Birdge_Insp_Rpt_5140-178P.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Blue Ridge Parkway - WMS NC (1) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-13-R-00013
About this file
Bridge Inspection Report - 5140-178P
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_002_-_NPS_BLRI_WMS_NC(1).pdf | ||
| Amendment_001_-_NPS-BLRI_WMS_NC(1).pdf | ||
| Birdge_Insp_Rpt_5140-180P.pdf | ||
| Birdge_Insp_Rpt_5140-091P.pdf | ||
| Birdge_Insp_Rpt_5140-182P.pdf | ||
| RFP_Solicitation_-_PRA-BLRI_WMS_NC(1).pdf | ||
| VETS-100A-Form.pdf | ||
| Birdge_Insp_Rpt_5140-181P.pdf | ||
| Birdge_Insp_Rpt_5140-183P.pdf | ||
| Birdge_Insp_Rpt_5140-099P.pdf | ||
| ADV_Offeror's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Birdge_Insp_Rpt_5140-176P.pdf | ||
| Birdge_Insp_Rpt_5140-177P.pdf | ||
| FP03_Eng_.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_PRA-BLRI_WMS_NC(1).pdf | ||
| FP03_Errata.pdf | ||
| Birdge_Insp_Rpt_5140-179P.pdf | ||
| REV_Synopsis_Notice_-_PRA-BLRI_WMS_NC(1).doc | DOC document |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
ROUGH RIDGE BRIDGE
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY OVER RAVINE
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
LS
STRUCTURE NO. 5140-178P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 6/23/11
Report prepared by: ED
MILE POINT: 303.01
Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 487.67 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-178P
ROUGH RIDGE BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 6/23/11
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 360.0 FT (109.7 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 180.0 FT (54.9 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... MONOLITHIC CONCRETE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 38.8 FT (11.8 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 34.5 FT (10.5 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ OTHER YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... BR2H10 / BR2H10 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2008- LONGITUDINAL JOINT IN NORTH APPROACH SLAB HAS BEEN RESEALED.
LOCATION
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 303.01 (KM PT 487.67)
STATE: ................................. NORTH CAROLINA LOCATION: 1.98 MILES FROM U.S. ROUTE 22
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. RAVINE
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This prestressed box girder bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include an accumulation of debris and gravel in the deck joints, deterioration of the mortar joints of the masonry wingwalls and parapets, and displacement of the aluminum joint armor at the corner of the southwest curb. An interior inspection of the box girder revealed minor but widespread cracking on the underside of the top slab, with up to 1/16" cracks on the web walls and diaphragms.
Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: J. THOMAS, R. TAYLOR (VOLKERT, INC.)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
JOE THOMAS, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., LEAD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 12/19/11
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-178P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
60.6, 222.3 REPOINT MORTAR JOINTS OF MASONRY WINGWALLS AND APPROACH PARAPETS
AS NECESSARY.
20 LF
58.2 CLEAN GRAVEL FROM EXPANSION JOINTS AT ABUTMENTS. REPAIR ALUMINUM
HARDWARE AT JOINT IN CURB BETWEEN APPROACH SLAB AND BRIDGE.
1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-178P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal
5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK 6 ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
F1. DECK SLAB
F2. EXPANSION JOINTS
N3. WEARING SURFACE
G4. RIDEABILITY
G5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
G6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
F7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
N8. UTILITIES
G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
N10. OTHER
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7
G
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
1. BEARING DEVICES
G
N3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
N5. TRUSSES
G6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
N7. PAINT
N8. FASCIA(E)
G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
G10. ALIGNMENT
N11. OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7
58.1 MINOR CRACKING, SPALLING, AND SCALING ON DECK SURFACE.
MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS. SEE ALSO 59.2.
58.2 MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF SILT AND GRAVEL ON EXPANSION
JOINT STRIP SEALS AT ABUTMENTS. MODERATE CRACKING OF
GROUT AT JOINTS. ALUMINUM JOINT ARMOR IS BENT AT
SOUTHWEST PARAPET. MINOR
58.5 MINOR CRACKING AND SCALING ON CURBS, ESPECIALLY NEAR RAIL
POSTS. ONE SEVERE CRACK ON SOUTH END OF EAST CURB IN
VICINITY OF EXPANSION JOINT.
58.6 ALUMINUM BRIDGE RAIL HAD SEVERAL "EXPANSION JOINTS" THAT
WERE FULLY CLOSED OR NEARLY SO AT TIME OF INSPECTION. (AIR
TEMP WAS 80 DEG).
58.7 PAVED WATERWAYS ALONG NORTHWEST WINGWALL AND AT
CULVERT NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT HAVE SETTLED AND ARE
BREAKING UP. CULVERT IS UNDERMINED. MINOR PONDING AT
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DECK NOTED IN PREVIOUS INSPECTION
(UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING THIS INSPECTION).
ABUTMENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G
PILE BENTS 2. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. G
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS 4. G
FOUNDATIONS 5. G
WINGWALLS 6. F
WEEP HOLES 7. N
EXPANSION JOINTS 8. F
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 9. G
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 10. G
SLOPE PROTECTION 11. N
OTHER 12. N
PIER(S)
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. G
PILE BENTS 14. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. G
FOUNDATIONS 16. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 17. G
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 18. G
OTHER 19. N
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
ALIGNMENT 1.
61. CHANNEL N
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS 7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION 5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS 2.
1. APPROACH SLABS G
G F G G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL 8
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.
FOUNDATION 3.
WEEP HOLES 2.
1. WALL G
G N G G N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
59.2 BOX GIRDER EXTERIOR: MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING OF TOP OF
WEB AT NORTH CORNERS. EFFLORESCENCE PRESENT AT
NORTHEAST CORNER.
BOX GIRDER INTERIOR: BOX GIRDER IS DIVIDED INTO THREE
CELLS. DEBRIS FROM CONSTRUCTION LEFT INSIDE BOX GIRDER.
ALL CRACK LENGTHS LISTED ARE APPROXIMATE.
UNDERSIDE OF TOP SLAB: TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON WEST
CELL NEAR CENTER DIAPHRAGM, SOUTH SPAN. TRANSVERSE
CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE NEAR ABUTMENTS. 15'
LONGITUDINAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST CELL,
NORTH SPAN. DIAGONAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST
CELL, SOUTH SPAN. MINOR HONEYCOMBING IN EAST CELL, NORTH
SPAN NEAR PIER.
BOTTOM SLAB: 20' MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACK ON CENTER CELL,
SOUTH SPAN, NEAR PIER. MINOR GOUGE IN BOTTOM SLAB, NORTH
SPAN, CENTER CELL, APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN PURPOSELY
GROOVED AFTER CONCRETE HARDENED TO ELIMINATE AREA OF
PONDING INSIDE BOX GIRDER.
59.2 LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ON EXTERIOR WEBS: 20' CRACK ON
EAST WEB, SOUTH SPAN, 1' FROM TOP, BEGINNING 15' FROM
CENTER PIER. SIMILAR CRACK (8' LONG) ON WEST WEB, 30' FROM
PIER (UNABLE TO VERIFY DURING THIS INSPECTION).
INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR WEB WALLS: VERTICAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON SEVERAL LOCATIONS. MINOR LONGITUDINAL
CRACKING IN VICINITY OF END DIAPHRAGMS IN SEVERAL
LOCATIONS. MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING ON TOP OF DIAPHRAGMS
AND WEB WALLS AT CONSTRUCTION JOINTS IN SEVERAL
LOCATIONS. SEVERAL DIAGONAL CRACKS UP TO 1/16" ON WEB
WALLS ON EXTERIOR CELLS OF NORTH SPAN, EXTENDING ACROSS
ABUTMENT DIAPHRAGM. SOME CRACKS EXTEND BACK
APPROXIMATELY 12' ALONG WEB WALL AT CONSTRUCTION JOINT
BETWEEN CEILING AND WALL.
59.6 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING ON END DIAPHRAGMS. MINOR
VERTICAL CRACKING ON PIER DIAPHRAGMS; CRACKS ORIGINATE
AT VENTILATION TUBES; MINOR CRACKING ON DIAPHRAGMS AT
CORNERS OF ACCESS OPENINGS.
59.9 NOTICEABLE VIBRATION WHEN RECREATIONAL VEHICLES CROSS
BRIDGE.
60.1 MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.
ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
60.3 KEY AT NORTH ABUTMENT (WHICH PREVENTS LATERAL MOVEMENT OF SUPERSTRUCTURE WITH RESPECT TO ABUTMENT) EXTENDS OUTWARD (SOUTHWARD) FROM FACE OF BREASTWALL, APPROXIMATELY 2" ADDITIONAL FROM TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. KEY AT SOUTH ABUTMENT SIMILAR. SOIL ON BOTH ABUTMENT BEARING
SEATS.
60.5 PREVIOUSLY NOTED EXPOSED FOOTING APPEARS TO BE RUBBLE FROM PRIOR BRIDGE SUBSTRUCTURE.
60.6, 222.3 MODERATE TO SEVERE CRACKING OF JOINT MORTAR IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS.
60.8 NO FILLER IN JOINT BETWEEN WINGWALL AND APPROACH PARAPETS, SOUTHEAST CORNER. SOUTHWEST AND
NORTHEAST JOINTS ARE MORTARED IN.
60.9 MODERATE EROSION AND MINOR SLOPE FAILURE AT SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.
222.1 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ON APPROACH SLABS.
222.2,4,6 MINOR SETTLEMENT AND DETERIORATION OF APPROACH PAVEMENT AT BOTH APPROACHES. VEGETATION
GROWTH IN NORTH APPROACH SLAB JOINT.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-178P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 20 18 33 30
HS 36 33 60 55
TYPE 3 41 37 68 62
TYPE 3S2 44 40 74 67
TYPE 3-3 46 42 77 70
DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-178P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 374 - NORTH CAROLINA (NC)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... ROUGH RIDGE BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 011 - AVERY
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-178P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... RAVINE
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 178P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140178P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.98 MILES FROM U.S. ROUT
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ BR2H10 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 303.01 (KM PT 487.67)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... BR2H10 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
6 - P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS
06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD
180.0 FT (54.9 M)
360.0 FT (109.7 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
5 - OTHER
5 - OTHER
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 1 - MONOLITHIC CONCRETE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.1 TONS (54.5 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 6/11 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-178P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.5 FT (10.5 M)
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 36°05'49.00"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 81°48'03.80"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 10 MI (16 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 0 - OTHER
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
38.8 FT (11.8 M)
28.0 FT (8.5 M)
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
3.0 FT (0.9 M)
3.0 FT (0.9 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
0 °
NO
34.5 FT (10.5 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET
2 - CONCRETE/ALUMINUM
1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
2.92 FT (0.89 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL:
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1111
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N
N - Not over waterway.
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2008- LONGITUDINAL JOINT IN NORTH APPROACH SLAB HAS BEEN RESEALED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:81�48'03.80 http:36�05'49.00
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-178P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-178P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTHBOUND TOWARD BLOWING ROCK
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - WEST SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF NORTH SPAN LOOKING
SOUTH
PHOTO #5 - GENERAL VIEW OF DECK JOINT AT
NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE GRAVEL
ACCUMULATION
PHOTO #6 - SPALLING ALONG EAST SIDE OF
NORTH APPROACH SLAB; NOTE CONDITION
OF POURED JOINT SEALANT
PHOTO #7 - SETTLEMENT AND
DETERIORATION OF NORTH APPROACH SLAB
AT JOINT; NOTE VEGETATION GROWTH
PHOTO #8 - DETERIORATION OF MORTAR AT
NORTHEAST PARAPET
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL
CRACKING OF DECK, NORTHBOUND LANE
NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - SLEEVE MISSING FROM LOWER,
WEST RAIL NEAR CENTER PIER
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF DECK
NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL VIEW OF DECK JOINT
AT SOUTH ABUTMENT; NOTE GRAVEL
ACCUMULATION
PHOTO #13 - CRACKING AND SPALLING OF
SOUTH APPROACH SLAB
PHOTO #14 - BENT EXPANSION JOINT ARMOR
AT SOUTHWEST PARAPET; NOTE PATCHING
ON CURB AND GRAVEL ACCUMULATION IN
JOINT
PHOTO #15 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF BEARING AT NORTH ABUTMENT,
BEARING #3 SHOWN
PHOTO #17 - DISPLACED SHEAR KEY AT NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #18 - CRACKING OF WEST SIDE OF BOX GIRDER NEAR NORTH
ABUTMENT
PHOTO #19 - CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST EXTERIOR WEB
OF BOX GIRDER AT NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #20 - GENERAL VIEW OF PIER
PHOTO #21 - CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST OVERHANG, WEST
OVERHANG SIMILAR
PHOTO #22 - DRAINAGE PIPE ON WEST SIDE
OF SOUTH ABUTMENT SLOPE; NOTE
UNDERMINING OF HEADWALL
PHOTO #23 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #24 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF BEARING PADS AT SOUTH
ABUTMENT, EAST BEARING SHOWN
PHOTO #25 - DISPLACED SHEAR KEY AT SOUTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW OF CENTER CELL, NORTH SPAN,
LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO #27 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF END DIAPHRAGM NEAR NORTH
ABUTMENT, WEST CELL SHOWN
PHOTO #28 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST WEB AND
PIER DIAPHRAGM IN SOUTH SPAN
PHOTO #29 - GENERAL VIEW OF END
DIAPHRAGM AT SOUTH ABUTMENT, CENTER
CELL
PHOTO #30 - CRACKING OF NORTH FACE OF
END DIAPHRAGM IN CENTER CELL, SOUTH
SPAN
PHOTO #31 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE
CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB
UNDERSIDE, CENTER CELL OF SOUTH SPAN
SHOWN
PHOTO #32 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL
CRACKING OF FLOOR SLAB NEAR PIER,
CENTER CELL SHOWN
PHOTO #33 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGM AT
ACCESS HATCH, CENTER CELL, SOUTH SPAN SHOWN
PHOTO #34 - PREVIOUSLY NOTED EXPOSED FOOTING AT SOUTH
ABUTMENT APPEARS TO BE RUBBLE FROM PRIOR BRIDGE
SUBSTRUCTURE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .