EXHIBIT 3 - EVALUATION CRITERIA.pdf
PDF 54 KB Posted
- Attached to
- As-Needed Battery Supply and Install
- Solicitation number
- PS139177
- Issued by
- California
About this file
This is an Evaluation Criteria document for a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) for as-needed battery supply and installation services across the LACMTA service area in California. The project encompasses the supply and replacement of battery systems at various LACMTA facilities, including batteries, cabling, rack/mounting systems, and all associated materials necessary for installation. The RFP evaluation process will assess proposals based on four weighted criteria categories designed to identify the most qualified contractor for this ongoing service requirement.
The proposal evaluation framework allocates 35 percent weight to the prime contractor's skills, experience, and past performance, including relevant project experience within the last five years, client references, key personnel qualifications, and available resources. Team composition, qualifications, and management account for 25 percent of the evaluation score, assessing team capabilities, subcontractor performance history, personnel certifications, contingency planning, and regulatory compliance experience with California agencies. The effectiveness of the execution plan comprises 25 percent of the evaluation, focusing on project organization, resource allocation, schedule management, stakeholder coordination with LACMTA, and quality and safety assurance protocols. The cost proposal represents 15 percent of the final evaluation score, calculated using the formula where the proposer's cost score equals the lowest cost proposal multiplied by total available points, divided by the proposer's cost proposal. The evaluation team will score DBE (Disadvantaged Business Enterprise) participation as either responsive or non-responsive.
View the file
Other files
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EXHIBIT 3 - EVALUATION CRITERIA
Proposals resulting from this RFP will be evaluated by the proposal evaluation team according to the following criteria and be given the weights indicated below in the scoring of the Proposals. Sub-criteria identified in the following numbered sections will be weighted as shown. The criteria for DBE participation will be scored as either responsive or non-responsive
1. PRIME CONTRACTOR’S SKILLS, EXPERIENCE, AND PAST PERFORMANCE 35 %
The proposer must demonstrate their technical expertise, project experience, and ability to successfully deliver similar contracts. Evaluation will be based on:
Relevant Experience: Provide evidence of successfully completing projects of similar scope, scale, and complexity within the last five years.
Performance Record: Submit references from current and past clients detailing satisfactory performance, including adherence to schedule, quality of work, and budget management.
Key Personnel Expertise: Demonstrate the qualifications, relevant experience, and technical expertise of the personnel assigned to this project. Include descriptions of past roles and contributions to similar projects.
Resource Availability & Capability: Outline the proposer’s technical resources, including tools, technology, and methodologies that enhance project performance.
2. TEAM COMPOSITION, QUALIFICATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT 25 %
This section assesses the proposer’s ability to build and manage a qualified project team, including subcontractors. Evaluation will consider:
Team Capabilities & Roles: Provide detailed descriptions of key personnel’s qualifications, skillsets, and experience, including subcontractors.
Subcontractor Performance History: Include a record of satisfactory performance and successful completion of similar projects by proposed subcontractors. Provide client references where applicable.
Personnel Qualifications & Certifications: Submit resumes for key personnel and highlight relevant licenses, certifications, and professional accreditations.
Personnel Management & Contingency Planning: Demonstrate the ability to manage staff assignments and personnel changes effectively without impacting project quality or schedule.
Regulatory Compliance Experience: Provide examples of coordination with California regulatory agencies and familiarity with relevant local, state, and federal requirements.
3. EFFECTIVENESS OF EXECUTION PLAN 25 %
The proposer must demonstrate a structured, effective approach to project execution, quality control, and coordination. Evaluation will be based on:
Project Organization & Communication: Provide a clear organizational structure with defined lines of authority, communication protocols, and assigned responsibilities.
Resource Allocation: Describe the depth of skilled personnel and technical resources available to execute the project efficiently.
Schedule Management & Control Measures: Outline project timeline management strategies, schedule monitoring techniques, and risk mitigation approaches to ensure timely completion.
Stakeholder Coordination & Collaboration: Describe the proposer's approach to working with LACMTA and designated consultants, ensuring seamless coordination.
Quality & Safety Assurance: Provide details on quality control methodologies, safety programs, and compliance with industry best practices to ensure the highest standards of service delivery.
4. COST PROPOSAL 15_%
The Cost Proposal will be factored into the Proposer's final evaluation score in the following manner:
Proposer Cost Score = Lowest Cost Proposal X Total Points Available For Price
Proposer's Cost Proposal
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .