Q-A _revised_10-14-15.pdf
PDF 119 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- DTFH6815B00012
About this file
Questions and Answers revised 10/14/15
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Bid_Tabs_CO_ER_94.pdf | ||
| Bid_Opening_Summary-CO_ER_94-81-106(1)_.docx | DOCX document | |
| A003.pdf | ||
| A002.pdf | ||
| Sign-in_Sheet.pdf | ||
| A001.pdf | ||
| Earthwork_by_Station.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Cross_Sections.pdf | ||
| CO_ER_94-81-106(1)_Lefthand_Canyon_Drive_Pavements_Report-8-25-2015.pdf | ||
| CO_ER_94_81_106(1)-1.Boulder_County.Left_Hand_Canyon.Final.2015._.pdf | ||
| DTFH6815B00012.pdf | ||
| Plans.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DTFH6815B00012 Revised 10/14/15
CO ER 94/81/106(1)
BOULDER COUNTY LEFTHAND CANYON DRIVE
9/30/15
QUESTION #1
Will the excavation and embankment at each station from the cross sections be made available?
Response: See amendment A001.
10/7/15
QUESTION #2
Is recycled concrete and/or recycled asphalt an acceptable material for Aggregate Base?
Response: No
QUESTION #3
Is recycled concrete an acceptable material for Riprap?
Response: No
10/12/15
QUESTION #4
Pg 117 of FP (b) middle of the paragraph “Document the natural frequency of each affected structure or feature.” Question: I do not understanding this statement, can you please explain?
Response: Establish a baseline for in-place monitoring equipment prior to the blast. This can be conducted immediately prior to the blast.
QUESTION #5
Pg 117 of FP (d) forth sentence reads: “Place at least one station on the structure.” Question: Will it be allowable to place one station (seismograph) in a straight line and in-between the blast and the nearest structure? Instead of placing the station (seismograph) on the structure?
Response: Pg 117 (d) second sentence: “Locate monitoring equipment as directed by the vibration specialist.” Seismograph placement is based on findings of the pre-blast survey and proposed blast plan.
QUESTION #6
Pg 117 of FP sentence below (d): ”Ensure blasting operations incorporate collected data and findings from the vibration monitoring by having the vibration specialist interpret seismograph and air-blast records. Question: In regard to interpreting the vibration and air-blast records, can the seismograph specialist be an employee of the drilling & blasting contractor?
Response: Yes. Submit qualifications.
QUESTION #7
Does the vibration specialist have to observe each blast event?
Response: No
QUESTION #8
Pg 117 of FP, 205.07 Test Blast: “Before beginning full-scale drilling and blasting, demonstrate adequacy of the site-specific blasting plan by drilling, blasting and excavating a test blast of up to 100 cubic yards…etc.” Question: Can the test blast volume be increased to 300 – 400 cubic yards?
Response: See amendment A003.
QUESTION #9
Pg 118 of FP second paragraph: “Record and maintain a log of each blast hole drilled identifying the depth, color…etc.”. Question: Will drillers logs be required?
Response: See Amendment 003.
QUESTION #10
Pg 119 of FP seventh paragraph: “Offset lifts up to 24 inches horizontally to allow for drilling equipment clearance.” Question: Can the offset lift be increased to 36 inches for drill clearance?
Response: See Amendment A003.
QUESTION #11
Pg 120 of FP (1) Presplitting: “Do not presplit final slopes and rock faces”. Question: Will presplit be utilized to control the final cut slopes? If not, what control drilling and blasting method should be used?
Response: SCR 205.01 reads: “Controlled pre-split blasting will be required for all excavated slopes where rock blasting is required”
QUESTION #12
Pg 120 of FP 205.09 Reporting, (b) Vibration and air-blast reporting. “Submit a vibration and air-blast report within 3 days of a blast…etc.” Question: Does the report need to be a full wave-form report or does the CO require just the peak particle velocity (inches per second) and air-blast (Db) readings? If so, can the readings be documented on the Final Blast Report for the CO’s review?
Response: The peak particle velocity (inches per second) and air-blast (Db) readings can be documented on the final blast report for the CO’s review. However, if requested, the full wave-form report should be made available.
QUESTION #13
Bid Schedule “Z”, it appears some asphalt items are missing. Does not have line items anti-strip additive, prime coat and tack coat.
Response: See Amendment A003.
QUESTION #14
In all asphalt bid item descriptions, it states to use ½” asphalt mix or ¾” asphalt mix. Does this mean we can use either or a combination of?
Response: Either
QUESTION #15
All schedules to be completed by September 30th, 2016?
Response: Yes
QUESTION #16
Asphalt: Is a percentage of RAP allowed?
Response: Yes, See subsection 401.03(a) of the FP.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .