BLS Monthly QASP.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C10D26Q0031
- Issued by
-
Department of Veterans Affairs
About this file
This document is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) template for monthly performance reviews of Beneficiary Locator/Outreach Services (BLS) contracts. The QASP establishes the evaluation framework and rating criteria that will be used to assess contractor performance throughout the contract period. The assessment uses a five-point rating scale—Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory—with all ratings requiring objective support and detailed narrative explanations.
The QASP evaluates three primary performance objectives: Technical/Quality of Product or Service, which measures how well the contractor meets success criteria for Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 cases as defined in the Performance Work Statement Section 5.2.6; Project Milestones and Schedule, which assesses compliance with reporting requirements for updated information and results as specified in PWS Section 5.2.5.D; and Management, which evaluates the contractor's integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract in accordance with the Contractor Project Management Plan. The template includes designated fields for reviewer name, vendor identification, review date, performance ratings, and narrative justification for each objective. This is a template document designed to standardize performance monitoring for the VA Insurance Service's beneficiary locator and outreach services contract.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C10D26Q0031.docx | DOCX document | |
| WD_2015-4281_Rev35_Dte-03Dec25.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Beneficiary Locator/Outreach Services Monthly QASP Review
| Date: | __ ___ | |
| Reviewer: | ______________ | |
| Vendor: | To Be Determined |
PERFORMANCE BASED SERVICE ASSESSMENT
EVALUATION RATINGS FOR ASSESSMENT :
EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY
All value ratings must be supported, objective and explained in the Narrative Section for each Performance Objective.
PERFORMANCE OBECTIVES:
A. TECHNICAL/QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE: Rating: <Value>
How well does the contractor meet the success criteria for Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 cases as defined in the PWS section 5.2.6?
NARRATIVE: (enter narrative in box)
B. PROJECT MILESTONES AND SCHEDULE: Rating: <Value>
How well does the contractor meet Reporting on Updated Information and Results requirements as defined in PWS 5.2.5.D?
NARRATIVE: (enter narrative in box)
C. MANAGEMENT: Rating: <Value>
How well did the contractor integrate/coordinate all activities needed to execute the contract as required in the Contractor Project Management Plan?
NARRATIVE: (enter narrative in box)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .