field | ||||||
| Programming as defined in AFI 32-1021, AFI 32-1022, AFI 32-1032, AFI 32-6002 | Cannon AFB | |||||
| Hurlburt Field | ||||||
| Architect-Engineering (Title 1) Services | Cannon AFB | |||||
| Hurlburt Field | ||||||
| 5.2 What would be the anticipated costs savings by subcontracting to qualified small business? It is the desire of the Air Force to maximize the use of qualified small business subcontractors when costs are competitive with qualified large businesses. Therefore, use of qualified small businesses located near Cannon AFB and Hurlburt Field, is highly desireable to reduce travel costs, and improve response times. | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Environmental Impact Analysis Process as defined in 32CFR, Part 989) | ||||||
| Environmental Planning (Base Comprehensive Planning as defined in AFI 32-7062) | ||||||
| Programming as defined in AFI 32-1021, AFI 32-1022, AFI 32-1032, AFI 32-6002 | ||||||
| Architect-Engineering (Title 1) Services | ||||||
| 6.0 Other | ||||||
| 6.1 It is the Government's intention to provide TO Statements of Work to the most qualified firm awarded an IDIQ contract for end-of-year projects that may or may not receive funding. | ||||||
| Is your firm willing to prepare scope and cost proposal(s) for these unfunded end-of-year projects, at no cost to the Government, in the event funding becomes available at end-of-year? | ||||||
| If not, what is your firm’s average cost to prepare scope and cost proposals? | ||||||
| 6.2 Do you apply a different nominal G & A rate for travel and/or material costs? | ||||||
| If so, what is your nominal rate? | ||||||
| 6.3 What is your firm's current approved rates for: | ||||||
| Fringe | ||||||
| Overhead | ||||||
| G&A | ||||||
| Profit | ||||||
| C.O.M. (if applicable) | ||||||
| 6.4 What company benefits does your firm offer? (401K, Health, Dental, Education, Training, etc.) | No page limit. Provide in Section X. | |||||
| 6.5 Provide your Firm's DCAA information. | ||||||
| DCAA Rep Name: | ||||||
| Title: | ||||||
| Phone: | ||||||
| Fax: | ||||||
| E-Mail: | ||||||
| Address: | ||||||
| City, State, Zip: | ||||||
| Does your firm have an approved accounting system through DCAA? | ||||||
| Provide date of last DCAA audit or input "never audited," as applicable. | ||||||
| 6.6 Provide DCAA information for subcontractor #1 anticipated to perform services on TO requirements. If not applicable, so state here: ____________ . | ||||||
| Company Name: | ||||||
| POC: | ||||||
| Title: | ||||||
| Phone Number: | ||||||
| DUNS No.: | ||||||
| Cage Code: | ||||||
| Anticipated percentage of work: | ||||||
| Address: | ||||||
| City, State, Zip: | ||||||
| DCAA Rep Name: | ||||||
| Title: | ||||||
| Phone Number: | ||||||
| Address: | ||||||
| City, State, Zip: | ||||||
| Fax: | ||||||
| E-Mail: | ||||||
| Does this subcontractor have an approved accounting system through DCAA? | ||||||
| Provide date of last DCAA audit or input "never audited," as applicable. | ||||||
| 6.7 Provide DCAA information for subcontractor #2 anticipated to perform services on TO requirements. If not applicable, so state here: ____________ . | ||||||
| Company Name: | ||||||
| POC: | ||||||
| Title: | ||||||
| Phone Number: | ||||||
| DUNS No.: | ||||||
| Cage Code: | ||||||
| Anticipated percentage of work: | ||||||
| Address: | ||||||
| City, State, Zip: | ||||||
| DCAA Rep Name: | ||||||
| Title: | ||||||
| Phone Number: | ||||||
| Address: | ||||||
| City, State, Zip: | ||||||
| Fax: | ||||||
| E-Mail: | ||||||
| Does this subcontractor have an approved accounting system through DCAA? | ||||||
| Provide date of last DCAA audit or input "never audited," as applicable. | ||||||
| 6.8 Provide DCAA information for subcontractor #3 anticipated to perform services on TO requirements. If not applicable, so state here: ____________ . | ||||||
| Company Name: | ||||||
| POC: | ||||||
| Title: | ||||||
| Phone Number: | ||||||
| DUNS No.: | ||||||
| Cage Code: | ||||||
| Anticipated percentage of work: | ||||||
| Address: | ||||||
| City, State, Zip: | ||||||
| DCAA Rep Name: | ||||||
| Title: | ||||||
| Phone Number: | ||||||
| Address: | ||||||
| City, State, Zip: | ||||||
| Fax: | ||||||
| E-Mail: | ||||||
| Does this subcontractor have an approved accounting system through DCAA? | ||||||
| Provide date of last DCAA audit or input "never audited," as applicable. |
&L&G&C&12HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND&"-,Bold"
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING, PROGRAMMING
AND ARCHITECTURAL-ENGINEERING SERVICES (EP2AE)
MARKET RESEARCH QUESTIONNAIRE&R&G
&C&P of &N&R&D
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .