Exhibit C - Written Proposal.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Health Technology Assessment State and local contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 2024HCA15
- Issued by
- Adams County, Asotin County, Benton County, Chelan County, Clallam County, Clark County, Columbia County, Cowlitz County, Douglas County, Ferry County, Franklin County, Garfield County, Grant County, Grays Harbor County, Island County, Jefferson County, King County, Kitsap County, Kittitas County, Klickitat County, Lewis County, Lincoln County, Mason County, Okanogan County, Pacific County, Pend Oreille County, Pierce County, San Juan County, Skagit County, Skamania County, Snohomish County, Spokane County, Stevens County, Thurston County, Wahkiakum County, Walla Walla County, Whatcom County, Whitman County, Yakima County, Asotin City, Clarkston City, Clarkston Heights-Vineland CDP, West Clarkston-Highland CDP, Benton City, Chelan City, Chelan Falls CDP, Clallam Bay CDP, Lewisville CDP, Rock Island City, Pacific Beach CDP, Whidbey Island Station CDP, Mercer Island City, Pacific City, Bainbridge Island City, Kingston CDP, Kitsap Lake CDP, Kittitas City, Klickitat CDP, Okanogan City, Anderson Island CDP, Fort Lewis CDP, Fox Island CDP, Herron Island CDP, Ketron Island CDP, North Fort Lewis CDP, Pacific City, Raft Island CDP, Stevenson City, Hat Island CDP, Lake Stevens City, Snohomish City, Spokane City, Spokane Valley City, Puget Island CDP, Garfield Town, Yakima City, Washington
About this file
This document is Exhibit C for a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the Health Care Authority (HCA) in Washington State. The solicitation seeks qualified firms to conduct evidence-based health technology assessments to support state health policy determinations. Bidders must submit comprehensive technical and management proposals across multiple categories, with a maximum of 730 points available. The technical proposal requires three work product examples spanning medical devices, surgical procedures, and diagnostic tests, each with specific subcategory requirements related to emerging interventions, outdated methodologies, or cost-effectiveness analyses.
The proposal demands detailed documentation including organizational conflict of interest policies, project team structure, staff resumes, and demonstrated experience in conducting health technology reviews. Bidders must showcase at least three years of evidence-based review performance, with specific experience in health technology assessments for healthcare payer organizations. Key evaluation criteria include the ability to produce comprehensive assessments, provide clinical committee presentations, develop work plans, generate periodic status reports, and demonstrate expertise across clinical, behavioral, social sciences, economic, and management domains. The management proposal section emphasizes organizational leadership, team qualifications, and professional capabilities in executing health technology assessment projects.
View the file
Other files for this state and local contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2024HCA15 - Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| 2024HCA15 - Amendment 2.pdf | ||
| 2024HCA15 - Amendment 4.pdf | ||
| 2024HCA15Health Technology Assessment.pdf | ||
| Exhibit C - Written Proposal.pdf | ||
| 2024HCA15 - Amendment 3.pdf | ||
| 2024HCA15-Health Technology Assessment.pdf | ||
| 2024HCA15ExhibitA-Bidder Forms&Certifications.pdf | ||
| Exhibit B Draft Contract.pdf | ||
| 2024HCA15 RFP Exhibit D - Cost Proposal.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit B Draft Contract.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EXHIBIT C – WRITTEN PROPOSAL
Maximum Points for Qualifications: 730 Technical Proposal Specifications (Maximum available points: 400) The bidder must provide a prior work product example for the following three types of assessments (1-3) and use each subcategory (A-C) once.
Assessments (1-3) must use each subcategory (A-C) once. Each work product example must be clearly identified using the Assessment number; a dash; and the subcategory used in that example (e.g. 1-B; 2-C; or 3-C) Medical or surgical device or medical equipment Subcategories:
Must contain one example related to an emerging intervention; OR Related to a currently used or more commonly accepted intervention that is outdated or being used in new ways; OR Includes a cost effectiveness analysis component. (Maximum available points: 50) 1.
1.1
1.2 Medical or surgical procedure Subcategories:
A. Must contain one example related to an emerging intervention; OR B. Related to a currently used or more commonly accepted intervention that is outdated or being used in new ways; OR C. Includes a cost effectiveness analysis component. (Maximum available points: 50)
1.3 Diagnostic test Subcategories:
A. Must contain one example related to an emerging intervention; OR B. Related to a currently used or more commonly accepted intervention that is outdated or being used in new ways; OR C. Includes a cost effectiveness analysis component. (Maximum available points: 50) Bidder must provide templates of a proposed document to be used for this contract for the items listed below. Include brief descriptions of major topic areas that would be included in the proposed template:
1.1 1.2 Health technology assessment; (Maximum available points: 50) Oral/slide presentation of assessment for a clinical committee audience; (Maximum available points: 50) Work plan for each assignment; (Maximum available points: 50) Periodic status reports on progress against the work plan; and (Maximum available points: 50) Additional sample of related HTA work. (Maximum available points: 50) 2.
Management Proposal Specifications (Maximum available points: 330) 2.
Describe the position within the entity that will have prime responsibility and final authority for the work, and the next senior level of management. (Maximum available points: 30) Provide a copy of the Proposer’s Conflict of Interest policy, guideline, or agreement that Proposer requires of its team members. (Maximum available points: 30) Provide a description of the project team structure and internal controls to be used during the course of the project, including an indication of potential subcontractors. Indicate position types (including identification of the labor categories below), responsibilities, time commitment estimated, and minimal qualifications for typical assessment projects. (Maximum available points: 30) Describe staff, including subcontractors who may be assigned to conduct the HTAs and related tasks that have general and specialized clinical, behavioral, social sciences, economic, and management expertise. (Maximum available points: 30) The bidder must identify an executive with qualifications of a Labor Category 1 that possesses strong corporate level management experience. (Maximum available points: 30) The bidder must identify a project manager or managers, if different from the executive that will be responsible for the day-to-day management of individual assignments. (Maximum available points: 30) 1.
2.
3.
4.
4.1.
4.2.
Resumes must include information on the individual's particular skills related to this project; education; experience; significant accomplishments; and any other pertinent information must be submitted.
Provide resumes for executive and managers of day-to-day management of individual assignments. (Maximum available points: 30) Representative samples of two resumes for each Labor Category (LC 1-4) of staff that are currently committed to the entity and that may conduct the health technology reviews. (Maximum available points: 30) Provide a list of contracts the Bidder has had during the last three years for health technology or evidence-based reviews. List brief description of work, contract period of performance, contact person, telephone number and email address. (Maximum available points: 30) Provide a summary of relevant experience that demonstrates the qualifications of the bidder and any subcontractors to conduct scientific evidence-based health technology assessments and updates; provide consultation and input in formulating key questions and other preliminary matters; and report, including oral presentations, on the findings of the health technology assessments. (Maximum available points: 30) Demonstrate at least three years’ performance of evidence-based reviews, preferably focused on health technologies. Experience in performing or incorporating the results of cost-effectiveness analysis is required. Specific experience in producing health technology assessments to assist health care payer organizations is desired. Experience in analyzing any unique impact of an intervention on specific populations based upon factors such as gender, age, ethnicity, rate, or disability is desired. (Maximum available points: 30)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .