Attachment J-LEX-FY18-FAC LE402-Tank 2-FINAL.PDF

PDF 3 MB Posted Sep 22, 2023

Attached to: SP-POL-CMP-INSPECT-FY24-LEXINGTON OKLAHOMA
Solicitation number: W9128F23Q0103
Issued by: Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Omaha

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Dec 21, 2023

This document is an inspection report for an aboveground storage tank (AST) at the A.A.S.F. #1 Lexington fuel storage facility in Lexington, Oklahoma. The report details an inspection of Tank 2 conducted in accordance with STI SP001 standards to evaluate integrity and establish data for future inspections. Significant findings include that the existing catwalk does not allow safe access to all tank appurtenances, thread engagement issues throughout the product piping system, and approximately 500 feet of joint seal deterioration and 135 feet of cracks in the facility containment requiring repair. The engineer recommends repairs and improvements be made to address these issues and fully comply with codes, including extending the catwalk, improving piping connections, removing vegetation from containment joints, and repairing cracks in the containment floor. Ultrasonic thickness readings were taken and shell life calculations determined the tank has over 30 years of remaining life under current conditions. Engineering drawings of the tank and facility layout are provided in the appendices.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
Attachment C - Tank Data Sheet.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Sep 22, 2023
W9128F23Q0103_Draft Solicitation.pdf	PDF	Sep 22, 2023
Attachment J -LEX-FY18-FAC LE401-Tank 1-FINAL.PDF	PDF	Sep 22, 2023
Attachment H - STI External Inspection Template.docx	DOCX document	Sep 22, 2023
Attachment B.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Sep 22, 2023
Attachment A - General Installation Security Requirements.docx	DOCX document	Sep 22, 2023
Attachment D - Monthly Contractors Progress Management and Status Report.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Sep 22, 2023
Attachment J-LEX-FY18-FAC LE403-Tank 3-FINAL.PDF	PDF	Sep 22, 2023
Attachment J-LEX-FY18-FAC LE404-Tank 4-FINAL.PDF	PDF	Sep 22, 2023

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

US	Army	Corps	of	Engineers
Omaha	District

STI	SP001	Formal	External	Inspection
Inspection	Report

A.A.S.F.	1	Lexington
	Facility	LE402

Tank 2

Army

Corps

Engineers

Center

Expertise

for

Petroleum,

Oils,

and

Lubricants

(USACE

POL‐MCX)

12/6/2017

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

Table	of	Contents
ACRONYMS	AND	ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................ 3

GENERAL SUMMARY

STI SP001 INSPECTION DETERMINATION

INSPECTION DATE

STATE REGULATIONS

PREVIOUS INSPECTION DATES

RECOMMENDED FUTURE INSPECTION DATES

A. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION

1. STI SP001 Inspection

2. Site Information

B. TANK INSPECTION COMMENTS

1. Tank Construction

2. Tank Foundation

3. Tank Appurtenances

4. Tank Coating

5. Tank Piping System

The

tank

has

aboveground

4‐inch

stainless

steel

receipt

piping

and

4‐inch

aboveground

stainless

steel

issue

piping.

Tanks

and

the

same

issue

and

receipt

piping

system.

6. Fire Protection System

7. Secondary Containment

C. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

1. MANDATORY REPAIRS per STI SP001, UFC 3‐460‐01, NFPA 30, or NFPA 30A

2. REQUIRED REPAIRS to Fully Comply with STI SP001 or Federal, State, and Local Codes . 12

3. RECOMMENDED	REPAIRS	to	Fully	Comply	with	UFC	3‐460‐01	and	AW	78‐24‐27
Standards	or	as	Part	of	Regular	Maintenance ................................................................................. 17

APPENDIX A: ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS AND DATA

APPENDIX B: ENGINEERING DRAWINGS

APPENDIX C: STI SP001 INSEPCTION CHECKLIST

APPENDIX D: PHOTOGRAPHS

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

API American Petroleum Institute

ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers

ASNT American Society of Non‐Destructive Testing

ATG Automatic Tank Gauge

BBL Barrel

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CP Cathodic Protection

DFT Dry Film Thickness

HLA High Level Alarm

HLCS High Level Control Shut‐Off

HHLA High‐High Level Alarm

LLA Low Level Alarm

LLLA Low‐Low Level Alarm

MFL Magnetic Flux Leakage

MT Magnetic Particle Testing

NACE National Association of Corrosion Engineers

NDT Non‐Destructive Testing

NFPA National Fire Protection Association

PSI Pounds per Square Inch

PT Penetrant Testing

P/V Pressure/Vacuum

RP Recommended Practice

PST Product Saver Tank

RT Radiography Testing

STI Steel Tank Institute

TML Thickness Measurement Location

TRV Thermal Relief Valve

UFC Unified Facilities Criteria

UFGS Unified Facilities Guide Specifications

ULS Ultra Low Sulfur

UT Ultrasonic Testing

VT Visual Testing

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

GENERAL

SUMMARY

STI

SP001

Formal

External

inspection

Tank

(Facility

LE402),

located

A.A.S.F.

Lexington,

Oklahoma

was

completed

December

2017

evaluate

the

tank’s

integrity,

collect

data,

and

establish

database

for

future

inspections

and

evaluations.

service

life

evaluation

performed

the

tank

shows

having

greater

than

years

remaining

shell

life

under

current

conditions.

Significant	Findings:
The	existing	catwalk	does	not	allow	safe	access	to	all	tank	appurtenances.
There	is	no	NFPA	diamond	on	the	tank	or	entering	fuel	farm.
The	tank	appurtenances	are	not	labeled.
There	is	improper	thread	engagement	throughout	the	product	issue	and	receipt	piping

system.

There is vegetation growing through deteriorated expansion joints in the fuel farm containment.

There are approximately 5oo feet of joint sealant deterioration in the facility containment

expansion

joint.

There

are

approximately

135

feet

cracks

the

facility

containment

floor.

Product

leaking/fuel

dripping

was

noted

the

2‐inch

meter

control

valve

near

the

Tank

issue.

The

1‐inch

TRV

and

sight

glass

the

sight

flow

indicator

are

dripping

the

product

return

line

near

Tank

The

pipe

support

for

the

1‐inch

pressure

relief

line

the

product

receipt

side

near

Tank

not

engaged

with

the

pipe.

The

product

saver

tank

has

brass

check

valve.

Minor

coating

failure

was

noted

the

tank

shell,

appurtenances,

valves,

flanges

flex

connectors, strainers, filter separators, and pumps.

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

STI

SP001

INSPECTION

DETERMINATION

STI

SP001

classifies

tanks

into

three

categories.

tank

ranked

Category

depending

the

risk

tank

poses

the

environment.

Category

tanks

pose

the

least

amount

risk

and

Category

the

highest.

The

inspection

types

and

inspection

intervals

are

based

the

tank

size

and

tank

category.

The

risk

factors

include

spill

control,

release

prevention

barrier

(RPB),

continuous

release

detection

method

(CRDM),

and

tank

design

and

configuration

(see

definitions

below).

SPILL

CONTROL

‐

means

preventing

release

liquid

into

the

environment,

including

adjoining

property

and

waterways.

Spill

control

methods

include:

Remote

impounding;

Secondary

containment

dike/berm;

Secondary

containment

AST;

and

Secondary

containment

system.

CONTINUOUS

RELEASE

DETECTION

METHOD

(CRDM)

–

means

detecting

release

liquid

through

inherent

design.

CRDM

passive

because

does

not

require

sensors

power

operate.

Liquid

releases

are

visually

detected

facility

operators.

The

system

shall

designed

accordance

with

good

engineering

practice.

Several

acceptable

and

commonly

used

CRDM

systems

are

follows:

Release

prevention

barrier

(RPB);

Secondary

containment

AST,

including

double‐wall

AST

double‐bottom

AST;

and

Elevated

AST,

with

without

release

prevention

barrier.

RELEASE

PREVENTION

BARRIER

(RPB)

–

liquid

containment

barrier

that

installed

under

the

AST.

Its

purpose

divert

leaks

toward

the

perimeter

the

AST,

where

they

can

easily

detected,

well

prevent

liquid

from

contaminating

the

environment.

RPBs

are

composed

materials

compatible

with

the

liquid

stored

the

AST

and

meet

appropriate

engineering

standards.

Examples

are

steel

(as

steel

double‐bottom

tanks),

concrete,

elastomeric

liners,

other

suitable

materials,

provided

the

above

criteria

are

met.

OVERFILL

PREVENTION

‐

systems,

procedures,

devices

used

prevent

liquid

ASTs

from

running

over

spilling

out

the

AST

during

the

filling

process.

Having

person

physically

present

and

control

shutoff

device

during

the

entire

tank

filling

process

acceptable

procedure

achieve

overfill

protection.

Category

tanks

are

ASTs

with

spill

control,

with

CRDM,

and

with

overfill

prevention.

Category

tanks

are

ASTs

with

spill

control,

without

CRDM,

and

with

overfill

prevention.

Category

tanks

are

ASTs

without

spill

control,

without

CRDM,

and/or

without

overfill

prevention.

Note: Any tank not having overfill prevention is classified as a Category 3 tank.

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

Table 1 shows some typical tank types and their corresponding AST categories.

Table 1: Tank Configuration and AST Category

Tank Configuration Tank has

CRDM

Tank	has
Spill	Control?

AST

Category

Single	wall	AST	in	contact	with	ground no no	3
Single	wall	AST	in	contact	with	ground no yes	2
Elevated	tank	yes yes	1
AST	with	RPB	yes yes	1
AST	with	double‐bottom	yes yes	1
Double‐wall	AST	with	overfill	prevention yes yes	1
Double‐wall	AST	without	overfill	prevention yes no	3
Vertical	tank	resting	on	concrete	(with	RPB) yes yes	1
Vertical	tank	resting	on	concrete	(with	RPB) yes no	3

Table 2 shows the STI SP001 inspection guidance based on tank size and AST category.

Table 2: Table of Inspection Schedules

AST Type and Size (U.S. gallons) Category 1 Category 2 Category 3

Shop‐ Fabricated ASTs

0	–	1100
(0‐4164	liters)	P	P	P,	E&L(10)

1101	‐	5,000
(4168‐18,927	liters)

P	P,	E&L(10)	[P,	E&L(5),	I(10)]	or
[P,	L(2),	E(5)]

5,001 ‐ 30,000 (18,931‐113,562 liters)

P,	E(20)
[P,	E(10),	I(20)]

or [P, E(5), L(10)]

[P,	E&L(5),	I(10)]	or
[P,	L(1),	E(5)]

30,001 ‐ 50,000 (113,566‐189,271 liters)

P, E(20) P, E&L(5), I(15) P, E&L(5), I(10)

–

Periodic

AST

inspection

–

Formal

external

inspection

certified

inspector

–

Formal

internal

inspection

certified

inspector

–

Leak

test

owner

owner’s

designee

(

)

indicates

maximum

inspection

interval

years.

For

example,

E(5)

indicates

formal

external

inspection

every

years.

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

INSPECTION	DATE
Inspection	Date:		6	December	2017
Equipment	Used:		Ultrasonic	Thickness	Meter
	Manufacturer:		General	Electric
	Model	Number:	DMS	II
	Calibration	Method:	Two	Point	Calibration

STATE	REGULATIONS
State	Regulation	for	STI	In‐Service	Tank	Inspections		N/A
State	Regulation	for	STI	Out‐of‐Service	Tank	Inspections	N/A

NOTE:

there

are

state

regulations

for

tank

inspections

then

N/A

shall

reside

in‐place

the

number

years

between

inspections.

state

regulations

reside,

the

recommended

future

inspections

dates

shall

based

whichever

stringent

between

the

STI

inspector’s

calculations

and

the

State

regulations.

PREVIOUS	INSPECTION	DATES
Inspection	Date:		Unknown/Not	Provided

RECOMMENDED	FUTURE	INSPECTION	DATES
STI	Out‐of‐Service	(Internal)	Inspection	Date:	N/A
STI	In‐Service	(External)	Inspection	Date:	December	2022

Signature(s):

Stephen	M.	Hollenzer,	STI	SP001#	1607
InterSpec,	LLC.

Stephen M Hollenzer Steve Sig

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

GENERAL TANK INFORMATION

ITEM	DESCRIPTION
Owner	U.S.	Army
Location	A.A.S.F.	1	Lexington
Facility	Number	LE402
Tank	Number	Tank	#2
State	/	Country	Oklahoma,	US
City	Lexington
Inspection	Date	December	6,	2017
Tank	Manufacturer	Service	Welding	&	Machine	CO,	Inc.
Design	Standard	UL‐2085
Date	of	Construction	Circa	2002
Tank	Contents	F‐24	Jet	Fuel
Tank	Serial	Number	12362
Tank	Diameter	10’	6”
Tank	Length	35’
Product	Height	10,445	gallons
Tank	Capacity	20,000	gallons
Tank	Foundation	Metallic	Saddles
Tank	Construction	Horizontal	Cylinder,	Lap‐Welded	Courses
Interior	Coating	System	Unknown
Exterior	Coating	System	Unknown

Level	Gauging
Electronic	(Franklin	Fueling	Systems	TS‐550)/
Morrison	Clock	Gauge	with	audible	alarm

Venting 10 in. primary emergency vent, 6 in. normal vent, 10 in. secondary emergency vent.

Strapping	Charts	1/8‐inch	increments
Piping	(Size	and	Material)	Receipt	4‐inch	Stainless	Steel

Issue 4‐inch Stainless Steel

Water Draw‐Off ¾‐inch Stainless Steel

Level	Alarms	Alarm	Electronic (Franklin	Fueling
systems	TS‐550)	Independent

High‐ High

98% (10.29 ft.) None

High	95%	(9.9975)	None
Low	NA	None
Low‐Low	NA	None

Secondary Containment Double‐Wall Tank

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

A. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION

1. STI

SP001

Inspection

STI

SP001

inspection

was

performed

the

tank

accordance

with

the

most

recent

version

STI

SP001.

Additional

consideration

given

federal,

state,

and

local

regulations,

well

any

applicable

military

criteria

and

general

industry

standards.

2. Site	Information
A.A.S.F.1	Lexington	is	located	in	Lexington,	OK.

B. TANK INSPECTION COMMENTS

1. Tank

Construction

Tank

(Facility

LE402)

nominal

20,000

gallon,

10‐foot

6‐inch

diameter

35‐feet

long,

aboveground

horizontal

cylindrical

fuel

tank

servicing

F‐24

jet

fuel.

The

tank

constructed

the

UL‐2085

standard.

Manufacturer

and

data

plates

were

affixed

the

tank.

As‐built

drawings

the

original

construction

were

not

available

the

time

the

inspection.

2. Tank

Foundation

The

tank

rests

two

steel

saddles

which

rest

concrete

pad.

The

steel

saddles

were

inspected

for

corrosion,

coating

failure,

and

adherence

the

STI

SP001

and

UL‐142

standards.

The

concrete

portion

the

foundation

was

inspected

for

broken

concrete,

spalling,

cracks,

and

vegetation

growth

against

the

bottom

the

tank.

3. Tank Appurtenances

a. Venting

Normal

venting

allows

the

relief

excessive

internal

pressure

vacuum

during

normal

storage

and

operations.

The

normal

vent

shall

least

large

the

largest

filling

withdrawal

connection

but

case,

shall

less

than

1.25

in.

(32

mm)

nominal

inside

diameter.

The

tank

vented

for

normal

operation

via

6‐inch

vent

with

flame

arrestor.

The

tank

has

4‐

inch

receipt

line

from

the

truck

fill

stand.

The

vent

adequately

sized

accordance

with

NFPA

and

API

Standard

2000.

b. Emergency

Venting

The

tank

equipped

with

two

10‐inch

Morrison

Bros.

244

series

emergency

vents

(one

for

the

inner

tank

and

one

for

the

annular

space).

The

vent

has

listed

venting

capacity

808,350

CFM.

The

tank

manufacturer

requires

498,600

CFM

emergency

venting

capacity

the

inner

tank.

The

tank

manufacturer

requires

517,200

CFM

emergency

venting

capacity

the

annular

space.

Therefore,

the

emergency

venting

capacity

satisfactory

for

this

tank.

The

emergency

vent

was

inspected

for

coating

failure

and

freedom

movement.

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

c. Manways The tank has two 36‐inch manholes located on the top of the tank.

d. Water	Draw‐Off
The	tank	has	a	water‐draw	off	line	with	a	hand	crank	pump.

e. High	Level	Shut‐Off	Valve
The	tank	has	a	solenoid	controlled	high	level	shut	off	valve	(Cla‐Valve

model).

f. Level

Alarms

The

tank

high,

high‐high,

low,

and

low‐low

level

alarms

are

provided

the

Franklin

Fueling

systems.

g. Gauging

The	tank	is	electronically	gauged	via	the	Franklin	Fueling	systems.	The	tank
has	a	Morrison	mechanical	fuel	level	gauge.

h. Pumps

Product	is	received	and	issued	via	trucks	and	to	dispensers.	The	centrifugal
pump	was	checked	for	leakage	and	proper	protection	from	moving	parts.

i. Stairs

and

Platforms

ladder

located

adjacent

the

tank

access

the

top

the

tank.

Platforms,

grating,

and

railings

were

inspected

for

coating

failure

and

adherence

OSHA

standards.

The

ladder

and

catwalk

are

satisfactory

condition.

j. Cathodic

Protection

The

tank

not

contact

with

the

ground,

and

cathodic

protection

not

required.

k. Grounding

and

Bonding

The

tank

grounded

via

grounding

cable

and

satisfactory

condition.

4. Tank

Coating

The

tank

shell

and

appurtenances

are

coated.

The

coating

was

evaluated

for

disbonding,

adhesion,

deterioration,

and

discoloration.

The

tank

shell

and

appurtenances

have

minor

coating

failure

present.

5. Tank

Piping

System

The

tank

has

aboveground

4‐inch

stainless

steel

receipt

piping

and

4‐inch

aboveground

stainless

steel

issue

piping.

Tanks

and

the

same

issue

and

receipt

piping

system.

6. Fire	Protection	System
The	fire	department	provides	fire	protection.

7. Secondary

Containment

CFR

112.7(c)

states

that

the

entire

secondary

containment

system,

“including

walls

and

floor,

must

capable

containing

oil

and

must

constructed

that

any

discharge

from

primary

containment

system

...

will

not

escape

containment

before

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

cleanup

occurs.”

CFR

112.8(c)(2)

and

CFR

112.12(c)(2)

state

that

diked

areas

must

“sufficiently

impervious

contain

oil.”

The

purpose

the

secondary

containment

requirement

prevent

discharges,

described

CFR

112.1(b);

therefore,

effective

secondary

containment

methods

must

able

contain

oil

until

the

oil

cleaned

up.

The

tank

double‐walled

tank

which

fully

enclosed

metallic

secondary

containment

structure.

The

secondary

containment

sufficient

size

contain

total

tank

loss

per

UFC

3‐460‐1,

Section

8‐14.2.1.

The

entire

tank

rests

metallic

beams

concrete

pad

allow

water

drain

away

from

the

tank

accordance

with

NFPA

30.

The

tank

farm

has

truck

fill/offload

containment.

The

dimensions

are

135

feet

150

feet.

equipped

with

sump

that

leads

oily

water

separator.

The

oily

water

separator

was

the

closed

position

during

the

inspection.

There

approximately

500

feet

joint

seal

deterioration

and

135

feet

containment

cracking.

C. FINDINGS	AND	RECOMMENDATIONS
The	following	information	identifies	the	significant	findings	found	during	the	tank	inspection:

1. MANDATORY

REPAIRS

per

STI

SP001,

UFC

3‐460‐01,

NFPA

30,

NFPA

30A

Mandatory

repairs

represent

items

that

require

immediate

attention,

order

prevent

imminent

risk

system

operators,

equipment

integrity,

the

adjacent

environment.

The

tank

should

remain

out

service

until

these

repairs

are

completed.

a None.

2. REQUIRED REPAIRS to Fully Comply with STI SP001 or Federal, State, and Local Codes

Recommended

repairs

represent

items

that

should

addressed

timely

manner,

order

prevent

future

potential

risks

system

operators,

equipment

integrity,

the

adjacent

environment.

These

items

may

required

federal,

state,

and

local

codes.

a. The	Catwalk	does	not	Allow	Safe	Access	to	All	Tank	Appurtenances
OBSERVATION:	The	existing	catwalk	does	not	allow	safe	access	to	all	tank

appurtenances.

CODE

REFERENCE:

UFC

3‐460‐01

Table

8.1

(j).

RECOMMENDATION:

Extend

the

existing

catwalk

run

the

length

the

tank

allow

safe

access

all

tank

appurtenances.

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

b. NFPA

Labeling

OBSERVATION:

The

tank

does

have

DOT

label,

but

the

tank

does

not

have

NFPA

label

affixed

the

tank.

CODE

REFERENCE:

NFPA

and

NFPA

704.

RECOMMENDATION:

Install

NFPA

704

diamond

label.

c. Appurtenance

Labeling

OBSERVATION:

The

tank

does

not

have

proper

labeling

each

tank

appurtenance.

Some

the

labeling

has

been

painted

over

has

deteriorated

due

weather.

CODE

REFERENCE:

UL‐142(4.8.1.1).

RECOMMENDATION:

Install

labels

all

tank

appurtenances

accordance

with

UL‐

142.

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

d. Thread

Engagement

OBSERVATION:

The

product

receipt

piping

system

and

issue

piping

system

have

improper

thread

engagement

and

several

loose

bolts

without

washers

flanged

connections

throughout

the

system.

CODE

REFERENCE:

ASME

B31

(335.2.3).

RECOMMENDATION:

Check

and

refasten

the

hardware

and

install

washers

the

entire

product

receipt

piping

system

and

issue

piping

system

accordance

with

ASME

B31.

e. Vegetation	in	Facility	Containment
OBSERVATION:	The	piping	containment	has	minor	vegetation	growth	coming	through
the	joint	seals	in	various	locations.
CODE	REFERENCE:	NFPA	30,	paragraph	21.6.6.3.
RECOMMENDATION:	Remove	the	vegetation	in	accordance	with	NFPA	30,	paragraph

21.6.6.

f. Facility

Containment

Expansion

Joint

Sealant

OBSERVATION:

There

approximately

500

feet

joint

seal

deterioration.

CODE

REFERENCE:

CFR

112.7(c)

states

that

the

entire

secondary

containment

system

“including

walls

and

floor,

must

capable

containing

oil

and

must

constructed

that

any

discharge

from

primary

containment

system

...

will

not

escape

containment

before

cleanup

occurs.”

CFR

112.8(c)(2)

and

CFR

112.12(c)(2)

state

that

diked

areas

must

“sufficiently

impervious

contain

oil.”

The

purpose

the

secondary

containment

requirement

prevent

discharges

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

described

CFR

112.1(b);

therefore,

effective

secondary

containment

methods

must

able

contain

oil

until

the

oil

cleaned

up.

RECOMMENDATION:

Remove

the

damaged

joint

sealant

and

install

new

backer

rods

and

sealant

within

the

containment.

The

sealant

shall

adequate

accommodate

joint

compression

equal

percent

the

width

the

joint.

The

backer

rod

shall

compressible

rod

stock

polyethylene

foam,

polyurethane

foam,

butyl

rubber

foam,

other

flexible,

non‐absorptive

material

recommended

the

sealant

manufacturer.

The

sealant

shall

conform

UFGS

Joint

Sealant

(Quantity:

500

linear

feet).

g. Facility	Containment	Floor	Cracks
OBSERVATION:	There	is	approximately	135	feet	of	cracks	on	the	facility	containment

floor.

CODE

REFERENCE:

CFR

112.7(c)

states

that

the

entire

secondary

containment

system

“including

walls

and

floor,

must

capable

containing

oil

and

must

constructed

that

any

discharge

from

primary

containment

system

...

will

not

escape

containment

before

cleanup

occurs.”

CFR

112.8(c)(2)

and

CFR

112.12(c)(2)

state

that

diked

areas

must

“sufficiently

impervious

contain

oil.”

The

purpose

the

secondary

containment

requirement

prevent

discharges

described

CFR

112.1(b);

therefore,

effective

secondary

containment

methods

must

able

contain

oil

until

the

oil

cleaned

up.

RECOMMENDATION:

Repair

all

exposed

cracks

the

containment

floor

grinding

V‐shape

pattern,

with

least

¼‐inch

width

the

surface

and

depth

least

¼‐

inch

and

sealing

with

flexible

urethane

(e.g.

Sikaflex

1c)

similar

approved

sealant.

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

Leaking/Fuel

Dripping

Truck

Fill

Stand

OBSERVATION:

Leaking/fuel

dripping

was

noted

the

2‐inch

meter

control

valve

near

the

Tank

issue.

The

1‐inch

TRV

and

sight

glass

the

sight

flow

indicator

are

dripping

the

product

return

line

near

Tank

CODE

REFERENCE:

NFPA

30,

paragraph

27.3.2.

RECOMMENDATION:

All

sight

flow

indicators

within

the

pressure

relief

piping

shall

removed

and

replaced

with

flanged

spool

pieces.

i. Pipe

Support

OBSERVATION:

The

pipe

support

for

the

1‐inch

pressure

relief

line

the

product

receipt

side

near

Tank

not

engaged

with

the

pipe.

CODE

REFERENCE:

NFPA

30,

paragraph

27.6.1,

“Piping

systems

shall

substantially

supported

and

protected

against

physical

damage

and

excessive

stresses

arising

from

settlement,

vibration,

expansion,

contraction.

The

installation

nonmetallic

piping

shall

accordance

with

the

manufacturer’s

instructions.”

(Also,

see

API

570‐7.5)

RECOMMENDATION:

Repair

the

pipe

support

for

the

1‐inch

pressure

relief

line

the

product

receipt

side

near

Tank

accordance

with

NFPA

30,

paragraph

27.6.1.

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

j. Product

Saver

Tank

OBSERVATION:

The

product

saver

tank

has

brass

check

valve.

Brass

considered

low

melting

point

material.

CODE

REFERENCE:

NFPA

30,

paragraph

27.4.3.2

RECOMMENDATION:

Replace

the

brass

check

valve

accordance

with

NFPA

30,

paragraph

27.4.3.2.

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

3. RECOMMENDED

REPAIRS

Fully

Comply

with

UFC

3‐460‐01

and

78‐24‐27

Standards

Part

Regular

Maintenance

Recommended

repairs

represent

items

that

should

addressed

timely

manner,

order

prevent

future

potential

risks

system

operators,

equipment

integrity,

the

adjacent

environment.

a. Coating

Failures

Tank

OBSERVATION:

Minor

coating

failure

was

noted

the

tank

shell,

appurtenances,

valves,

flanges

flex

connectors,

strainers,

filter

separators,

and

pumps.

CODE

REFERENCE:

RECOMMENDATION:

Abrasive

blast

and

recoat

areas

coating

failure

the

tank

shell,

appurtenances,

valves,

flanges

flex

connectors,

strainers,

filter

separators,

and

pumps.

Repairs

should

accomplished

using

epoxy

based

coating

system

equivalent.

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

APPENDIX A: ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS AND DATA

1. Remaining	Life	Calculation
2. Ultrasonic	Thickness	Data

InterSpec, LLC Rev.21505-2

12/6 2017

Tank #: 2 (LE 402) Plate Specification: Unknown T 55,000 Material: Y 30,000 Manufactured Date: 2002 Circa 23595

Horizontal 25960 Tank Specification Unit 0.80Y 0.429T Diameter (D) 10.500 feet Smaller of 24000 23595 Length (L) 35.000 feet Height (H) the two: 0.88Y 0.472T Volume (V) 20,073 gallon 26400 25960 S.G 0.88 N/A E 1 N/A *Smaller of Two specified minimum or 80,000(lb/in²) Y 15 years

Maximum Previous Current 2, 3 Minimum Next Next Product Allowable Measured Measured Acceptable Corrosion 1 Remaining VT UT Height Stress Joint Thickness Thickness Thickness Rate Life Inspection Inspection

Ft (psi) Efficiency (inches) (inches) (inches) (in./yr) (ca .) (years) (years) (feet) (S ) (E ) (t prev) (t act) (t min) (C r) (years) (I v) (I ut)

10.50 23,595 1 0.313 0.312 0.100 0.00001 >30 5 15

10.50 23,595 1 0.250 0.234 0.100 0.00107 >30 5 15

10.50 23,595 1 0.250 0.228 0.100 0.00147 >30 5 15

10.50 23,595 1 0.313 0.312 0.100 0.00001 >30 5 15

NOTE:

2 Acceptable roof thickness in any 100in. 2 shall not be less than 0.090 in 3 UL-142 Section 17.2.1 , 25.1, and 13.2.1 for Horz./Vertical and rectangular tanks <50,000 gal and >50,000 gal. API 653 Section 4.3.2.1, 4.3.4.1 and 4.4.1 VT and UT Intervals used are from API-653. See STI-SP001 Table 5.5 for inspection intervals for STI tanks.

Carbon Steel Specified minimum yield strength(lb/in ²)

North Head

Course Side

SConfiguration:

Specified minimum tensile strength *(lb/in²)

Shell Life Evaluation : Data Result

Owner/Operator: US Army AASF1 - Lexington; Lexington, OK

Inspection Date :

1 The engineering data used to calculate in-service period of operation (Remaining Life) assumes the tank remains in the same service and all corrosion rates remain constant.

All other

Maximum allowable stress, first and second (lb/in ²)

Maximum allowable stress, for all other (lb/in²)

Bottom and second course

Shell (West Face) South Head

Shell (East Face)

0.000

0.050

0.100

0.150

0.200

0.250

0.300

0.350

North Head Shell (East Face) Shell (West Face) South Head in ch es

Course #

Shell Life Evaluation tprev tact tmin

0.050

0.100

0.150

0.200

0.250

0.300

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 in ch es

Data Points

Shell (West Face)

0.050

0.100

0.150

0.200

0.250

0.300

0.350

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 in ch es

Data Points

South Head

0.050

0.100

0.150

0.200

0.250

0.300

0.350

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 in ch es

Data Points

North Head

0.050

0.100

0.150

0.200

0.250

0.300

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 in ch es

Data Points

Shell (East Face)

InterSpec,LLC Rev.21505-4 DATA Sheet: 1 Tank #:

1 0.332 1 0.239 1 0.237 1 0.327 2 0.332 2 0.241 2 0.240 2 0.328 3 0.331 3 0.241 3 0.228 3 0.329 4 0.331 4 0.241 4 0.252 4 0.328 5 0.329 5 0.240 5 0.256 5 0.329 6 0.331 6 0.241 6 0.254 6 0.328 7 0.329 7 0.238 7 0.253 7 0.330 8 0.332 8 0.235 8 0.254 8 0.329 9 0.331 9 0.237 9 0.254 9 0.330

10 0.331 10 0.237 10 0.254 10 0.330 11 0.332 11 0.239 11 0.250 11 0.330 12 0.332 12 0.234 12 0.235 12 0.329 13 0.332 13 0.238 13 0.237 13 0.330 14 0.332 14 0.237 14 0.237 14 0.330 15 0.331 15 0.236 15 0.238 15 0.328 16 0.331 16 0.256 16 0.237 16 0.330 17 0.329 17 0.255 17 0.237 17 0.329 18 0.331 18 0.253 18 0.241 18 0.332 19 0.333 19 0.255 19 0.238 19 0.331 20 0.333 20 0.254 20 0.237 20 0.334

Average 0.331 21 0.254 21 0.234 Average 0.330 Std.Dev. 0.001164158 22 0.253 22 0.241 Std.Dev. 0.001571958

23 0.256 23 0.233 24 0.235 24 0.246 25 0.237 25 0.235 26 0.239 26 0.235 27 0.242 27 0.242 28 0.240 28 0.244 29 0.239 29 0.246 30 0.236 30 0.234

Average 0.243 Average 0.242 Std.Dev. 0.007573092 Std.Dev. 0.007950204

2 (LE 402)

Owner/Operator:

North Head Shell (West Face) South HeadShell (East Face)

Tank Shell and Bottom/Roof/Heads UT Readings

US Army AASF1 - Lexington; Lexington, OK

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

APPENDIX B: ENGINEERING DRAWINGS

1. Tank	Layout	Drawing
2. Tank	Farm	Layout	Drawing

Q - 3" PlugK - 4" Electronic A.T.G.

L - 2" Clock Gauge with Audible Alarm M - 3" Plug N - 4" to 2" Product Return O - 36" Manway P - 6" to 4" Product Issue

F - 3" Plug G - 36" Manway with 2" Product Return and 1" Water Draw H - 3" Manual Gauge Well I - 3" Plug J - 10" Emergency Vent

A - 2" Leak Detection B - 3" Plug C - 10" Emergency Vent D - 6" to 4" Product Receipt E - 6" Primary Vent

Tank 2 Layout Tank 2 (LE402)

A.A.S.F. #1 Lexington; Lexington, OK

InterSpec, LLC.

12/6/2017 N/A N/A

-A

.S.F. #1 LEX

-LEX

N , O

-TA

N K

2-D

/2017Description:

Remarks/Legend:

Drawing Title:

Owner:

Drawn By:

Date: Rev. No.: Scale:

Modified By: InterSpec, LLC.

TER

SPEC

, LLC

-PR

IETA

ATIO

-FO

R O

FFIC

L U

SE O

AB C D

F G H I J

LMN O

P Q

Head 1 Head 2

Tank Farm Layout Tank Farm

A.A.S.F. #1 Lexington; Lexington, OK

InterSpec, LLC.

12/6/2017 N/A N/A

-A

.S.F. #1 LEX

-LEX

N , O

-TA

N K

M -D

/2017Description:

Remarks/Legend:

Drawing Title:

Owner:

Drawn By:

Date: Rev. No.: Scale:

Modified By: InterSpec, LLC.

TER

SPEC

, LLC

-PR

IETA

ATIO

-FO

R O

FFIC

L U

SE O

150'-0"

135'-0"

Cracks and Joint Sealant

Concrete Bollard

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

APPENDIX C: STI SP001 INSPECTION CHECKLIST

1. STI SP001 Inspection Checklist

There is minor cracking and joint seal deterioration

There is minor coating failure on the shell.

Appurtenance tages are coated

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

APPENDIX D: PHOTOGRAPHS

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

D.1: Tank Ground and Steel Saddle D.2: Steel Saddle

D.3: Head 1 D.4: Overall View

D.5: Nozzles A, B, and C D.6: Nozzles D and E

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

D.7: Flame Arrestor D.8: Flame Arrestor

D.9: Nozzle F D.10: Nozzle G

D.11: Water Draw Hand Pump D.12: Nozzle H

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

D.13: Nozzle I D.14: Nozzle J and K

D.15: Electronic ATG D.16: Nozzle L

D.17: Overfill Alarm D.18: Nozzle M

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

D.19: Nozzle M D.20: Nozzle N

D.21: Nozzles O, P, and Q D.22: Nozzles P and Q

D.23: Catwalk Access D.24: Catwalk

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

D.25: Catwalk Access D.26: Receipt Filter Separator

D.27: Receipt Piping D.28: Receipt Piping

D.29: Receipt Piping D.30: Receipt Piping

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

D.31: Receipt Piping D.32: Receipt Piping

D.33: Thread Engagement D.34: Overall View

D.35: Issue Piping D.36: Issue Piping

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

D.37: Issue Piping D.38: Issue Piping

D.39: Issue Piping D.40: Issue Piping

D.41: Issue Piping D.42: Issue Spill Bucket

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

D.43: Issue Piping D.44: Fuel Dripping

D.45: Leaking Sight Flow Indicator D.46: Electronic ATG House

D.47: Electronic ATG Alarm D.48: Electronic ATG Read Out

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

D.49: Electronic ATG Control Panel D.50: Facility Containment

D.51: Facility Containment D.52: Facility Containment

D.53: Facility Containment D.54: Facility Containment

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

D.55: Containment Sump D.56: Containment Sump

D.57: Remote Impounding D.58: Remote Impounding

D.59: Expansion Joint Deterioration D.60: Expansion Joint Deterioration

STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK

D.61: Vegetation D.62: Expansion Joint Deterioration

D.63: Expansion Joint Deterioration D.64: Containment Cracking

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Sep 22, 2023.