Draft_Performance_Work_Statement_NPSAS_2016.docx

DOCX document 256 KB Posted

Attached to
National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS 2016) & Postsecondary Longitudinal Studies Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
ED-IES-13-R-0011
Issued by
Department of Education Contracts and Acquisition Management

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS 2016) & Postsecondary Longitudinal Studies, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment_A_-_NPSAS-16_Performance_Work_Statement_(SAS).pdf PDF
Amendment_3_-_NPSAS_2016.pdf PDF
FormSF33_NPSAS-16.pdf PDF
Appendix_3_-NPSAS-16_IT_Program_Assessment_Guide_copy.pdf PDF
Attachment_D_-_NPSAS-16_Billing_Instructions.docx DOCX document
Attachment_B_-_NPSAS-16_Quality_Assurance_Surveillance_Plan_(2).docx DOCX document
Attachment_F_-_NPSAS-16_Contractor_Employee_Security_Screening.docx DOCX document
Attachment_A_-_NPSAS-16_Performance_Work_Statement_040113.docx DOCX document
Appendix_4_-_NPSAS-16_Contractor_Employee_Security_Screening_Policy.docx DOCX document
Attachment_H_-_NPSAS-16_Evaluation_Criteria.doc DOC document
Attachment_I_-_NPSAS-16_Subcontracting_Plan_Review_Forms.docx DOCX document
Attachment_J_-_NPSAS-16_Contract_Tasks.doc DOC document
Attachment_C_-_NPSAS-16_Pricing_Schedules_for_Fixed_Price_Deliverables_rev0419.docx DOCX document
Appendix_2-_NPSAS-16_WebVTS_Data_Upload_Specifications.docx DOCX document
Appendix_1_-_NPSAS-16_Data_Elements_.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_G_-_NPSAS-16_Conflict_of_Interest_Certification.docx DOCX document
Attachment_E_-_NPSAS-16_Past_Performance.docx DOCX document
Attachment_A_-_DRAFT_PWS_NPSAS_04_01_13.docx DOCX document
Presolicitation_12-14.pdf PDF
presolicitation_conf.mp3 MP3 file
Draft_Performance_Work_Statement_NPSAS_2016.docx DOCX document
Draft_PWS_NPSAS_2016_-_RFI —
Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT A

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

2015-16 NATIONAL POSTSECONDARY STUDENT AID STUDY (NPSAS:16)

& POSTSECONDARY LONGITUDINAL STUDIES

DRAFT

I. INTRODUCTION

Abstract

The United States Department of Education (the Department) has a requirement for a series of studies, based largely on administrative data collections and some student interviews, to comply with the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended. These studies are designed to describe (1) how students and their families finance postsecondary education and (2) students’ persistence, attainment, and workforce outcomes. They include:

· National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (http://nces.ed.gov/npsas);

· Baccalaureate and Beyond Longitudinal Study (http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/b&b); and

· Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study (http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/bps).

The cross-sectional National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS) provides information about the costs of postsecondary education and how students and their families meet these costs, and is based on a nationally-representative sample of undergraduate and graduate students attending all types of postsecondary institutions. Historically, NPSAS has served as the base year data collection for the Baccalaureate and Beyond Longitudinal Study (B&B) and the Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study (BPS) in alternating administrations. The purpose of the B&B is to collect data on students’ education and work experiences after they complete a bachelor’s degree. In contrast, BPS tracks first-time beginning college students’ paths through postsecondary education, and helps answer questions related to persistence and degree completion.

To better keep pace with evolving demands, this RFP outlines a NPSAS family of studies—and a contractual structure—that varies substantially from prior years. Specifically:

(1) The base contract includes plans to conduct a NPSAS study in 2015-16 that is based exclusively on administrative data sources (i.e., the Department of Education’s databases, data from postsecondary institutions, and data from other administrative data sources) that is:

a. Nationally-representative of graduate and undergraduate students at the sector level and,

b. State-representative of undergraduate students for the 50 states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia.

(2) A series of optional tasks, summarized in Table 3 on page 42, have been designed to repeat administrative NPSAS studies, add a student interview to a NPSAS study, begin one or more longitudinal studies, conduct follow-up student interviews in longitudinal studies begun in this or past contracts, and collect and code postsecondary transcripts.

Despite this restructuring, NCES assumes that the 2015-16 NPSAS will include both administrative data and a student interview component (described as “Contingency 1” in Section I.C below).

This study will culminate in documented data files, codebooks, web-based data analysis systems (see http://nces.ed.gov/datalab), and tabulations/descriptive reports for the base contract and optional task(s).

A. Definitions

The following definitions are used throughout this RFP:

Longitudinal follow-up – a cohort derived from a subsample of the NPSAS study with a subsequent interview at a later time period. For the purposes of this RFP, "longitudinal follow-up" refers to first-time beginning students in a BPS OR graduating seniors in a B&B study OR any other longitudinal study where NPSAS serves as the base-year.

Nationally-representative sample – a sample drawn from the U.S. population in the 50 states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia such that the individuals sampled are collectively similar to those in the national population and key estimates for each stratum have relative standard errors (RSEs) less than 10 percent. For the purposes of this RFP, the following institutional sectors shall comprise the major stratum for a nationally-representative sample:

· Public 4-year doctorate

· Public 4-year nondoctorate

· Public 2-year

· Public less-than-2-year

· Private nonprofit 4-year doctorate

· Private nonprofit 4-year nondoctorate

· Private nonprofit less-than-4-year

· Private for-profit 4-year

· Private for-profit 2-year

· Private for-profit less-than-2-year

State-representative sample – a sample drawn from each state population of the 50 states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia such that the individuals sampled are collectively similar to those in the state population and key estimates for each stratum have relative standard errors (RSEs) less than 10 percent for 90% of the states. For the purposes of this RFP, the following institutional sectors shall comprise the major stratum within each state (provided that the state has all the sectors):

· Public 4-year

· Public 2-year

· Private nonprofit 4-year

· Private for-profit 4-year

· Private for-profit 2-year

· Private for-profit less-than-2-year

B. Purpose of NPSAS and Postsecondary Longitudinal Studies

1. National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS)

NPSAS is a comprehensive nationwide study of how undergraduate and graduate students and their families pay for postsecondary education. The study will provide a national profile of students attending less-than-2-year institutions, 2-year colleges, and 4-year colleges and universities. The study includes students receiving federal financial aid, students receiving only other forms of financial aid, and those that do not receive financial aid. All sampled institutions participate in the Department’s Title IV financial aid programs.

2. Baccalaureate and Beyond Longitudinal Study (B&B)

The purpose of B&B is to collect data on students’ education and work experiences after they complete a bachelor’s degree. To do so, B&B follows baccalaureate recipients identified in NPSAS over time, with interviews occurring one year, four years, and ten years after graduation. Past B&B studies oversampled populations of interest including new elementary and secondary teachers and STEM graduates. B&B includes information on bachelor’s degree recipients’:

· workforce participation,

· career pathways and employment outcomes,

· income and debt repayment,

· entry into and persistence through graduate school programs,

· teacher preparation,

· entry into and persistence in the teaching profession, and

· teacher career paths.

B&B also gathers extensive information on bachelor’s degree recipients’ undergraduate experience, demographic backgrounds, and expectations regarding graduate study and work.

3. Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study (BPS)

The purpose of BPS is to track students’ pathways through postsecondary education, helping to answer questions related to undergraduates’ persistence and attainment outcomes. Following a cohort of students who are enrolling in postsecondary education for the first time regardless of age, the study collects data on:

· student persistence in, and completion of, postsecondary education programs,

· academic performance and other transcript information,

· transition to employment,

· demographic characteristics, and

· changes over time in their goals, marital status, income, and debt.

C. Scheduling of Studies

This contract is designed to anticipate three contingencies and will allow the government to adapt to the future demands for postsecondary data:

Contingency 1:

At minimum, NCES intends to maintain the current schedule of its postsecondary sample surveys by launching a NPSAS study in 2016 with an interview and include interview questions for potential baccalaureate recipients. This will launch a B&B study with anticipated follow-ups in 2017 and 2020.

Contingency 2:

Depending on the availability of funding and cost-efficiency related to administrative data collections, it is likely that NCES will launch a NPSAS study in 2016 and include interview questions for both potential baccalaureate recipients and first-time beginning students. In addition to a B&B study, this model would launch a BPS study with planned follow-ups in 2018 and 2021 and an administrative NPSAS study in 2018. Given the high interest in more frequent NPSAS studies, NCES may launch an administrative collection as early as 2014 so data are available in 2-year increments.

Contingency 3:

Because the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act of 1965 is anticipated during this contract’s period of performance, NCES anticipates increased demand for data like that collected via NPSAS. As a result, optional tasks in the contract allow the government to exercise yearly administrative collections of NPSAS data and/or additional longitudinal follow-up studies as Congress and policymakers may demand.

Offerors should be prepared for all of these contingencies.

D. Period of Performance

The work described in this contract shall be conducted during a base period of 60 months, with a possible renewal period of an additional 60 months. . .

E. Enabling Legislation

The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) of the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, conducts this study in compliance with the mandate stated in the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, (Public Law [P.L.] 107-279, Title I, Part C), which requires NCES to:

“collect, report, analyze, and disseminate statistical data related to education in the United States and in other nations, including …

(1) collecting, acquiring, compiling …, and disseminating full and complete statistics on the condition and progress of education at the … postsecondary and adult levels in the United States, including data on-

(E) access to, and opportunity for, postsecondary education, including data on financial aid to postsecondary students;

(F)teaching …;
(G)instruction, the conditions of the education workplace, and the supply, and demand for, teachers ….” (Section 153)

The Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended in the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008, 20 U.S.C. § 1015, also requires NCES to gather information on postsecondary student financial aid:

(A)(k) Student aid recipient survey

(1) Survey required The Secretary, acting through the Commissioner for Education Statistics, shall conduct, on a State-by-State basis, a survey of recipients of Federal student financial aid under Title IV—

(A) to identify the population of students receiving such Federal student financial aid;

(B) to describe the income distribution and other socioeconomic characteristics of recipients of such Federal student financial aid;

(C) to describe the combinations of aid from Federal, State, and private sources received by such recipients from all income categories;

(D) to describe the—

(i) debt burden of such loan recipients, and their capacity to repay their education debts; and

(ii) the impact of such debt burden on the recipients’ course of study and post-graduation plans;

(E) to describe the impact of the cost of attendance of postsecondary education in the determination by students of what institution of higher education to attend; and

(F) to describe how the costs of textbooks and other instructional materials affect the costs of postsecondary education for students.

(2) Frequency The survey shall be conducted on a regular cycle and not less often than once every four years.

(3) Survey design The survey shall be representative of students from all types of institutions, including full-time and part-time students, undergraduate, graduate, and professional students, and current and former students.

(4) Dissemination The Commissioner for Education Statistics shall disseminate to the public, in printed and electronic form, the information resulting from the survey.

Further, NCES assures participating individuals and institutions that any data collected conforms to the NCES standards for protecting the privacy of individuals as required by Section 183 of the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 (P.L. 107-279):

“all collection, maintenance, use, and wide dissemination of data by the institute, including each office, board, committee, and Center of the Institute, shall conform with the requirements of section 552A of title 5, United States Code [which protects the confidentiality rights of individual respondents with regard to the data collected, reported, and published under this title].” (Section 183)

Under the law, Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 (ESRA 2002), all individually identifiable information about students, their families, and their schools shall remain confidential. To this end, this law requires that no person may:

· Use any individually identifiable information furnished under the provisions of this section for any purpose other than statistical purposes for which it is supplied, except in the case of terrorism (see discussion of the Patriot Act);

· Make any publication whereby the data furnished by any particular person under this section can be identified; or

· Permit anyone other than the individuals authorized by the Commissioner to examine the individual reports.

Further, individually identifiable information is immune from legal process, and shall not, without the consent of the individual concerned, be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any action, suit, or other judicial or administrative proceeding, except in the case of terrorism. Employees, including temporary employees, or other persons who have sworn to observe the limitations imposed by this law, who knowingly publish or communicate any individually identifiable information will be subject to fines of up to $250,000, or up to 5 years in prison, or both (Class E felony).

On October 20, 1994, P.L. 103-382 was passed by Congress which was the legislation reauthorizing NCES. Section 405, Performance of Duties, indicates the following:

(a)Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements
(1)In General, in carrying out the Commissioner's duties until this title, the Commissioner may award grants, and enter into contracts and cooperative agreements.
(2)Duration - Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, the grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements under this section may be awarded, on a competitive basis, for a period of not more than five years, and may be renewed at the discretion of the Commissioner for an additional period of not more than five years.

F. Overview of the NPSAS Collection

NCES conducts a series of postsecondary sample survey studies, all anchored by the NPSAS study. NPSAS is a comprehensive study, historically completed every four years, that examines how students and their families pay for postsecondary education. It includes nationally-representative samples of undergraduates and graduate students attending all types of colleges, universities, and other postsecondary education institutions. Students who receive financial aid as well as those who do not receive financial aid participate in NPSAS. NPSAS includes certificate, undergraduate, and graduate students. Data from comprehensive student interviews and administrative records, with exceptional detail concerning student financial aid, are available for select academic years between 1986–87 and 2011–12.

An institutional sample will be drawn from a NCESsupplied postsecondary education institution file of institutions participating in the Department of Education’s Title IV financial aid programs. A sample design (for the field test and for the full-scale study) will be developed for the selection of institutions and students that specifies the rationale for the selected approach. To the extent possible, a non-overlapping sample of institutions will be selected for the field test and the full-scale study.

Methods will be developed to collect lists of students from sampled institutions and lists will be collected from sampled institutions. Training material will be developed and used to help train personnel who will contact institutions. Once lists of students are collected, a student sample will be drawn from the lists according to the sample design that has been developed. Once the student samples have been drawn, institutions will be recontacted to obtain administrative and enrollment data on sampled students. Sampled students are contacted individually and asked to complete a survey over the web or by telephone.

It is anticipated that at least 85 percent of the institutions sampled will provide lists of students. Procedures for identifying, contacting, securing the cooperation of, and obtaining information from institution-level representatives and students have been developed in the previous studies. Recent studies have shown that list collection for the last 15–20 percent of the institution sample has taken much longer than expected. As a way of encouraging participation of institutions, they may be reimbursed for the cost and time associated with their participation. This is permitted on a case-by-case basis. All student sample members may be offered an incentive to encourage participation.

Upon completion of the data collections for the base contract (NPSAS:16) and each of the data collection contract optional tasks, the contractor will produce a data user documentation report; a non-response bias analysis report; restricted-use data files, codebooks; a set of input files for the NCES’s web-based analysis tools (PowerStats and QuickStats, see http://nces.ed.gov/datalab); First Look publications; and descriptive tables/reports.

A subset optional tasks included in this RFP, if exercised, would substantially alter the way in which the NPSAS family of studies are executed, including:

1) Optional tasks that increase the frequency of NPSAS studies by alternating administrative collections that include student interview components with those that do not;

and

2) Optional tasks that decrease the periodicity between new iterations of longitudinal studies by launching a cohort of BPS and B&B students in the same NPSAS collection.

As noted above, the most substantive change in this NPSAS RFP is the request that the offerors respond to the requirements of the base contract, which now includes a 50-state-representative sample of undergraduate students for an administrative-only collection.

G. Information about Prior Iterations of the NPSAS Family of Studies

For more information on the NPSAS sample design, questionnaire development, survey methodology, response rates, weight calculations, and data quality for prior studies, see the methodology reports at the following website: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=013#012.

An example of a contract deliverable (methodology report for the 2007–08 NPSAS) is available at the following website: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2011188. While the structure of the report will remain the same, the name of the report for future studies will be called a Data File Documentation Manual.

For the Baccalaureate and Beyond (B&B) study, see the methodology reports for more information on the sample design, questionnaire development, survey methodology, response rates, weight calculations, and data quality, found at the following website: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=015.

For the Beginning Postsecondary Students (BPS) longitudinal studies, see the methodology reports for more information on the sample design, questionnaire development, survey methodology, response rates, weight calculations, and data quality, found at the following website: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=014#012.

Descriptive reports from these studies are also accessible on the websites above. Datasets, table libraries, and codebooks can also be accessed online via NCES's Datalab webpage (http://nces.ed.gov/datalab).

H. Relationship with Other Postsecondary Statistics Programs

The mission of NCES is to collect and disseminate information related to education in the United States and in other nations. In response to that mandate, the Postsecondary Studies Division (PSD) has developed a major program to measure and analyze the magnitude, content, resources, and outcomes of education. The program consists of a distinct but highly interrelated series of sample, longitudinal, and universe surveys designed to provide accurate and current information on the nation's diverse education activities.

The foundation of the postsecondary data collection program is the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). This system is “integrated” in that the surveys, data elements, and definitions are consistent across the three levels of postsecondary institutions (4-year, 2-year, and lessthan2-year) and types of control (public, private not-for-profit, and private for-profit). The data from the institutions can be aggregated to provide an accurate measure of the nation's postsecondary activities at institutions participating in the Department’s Title IV financial aid programs.

IPEDS provides a good measure of the magnitude and structure of postsecondary education, but it is limited in that specific data on participants can only be obtained in the aggregate. Some critical issues concerning resources and assessment (student aid and education outcomes) have been addressed through a series of other studies. NPSAS, BPS, and B&B are geared primarily to samples of individuals, not institutions. A linkage with the IPEDS and other postsecondary databases to provide an analytical framework is important to maintain. This linkage is done by using consistent sampling frames, definitions, and terminology, across all postsecondary surveys.

I. Quality Control

NCES is firmly committed to determining how well each project meets its goals, the quality of data collected, and its implications for future projects. Project quality control and statistical rigor should be integrated into every phase of the project. For instance, potential problems should be identified early so that possible solutions are tested as part of the field test. Item reliability and validity tests must be built into the data collection efforts, non-response bias analyses should be conducted as part of the final weighting process, and survey methodology and sample design effects should be presented for use by all data users. Additionally, the use of the most current survey research methods to increase quality and reduce bias as well as responsive designs in the data collection process should be accounted for in the project.

J. Property of Information Technology Programming or Source Code

When programming and or source code is used to develop a deliverable, the contractor will be required to provide the annotated code when the deliverable is submitted to and accepted by the Government. All intermediate and final products and supporting programming and or source code generated by work under awarded tasks are the property of the Government, and must be provided to the Government upon request. Analyses and data developed under this contract by contractors, subcontractors, and or their partners cannot be released without written NCES approval. Contractors, subcontractors, and or their partners may not use pre-release or restricted-use data provided under this contract for any purpose not specified in the contract without written permission from the COR and Task Leader.

K. Use of Institutional Review Boards

Studies conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics and its agents are exempt from human subjects review by Institutional Review Boards under 45 CFR 46.101(b)(3) in conjunction with the protections present under the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, (P.L. 107-279, Title I, Part C). No funds may be used under this contract for time, material preparation, or to respond to requests from an Institutional Review Board.

This exemption does not apply to the contractor using the same data for its own research projects and/or presentations that are not within the scope of this contract. For these purposes, the contractor must comply with 45 CFR 46 and conduct a human subjects review through an Institution Review Board at its own expense, if applicable.

L. NCES standards

NCES has developed and implemented a set of standards, NCES Statistical Standards which set guidelines to ensure the quality of NCES’ work. These standards (as amended) are to be followed by NCES staff and their contractors in performing the daytoday work of NCES. A copy of the standards are available at http://nces.ed.gov/statprog/. In addition, contractors shall follow content and format guidelines described in the IES Style Guide, found at http://nces.ed.gov/StatProg/style.asp, and the IES Graphics Guide, found at http://nces.ed.gov/statprog/styleguide/pdf/graphicsguide.pdf.

M. Implementing Contractor Employee Personnel Screening Requirements

The Department has established policy on personnel security screening for all contractor and subcontractor employees and their field staff. The relevant Departmental Directive is OM:5-101 (July 2010), located at http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/leg/foia/acsom5101.pdf . The contractor must comply with the personnel security-screening requirements in OM:5-101 throughout the life of the contract.

The type of screening and the timing of the screening will depend upon the nature of the contractor position, the type of data the contractor employee will have access to, or the type of Departmental information technology (IT) system they will access. Personnel security screenings will be commensurate with the risk and magnitude of harm the individual could cause to the Department or the public. A position risk level will be assigned to each contractor employee position, before a solicitation is released, consistent with the descriptions in Appendix I of OM:5-101. Hence, each contractor employee working on this contract must be assigned a position risk level. Depending on the risk level assigned to each person's position, a follow-up background investigation by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) may occur.

The contractor must identify one of their employees as a security liaison for this process. This Contractor Security Liaison coordinates the distribution, collection, and dissemination of various forms required in this process. They answer general questions from their employees on completing the security screening process. And, they are the first point of contact for contractor employees in using the OPM’s Internet based security screening portal called e-QIP[footnoteRef:1] (http://www.opm.gov/e-qip/). The contractor is also responsible for ensuring that all subcontractors follow these personnel security screening procedures. [1: The E-Qip System is an electronic version of the RSA form. The purpose of the E-Qip System is to make sure that each applicant answers all questions on the RSA form. A signature page will be automatically generated when all of the information is filled in on the RSA form. ]

NCES requires each contractor employee to have or apply for a clearance for the security level designated for the position held on a contract. See Attachment X {not included in this draft} for detailed screening requirements.

II. SCOPE OF WORK

Independently and not as an agent of the United States Government, the contractor shall provide all personnel, materials, services, and facilities necessary for the project and perform the tasks as described below.

A. Base Contract

1. Overview

The base contract shall be an incrementally funded 60-month contract. The Department may extend the contract for up to an additional 60 months. The anticipated start date is approximately June 2013.

The contractor shall develop and implement a plan to field a study of postsecondary students that is nationally-representative for both graduate and undergraduate students and, for undergraduate students only, state-representative. The study shall be based entirely on data collected from administrative sources, including: the Department of Education’s Office of Federal Student Aid’s (FSA) National Student Loan Data System, FSA’s Central Processing System, FSA’s Pell Grant Recipients File, ETS/College Board, ACT, National Student Clearinghouse (if necessary), and postsecondary institutions.

The contractor shall use a two-stage sampling design (institution sampling, then students). The contractor shall develop a sample design and shall obtain at least an 85 percent participation of the institutions sampled if optional task 13 is not exercised. If optional task 13 is exercised, the contractor shall obtain 95% participation of institutions sampled.

The contractor shall propose an institution and student sample size to meet these specifications.

If the contractor believes such specifications are not feasible, either technically or due to cost, they may propose other sampling designs or strata groups after clearly articulating a rationale for doing so.

The contractor shall develop a plan for all phases of the data collection, including:

· contacting institutions to obtain student lists,

· training personnel who will contact institutions,

· sampling students from lists,

· compiling data from multiple administrative data sources (including postsecondary education institutions, and

· develop data products and publications for government/public use.

Although the base contract specifies 50-state representation, NCES may not have the funds to oversample all 50 states, and may choose to oversample some lesser number of states. If this happens, the contractor shall work with NCES to determine the best way to utilize the resources available in designing the sample.

The contract requires seven tasks:

1) Project Management

2) Developing Standardized Administrative Data Extractions from Postsecondary Institutions

3) Field Test Data Collections

4) Full-Scale Data Collections

5) Publications and Data Products

6) Information Requests, IT Reporting, and Data Analysis

7) Contract Closeout and Transition

Each time a NPSAS, BPS, or B&B study is initiated by the base contract or through the exercise of one or more optional tasks, the contractor shall repeat the subtasks listed in Table 3 on page 42. For postsecondary education transcript studies (PETS), a reduced set of subtasks must be repeated.

Table 1. Subtasks that apply to the base contract and are repeated for each study exercised

Task Description

1.2Schedules
1.3Monthly Reports
1.5Technical Review Panels
1.5.1Preparation of materials
1.5.2Meeting logistics
1.5.3Staffing at the Technical Review Panel
1.5.4Travel, hotel, meals, and expenses
1.5.5Honoraria
1.5.6Post meeting activities
2.3Standardized process for enrollment list collection (if applicable)
2.4Standardized process postsecondary institution data extraction (if applicable)
3.1Field test sampling (for studies with a field test)
3.2Field test OMB forms clearance (for studies with a field test)
3.3Field test data collection
3.3.1Develop and deploy websites for data collection
3.3.2File merge with the Department’s Central Processing System
3.3.3File merge with NSLDS disbursement files to collect federal loan and Pell grant data
3.3.4File merge with ETS/ACT to obtain admissions test data
3.3.5Develop and implement contacting materials, and seek endorsements for data collection
3.4Field test methodology memo
4.1Sampling
4.2OMB forms clearance
4.3Full-scale data collection
4.3.1Develop and deploy websites for data collection
4.3.2File merge with the Department’s Central Processing System
4.3.3File merge with NSLDS disbursement files to collect federal loan and Pell grant data
4.3.4File merge with ETS/ACT to obtain admissions test data
4.3.5Develop and implement plan for non-response bias analysis and weight adjustments, and imputing missing variable values
4.3.6Develop and implement a plan to prevent data disclosure
5.1Analysis and Reporting
5.1.1Analysis prospectus for each report
5.1.2Draft manuscript for each report
5.1.3Review-Quality manuscript for each report
5.1.4Publication-Ready manuscript for each report
5.1.5Response to professional judgment reviews for each report
5.2Datalab/WebVTS Tools
5.3Restricted-Use Data Files
5.5Final technical memo

NOTE: This table only contains subtasks that must be repeated every time a new study is exercised under this RFP.

2. Task Descriptions

Task 1. Project management

The contractor shall manage the collection of data in an efficient manner that fosters communications with staff, the NCES COR, and potential users of the data.

Subtask 1.1 Initial meeting with NCES (fixed-price)

Within one (1) week after the award of the contract, the contractor's project director and other key project staff as identified in the proposal, shall meet with the NCES Contracting Officer's Representative (COR), and other appropriate The Department staff in Washington, D.C. to review the overall contract tasks and to discuss issues relating to the proposed project staffing plan and other management requirements. The purpose of this meeting is to refine the management, staffing, and overall scheduling plan contained in the contractor's technical proposal. These refinements will not alter the specifications or the design of the contract, but will provide management information for use by the contractor and the Department in monitoring the work to be performed. The content and format of the monthly progress reports will be discussed.

The contractor shall submit a summary of the meeting and a revised detailed project management plan, based on the contractor’s proposed management plan and the understandings reached at the meeting, detailing the organization chart, staffing plan, schedule, budget control procedures, personnel and task coordination procedures, quality control procedures, and procedures for protecting survey data.

Deliverables:

Summary of initial meeting/Expanded project management plan

Subtask 1.2Schedules (fixed-price)
Subtask 1.2ASchedules for the NPSAS:16 study
Subtask 1.2BSchedules for the second study exercised
Subtask 1.2CSchedules for the third study exercised
…
Subtask 1.2XSchedules for the Xth study exercised

Due to the uncertainties of large data collection projects, the contractor shall develop and maintain a general schedule for all activities of the project. The schedule(s) for each subtask shall be updated monthly and include a detailed schedule for the upcoming 3-month period.

Recognizing the “dynamic” nature of project activities, the contractor will discuss possible delays and changes in project activities affecting the schedule of deliverables. Changes in the schedule of project activities are approved by the COR and must be subsequently documented in the monthly report.

Deliverables:

Schedules

Subtask 1.3 Monthly reports (fixed-price)

Subtask 1.3AMonthly reports for the NPSAS:16 study
Subtask 1.3BMonthly reports for the second study exercised
Subtask 1.3CMonthly reports for the third study exercised
…
Subtask 1.3XMonthly reports for the Xth study exercised

The contractor shall report monthly on the progress made in accomplishing the project tasks, the consumption of funds, problems encountered, and the plans for next month, including work performed by small businesses. As part of the monthly report, the contractor shall add the efforts made in complying with the small business subcontracting plan and the dollars as well as specific work that has been subcontracted to small businesses. The contractor shall include a section specifically titled Small Business Subcontracting Plan and indicate the name of the small business, contact information, type of small business, work that was subcontracted including what task the work falls under and the dollar amount subcontracted for that month. The monthly report shall be due on the 20th day of each month. The monthly report, invoice, and supporting documentation shall cover the previous month’s activities, for both the contractor and subcontractor(s). The monthly report shall be accompanied (within three days) by the invoice (SF No. 1034) and documentation of expenses.

Deliverables:

Monthly reports; invoice (SF No. 1034); and documentation of expenses

Subtask 1.4 Integrated monitoring system (fixed-price)

The contractor shall develop and maintain a web-based Integrated Monitoring System (IMS) to foster communications with the NCES COR and survey staff, as needed. The contractor shall design the IMS to routinely produce information about the project and provide access to this information to the survey staff and to the NCES COR on an on-going, as-needed basis. The contractor shall provide examples of reports from the proposed integrated monitoring system.

Deliverables for each study:

Integrated Monitoring System Website

Subtask 1.5Technical Review Panels
Subtask 1.5ATechnical Review Panels for the NPSAS:16 study
Subtask 1.5BTechnical Review Panels for the second study exercised
Subtask 1.5CTechnical Review Panels for the third study exercised
…
Subtask 1.5XTechnical Review Panels for the Xth study exercised

To obtain peer review of project plans and products and to foster communications with potential users of the data, the contractor shall establish Technical Review Panels (TRPs) for the NPSAS, B&B, and BPS studies, if exercised. The meetings shall be held in the Baltimore/Washington DC Metropolitan area at a location convenient to NCES and easily accessible by public transportation.

The contractor shall budget for the following technical review panels:

For the base year contract (NPSAS:16 with or without optional task 2a or 2b):

· panels comprised of 65 members (40 non-federal and up to 25 federal members)

· five (5) 2-day meetings shall be scheduled (two of the NPSAS TRPs shall be scheduled the first year of the contract award).

· The purpose of these TRPs is to discuss the issues and procedures for (1) sampling postsecondary institutions and students for the NPSAS studies exercised in the contract, (2) standardizing administrative data collections and reducing burden at postsecondary education institutions, and (3) logistics for obtaining state-representative samples.

If optional tasks are exercised, the contractor shall also conduct the following technical review panels for each longitudinal follow-up:

· panels comprised of 35 members (20 non-federal members and up to 15 non-federal). At least one-half of the non-federal members should be from outside the Washington, DC area;

· two (2) 2-day meetings shall be scheduled for the studies;

· if optional tasks 10 or 11 are exercised to initiate a postsecondary transcript study, the technical review will occur within the TRP allotment for the relevant study.

The TRPs shall work with the contractor to improve plans, products, and user-friendliness of resulting data products; the TRPs, however, do NOT report to or advise NCES. Based on discussions at these meetings, the contractor shall propose a sample design of institutions and another sample design of individual students within institutions. These designs shall yield results to determine strategies for sampling to achieve three goals:

1) Provide reliable estimates on student-level characteristics, including but not limited to: type of student (undergraduate, graduate), age, gender, race/ethnicity, dependency status, type of postsecondary institution attended, attendance intensity, and program of enrollment;

2) Provide efficient sample to adequately represent students in the NPSAS study, the B&B cohort and the BPS cohort if optional task 2a, 2b, 2c, or 2d are exercised; and

3) Provide sample size sufficient to support the longitudinal follow-ups of the B&B and BPS (if exercised), including national-representative results. For the base-year and/or NPSAS studies in optional task 1, these meetings should also discuss the sample size sufficient to support nationally- and state-representative results.

For each TRP, the contractor shall complete subtasks 1.5.1 through 1.5.6:

Subtask 1.5.1 Preparation of Materials (fixed-price)

The contractor's responsibilities for each TRP shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

· Select the federal and nonfederal members for the TRP to provide consultation and coordination for the study (The contractor shall consult with the COR in selecting TRP members);

· Prepare, for NCES approval, letters of invitation to join the TRP;

· Establish a schedule, for NCES COR approval, to inform the TRP of the progress of the project;

· Prepare and disseminate all materials required for TRP consideration and review (i.e., pre-meeting information packets and meeting materials), and secure the Panel's advice; and

· Prepare presentations to facilitate the discussion at the panel.

Subtask 1.5.2 Meeting Logistics (cost reimbursement)

The contractor shall select a meeting location in a federally owned or leased space and provide for all audio-visual, room set-up, and meeting supplies. Note that most federal spaces do not have staff to assist with room set-up, audio visual equipment, or provide table skirting or linens, so offerors should budget for non-federal staff to prepare for the meeting. The contractor may request a waiver from using federal space with the approval of the CO should no space meet specifications required for the TRP.

The contractor shall comply with all pre-security screening requests to allow panelists to access federal spaces (which may include submitting background information about each panelist for background checks). No food or beverages shall be provided (all food and beverage costs must be incurred by the non-federal participants through the Meals and Expenses per diem).

Past technical review panels have included:

· LCD projector and screens for PowerPoint or similar presentations

· Access to internet for the presenter(s) (pending availability)

· Access to internet for panelists (pending availability)

· Amplified sound for the presenter(s)

· Amplified sound for the panelists with one microphone available for every 3 to 5 panelists.

· Notepads and materials for each participant

Subtask 1.5.3 Staffing at the Technical Review Panel Meeting (fixed price)

The contractor shall provide on-site staff at the TRP meeting to conduct presentations, take minutes, register participants, and manage the logistics of the meeting. Note: This subtask shall not include travel expenses and meals (see subtask 1.5.4) or staff time for the preparation of materials (see subtask 1.5.1).

Subtask 1.5.4 Travel, hotel, meals, and expenses (cost reimbursement)

The contractor shall pay for all associated expenses, including travel and per diem for non-Federal members. Hotel, meal, and expense amounts shall not exceed the per diem amounts published by the General Services Administration for the Baltimore/Washington DC Metropolitan area.

Subtask 1.5.5 Honoraria (fixed-price)

Non-Federal members of the panel may be paid an honorarium (in FY 2012, $400 a day) both for meeting attendance and other work, which they perform on the project. The contractor shall not pay an honorarium to any person who is already paid to work on any tasks in this contract.

Subtask 1.5.6 Post-meeting activities (fixed-price)

The contractor shall prepare meeting minutes and post them to the IMS within 20 working days of the meeting.

Technical Review Panel (TRP) meeting minutes and materials

Subtask 1.5 Mini-Technical Review Meetings (fixed price)

The contractor shall convene eight (8) mini-technical review meetings including NCES staff, contractors, subcontractors, and a subset of any Technical Review Panel (up to 25 contractors, subcontractors, federal staff, and non-federal members) to allow for more focused discussion of sample design, survey design, instrumentation, state representation, and other survey methodology aspects of the postsecondary data collections in this contract. As needed, experts in a particular area may be invited to participate as well.

The contractor will consult with the COR in selecting members for the mini-meetings. The contractor shall pay for all associated expenses, including travel and per diem for non-Federal members. Non-Federal members of the panel may be paid an honorarium (in FY2009, $400 a day) both for meeting attendance and other work, which they perform on the project. The contractor shall not pay an honorarium to any person who is already paid to work on any tasks in this contract.

All meetings will be held in the Baltimore/Washington, DC metropolitan area, or at a location convenient to NCES and easily accessible by public transportation. Pre-meeting information packets, including agendas and materials to be discussed, will be posted to the IMS for NCES review three (3) weeks before each meeting. The contractor shall compile a list of follow-up activities as well as meeting minutes within three (3) weeks of the meeting.

Deliverables for each meeting:

Mini-technical review meeting minutes and materials

Task 2. Developing Standardized Administrative Data Extractions from Postsecondary Institutions

In anticipation of more frequent data requests to postsecondary education institutions, and to reduce burden for postsecondary institutions, the contractor shall develop and implement a plan to standardize administrative data extractions from postsecondary education institutions. The contractor shall develop a data collection system to collect administrative data from postsecondary education institutions for all studies in this contract and for ad hoc data extractions if exercised in optional task 7.

Subtask 2.1 – Data Element Comparison Report (cost reimbursement)

Within 90 days of the contract award, the contractor shall prepare a report that compares data elements across different studies and information systems of postsecondary institutions. This report shall be used as a concept document for the technical review panel that focuses on standardizing the administrative data collections.

In consultation with the COR, within 270 days of the contract award and following a NPSAS technical review panel that discussed the topic, the contractor shall prepare a plan to standardize data elements from the data extractions from postsecondary institutions. This plan should list all data elements collected from postsecondary institutions and note differences between the proposed data elements and the variables collected in NPSAS:12. Upon delivery and acceptance of the report, the contractor shall implement any recommendations from the report in the NPSAS:16 field test or NPSAS:14 or NPSAS:15 if exercised in optional tasks 1a or 1b respectively.

Deliverables:

Report comparing data elements including plans for standardizing institutional data extractions

Subtask 2.2 – Institution Data Reporting System (cost reimbursement)

The contractor shall develop and maintain a web site on NCES’s website (http://surveys.nces.ed.gov) that would allow institutions to securely upload standardized data extractions from the institution’s data systems. This web site shall comply with the Department’s IT and security policies. The website shall be reused for each study exercised in optional tasks 1, 2, 7 or 9. The website shall be developed so institutions can upload enrollment lists in support of the Department’s two-stage sampling design.

Data collection website

Subtask 2.3 – Enrollment list collection for NCES studies (cost reimbursement) Subtask 2.4 – Institutional Data Extractions for NCES Studies (cost reimbursement)

Subtask 2.3AEnrollment lists for the NPSAS:16 study
Subtask 2.3BEnrollment lists for the second study exercised (not applicable to longitudinal studies)
Subtask 2.3CEnrollment lists for the third study exercised (not applicable to longitudinal studies)

Subtask 2.3X Enrollment lists for the Xth study exercised (not applicable to longitudinal studies)

Subtask 2.4AStandardized Institutional Data Extraction for the NPSAS:16 study
Subtask 2.4BStandardized Institutional Data Extraction for the second study exercised
Subtask 2.4CStandardized Institutional Data Extraction for the third study exercised
…
Subtask 2.4XStandardized Institutional Data Extraction for the Xth study exercised

The contractor shall use the Institution Data Reporting System developed in Task 2.2 to request and collect data. For the standardized administrative data collection, at minimum the contractor shall provide either a social security number OR an institution ID number OR name, birthdate, and address for institutions to match to, depending on the availability of the data. The contractor shall develop a yearly schedule so that data extractions from postsecondary institutions only occur once per year (not including enrollment list collections). Additionally, the contractor shall collect data extractions from multiple NCES studies exercised in this contract concurrently.

Deliverables:

Subtask 2.3:
Monthly reporting on IMS on enrollment list collections
Subtask 2.4:
Regular deliveries of de-identified standardized data by NCES study duringdata collection

Task 3. Field Test Data Collections

Task 3AField Test for the NPSAS:16 study
Task 3BField Test for the second study exercised
Task 3CField Test for the third study
Task 3XField Test for the Xth study exercised
NOTE: This task does not apply to optional tasks 1a-1e.

For each study, the contractor shall develop all systems for data collection, prepare materials for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) forms clearance, train staff in the methods of data collection, test all data collection systems, and report on the quality of the data collection systems as a field test prior to the full-scale collection of data.

The contractor shall explore whether certain types of incentives will significantly reduce bias of key estimates during the field test. The contractor shall offer institutional coordinators reasonable reimbursement if the coordinator provides the information in a timely manner. The costs for these field test incentives shall be included in the base contract.

Subtask 3.1Field Test sampling (cost reimbursement)
Subtask 3.1AField Test sampling for the NPSAS:16 study
Subtask 3.1BField Test sampling for the second study exercised
Subtask 3.1CField Test sampling for the third study
Subtask 3.1XField Test sampling for the Xth study exercised
NOTE: This subtask does not apply to optional tasks 1a-1e.

The contractor shall…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .