Attachment J-LEX-FY18-FAC LE404-Tank 4-FINAL.PDF
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- SP-POL-CMP-INSPECT-FY24-LEXINGTON OKLAHOMA
- Solicitation number
- W9128F23Q0103
About this file
This document summarizes an STI SP001 formal external inspection report for an aboveground storage tank (AST) located at the A.A.S.F. #1 Lexington fuel storage facility in Lexington, Oklahoma. The inspection was conducted on December 6, 2017 to evaluate the tank's integrity and establish a database for future inspections. Key findings included that the existing catwalk does not allow safe access to all tank appurtenances, NFPA labeling is needed, thread engagement is improper in product piping, and the secondary containment has approximately 500 feet of joint sealant deterioration and 135 feet of cracks. Mandatory, required, and recommended repairs are identified addressing these issues and others in order to comply with standards and codes from STI, NFPA, API, ASME, and the UFC. Appendices provide engineering calculations and data, drawings, inspection checklists and photographs documenting the inspection results.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment J-LEX-FY18-FAC LE402-Tank 2-FINAL.PDF | ||
| Attachment C - Tank Data Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W9128F23Q0103_Draft Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attachment J -LEX-FY18-FAC LE401-Tank 1-FINAL.PDF | ||
| Attachment H - STI External Inspection Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment B.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment A - General Installation Security Requirements.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment D - Monthly Contractors Progress Management and Status Report.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment J-LEX-FY18-FAC LE403-Tank 3-FINAL.PDF |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| US | Army | Corps | of | Engineers |
| Omaha | District |
| STI | SP001 | Formal | External | Inspection |
| Inspection | Report |
| A.A.S.F. | 1 | Lexington |
| Facility | LE404 |
Tank 4
| US | Army | Corps | of | Engineers | Center | of | Expertise | for | Petroleum, | Oils, | and | Lubricants |
| (USACE | POL‐MCX) |
12/6/2017
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| Table | of | Contents |
| ACRONYMS | AND | ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................ 3 |
GENERAL SUMMARY
STI SP001 INSPECTION DETERMINATION
INSPECTION DATE
STATE REGULATIONS
PREVIOUS INSPECTION DATES
RECOMMENDED FUTURE INSPECTION DATES
A. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
1. STI SP001 Inspection
2. Site Information
B. TANK INSPECTION COMMENTS
1. Tank Construction
2. Tank Foundation
3. Tank Appurtenances
4. Tank Coating
5. Tank Piping System
| The | tank | has | aboveground | 4‐inch | stainless | steel | receipt | piping | and | 4‐inch | aboveground | ||||||
| stainless | steel | issue | piping. | Tanks | 1, | 2, | 3, | and | 4 | share | the | same | issue | and | receipt | piping | system. |
6. Fire Protection System
7. Secondary Containment
C. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. MANDATORY REPAIRS per STI SP001, UFC 3‐460‐01, NFPA 30, or NFPA 30A
2. REQUIRED REPAIRS to Fully Comply with STI SP001 or Federal, State, and Local Codes . 12
| 3. RECOMMENDED | REPAIRS | to | Fully | Comply | with | UFC | 3‐460‐01 | and | AW | 78‐24‐27 |
| Standards | or | as | Part | of | Regular | Maintenance ................................................................................. 17 |
APPENDIX A: ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS AND DATA
APPENDIX B: ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
APPENDIX C: STI SP001 INSEPCTION CHECKLIST
APPENDIX D: PHOTOGRAPHS
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
API American Petroleum Institute
ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASNT American Society of Non‐Destructive Testing
ATG Automatic Tank Gauge
BBL Barrel
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CP Cathodic Protection
DFT Dry Film Thickness
HLA High Level Alarm
HLCS High Level Control Shut‐Off
HHLA High‐High Level Alarm
LLA Low Level Alarm
LLLA Low‐Low Level Alarm
MFL Magnetic Flux Leakage
MT Magnetic Particle Testing
NACE National Association of Corrosion Engineers
NDT Non‐Destructive Testing
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
PSI Pounds per Square Inch
PT Penetrant Testing
P/V Pressure/Vacuum
RP Recommended Practice
PST Product Saver Tank
RT Radiography Testing
STI Steel Tank Institute
TML Thickness Measurement Location
TRV Thermal Relief Valve
UFC Unified Facilities Criteria
UFGS Unified Facilities Guide Specifications
ULS Ultra Low Sulfur
UT Ultrasonic Testing
VT Visual Testing
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| GENERAL | SUMMARY | |||||||||||||||
| An | STI | SP001 | Formal | External | inspection | of | Tank | 4 | (Facility | LE404), | located | at | A.A.SF.1 | Lexington, | ||
| Oklahoma | was | completed | on | December | 6, | 2017 | to | evaluate | the | tank’s | integrity, | collect | data, | and | ||
| establish | a | database | for | future | inspections | and | evaluations. | A | service | life | evaluation | performed | on | |||
| the | tank | shows | it | as | having | greater | than | 30 | years | of | remaining | shell | life | under | current | conditions. |
| Significant | Findings: | ||||||||||
| The | existing | catwalk | does | not | allow | safe | access | to | all | tank | appurtenances. |
| There | is | no | NFPA | diamond | on | the | tank | or | entering | fuel | farm. |
| The | tank | appurtenances | are | not | labeled. | ||||||
| There | is | improper | thread | engagement | throughout | the | product | issue | and | receipt | piping |
system.
There is vegetation growing through deteriorated expansion joints in the fuel farm containment.
There are approximately 5oo feet of joint sealant deterioration in the facility containment
| expansion | joint. | |||||||||||||
| There | are | approximately | 135 | feet | of | cracks | on | the | facility | containment | floor. | |||
| Product | leaking/fuel | dripping | was | noted | on | the | 2‐inch | meter | control | valve | near | the | Tank | 4 |
| issue. | The | 1‐inch | TRV | and | sight | glass | on | the | sight | flow | indicator | are | dripping | on | the | product |
| return | line | near | Tank | 4. |
| The | pipe | support | for | the | 1‐inch | pressure | relief | line | on | the | product | receipt | side | near | Tank | 4 |
| is | not | engaged | with | the | pipe. |
| The | audible | alarm | for | the | Morrison | Bros. | clock | gauge | does | not | work. | ||
| The | product | saver | tank | has | a | brass | check | valve. | |||||
| Minor | coating | failure | was | noted | on | the | tank | shell, | appurtenances, | valves, | flanges | of | flex |
connectors, strainers, filter separators, and pumps.
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| STI | SP001 | INSPECTION | DETERMINATION | |||||||||||||||
| STI | SP001 | classifies | tanks | into | three | categories. | A | tank | is | ranked | as | a | Category | 1, | 2, | or | 3 | depending |
| on | the | risk | a | tank | poses | to | the | environment. | Category | 1 | tanks | pose | the | least | amount | of | risk | and |
| Category | 3 | the | highest. | The | inspection | types | and | inspection | intervals | are | based | on | the | tank | size | and | ||
| tank | category. | The | risk | factors | include | spill | control, | release | prevention | barrier | (RPB), | continuous | ||||||
| release | detection | method | (CRDM), | and | tank | design | and | configuration | (see | definitions | below). |
| SPILL | CONTROL | ‐ | a | means | of | preventing | a | release | of | liquid | into | the | environment, | including |
| adjoining | property | and | waterways. | Spill | control | methods | include: | 1) | Remote | impounding; | ||||
| 2) | Secondary | containment | dike/berm; | 3) | Secondary | containment | AST; | and | 4) | Secondary | ||||
| containment | system. |
| CONTINUOUS | RELEASE | DETECTION | METHOD | (CRDM) | – | a | means | of | detecting | a | release | of | |
| liquid | through | inherent | design. | CRDM | is | passive | because | it | does | not | require | sensors | or |
| power | to | operate. | Liquid | releases | are | visually | detected | by | facility | operators. | The | system | |
| shall | be | designed | in | accordance | with | good | engineering | practice. | Several | acceptable | and | ||
| commonly | used | CRDM | systems | are | as | follows: | 1) | Release | prevention | barrier | (RPB); | 2) | |
| Secondary | containment | AST, | including | double‐wall | AST | or | double‐bottom | AST; | and | 3) | |||
| Elevated | AST, | with | or | without | release | prevention | barrier. |
| RELEASE | PREVENTION | BARRIER | (RPB) | – | a | liquid | containment | barrier | that | is | installed | |||||
| under | the | AST. | Its | purpose | is | to | divert | leaks | toward | the | perimeter | of | the | AST, | where | they |
| can | be | easily | detected, | as | well | as | to | prevent | liquid | from | contaminating | the | environment. | |||
| RPBs | are | composed | of | materials | compatible | with | the | liquid | stored | in | the | AST | and | meet | ||
| appropriate | engineering | standards. | Examples | are | steel | (as | in | steel | double‐bottom | tanks), | ||||||
| concrete, | elastomeric | liners, | or | other | suitable | materials, | provided | the | above | criteria | are |
met.
| OVERFILL | PREVENTION | ‐ | systems, | procedures, | or | devices | used | to | prevent | liquid | in | ASTs | |||
| from | running | over | or | spilling | out | of | the | AST | during | the | filling | process. | Having | a | person |
| physically | present | and | in | control | of | a | shutoff | device | during | the | entire | tank | filling | process | is |
| an | acceptable | procedure | to | achieve | overfill | protection. |
| Category | 1 | tanks | are | ASTs | with | spill | control, | with | CRDM, | and | with | overfill | prevention. |
| Category | 2 | tanks | are | ASTs | with | spill | control, | without | CRDM, | and | with | overfill | prevention. |
| Category | 3 | tanks | are | ASTs | without | spill | control, | without | CRDM, | and/or | without | overfill |
prevention.
Note: Any tank not having overfill prevention is classified as a Category 3 tank.
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
Table 1 shows some typical tank types and their corresponding AST categories.
Table 1: Tank Configuration and AST Category
Tank Configuration Tank has
CRDM
| Tank | has |
| Spill | Control? |
AST
Category
| Single | wall | AST | in | contact | with | ground no no | 3 |
| Single | wall | AST | in | contact | with | ground no yes | 2 |
| Elevated | tank | yes yes | 1 | ||||
| AST | with | RPB | yes yes | 1 | |||
| AST | with | double‐bottom | yes yes | 1 | |||
| Double‐wall | AST | with | overfill | prevention yes yes | 1 | ||
| Double‐wall | AST | without | overfill | prevention yes no | 3 | ||
| Vertical | tank | resting | on | concrete | (with | RPB) yes yes | 1 |
| Vertical | tank | resting | on | concrete | (with | RPB) yes no | 3 |
Table 2 shows the STI SP001 inspection guidance based on tank size and AST category.
Table 2: Table of Inspection Schedules
AST Type and Size (U.S. gallons) Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Shop‐ Fabricated ASTs
| 0 | – | 1100 | |||
| (0‐4164 | liters) | P | P | P, | E&L(10) |
| 1101 | ‐ | 5,000 |
| (4168‐18,927 | liters) |
| P | P, | E&L(10) | [P, | E&L(5), | I(10)] | or |
| [P, | L(2), | E(5)] |
5,001 ‐ 30,000 (18,931‐113,562 liters)
| P, | E(20) | |
| [P, | E(10), | I(20)] |
or [P, E(5), L(10)]
| [P, | E&L(5), | I(10)] | or |
| [P, | L(1), | E(5)] |
30,001 ‐ 50,000 (113,566‐189,271 liters)
P, E(20) P, E&L(5), I(15) P, E&L(5), I(10)
| P | – | Periodic | AST | inspection | ||||||||
| E | – | Formal | external | inspection | by | certified | inspector | |||||
| I | – | Formal | internal | inspection | by | certified | inspector | |||||
| L | – | Leak | test | by | owner | or | owner’s | designee | ||||
| ( | ) | indicates | maximum | inspection | interval | in | years. | For | example, | E(5) | indicates | formal |
| external | inspection | every | 5 | years. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| INSPECTION | DATE | ||||
| Inspection | Date: | 6 | December | 2017 | |
| Equipment | Used: | Ultrasonic | Thickness | Meter | |
| Manufacturer: | General | Electric | |||
| Model | Number: | DMS | II | ||
| Calibration | Method: | Two | Point | Calibration |
| STATE | REGULATIONS | |||||||
| State | Regulation | for | STI | In‐Service | Tank | Inspections | N/A | |
| State | Regulation | for | STI | Out‐of‐Service | Tank | Inspections | N/A |
| NOTE: | If | there | are | no | state | regulations | for | tank | inspections | then | N/A | shall | reside | in‐place | of | the |
| number | of | years | between | inspections. | If | state | regulations | reside, | the | recommended | future | |||||
| inspections | dates | shall | be | based | on | whichever | is | more | stringent | between | the | STI | inspector’s | |||
| calculations | and | the | State | regulations. |
| PREVIOUS | INSPECTION | DATES | ||
| Inspection | Date: | Unknown/Not | Provided |
| RECOMMENDED | FUTURE | INSPECTION | DATES | |||
| STI | Out‐of‐Service | (Internal) | Inspection | Date: | N/A | |
| STI | In‐Service | (External) | Inspection | Date: | December | 2022 |
Signature(s):
| Stephen | M. | Hollenzer, | STI | SP001# | 1607 |
| InterSpec, | LLC. |
Stephen M Hollenzer Steve Sig
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
GENERAL TANK INFORMATION
| ITEM | DESCRIPTION | ||||||
| Owner | U.S. | Army | |||||
| Location | A.A.S.F.1 | Lexington | |||||
| Facility | Number | LE404 | |||||
| Tank | Number | Tank | #4 | ||||
| State | / | Country | Oklahoma, | US | |||
| City | Lexington | ||||||
| Inspection | Date | December | 6, | 2017 | |||
| Tank | Manufacturer | Service | Welding | & | Machine | CO, | Inc. |
| Design | Standard | UL‐2085 | |||||
| Date | of | Construction | Circa | 2002 | |||
| Tank | Contents | F‐24 | Jet | Fuel | |||
| Tank | Serial | Number | 12361 | ||||
| Tank | Diameter | 10’ | 6” | ||||
| Tank | Length | 35’ | |||||
| Product | Height | 10,445 | gallons | ||||
| Tank | Capacity | 20,000 | gallons | ||||
| Tank | Foundation | Metallic | Saddles | ||||
| Tank | Construction | Horizontal | Cylinder, | Lap‐Welded | Courses | ||
| Interior | Coating | System | Unknown | ||||
| Exterior | Coating | System | Unknown |
| Level | Gauging | ||||
| Electronic | (Franklin | Fueling | Systems | TS‐550)/ | |
| Morrison | Clock | Gauge | with | audible | alarm |
Venting 10 in. primary Emergency Vent, 6 in. normal vent, 10 in. secondary emergency vent.
| Strapping | Charts | 1/8‐inch | Increments | ||||
| Piping | (Size | and | Material) | Receipt | 4‐inch | Stainless | Steel |
Issue 4‐inch Stainless Steel
Water Draw‐Off ¾‐inch Stainless Steel
Level Alarms Alarm
| Electronic (Franklin | Fueling | |
| systems | TS‐550) | Independent |
High‐ High 98% (10.29 ft.) None
| High | 95% | (9.975 | ft.) | None |
| Low | NA | None | ||
| Low‐Low | NA | None |
Secondary Containment Double‐Wall Tank
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
A. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
| 1. STI | SP001 | Inspection | ||||||||||||
| An | STI | SP001 | inspection | was | performed | on | the | tank | in | accordance | with | the | most | recent |
| version | of | STI | SP001. | Additional | consideration | is | given | to | federal, | state, | and | local | ||
| regulations, | as | well | as | any | applicable | military | criteria | and | general | industry | standards. |
| 2. Site | Information | |||||
| A.A.S.F.1 | Lexington | is | located | in | Lexington, | OK. |
B. TANK INSPECTION COMMENTS
| 1. Tank | Construction | |||||||||||||
| Tank | 4 | (Facility | LE404) | is | a | nominal | 20,000 | gallon, | 10‐foot | 6‐inch | diameter | by | 35‐feet | |
| long, | aboveground | horizontal | cylindrical | fuel | tank | servicing | F‐24 | jet | fuel. | The | tank | is | ||
| constructed | to | the | UL‐2085 | standard. | Manufacturer | and | UL | data | plates | were | affixed | to | ||
| the | tank. | As‐built | drawings | of | the | original | construction | were | not | available | at | the | time | of |
| the | inspection. |
| 2. Tank | Foundation | |||||||||||||||
| The | tank | rests | on | two | steel | saddles | which | rest | on | a | concrete | pad. | The | steel | saddles | were |
| inspected | for | corrosion, | coating | failure | and | adherence | to | the | STI | SP001 | and | UL‐142 | ||||
| standards. | The | concrete | portion | of | the | foundation | was | inspected | for | broken | concrete, | |||||
| spalling, | cracks, | and | vegetation | growth | against | the | bottom | of | the | tank. |
3. Tank Appurtenances
a. Venting
| Normal | venting | allows | the | relief | of | excessive | internal | pressure | or | vacuum | ||||
| during | normal | storage | and | operations. | The | normal | vent | shall | be | at | least | as | ||
| large | as | the | largest | filling | or | withdrawal | connection | but | in | no | case, | shall | it | be |
| less | than | 1.25 | in. | (32 | mm) | nominal | inside | diameter. | The | tank | is | vented | for | |
| normal | operation | via | a | 6‐inch | vent | with | a | flame | arrestor. | The | tank | has | a | 4‐ |
| inch | receipt | line | from | the | truck | fill | stand. | The | vent | is | adequately | sized | in | |
| accordance | with | NFPA | 30 | and | API | Standard | 2000. |
| b. Emergency | Venting | ||||||||||||||
| The | tank | is | equipped | with | two | 10‐inch | Morrison | Bros. | 244 | series | emergency | ||||
| vents | (one | for | the | inner | tank | and | one | for | the | annular | space). | The | vent | has | a |
| listed | venting | capacity | of | 808,350 | CFM. | The | tank | manufacturer | requires | ||||||
| 498,600 | CFM | of | emergency | venting | capacity | on | the | inner | tank. | The | tank | ||||
| manufacturer | requires | 517,200 | CFM | of | emergency | venting | capacity | on | the | ||||||
| annular | space. | Therefore, | the | emergency | venting | capacity | is | satisfactory | for | ||||||
| this | tank. | The | emergency | vent | was | inspected | for | coating | failure | and | freedom | ||||
| of | movement. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
c. Manways The tank has two 36‐inch manholes located on the top of the tank.
| d. Water | Draw‐Off | ||||||||||
| The | tank | has | a | water‐draw | off | line | with | a | hand | crank | pump. |
| e. High | Level | Shut‐Off | Valve | ||||||||
| The | tank | has | a | solenoid | controlled | high | level | shut | off | valve | (Cla‐Valve |
model).
| f. Level | Alarms | |||||||||||
| The | tank | high, | high‐high, | low, | and | low‐low | level | alarms | are | provided | by | the |
| Franklin | Fueling | systems. |
g. Gauging
| The | tank | is | electronically | gauged | via | the | Franklin | Fueling | systems. | The | tank |
| has | a | Morrison | mechanical | fuel | level | gauge. |
h. Pumps
| Product | is | received | and | issued | via | trucks | and | to | dispensers. | The | centrifugal |
| pump | was | checked | for | leakage | and | proper | protection | from | moving | parts. |
| i. Stairs | and | Platforms | ||||||||||||
| A | ladder | is | located | adjacent | to | the | tank | to | access | the | top | of | the | tank. |
| Platforms, | grating, | and | railings | were | inspected | for | coating | failure | and | |||||
| adherence | to | OSHA | standards. | The | ladder | and | catwalk | are | in | satisfactory |
condition.
| j. Cathodic | Protection | ||||||||||||
| The | tank | is | not | in | contact | with | the | ground, | and | cathodic | protection | is | not |
required.
| k. Grounding | and | Bonding | ||||||||||
| The | tank | is | grounded | via | a | grounding | cable | and | is | in | satisfactory | condition. |
| 4. Tank | Coating | |||||||||||
| The | tank | shell | and | appurtenances | are | coated. | The | coating | was | evaluated | for | disbonding, |
| adhesion, | deterioration, | and | discoloration. | The | tank | shell | and | appurtenances | have | |||
| minor | coating | failure | present. |
| 5. Tank | Piping | System | ||||||||||||||
| The | tank | has | aboveground | 4‐inch | stainless | steel | receipt | piping | and | 4‐inch | aboveground | |||||
| stainless | steel | issue | piping. | Tanks | 1, | 2, | 3, | and | 4 | share | the | same | issue | and | receipt | piping |
system.
| 6. Fire | Protection | System | |||
| The | fire | department | provides | fire | protection. |
| 7. Secondary | Containment | |||||||||||||
| 40 | CFR | 112.7(c) | states | that | the | entire | secondary | containment | system, | “including | walls | |||
| and | floor, | must | be | capable | of | containing | oil | and | must | be | constructed | so | that | any |
| discharge | from | a | primary | containment | system | ... | will | not | escape | containment | before |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| cleanup | occurs.” | 40 | CFR | 112.8(c)(2) | and | 40 | CFR | 112.12(c)(2) | state | that | diked | areas | ||||
| must | be | “sufficiently | impervious | to | contain | oil.” | The | purpose | of | the | secondary | |||||
| containment | requirement | is | to | prevent | discharges, | as | described | in | 40 | CFR | 112.1(b); | |||||
| therefore, | effective | secondary | containment | methods | must | be | able | to | contain | oil | until | the | ||||
| oil | is | cleaned | up. | The | tank | is | a | double‐walled | tank | which | is | a | fully | enclosed | metallic | |
| secondary | containment | structure. | The | secondary | containment | is | of | sufficient | size | to | ||||||
| contain | a | total | tank | loss | per | UFC | 3‐460‐1, | Section | 8‐14.2.1. | The | entire | tank | rests | on | ||
| metallic | beams | on | a | concrete | pad | to | allow | water | to | drain | away | from | the | tank | in | |
| accordance | with | NFPA | 30. | |||||||||||||
| The | tank | farm | has | a | truck | fill/offload | containment. | The | dimensions | are | 135 | feet | by | 150 | ||
| feet. | It | is | equipped | with | a | sump | that | leads | to | an | oily | water | separator. | The | oily | water |
| separator | was | in | the | closed | position | during | the | inspection. | There | is | approximately | 500 | ||||
| feet | of | joint | seal | deterioration | and | 135 | feet | of | containment | cracking. |
| C. FINDINGS | AND | RECOMMENDATIONS | |||||||||
| The | following | information | identifies | the | significant | findings | found | during | the | tank | inspection: |
| 1. MANDATORY | REPAIRS | per | STI | SP001, | UFC | 3‐460‐01, | NFPA | 30, | or | NFPA | 30A | |
| Mandatory | repairs | represent | items | that | require | immediate | attention, | in | order | to | ||
| prevent | imminent | risk | to | system | operators, | equipment | integrity, | or | the | adjacent | ||
| environment. | The | tank | should | remain | out | of | service | until | these | repairs | are | completed. |
a. None.
2. REQUIRED REPAIRS to Fully Comply with STI SP001 or Federal, State, and Local Codes
| Recommended | repairs | represent | items | that | should | be | addressed | in | a | timely | manner, | in |
| order | to | prevent | future | potential | risks | to | system | operators, | equipment | integrity, | or | the |
| adjacent | environment. | These | items | may | be | required | by | federal, | state, | and | local | codes. |
| a. The | Catwalk | does | not | Allow | Safe | Access | to | All | Tank | Appurtenances | |
| OBSERVATION: | The | existing | catwalk | does | not | allow | safe | access | to | all | tank |
appurtenances.
| CODE | REFERENCE: | UFC | 3‐460‐01 | Table | 8.1 | (j). | ||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Extend | the | existing | catwalk | to | run | the | length | of | the | tank | to |
| allow | safe | access | to | all | tank | appurtenances. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| b. NFPA | Labeling | ||||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | tank | does | have | a | DOT | label, | but | the | tank | does | not | have | a | NFPA |
| label | affixed | to | the | tank. | |||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30 | and | NFPA | 704. | |||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | a | NFPA | 704 | diamond | label. |
| c. Appurtenance | Labeling | ||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | tank | does | not | have | proper | labeling | on | each | tank | appurtenance. | ||
| Some | of | the | labeling | has | been | painted | over | or | has | deteriorated | due | to | weather. |
| CODE | REFERENCE: | UL‐142(4.8.1.1). | |||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | labels | on | all | tank | appurtenances | in | accordance | with | UL‐ |
142.
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| d. Thread | Engagement | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | product | receipt | piping | system | and | issue | piping | system | have | ||
| improper | thread | engagement | and | several | loose | bolts | without | washers | on | flanged | ||
| connections | throughout | the | system. | |||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | ASME | B31 | (335.2.3). | ||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Check | and | refasten | hardware | and | install | washerss | on | the | entire | ||
| product | receipt | piping | system | and | issue | piping | system | in | accordance | with | ASME | B31. |
| e. Vegetation | in | Facility | Containment | ||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | piping | containment | has | minor | vegetation | growth | coming | through |
| the | joint | seals | in | various | locations. | ||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 21.6.6.3. | ||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Remove | the | vegetation | in | accordance | with | NFPA | 30, | paragraph |
21.6.6
| f. Facility | Containment | Expansion | Joint | Sealant | |||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | There | is | approximately | 500 | feet | of | joint | seal | deterioration. | ||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | 40 | CFR | 112.7(c) | states | that | the | entire | secondary | containment | |||
| system | “including | walls | and | floor, | must | be | capable | of | containing | oil | and | must | be |
| constructed | so | that | any | discharge | from | a | primary | containment | system | ... | will | not | |
| escape | containment | before | cleanup | occurs.” | 40 | CFR | 112.8(c)(2) | and | 40 | CFR | |||
| 112.12(c)(2) | state | that | diked | areas | must | be | “sufficiently | impervious | to | contain | oil.” | ||
| The | purpose | of | the | secondary | containment | requirement | is | to | prevent | discharges | as | ||
| described | in | 40 | CFR | 112.1(b); | therefore, | effective | secondary | containment | methods | ||||
| must | be | able | to | contain | oil | until | the | oil | is | cleaned | up. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| RECOMMENDATION: | Remove | the | damaged | joint | sealant | and | install | new | backer | rods | ||||||
| and | sealant | within | the | containment. | The | sealant | shall | be | adequate | to | accommodate | |||||
| joint | compression | equal | to | 50 | percent | of | the | width | of | the | joint. | The | backer | rod | shall | be |
| compressible | rod | stock | of | polyethylene | foam, | polyurethane | foam, | butyl | rubber | foam, | ||||||
| or | other | flexible, | non‐absorptive | material | as | recommended | by | the | sealant | |||||||
| manufacturer. | The | sealant | shall | conform | to | UFGS | 07 | 92 | 00 | Joint | Sealant | (Quantity: | ||||
| 500 | linear | feet). |
| g. Facility | Containment | Floor | Cracks | ||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | There | is | approximately | 135 | feet | of | cracks | on | the | facility | containment |
floor.
| CODE | REFERENCE: | 40 | CFR | 112.7(c) | states | that | the | entire | secondary | containment | ||||||
| system | “including | walls | and | floor, | must | be | capable | of | containing | oil | and | must | be | |||
| constructed | so | that | any | discharge | from | a | primary | containment | system | ... | will | not | ||||
| escape | containment | before | cleanup | occurs.” | 40 | CFR | 112.8(c)(2) | and | 40 | CFR | ||||||
| 112.12(c)(2) | state | that | diked | areas | must | be | “sufficiently | impervious | to | contain | oil.” | |||||
| The | purpose | of | the | secondary | containment | requirement | is | to | prevent | discharges | as | |||||
| described | in | 40 | CFR | 112.1(b); | therefore, | effective | secondary | containment | methods | |||||||
| must | be | able | to | contain | oil | until | the | oil | is | cleaned | up. | |||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Repair | all | exposed | cracks | in | the | containment | floor | by | grinding | in | a | ||||
| V‐shape | pattern, | with | at | least | ¼‐inch | width | at | the | surface | and | a | depth | of | at | least | ¼‐ |
| inch | and | sealing | with | flexible | urethane | (e.g. | Sikaflex | 1c) | or | a | similar | approved | sealant. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| h. | Leaking/Fuel | Dripping | at | Truck | Fill | Stand | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | Leaking/fuel | dripping | was | noted | on | the | 2‐inch | meter | control | valve | ||||||
| near | the | Tank | 4 | issue. | The | 1‐inch | TRV | and | sight | glass | on | the | sight | flow | indicator | are |
| dripping | on | the | product | return | line | near | Tank | 4. | ||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 27.3.2. | |||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | All | sight | flow | indicators | within | the | pressure | relief | piping | shall | be | |||||
| removed | and | replaced | with | flanged | spool | pieces. |
| i. Pipe | Support | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | pipe | support | for | the | 1‐inch | pressure | relief | line | on | the | product |
| receipt | side | near | Tank | 4 | is | not | engaged | with | the | pipe. | ||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 27.6.1, | “Piping | systems | shall | be | substantially | ||
| supported | and | protected | against | physical | damage | and | excessive | stresses | arising | from | ||
| settlement, | vibration, | expansion, | or | contraction. | The | installation | of | nonmetallic | piping | |||
| shall | be | in | accordance | with | the | manufacturer’s | instructions.” | (Also, | see | API | 570‐7.5) | |
| RECOMMENDATION: | Repair | the | pipe | support | for | the | 1‐inch | pressure | relief | line | on | the |
| product | receipt | side | near | Tank | 4 | in | accordance | with | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 27.6.1. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| j. Morrison | Bros. | Clock | Gauge | Overfill | Alarm | |||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | Morrison | Bros. | clock | gauge | is | equipped | with | an | audible | alarm. | The |
| alarm | battery | is | dead | or | the | alarm | is | not | working | |||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 22.11.4.5 | |||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Repair | the | Morrison | Bros. | audible | alarm | in | accordance | with | NFPA | ||
| 30, | paragraph | 22.11.4.5. |
| k. Product | Saver | Tank | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | product | saver | tank | has | a | brass | check | valve. | Brass | is | considered | a |
| low | melting | point | material. | ||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 27.4.3.2 | ||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Replace | the | brass | check | valve | in | accordance | with | NFPA | 30, | |||
| paragraph | 27.4.3.2. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| 3. RECOMMENDED | REPAIRS | to | Fully | Comply | with | UFC | 3‐460‐01 | and | AW | 78‐24‐27 | ||
| Standards | or | as | Part | of | Regular | Maintenance | ||||||
| Recommended | repairs | represent | items | that | should | be | addressed | in | a | timely | manner, | in |
| order | to | prevent | future | potential | risks | to | system | operators, | equipment | integrity, | or | the |
| adjacent | environment. |
| a. Coating | Failures | on | Tank | |||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | Minor | coating | failure | was | noted | on | the | tank | shell, | appurtenances, | ||
| valves, | flanges | of | flex | connectors, | strainers, | filter | separators, | and | pumps. | |||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NA | ||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Abrasive | blast | and | recoat | areas | of | coating | failure | on | the | tank | shell, |
| appurtenances, | valves, | flanges | of | flex | connectors, | strainers, | filter | separators, | and | |||
| pumps.. | Repairs | should | be | accomplished | using | an | epoxy | based | coating | system | or |
equivalent.
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
APPENDIX A: ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS AND DATA
| 1. Remaining | Life | Calculation |
| 2. Ultrasonic | Thickness | Data |
InterSpec, LLC Rev.21505-2
12/6 2017
Tank #: 4 (LE 404) Plate Specification: Unknown T 55,000 Material: Y 30,000 Manufactured Date: 2002 Circa 23595
Horizontal 25960 Tank Specification Unit 0.80Y 0.429T Diameter (D) 10.500 feet Smaller of 24000 23595 Length (L) 35.000 feet Height (H) the two: 0.88Y 0.472T Volume (V) 20,073 gallon 26400 25960 S.G 0.88 N/A E 1 N/A *Smaller of Two specified minimum or 80,000(lb/in²) Y 15 years
Maximum Previous Current 2, 3 Minimum Next Next Product Allowable Measured Measured Acceptable Corrosion 1 Remaining VT UT Height Stress Joint Thickness Thickness Thickness Rate Life Inspection Inspection
Ft (psi) Efficiency (inches) (inches) (inches) (in./yr) (ca .) (years) (years) (feet) (S ) (E ) (t prev) (t act) (t min) (C r) (years) (I v) (I ut)
10.50 23,595 1 0.313 0.312 0.100 0.00001 >30 5 15
10.50 23,595 1 0.250 0.237 0.100 0.00087 >30 5 15
10.50 23,595 1 0.250 0.235 0.100 0.00100 >30 5 15
10.50 23,595 1 0.313 0.312 0.100 0.00001 >30 5 15
NOTE:
2 Acceptable roof thickness in any 100in. 2 shall not be less than 0.090 in 3 UL-142 Section 17.2.1 , 25.1, and 13.2.1 for Horz./Vertical and rectangular tanks <50,000 gal and >50,000 gal. API 653 Section 4.3.2.1, 4.3.4.1 and 4.4.1 VT and UT Intervals used are from API-653. See STI-SP001 Table 5.5 for inspection intervals for STI tanks.
Carbon Steel Specified minimum yield strength(lb/in ²)
North Head
Course Side
SConfiguration:
Specified minimum tensile strength *(lb/in²)
Shell Life Evaluation : Data Result
Owner/Operator: US Army AASF1 - Lexington; Lexington, OK
Inspection Date :
1 The engineering data used to calculate in-service period of operation (Remaining Life) assumes the tank remains in the same service and all corrosion rates remain constant.
All other
Maximum allowable stress, first and second (lb/in ²)
Maximum allowable stress, for all other (lb/in²)
Bottom and second course
Shell (West Face) South Head
Shell (East Face)
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.350
North Head Shell (East Face) Shell (West Face) South Head in ch es
Course #
Shell Life Evaluation tprev tact tmin
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 in ch es
Data Points
Shell (West Face)
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.350
0.400
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 in ch es
Data Points
South Head
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.350
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 in ch es
Data Points
North Head
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 in ch es
Data Points
Shell (East Face)
InterSpec,LLC Rev.21505-4 DATA Sheet: 1 Tank #:
1 0.332 1 0.242 1 0.241 1 0.344 2 0.331 2 0.243 2 0.243 2 0.344 3 0.331 3 0.242 3 0.243 3 0.342 4 0.331 4 0.242 4 0.252 4 0.346 5 0.328 5 0.242 5 0.245 5 0.354 6 0.332 6 0.242 6 0.240 6 0.344 7 0.332 7 0.239 7 0.251 7 0.342 8 0.331 8 0.245 8 0.251 8 0.341 9 0.332 9 0.245 9 0.249 9 0.340
10 0.332 10 0.246 10 0.250 10 0.341 11 0.333 11 0.248 11 0.243 11 0.340 12 0.333 12 0.242 12 0.248 12 0.341 13 0.327 13 0.244 13 0.247 13 0.340 14 0.329 14 0.244 14 0.249 14 0.349 15 0.332 15 0.248 15 0.243 15 0.343 16 0.331 16 0.250 16 0.238 16 0.341 17 0.332 17 0.244 17 0.240 17 0.341 18 0.332 18 0.247 18 0.241 18 0.343 19 0.327 19 0.247 19 0.240 19 0.340 20 0.329 20 0.248 20 0.240 20 0.340
Average 0.331 21 0.246 21 0.239 Average 0.343 Std.Dev. 0.001843195 22 0.246 22 0.238 Std.Dev. 0.003518373
23 0.237 23 0.240 24 0.242 24 0.237 25 0.238 25 0.235 26 0.244 26 0.238 27 0.241 27 0.240 28 0.242 28 0.236 29 0.241 29 0.240 30 0.239 30 0.246
Average 0.244 Average 0.243 Std.Dev. 0.003191944 Std.Dev. 0.004889703
4 (LE 404)
Owner/Operator:
North Head Shell (West Face) South HeadShell (East Face)
Tank Shell and Bottom/Roof/Heads UT Readings
US Army AASF1 - Lexington; Lexington, OK
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
APPENDIX B: ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
| 1. Tank | Layout | Drawing | |
| 2. Tank | Farm | Layout | Drawing |
Q - 3" PlugK - 4" Electronic A.T.G.
L - 2" Clock Gauge with Audible Alarm M - 3" Plug N - 4" to 2" Product Return O - 36" Manway P - 6" to 4" Product Issue
F - 3" Plug G - 36" Manway with 2" Product Return and 1" Water Draw H - 3" Manual Gauge Well I - 3" Plug J - 10" Emergency Vent
A - 2" Leak Detection B - 3" Plug C - 10" Emergency Vent D - 6" to 4" Product Receipt E - 6" Primary Vent
Tank 4 Layout Tank 4 (LE404)
A.A.S.F. #1 Lexington; Lexington, OK
InterSpec, LLC.
12/6/2017 N/A N/A
Description:
Remarks/Legend:
Drawing Title:
Owner:
Drawn By:
Date: Rev. No.: Scale:
Modified By: InterSpec, LLC.
IN
T
E R
S P
E C
, L L
C -P
R O
P R
IE
TA
R Y
IN
F
O R
M A
T
IO
N -F
O R
O F
F
IC
IA
L
U S
E O
N
LY
AB C D
E
F G H I
J K
LMN O
P
Q
Head 1 Head 2
E R
-A .A
.S .F. #1 L
E X
IN
G
T O
N -L
E X
IN
G
T O
N , O
K
-TA
N K
4-D E
C E
M B
E R
/2017
Tank Farm Layout Tank Farm
A.A.S.F. #1 Lexington; Lexington, OK
InterSpec, LLC.
12/6/2017 N/A N/A
E R
-A .A
.S .F. #1 L
E X
IN
G
T O
N -L
E X
IN
G
T O
N , O
K
-TA
N K
FA
R
M -D
E C
E M
B E
R /2017
Description:
Remarks/Legend:
Drawing Title:
Owner:
Drawn By:
Date: Rev. No.: Scale:
Modified By: InterSpec, LLC.
IN
T
E R
S P
E C
, L L
C -P
R O
P R
IE
TA
R Y
IN
F
O R
M A
T
IO
N -F
O R
O F
F
IC
IA
L
U S
E O
N
LY
150'-0"
135'-0"
Cracks and Joint Sealant
Concrete Bollard
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
APPENDIX C: STI SP001 INSPECTION CHECKLIST
1. STI SP001 INSPECTION CHECKLIST
There is minor cracking and joint seal deterioration
There is minor coating failure on the shell.
Labels are coated and painted over
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
APPENDIX D: PHOTOGRAPHS
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.1: Tank Ground and Steel Saddle D.2: Steel Saddle
D.3: Head 1 D.4: Head 2
D.5: Nozzles A, B, and C D.6: Nozzles D and E
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.7: Flame Arrestor D.8: Flame Arrestor
D.9: Nozzles F D.10: Nozzle G
D.11: Water Draw Hand Pump D.12: Nozzle H
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.13: Nozzle I D.14: Nozzle J
D.15: Nozzle K D.16: Nozzle L
D.17: Overfill Alarm D.18: Nozzle M
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.19: Nozzles M and N D.20: Nozzles N, O, and P
D.21: Nozzles O, P, and Q D.22: Nozzles P and Q
D.23: Catwalk Access D.24: Catwalk
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.25: Catwalk Access D.26: Receipt Filter Separator
D.27: Receipt Piping D.28: Receipt Piping
D.29: Receipt Piping D.30: Receipt Piping
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.31: Receipt Piping D.32: Receipt Piping
D.33: Thread Engagement D.34: Overall View
D.35: Issue Piping D.36: Issue Piping
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.37: Issue Piping D.38: Issue Piping
D.39: Issue Piping D.40: Issue Piping
D.41: Issue Piping D.42: Issue Spill Bucket
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.43: Issue Piping D.44: Fuel Dripping
D.45: Leaking Sight Flow Indicator D.46: Electronic ATG House
D.47: Electronic ATG Alarm D.48: Electronic ATG Read Out
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.49: Electronic ATG Control Panel D.50: Facility Containment
D.51: Facility Containment D.52: Facility Containment
D.53: Facility Containment D.54: Facility Containment
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.55: Containment Sump D.56: Containment Sump
D.57: Remote Impounding D.58: Remote Impounding
D.59: Expansion Joint Deterioration D.60: Expansion Joint Deterioration
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.61: Vegetation D.62: Expansion Joint Deterioration
D.63: Expansion Joint Deterioration D.64: Containment Cracking
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .