A001_WA_PFH_29-1(5).pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

N/A

PAGE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

A001 3/30/2017 N/A See Block 14

6. ISSUED BY CODE N/A 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE N/A

Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 610 East Fifth Street Vancouver WA 98661-3801

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and Zip Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

X

DTFH7017B00020

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

03/28/2017

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

N/A

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE: N/A FACILITY CODE: N/A

N/A

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

| X | The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

(__ ) is extended, ( x ) is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

N/A

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN

ITEM 10A.

N/A

B THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (Such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

N/A

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor n/a is not, n/a is required to sign this document and return n/a copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

WA PFH WA 29-1(5) Middle Fork Snoqualmie River Road Slope Stabilization

Amendment A001 is being issued to provide Physical Data listed in FAR Clause 52.236-4 that was not available with the original solicitation.

See attached - Government’s initial Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Government’s initial SWPPP)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15a. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 15a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

N/A

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY_________________________________________ BY N/A___________________________ N/A (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Table of Contents

. S\VPPP/ESCP TABS

TAB 1: SWPPP/ESCP Narrative

TAB 2: NPDES Permit (Construction General Permit or Corresponding State Permit)

TAB 3: NOI, EPA/State Acknowledgement, Other Applicable EPA/State Correspondence

TAB 4: Delegation of Authority

TAB 5: Maps

TAB 6: Erosion/Sediment Control Plan Sheets (plan set and BMP typical details).

TAB 7: Permanent Stabilization and Revegetation Plan(plan sets and details)

TAB 8: SWPPP Amendment Log

TAB 9: Erosion/Sediment Control Inspection Reports and Requirements

TAB 10: Corrective Action Log

TAB il: Water Quality Monitoring, Reporting Requirements, and Reports

TAB 12: Training Log

TAB 13: Waste and/or Borrow Site Information

TAB 14: Grading and Stabilization.Log

TAB 15: Hazardous Spill Plan

TAB 16: Other Applicable Permits(§ 404, § 401, Oregon Remove-Fm Permit)

TAB 17: NPDES Quality Assurance Checklist

TAB 18: NPDES Notice of Termination (NOT) r" . ,, ,f t r 1

J:

r» i ..

' ' I

.t

Li:

f

1--:

r-::

l

I ·, r· " ;"'""":! ._ ...

J. ~' ." ::...1:...

1:

SWPPP (ESCP - Oregon) NARRATIVE

-., 1

I, I' .,,. .• ,' ., 1 l.~ ~ -' >

Tab 1

CONTRACTOR:

Complete SWPPP narrative in accordance with contract 107.0lA(b).

Revise SWPPP narrative as needed throughout construction in accordance with contract 107.0lA(:t)

ALASKA, IDAHO AND WASHINGTON PROJECTS ONLY:

SWPPP narrative must be signed by General Contractor's responsible corporate officer as defined in CGP I.11.2.

File approved SWPPP narrative in Tab 1.

For Construction Activities at:

Project Name:

Project Site Location:

City, County, State, Zip Code:

SWPPP Prepared for:

Organization Name:

Address:

Telephone Number:

SWPPP Prepared by:

Name, Title:

Name, Title:

Company/Organization:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Middle Fork Snoqualmie River Road Slope Stabilization

SE Middle Fork Road, SE Lake Dorothy Road

North Bend, King County, WA, 98045

FHW A, Western Federal Lands Highway Division

610 East Fifth Street Vancouver, WA 98661-3801

360-619-7700

Chris Kelly, Environmental Protection Specialist

FHW A, Western Federal Lands Highway Division

610 East Fifth Street Vancouver, WA 98661-3801

360-619-7700

SWPPP Preparation Date: January 31, 2017

Estimated Construction Start Date: July 15, 2017. Estimated Construction Completion Date:

October 31, 2017.

Estimated Revegetation Start Date: October 1, 2017. Estimated Revegetation Completion Date:

October 31, 2017.

TAB 1:

TAB2:

TAB3:

TAB4:

TABS:

TAB6:

TAB7:

TABS:

TAB9:

TAB 10:

TAB 11:

TAB 12:

TAB 13:

TAB 14:

TAB 15:

TAB 16:

TAB 17:

TAB 18:

SWPPP T ABs (SWPPP Inclusions)

SWPPP/ESCP Narrative

NPDES Permit (Construction General Permit or Corresponding State Permit)

NOI, EPA/State Acknowledgement, Other Applicable EPA/State Correspondence

Delegation of Authority

Maps

Erosion/Sediment Control Plan Sheets (plan set and BMP typical details)

Revegetation Plan (if applicable)

SWPPP Amendment Log

Inspection Reports

Corrective Action Log

Water Quality Monitoring, Reporting Requirements, and Reports (if applicable)

Training/Certification Log

Government-Selected Waste, Borrow, Staging Sites

Grading and Stabilization Log

Hazardous Spill Plan or SPCC

Threatened and Endangered Species and Historic Preservation (Section 106) Documentation

NPDES Quality Assurance Checklist

NPDES Notice of Termination (NOT)

SWPPP/ESCP NARRATIVE

SECTION 1: RESPONSIBLE PARTIES/CONTACT INFORMATION

1.1 Operator(s):

1.2 Construction Site SWPPP Contact(s):

1.3 SWPPP Prepared by:

1.4 NPDES Storm,vater Permit

1.5 SWPPP Administrator

1.6 Permitting Authority for FHW A/WFLHD Projects

SECTION 2: PROJECT INFORMATION .•...•..•..•........................•.........•......•...•..............•.•

2.1 Project Name and Location

2.2 Project Site Characteristics

SECTION 3: NATURE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY

3.1 General Description of Project and Scope ofWork:

3.2 Sequence and Estimated Dates of Construction Activities

3.3 Potential Sources of Pollutants

SECTION 4: SITE MAPS ............•.•..................................•..................••.•........•...•..............•

SECTION 5: DISCHARGES

5.1 Allo'\vable Non-Storm'\vater Discharges

5.2 Receiving Waters:

5.3 Water Quality Monitoring Requirements

SECTION 6: COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS

6.1 Endangered Species Protection

6.2 Historic Preservation

6.3 Safe Drinking Water Act Underground Injection Control Requirements

SECTION 7: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS

7.1 Natural Buffers or Equivalent Sediment Controls

7.2 Perimeter Controls

7.3 Sediment Track-Out

7 .4 Stockpiled Soil or Other Erodible Materials

7.5 Minimize Dust

[i]

7 .6 Minimize Disturbance of Steep Slopes ·····························································~·························21

7.7 Topsoil Conservation

7 .8 Minimize Soil Compaction

7.9 Storm Drain Inlets and Culvert Inlets

7.10 Constructed Stormwater Conveyance Channels and Culvert Outlets

7.11 Sediment Basins

7.12 Chemical Treatment

7.13 Dewatering Practices

7.14 Erosion Control and Stabilization

7.15 Removal of BMPs

7.16 Post Construction Measures

SECTION 8: OPERATIONAL CONTROLS/GOOD HOUSEKEEPING MEASURES ... 27

8.1 Hazardous Spill Plan

8.2 Spills/Releases in Excess of Reportable Quantities

8.3 Equipment/Vehicle Fueling and Maintenance Practices

8.4 Equipment/Vehicle Washing

8.5 Material Handling and Waste Management

8.6 Designate Concrete Washout Areas

SECTION 9: INSPECTIONS

9.1 Inspection Frequency

9.2 Corrective Actions

SECTION 10: DELEGATIONS OF AUTHORITY

SECTION 11: STAFF TRAINING

SECTION 12: CERTIFICATION AND NOTIFICATION

[ii]

1.1 Operator(s):

Organization Name:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Contractor and

FHWA, Western Federal Lands Highway Division (WFLHD) 610 East Fifth Street Vancouver, WA 98661-3801 360-619-7700

Note: Fill in all incomplete information following contract award date and prior to start of construction

(AK, ID, WA projects only) TBD General Contractor Name:

Address:

Telephone Number:

1.2 Construction Site SWPPP Contact(s):

FHW A Contact Name:

Title:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Contractor and PE

Mike Niemi

Project Engineer

8050 Railroad Ave _SE, Suite C, Snoqualmie, WA 98065 425-292-0431

Note: Fill in all incomplete infonnation following contract award date and prior to start of construction General Contractor, Company:

(complete for all States) Erosion Control Supervisor Name:

(complete for all States) Address:

Telephone Number:

TBD

1.3 SWPPP Prepared by:

Organization/Company:

Name, Position:

Role/Responsibility

, Telephone Number:

Email:

Chris Kelly, Environmental Protection Specialist SWPPP Preparer 360-619-7700 christopher.kelly@dot.gov

[I]

Name, Position:

Role/Responsibility Telephone Number:

Email:

1.4 NPDES Stormwater Permit

The Applicable EPA/State NPDES Stormwater Permit is located in TAB 2. The Project NOI and EPA/State Acknowledgement with NPDES Tracking Number is located in TAB 3.

1.5 SWPPP Administrator

The General Contractor (section 1.2) is responsible for maintaining the project SWPPP of Record. The General Contractor will provide a qualified Erosion Control Supervisor, who is responsible for managing the installation, maintenance, inspection, and reporting for erosion and sediment control measures, shall maintain and update the project SWPPP of Record and prepare all documentation required by the project NPDES stormwater permit and SWPPP.

The Erosion Control Supervisor (ECS) is identified in section 1.2 and his/her qualifications are documented in TAB 12.

The FHW A/WFLHD Project Engineer (PE) is the duly authorized representative of the FHW A for the purpose of overseeing compliance with the NPDES stormwater permit and SWPPP at the construction site. See Delegation of Authority TAB 4.

All SWPPP documentation, revisions/updates, and reports will be approved/signed by both the General Contractor's ECS and the FHWA PE.

1.6 Permitting Authority for FHW A/WFLHD Projects

Delivery Confirmation documentation of the NOI is located in TAB 3.

The applicable EPA/State NPDES permit is located in TAB 2

Idaho and Washington, Environmental Protection Agency EPA Region 10

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC)

Montana Department of Environmental Quality (MDEO)

Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ)

Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (WDEQ)

State Permitting Authority Alaska • ADEC is permitting authority for most discharges within the state EXCEPT for:

• EPA is the permitting authority for the Denali National Park and Preserve and Metlakatla Indian Reservation.

Idaho • EPA is permitting authority for discharges within the state .

Montana • MDEQ is permitting authority for most discharges within the state EXCEPT for:

• EPA is the permitting authority for Indian Country lands within the state .

Oregon • ODEQ is permitting authority for most discharges within the state EXCEPT for:

• EPA is the permitting authority for Indian Country lands within the state .

Washington • WDE is permitting authority for most discharges within the state EXCEPT for:

• EPA is pennitting authority for Federal Operators and Indian Country lands within the state

(2)

Wyoming GI WDEQ is permitting authority for most discharges within the state EXCEPT for:

GI EPA is the ermittin authorit for Indian Count lands within the state

The NOI for Alaska projects (through the ADEC) can be filed electronically at Alaska Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program website. The completed SWPPP will be submitted to either ADEC or the Municipality based on the project type and operator described in the ADEC CGP.

The NOI for projects in Idaho, Washington, Denali NP and Metlakatla Indian Reservation can be filed electronically at The EPA website.

The NOI for Montana can be filed through MDEQ following guidance at this website.

Oregon DEQ authorizes FHW A/WFLHD projects under the programmatic 1200-CA permit, (expired in 12/31/2005, administratively extended)

The NOI for Wyoming can be filed electronically at this website.

[3]

2.1 Project Name and Location

This basic site infmmation is used to file for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit coverage. Permit coverage is obtained by filing the Notice oflntent (NOI) after the SWPPP is complete.

Project Name:

Project Site Location:

City, County, State, Zip Code:

Middle Fork Snoqualmie River Road Slope Stabilization

SE Middle Fork Road, SE Lake Dorothy Road

North Bend, King County, WA, 98045

Latitude/Longitude (Using~ of three possible formats) 1

Latitude: Longitude:

1. 47 ° 28 '20 "N (degrees, minutes, seconds) 1. 121°43 '07 "W (degrees, minutes, seconds)

2. __ 0 __ • __ ' N (degrees, minutes, decimal) 2. __ 0

__ • __ ' W (degrees, minutes, decimal)

3. __ . ____ 0 N (decimal) 3. __ . ____ 0 W (decimal)

The method used for determining latitude/longitude was: GPS

Township: 23N

Range: 8E

Section: 13

Township: 23N

Range:9E

Section: 2, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21

Township: 24N

Range: 9E

Section: 35, 36

Township: 24N

Range: IOE

Section: 21, 28, 29, 30, 31

1 Detailed information on determining the site's latitude and longitude can be found at:

www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/latlong

[4]

Is the project located in Indian country? No

If yes, the name of Reservation is:

Name of Reservation:

Are you applying for permit coverage as a "federal operator?" Yes

The project Does Not discharge stormwater into a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System ?

2.2 Project Site Characteristics

The undeveloped site and features of the land that are incorporated into the final soil Erosion and Sediment Control plan sheets (TAB 6) , as well as natural resources that should be protected are described below:

Vegetation, trees, and sensitive areas, such as stream buffers, wetlands, highly erodible soils, and steep slopes at the site include:

Types: Vegetation, trees, and stream buffer along the Middle Fork Snoqualmie River

Also, see TAB 6

Stormwater currently drains from the site in the following manner, Overland flow and culverts that drain onto the slopes above the Middle Fork Snoqualmie River

Also, see TAB 6

The location of discharge points or areas

Three existing culverts within the roadway reconstruction section of the project.

Also see TAB 6

The location of all waters, including wetlands, are shown on the site map located in

TABs 5 and 6.

Critical slopes and slope lengths include:

Locations: In roadway reconstruction section, 1 V:2H slopes up to 25 feet in length;

1 V: l.25H slopes up to 45 feet in length; and 2V: IH slopes up to 25 feet in length.

[5]

Soil type(s) of highly erodible soils and the soils' infiltration capacity are identified as,2

Melakwa sandy loam, 30 to 65 percent slopes, 0.08 to 0.20 in/in

Any past soil contamination at the site is identified as, NIA

The following natural features, including trees, streams, wetlands, slopes and other features to be protected includes:

Also see TAB 6

Protected Natural Features:

Middle Fork Snoqualmie River and stream buffer, steep slopes

Measures to protect these features:

Middle Fork Snoqualmie River and stream buffer: fiber rolls, check dams, turbidity curtains

Steep slopes: turf reinforcement mat and anchored wire mesh

Mean Annual Precipitation at the Project Site: 100 inches

The frequency, intensity, and duration of rainfall for the project site, which are the principal factors influencing erosion from a construction site, are described as, The 2-year, 24-hour storm event:3

3.0 inches per day

The 10-year, 24-hour storm event:

4.0 inches per day

2 Access the Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey.

3 Precipitation frequency for Western States

[6]

The 25-year, 24-hour storm event:

5.0 inches per day

Alaska Projects Only, Approximate Growing Season at the Project Site: Click here to enter text.

[7]

3:

3.1 General Description of Project and Scope of Work:

(i.e. highway construction, roadway realignment, highway and bridge reconstruction, etc.) is described below:

Highway reconstruction and bridge scour mitigation

The type or function of the project is: Road Construction

Construction Support Activities: If applicable, describe any construction support activities such as dedicated concrete or asphalt batch plants, dedicated aggregate sites, equipment staging yards, material storage areas, borrow, or disposal sites (government-selected sites):

NIA

NOTE: AH Contractor-selected sources and support sites are the sole responsibility of the General Contractor. The SWPPP and NPDES permitting for Contractor-selected sites and sources are separate from this documentation (SCR 107.0lA(h)).

Support activities are located on the general vicinity map and/or site map in 6.

Size of the Construction Project:

(Including all Government-selected support sites such as staging, borrow, waste, access roads, etc.)

Estimated Area Total project area (within ROW or Construction limits):

Construction site area to be disturbed:

Percent Impervious Area BEFORE Construction: 96 %

Runoff Coefficient BEFORE Construction: 0.78

Percent Impervious Are AFTER Construction:

Runoff Coefficient AFTER Construction:

(8]

96 %

0.78

Units

7.0 Acres (road rehabilitation)

0.4 Acres (reconstruction)

0.1 Acres (bridge scour)

0.7 Acres (road rehabilitation)

0.4 Acres (reconstruction)

0.1 Acres (bridge scour)

3.

S eq ue nc e an d E st im at ed

D at es o f C on st ru ct io n A ct iv it ie s

T he in te nd ed c on st ru ct io n se qu en ci ng a nd ti m in g o f m aj or c on st ru ct io n ac ti vi ti es is d et ai le d he re in cl ud in g th e ph as ed g ra di ng a nd s ta bi li za ti on ac vi ti es u se d to m in im iz e ov er al l am ou nt o f d is tu rb ed s oi l.

P ha se

R oa d re co ns tr uc

C st ru ct io n se qu en ce d es cr ip ti on

D ur at io n o f s eq ue nc e:

B M

P s as so ci at ed w it h th is

S ta bi li za ti on m ea su re s:

se qu en ce

F ib er ro ll s, c he ck d am s, t u rf

T ur f r ei nf or ce m en t m at

G ra di ng

/r oc k bl as ti ng /s lo pe s ta bi li za d ay s re in fo rc em en t m at an ch or ed w ir e an ch or ed w ir e m es h m es h

P ha se

B ri dg e sc ou r m it ig at io n

C on st ru ct io n se qu en ce d es cr ip ti on

D ur at io n of se qu en ce

B

M P s as so ci at ed w it h bi li za ti on m ea su en ce

R ip ra p pl ac em en t/ ro ot w ad c on st ru ct io n da ys

F ib er r ol ls

, t ur bi di ty c ur ta in s

N

IA

P ha se

R oa d re ha bi li ta

C st ru ct io n se qu en ce d es cr ip ti on

D ur at io n of se qu en ce

B

M P s as so ci at ed w it h bi li za ti on m ea su en ce

P av em en t p at ch /p av in g/ ch ip s ea l d ay s

[9 g :C ·:;

"<=l

'O a:;

(J°)

{gJ

3.3 Potential Sources of PoUutants

The follow table identifies all potential sources (checked activities in column 1) of sediment and other sources of pollution, which may reasonably be expected to affect the quality of stormwater discharges from the construction site.

Potential Construction Site Pollutants

Construction Activity "' "' ..... .'!)

c "' o(! ... c ·;::: c.:i s ... ..c: .~ ii ~ o(! "' ... :a <.> f~ ... = "' :::: 0 (J°) z ~ c. f--Q

Clearing, excavating, and grading x x Fill of roadway embankment, backfill at structures x x Vehicle/equipment fueling and maintenance x x Vehicle/equipment use and storage x Sanitary/septic waste x x Dewatering operations x x Drilling and blasting operations x x x Concrete washout and waste x x Structure construction/painting/cleaning x x x Demolition and debris disposal x x x Solid waste (trash and debris) x Hazardous waste or contaminated spills

Paving operations x x Landscaping operations x x Mining, rock extraction, crushing x x x

Construction and waste material expected to be stored on-site includes:

Material

Aggregates, riprap

Plastic culverts, geotextiles

Anchored wire mesh components

[10]

Storage Location

Pullouts adjacent to roadway

Pullouts adjacent to roadway

Pullouts adjacent to roadway

"' :s "' ... .'!) ... ~ c .,, ·o:; ~ ... .fl "' "' .c =

- 0 i:.. :::: Ot:l.

x x x x x x x x x x

Vicinity maps are located in TAB 5. Site maps and erosion and sediment control plan maps are located in TAB 6.

[11]

Industrial stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity other than construction at the site (including dedicated asphalt plants and dedicated concrete plants that are covered by this permit) include:

NOTE: An Industrial Activity Multi-Sector General Permit may be required for some activities.

Industrial Activity

I.NIA

2.

3.

Stormwater Discharge Location

5.1 Allowable Non-Stormwater Discharges

Multi-Sector General Permit Number (if applicable)

Non-stormwater discharges used at the constmction sited are identified below, along with control measures used to eliminate or reduce the discharges and BMPs used to prevent stormwater contamination.

Applicable to this Project

(check all that apply)

Ill ~

• D

• D Ill ~

• D

Ill D

• D

• D

• D

• D

Potential Non-Stormwater Discharges

Waters used to wash vehicles where detergents are not used

• Water used to control dust

• Potable water including uncontaminated water line flushings

• Construction dewatering (uncontaminated)

• Ground water or spring water (uncontaminated)

• Routine external building wash down that does not use detergents

• Pavement wash waters where spills or leaks of toxic or hazardous materials have not occurred (unless all spilled material has been removed) and where detergents are not used

• Foundation or footing drains where flows are not contaminated with process materials such as solvents

• Landscape irrigation

• Discharges from emergency fire-fighting activities

• Fire hydrant flushings

[12]

Control Measures

Excess water will be treated by perimeter BMP's prior to leaving site

Excess water will be treated by perimeter BMP's prior to leaving site

Excess water will be treated by perimeter BMP's prior to leaving site

• D • Uncontaminated air conditioning or compressor condensate

NOTE: The likely locations of these discharges are identified on the site map TAB 5 and/or

TAB6

5.2 Receiving Waters:

Are there any surface waters located within 50 feet of the construction disturbance? Yes

Impaired Waters/TDMLs:

Answer the following for each surface water listed in Table 1:

If Is this surface I What pollutant(s) is--fHas a TMDL -1 Pollut;~t(s) for-which I I I water listed as j causing the I been I there is a TDML j f--+-"i~paired?" ~mpairmen_t? ______ _ completed?_

____ ----1

11. I Yes cg] No D I Temperature

Yes D No cg] I

12. IYesD NoD i ~D NoD \ ----~

13. I YesO N~CJ1 I YesO NoO I ~ ~IYesD NoDI IYesD NoD r _J

Source used to determine whether or not your project discharges into an impaired water:

WA Department of Ecology Water Quality Assessment Website

Tier 2, 2.5 or 3 Waters Answer the following for each surface water listed in Table 1:

I Is this surface If yes, specify which Tier.

water I designated as

Tier 1,2 or 3?

1. Yes D No cg] Choose an item.

i jYes0No0 2. Choose an item.

3. jYes0No0 Choose an item.

4. YesD NoD Choose an item.

[13]

If applicable, documentation of consultation with State or Federal TMDL authorities on consistency of SWPPP conditions with the approved TMDL is found in TAB 11. The control measures required to ensure that discharge of pollutants from the site are consistent with the assumptions and requirements of the EPA-established or approved TMDL, including any specific waste-load allocations are included in that documentation.

5.3 Water Quality Monitoring Requirements

Provisions in Permit Conditions of the applicable NP DES stormwater permit, as well as the associated §401 ce1iification or other special conditions, define additional monitoring and reporting requirements. Details about water quality monitoring and reporting requirements applicable to this project are included in TAB 11.

Samples and measurements taken for the purpose of monitoring will be representative of the monitored activity. Records of all monitoring information will be retained in TAB 11, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation.

Records of monitoring information will include:

1. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements;

2. The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements;

3. The date(s) analyses were performed

4. The individual(s) who performed the analyses;

5. The analytical techniques or methods used; and

6. The results of such analyses.

[14]

6.1 Endangered Species Protection

Under which criterion is project eligible for Endangered Species coverage under the NPDES permit (EPA)?

DA DB De ~D DE

Criterion A.

Criterion B.

Criterion C

Criterion D.

No federally-listed threatened or endangered species or their designated critical habitat(s) are likely to occur in your site's "action area" as defined in Appendix A of EPA permit.

The construction site's discharges and discharge-related activities were already addressed in another operator's valid certification of eligibility for your action area under eligibility Criterion A, C, D, E, or F and there is no reason to believe that federally-listed species or federally-designated critical habitat not considered in the prior certification may be present or located in the "action area". To ce1tify your eligibility under this Criterion, there must be no lapse ofNPDES permit coverage in the other operator's certification.

By certifying eligibility under this Criterion, you agree to comply with any effluent limitations or conditions upon which the other operator's certification was based. You must include in your NOI the tracking number from the other operator's notification of authorization under this permit. If your certification is based on another operator's certification under Criterion C, you must provide EPA with the relevant supporting information required of existing dischargers in Criterion C in the EPA NOI form.

Federally-listed threatened or endangered species or their designated critical habitat(s) are likely to occur in or near your site's "action area," and your site's discharges and discharge-related activities are not likely to adversely affect listed threatened or endangered species or critical habitat. This determination may include consideration of any stormwater controls and/or management practices you will adopt to ensure that your discharges and discharge-related activities are not likely to adversely affect listed species and critical habitat. To make this certification, you must include the following in your NOI: 1) any federally listed species and/or designated habitat located in your "action area"; and 2) the distance between your site and the listed species or designated critical habitat (in miles). You must also include a copy of your site map with the

NOL

Coordination between you and the Services has been concluded. The coordination must have addressed the effects of your site's discharges and discharge-related activities on federally-listed threatened or endangered species and federally-designated critical habitat, and must have resulted in a written concurrence from the relevant Service(s) that your site's discharges and discharge-related activities are not likely to adversely affect listed species or critical habitat. You must include copies of the

[15]

Criterion E.

Criterion F.

correspondence between yourself and the Services in your SWPPP and

NOI.

Consultation between a Federal Agency and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service under section 7 of the ESA has been concluded. The consultation must have addressed the effects of the construction site's discharges and discharge-related activities on federally-listed threatened or endangered species and federally designated critical habitat. The result of this consultation must be either:

i. a biological opinion that concludes that the action in question (taking into account the effects of your site's discharges and discharge-related activities) is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of listed species, nor the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat; or

ii. written concurrence from the applicable Service(s) with a finding that the site's discharges and discharge-related activities are not likely to adversely affect federally-listed species or federally-designated habitat.

You must include copies of the correspondence between yourself and the Services in your SWPPP and NOI.

Your construction activities are authorized through the issuance of a permit under section 10 of the ESA, and this authorization addresses the effects of the site's discharges and discharge-related activities on federally listed species and federally-designated critical habitat. You must include copies of the correspondence between yourself and the Services in your SWPPP and NOI.

Support Documentation for Endangered Species criterion eligibility is filed in TAB 16.

6.2 Historic Preservation

1. Will the project involve installation of any of the following stormwater controls that entail subsurface earth disturbance? Yes

D Dike

D Berm D Catch Basin

D Pond [g] Ditch, trench, swale, perimeter drain, etc.

D Culvert

D Other ground-disturbing stormwater control Click here to enter text.

If the project involves no installation of earth-disturbing stormwater controls, then no further historic preservation screening is necessary (for NPDES permitting purposes).

2. If answer to step 1 is Yes, have professional surveys or evaluations determined that historic properties do not exist (or have prior disturbances at the site precluded the existence of historic properties)? Yes

[16]

Provide documentation for the basis of this determination. Middle Fork Snoqualmie River Road Project Environmental Assessment, March 2012.

3. If answer to step 2 is No, have professional surveys or evaluations determined that installation of stormwater controls will have no effect on historic properties? Choose an item.

Provide documentation for the basis of this determination. Click here to enter text.

4. Has the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) or other tribal representative concurred with the determinations of effects on historic properties? Yes

Provide the nature of their response. No impacts to cultural resources.

6.3 Safe Drinking Water Act Underground Injection Control Requirements

Will the project plan install any of the following controls? No

Check all that apply:

D Infiltration trenches (if stormwater is directed to any bored, drilled, driven shaft or dug hole that is deeper than is widest surface dimension, or has a subsurface fluid distribution system)

D Commercially manufactured pre-cast or pre-built proprietary subsurface detention vaults, chambers, or other devices designed to capture and infiltrate stormwater flow.

D Drywells, seepage pits, or improved sinkholes (if stormwater is directed to any bored, drilled, driven shaft or dug hole that is deeper than its widest surface dimension, or has a subsurface fluid distribution system)

If yes, provide documentation of communications with the EPA or applicable State agency.

Click here to enter text.

[17)

Control measures at the construction site are selected, installed, implemented, and maintained to minimize pollutants in the discharge as necessary to meet applicable water quality standards.

The objectives of this SWPPP include:

• Stabilize the site as soon as possible (targeting the preparation and implementation of erosion and sediment controls to get the site to final grade, and either permanently or temporarily stabilize all bare soil areas as soon as possible).

• Perimeter controls will be installed before ground disturbing activities are initiated.

• Perimeter protection will remain in place until final stabilization has been achieved.

• Slopes and channels will be protected by ·conveying concentrated stormwater runoff around the top of slopes and stabilize slopes as soon as possible. A void disturbing natural channels and the vegetation along natural channels as much as possible.

• Divert stormwater coming on to the site by conveying it safely around, through, or under the work area. (Divert the clean water, trap the dirty water.)

• Protect receiving waters and other environmentally sensitive waters or areas adjacent to the site.

• Follow pollution prevention measures by providing proper containers for waste and garbage at the site. Store hazardous materials and chemicals so that they are not exposed to stormwater.

• Minimize the area and duration of exposed soils. Clear only land that will be under construction in the near future.

7.1 Natural Buffers or Equivalent Sediment Controls {Required for EPA CGP states only - ID, WA)

This section only applies if a surface water is located within 50 feet of the project's earth disturbing activities.

Are there any surface waters within 50 feet of the project's earth disturbances? Yes

If No, then no further documentation is required for the SWPPP.

NOTE: Reference EPA CGP appendix G for buffer guidance.

If Yes, check which natural buffer compliance alternative is used at the project site:

D The project will provide and maintain a 50-foot wide undisturbed natural buffer.

The location and width of natural buffers are shown on the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan sheets in TAB 6.

[18]

D The project will provide and maintain an undisturbed natural buffer that is less than 50 feet in width and is supplemented by additional erosion and sediment controls, which in combination achieves the sediment load reduction equivalent to a 50-foot undisturbed natural buff er.

The location of natural buffers are shown on the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan sheets in TAB 6.

Insert the width of the natural buffer to be retained Click here to enter text.

Insert description of additional erosion and sediment controls to be used in combination with the natural buffer: Click here to enter text.

Document the method used to determine that the above combination of natural buffer and sediment and erosion controls equal the estimated sediment removal capacity of a 50-foot undisturbed natural buffer: Click here to enter text.

D It is infeasible to provide and maintain an undisturbed natural buffer of any size, therefore, the project will implement erosion and sediment controls that achieve the sediment load reduction equivalent to a 50-foot undisturbed natural buffer.

Insert rationale for concluding that providing and maintaining a natural buffer of any size is infeasible: Click here to enter text.

Insert description of erosion and sediment controls to be used to achieve the sediment load reduction equivalent to a 50-foot undisturbed natural buffer: Click here to enter text.

~ The project qualifies for one of the exceptions in EPA CGP Part 2.1.2.1.e

~ For a "linear project", site constraints (e.g. limited right of way) make it infeasible for the project to meet any of the CGP part 2.1.2.1.a compliance alternatives.

D Other exception (state type): Click here to enter text.

Document why it is infeasible to meet one of the buffer compliance alternatives: Some construction activities on the project, such as riprap placement, will require work in live streams, which precludes the use of an undisturbed natural buffer. In all other areas, the maximum buffer width possible will be retained.

Insert description of erosion and sediment controls to be used to achieve the sediment load reduction equivalent to a 50-foot undisturbed natural buffer: Whether or not surface waters exist within 50 feet of the disturbance limits, sediment containment measures such as fiber rolls, check dams, or turf reinforcement mats will be used in all areas where stormwater could flow away from the project area.

[19]

7 .2 Perimeter Controls

All Perimeter Sediment Controls will be installed prior to ground disturbing activities taking place. There will be no clearing or grubbing outside the physical clearance limits.

Locations and design specifications of BMPs are shown on the erosion and sediment control plan sheets in TAB 6.

The following perimeter controls will be implemented:

Control measure: Fiber rolls

Implementation: All fiber rolls will be installed prior to any ground disturbing activities.

Maintenance requirements: Sediment will be removed from fiber roll perimeter controls before deposits reach 50% of the above ground height. Fiber rolls will not be removed until vegetation is satisfactorily established.

Control measure: Turbidity curtains

Implementation: Prior to performing any in-water work.

Maintenance requirements: Turbidity curtains will be inspected at least once every 7 days, or once every 14 days and within 24 hours of a storm event of0.25 inches (6 millimeters) or greater as determined by an on-site rain gauge to ensure it is functioning. Turbidity curtains will not be removed until the turbidity on either side of the curtain is visually equal.

7.3 Sediment Track-Out

The following methods will be implemented to minimize off-site vehicle tracking of sediment onto paved surfaces. If sediment escapes the construction site, off-site accumulations of sediment will be removed at a frequency sufficient to minimize off-site impacts.

Locations and design specifications ofBMPs are shown on the erosion and sediment control plan sheets in TAB 6.

~ Not applicable to this project. Reason: Although specific BMPs are not included for sediment track-out, the contract does require the contractor to remove accumulations of soil or other material from the roadway. The reconstruction portion of the project where sediment track-out could occur is short (400 feet in length) and isolated.

7.4 Stockpiled Soil or Other Erodible Materials

Stockpile management includes measures to minimize surface erosion and sediment transport from soil stockpiles or other erodible materials.

Locate erodible stockpiles away from drainages including storm sewer inlets and culvert inlets.

Locations of stockpiles are shown on the erosion and sediment control plan sheets in TAB 6.

D Not applicable to this project. Reason: Click here to enter text.

[20)

If applicable:

Control measure: Fiber Rolls

Implementation: All fiber rolls will be installed prior to any ground disturbing activities.

Maintenance requirements: Sediment will be removed from fiber roll perimeter controls before deposits reach 50% of the above ground height. Fiber rolls will not be removed until vegetation is satisfactorily established.

Control measure: Click here to enter text.

Implementation: Click here to enter text.

Maintenance requirements: Click here to enter text.

7 .5 Minimize Dust

Dust control includes practices used to reduce or prevent the surface and air transport of dust during construction

D Not applicable to this project. Reason: Click here to enter text.

If applicable:

Control measure: Watering for dust control

Implementation: As needed during construction, and during non-work periods when the road is open to public traffic.

Maintenance requirements: Water will be applied on as-needed basis.

7 .6 Minimize Disturbance of Steep Slopes

Describe how disturbance of steep slopes will be minimized. Describe controls (e.g. erosion control blankets, tackifiers) that will be implemented to minimize sediment discharges from slope disturbances.

If applicable, describe how stormwater run-on and run-off will be managed. Flows may be diverted from exposed soils by retaining/detaining flows or otherwise minimizing runoff and the discharge of pollutants from exposed areas of the site. Placement of stmctural practices in floodplains will be avoided to the degree technologically and economically practicable and achievable.

D Not applicable to this project. Reason: Click here to enter text.

If applicable:

Control measure: Turf reinforcement mat

Implementation: Turf reinforcement mat will be installed within 21 days of starting constmction.

[21]

Maintenance requirements: The turf reinforcement mat is a permanent feature that does not require maintenance.

7.7 Topsoil Conservation

Describe how topsoil will be preserved, if feasible. If conservation of topsoil is infeasible, explain why, and describe alternate methods to be used to insure optimum vegetation survival and growth.

Erosion and sediment control measures for topsoil stockpiles (and other erodible materials) are shown in section 4.4.

D Conservation of topsoil is Infeasible:

Reason: Click here to enter text.

Alternate method: Click here to enter text.

~ Conservation of topsoil is Feasible:

Conservation measure: Topsoil stockpiles

Implementation: Topsoil will be stripped and stockpiled prior to grading activities.

Maintenance requirements: Once topsoil is placed on the finished slopes, it will be seeded by the Forest Service.

7.8 Minimize Soil Compaction

Minimize soil compaction in areas where final vegetative stabilization will occur and where infiltration practices will be installed.

D Not applicable to this project. Reason: Click here to enter text.

If applicable:

Control measure: The contract directs the contractor to use harrows, disks, or other appropriate equipment to break clods and lumps, and to avoid overly compacting the topsoil surface during spreading activities.

Implementation: During topsoil placement

Maintenance requirements: NI A

7 .9 Storm Drain Inlets and Culvert Inlets

Applicable for stormwater drain inlets which are connected to separate storm sewer systems (usually in urban locations) AND for culvert inlets that discharge stormwater from the project into surface waters.

Locations and design specifications of BMPs are shown on the erosion and sediment control plan sheets in TAB 6.

[22]

D Not applicable to this project. Reason: Click here to enter text.

If applicable:

The following BMPs are applicable to:

D Storm Drain Inlets

~ Culvert Inlets

Control measure: Fiber roll check dams

Implementation: Following ditch construction.

Maintenance requirements: Sediment will be removed from check dams before deposits reach 50% of the above ground height. Check dams will not be removed until vegetation is satisfactorily established.

7.10 Constructed Stormwater Conveyance Channels and Culvert Outlets

Describe velocity dissipation and/or erosion control devices to be installed at stormwater conveyance channels (such as roadside ditches) and culvert outlets. Includes permanent and temporary devices (specify).

Velocity dissipation devices will be placed at discharge locations and along the length of any outfall channel to provide a non-erosive flow velocity from the structure to a water course so that the natural physical and biological characteristics and functions are maintained and protected (e.g., no significant changes in the hydrological regime of the receiving water).

Locations and design specifications ofBMPs are shown on the erosion and sediment control plan sheets in TAB 6.

D Not applicable to this project.

If applicable:

Control measure: Fiber roll check dams

Implementation: Following ditch construction.

Maintenance requirements: Sediment will be removed from check dams before deposits reach 50% of the above ground height. Check dams will not be removed until vegetation is satisfactorily established.

7.11 Sediment Basins

If applicable, provide site design specifications and other details for design of sediment basins and ponds. This may also include sediment infiltration swales.

Locations and design specifications of BMPs are shown on the erosion and sediment control plan sheets in TAB 6.

[23]

At a minimum, sediment ponds must provide storage for either the calculated volume of runoff from the 2-year, 24-hour storm event or 3,600 cubic feet per acre drained. Sediment ponds must also use outlet structures that withdraw water from the surface, unless infeasible.

0 Not applicable to this project.

If applicable, type of sediment retention/infiltration used: Click here to enter text.

Design description: Click here to enter text.

7.12 Chemical Treatment

If chemical sediment control (such as polymers) will be used, provide design specifications and other details considered when choosing treatment type and locations.

0 Not applicable to this project.

If applicable:

NOTE: If use of cationic treatment chemicals is planned, separate prior approval is required from EPA.

Locations of chemical treatment sites are shown on the erosion and sediment control plan sheets in TAB 6.

Describe/name treatment chemicals that will be used and why these chemicals are suited to site soil characteristics and other construction site conditions: Click here to enter text.

Describe treatment system specifications and dosage of chemicals to be used: Click here to enter text.

Describe storage of chemicals and other material safety data: Click here to enter text.

Special controls to be used for Cationic treatment chemicals: Click here to enter text.

Describe training that personnel handling/applying treatment chemicals have/will receive: Click here to enter text.

7.13 Dewatering Practices

Discharge of ground water or accumulated stormwater that is removed from excavations, trenches, foundations, etc. into surface waters is prohibited unless such waters are first effectively managed by appropriate sediment controls. Uncontaminated non-turbid dewatering water can be discharge without being routed to a control.

0 Not applicable to this project

If applicable:

Specific dewatering practice: Click here to enter text.

Implementation: Click here to enter text.

Maintenance: Click here to enter text.

[24]

7.14 Erosion Control and Stabilization

Commence temporary soil stabilization measures immediately if no further disturbance of an area of the site or stockpile is expected within the next 14 days. Complete temporary soil stabilization measures to disturbed sites or stockpiles within 14 days of last disturbance. Provide for temporary stabilization of all exposed soil prior to winter construction shut down.:.

Specify whether stabilization measure is temporary or permanent.

D Temporary Measures:

Practice/Control measure: Click here to enter text.

Implementation: Click here to enter text.

Maintenance: Click here to enter text.

IZl Permanent Measures:

Practice/Control measure: Permanent turf establishment

Implementation: Prior to winter shutdown by Forest Service.

Maintenance: Permanent turf establishment that does not satisfactorily grow or temporary turf establishment that does not satisfactorily stabilize the soil will be reapplied.

7.15 Removal of BMPs

Remove erosion and sediment control BMPs that are no longer needed and leave in good working order those BMPs that will remain at the construction site after close-out.

BMPs are no longer needed when the site that the BMP is protecting has reached final stabilization as defined in the applicable NPDES Stormwater Permit.

Final stabilization means:

• All ground disturbing activities at the site have been completed, AND

• Vegetation has been established that provides a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70% of the natural vegetative cover prior to construction.

• In arid (0-1 O" annual precipitation) or semiarid (10-20" annual precipitation) areas, final stabilization is considered to be achieved when the area is seeded or planted and vegetation is expected to provide 70% cover within 3 years; AND, erosion controls are in place that provide soil protection for at least 3 years without active maintenance.

Document arid/semi-arid conditions in SWPPP

• Effective non-vegetative stabilization is in-place such as rip rap, gabions, geotextiles, rock, aggregate etc.

[25]

7.16 Post Construction Measures

Responsibility for NPDES permit compliance after construction close-out will be the responsibility of:

181 FHW NWFLHD

D Land Management/Owner Agency

0 County/State DOT

Specify Agency: Choose an item.

Applicable permit termination/transfer information is located in TAB 18.

(26]

8.1 Hazardous Spill Plan

Spills and potential stormwater contamination will be controlled to reduce the chance of spills, stop the source of spills, contain and clean up spills, and dispose of materials contaminated by spills.

Spill prevention and response actions are outlined in the Hazardous Spill Plan or Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC) whichever is applicable, 5.

Construction sites may be subject to 40 CFR Part 112 regulations that require the preparation and implementation of a Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan if the facility is a non transportation-related facility that: has a total storage capacity greater than 1,320 gallons or a completely buried storage capacity greater than 42,000 gallons and could reasonably be expected to discharge oil in quantities that may be harmful to navigable waters of the United States and adjoining shorelines. See EPA website: http://www.epa.gov/OEM/content/spcc/index.htm

Implementation: Prior to construction activities and throughout construction.

8.2 Spills/Releases in Excess of Reportable Quantities

This permit does not provide authorization to discharge hazardous substances or oil resulting from an on-site spill. This permit does not provide relief from the federal reporting requirements of 40 CFR Part 110, 40 CFR Part 117 and 40 CFR Part 302 relating to spills or other releases of oils or hazardous substances.

For a release containing a hazardous substance or oil in an amount equal to or in…