Attachment J -LEX-FY18-FAC LE401-Tank 1-FINAL.PDF
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- SP-POL-CMP-INSPECT-FY24-LEXINGTON OKLAHOMA
- Solicitation number
- W9128F23Q0103
About this file
This document contains an in-service inspection report for an aboveground storage tank (AST) located at the A.A.S.F. #1 Lexington fuel storage facility in Lexington, Oklahoma. The inspection was conducted in accordance with STI SP001 standards to evaluate the integrity of Tank 1, which has a capacity of 20,000 gallons and contains F24 jet fuel. Significant findings included coating failures, improper piping connections, vegetation growing in containment areas, and cracks in the secondary containment floor. The report provides details on the tank construction and components, presents ultrasonic test data and calculations for remaining shell life, and includes appendices with drawings, checklists, and photographs documenting issues found. Required repairs are specified to address safety hazards and compliance deficiencies regarding access, labeling, piping installation, and containment integrity. Recommended repairs are also outlined to prevent corrosion and facilitate future inspections.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment J-LEX-FY18-FAC LE402-Tank 2-FINAL.PDF | ||
| Attachment C - Tank Data Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W9128F23Q0103_Draft Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attachment H - STI External Inspection Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment B.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment A - General Installation Security Requirements.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment D - Monthly Contractors Progress Management and Status Report.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment J-LEX-FY18-FAC LE403-Tank 3-FINAL.PDF | ||
| Attachment J-LEX-FY18-FAC LE404-Tank 4-FINAL.PDF |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| US | Army | Corps | of | Engineers |
| Omaha | District |
| STI | SP001 | Formal | External | Inspection |
| Inspection | Report |
| A.A.S.F. | 1 | Lexington |
| Facility | LE401 |
Tank 1
| US | Army | Corps | of | Engineers | Center | of | Expertise | for | Petroleum, | Oils, | and | Lubricants |
| (USACE | POL‐MCX) |
12/6/2017
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| Table | of | Contents |
| ACRONYMS | AND | ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................ 3 |
GENERAL SUMMARY
STI SP001 INSPECTION DETERMINATION
INSPECTION DATE
STATE REGULATIONS
PREVIOUS INSPECTION DATES
RECOMMENDED FUTURE INSPECTION DATES
A. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
1. STI SP001 Inspection
2. Site Information
B. TANK INSPECTION COMMENTS
1. Tank Construction
2. Tank Foundation
3. Tank Appurtenances
4. Tank Coating
5. Tank Piping System
| The | tank | has | aboveground | 4‐inch | stainless | steel | receipt | piping | and | 4‐inch | aboveground | |||||||
| stainless | steel | issue | piping. | Tanks | 1, | 2, | 3, | and | 4 | share | the | same | issue | and | receipt | piping | system. |
6. Fire Protection System
7. Secondary Containment
C. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. MANDATORY REPAIRS per STI SP001, UFC 3‐460‐01, NFPA 30, or NFPA 30A
2. REQUIRED REPAIRS to Fully Comply with STI SP001 or Federal, State, and Local Codes . 12
| 3. RECOMMENDED | REPAIRS | to | Fully | Comply | with | UFC | 3‐460‐01 | and | AW | 78‐24‐27 |
| Standards | or | as | Part | of | Regular | Maintenance ................................................................................. 17 |
APPENDIX A: ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS AND DATA
APPENDIX B: ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
APPENDIX C: STI SP001 INSEPCTION CHECKLIST
APPENDIX D: PHOTOGRAPHS
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
API American Petroleum Institute
ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASNT American Society of Non‐Destructive Testing
ATG Automatic Tank Gauge
BBL Barrel
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CP Cathodic Protection
DFT Dry Film Thickness
HLA High Level Alarm
HLCS High Level Control Shut‐Off
HHLA High‐High Level Alarm
LLA Low Level Alarm
LLLA Low‐Low Level Alarm
MFL Magnetic Flux Leakage
MT Magnetic Particle Testing
NACE National Association of Corrosion Engineers
NDT Non‐Destructive Testing
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
PSI Pounds per Square Inch
PT Penetrant Testing
P/V Pressure/Vacuum
RP Recommended Practice
PST Product Saver Tank
RT Radiography Testing
STI Steel Tank Institute
TML Thickness Measurement Location
TRV Thermal Relief Valve
UFC Unified Facilities Criteria
UFGS Unified Facilities Guide Specifications
ULS Ultra Low Sulfur
UT Ultrasonic Testing
VT Visual Testing
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| GENERAL | SUMMARY | |||||||||||||||
| An | STI | SP001 | Formal | External | inspection | of | Tank | 1 | (Facility | LE401), | located | at | A.A.S.F. | 1 | Lexington, | |
| Oklahoma | was | completed | on | December | 6, | 2017 | to | evaluate | the | tank’s | integrity, | collect | data, | and | ||
| establish | a | database | for | future | inspections | and | evaluations. | A | service | life | evaluation | performed | on | |||
| the | tank | shows | it | as | having | greater | than | 30 | years | of | remaining | shell | life | under | current | conditions. |
| Significant | Findings: | ||||||||||
| The | existing | catwalk | does | not | allow | safe | access | to | all | tank | appurtenances. |
| There | is | no | NFPA | diamond | on | the | tank | or | entering | fuel | farm. |
| The | tank | appurtenances | are | not | labeled. | ||||||
| There | is | improper | thread | engagement | throughout | the | product | issue | and | receipt | piping |
system.
There is vegetation growing through deteriorated expansion joints in the fuel farm containment.
There are approximately 5oo feet of joint sealant deterioration in the facility containment
| expansion | joint. | |||||||||||||
| There | are | approximately | 135 | feet | of | cracks | on | the | facility | containment | floor. | |||
| Product | leaking/fuel | dripping | was | noted | on | the | 2‐inch | meter | control | valve | near | the | Tank | 4 |
| issue. | The | 1‐inch | TRV | and | sight | glass | on | the | sight | flow | indicator | are | dripping | on | the | product |
| return | line | near | Tank | 4. |
| The | pipe | support | for | the | 1‐inch | pressure | relief | line | on | the | product | receipt | side | near | Tank | 4 |
| is | not | engaged | with | the | pipe. |
| The | product | saver | tank | has | a | brass | check | valve. | |||||
| Minor | coating | failure | was | noted | on | the | tank | shell, | appurtenances, | valves, | flanges | of | flex |
connectors, strainers, filter separators, and pumps.
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| STI | SP001 | INSPECTION | DETERMINATION | |||||||||||||||
| STI | SP001 | classifies | tanks | into | three | categories. | A | tank | is | ranked | as | a | Category | 1, | 2, | or | 3 | depending |
| on | the | risk | a | tank | poses | to | the | environment. | Category | 1 | tanks | pose | the | least | amount | of | risk | and |
| Category | 3 | the | highest. | The | inspection | types | and | inspection | intervals | are | based | on | the | tank | size | and | ||
| tank | category. | The | risk | factors | include | spill | control, | release | prevention | barrier | (RPB), | continuous | ||||||
| release | detection | method | (CRDM), | and | tank | design | and | configuration | (see | definitions | below). |
| SPILL | CONTROL | ‐ | a | means | of | preventing | a | release | of | liquid | into | the | environment, | including |
| adjoining | property | and | waterways. | Spill | control | methods | include: | 1) | Remote | impounding; | ||||
| 2) | Secondary | containment | dike/berm; | 3) | Secondary | containment | AST; | and | 4) | Secondary | ||||
| containment | system. |
| CONTINUOUS | RELEASE | DETECTION | METHOD | (CRDM) | – | a | means | of | detecting | a | release | of | |
| liquid | through | inherent | design. | CRDM | is | passive | because | it | does | not | require | sensors | or |
| power | to | operate. | Liquid | releases | are | visually | detected | by | facility | operators. | The | system | |
| shall | be | designed | in | accordance | with | good | engineering | practice. | Several | acceptable | and | ||
| commonly | used | CRDM | systems | are | as | follows: | 1) | Release | prevention | barrier | (RPB); | 2) | |
| Secondary | containment | AST, | including | double‐wall | AST | or | double‐bottom | AST; | and | 3) | |||
| Elevated | AST, | with | or | without | release | prevention | barrier. |
| RELEASE | PREVENTION | BARRIER | (RPB) | – | a | liquid | containment | barrier | that | is | installed | |||||
| under | the | AST. | Its | purpose | is | to | divert | leaks | toward | the | perimeter | of | the | AST, | where | they |
| can | be | easily | detected, | as | well | as | to | prevent | liquid | from | contaminating | the | environment. | |||
| RPBs | are | composed | of | materials | compatible | with | the | liquid | stored | in | the | AST | and | meet | ||
| appropriate | engineering | standards. | Examples | are | steel | (as | in | steel | double‐bottom | tanks), | ||||||
| concrete, | elastomeric | liners, | or | other | suitable | materials, | provided | the | above | criteria | are |
met.
| OVERFILL | PREVENTION | ‐ | systems, | procedures, | or | devices | used | to | prevent | liquid | in | ASTs | |||
| from | running | over | or | spilling | out | of | the | AST | during | the | filling | process. | Having | a | person |
| physically | present | and | in | control | of | a | shutoff | device | during | the | entire | tank | filling | process | is |
| an | acceptable | procedure | to | achieve | overfill | protection. |
| Category | 1 | tanks | are | ASTs | with | spill | control, | with | CRDM, | and | with | overfill | prevention. |
| Category | 2 | tanks | are | ASTs | with | spill | control, | without | CRDM, | and | with | overfill | prevention. |
| Category | 3 | tanks | are | ASTs | without | spill | control, | without | CRDM, | and/or | without | overfill |
prevention.
Note: Any tank not having overfill prevention is classified as a Category 3 tank.
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
Table 1 shows some typical tank types and their corresponding AST categories.
Table 1: Tank Configuration and AST Category
Tank Configuration Tank has
CRDM
| Tank | has |
| Spill | Control? |
AST
Category
| Single | wall | AST | in | contact | with | ground no no | 3 |
| Single | wall | AST | in | contact | with | ground no yes | 2 |
| Elevated | tank | yes yes | 1 | ||||
| AST | with | RPB | yes yes | 1 | |||
| AST | with | double‐bottom | yes yes | 1 | |||
| Double‐wall | AST | with | overfill | prevention yes yes | 1 | ||
| Double‐wall | AST | without | overfill | prevention yes no | 3 | ||
| Vertical | tank | resting | on | concrete | (with | RPB) yes yes | 1 |
| Vertical | tank | resting | on | concrete | (with | RPB) yes no | 3 |
Table 2 shows the STI SP001 inspection guidance based on tank size and AST category.
Table 2: Table of Inspection Schedules
AST Type and Size (U.S. gallons) Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Shop‐ Fabricated ASTs
| 0 | – | 1100 | |||
| (0‐4164 | liters) | P | P | P, | E&L(10) |
| 1101 | ‐ | 5,000 |
| (4168‐18,927 | liters) |
| P | P, | E&L(10) | [P, | E&L(5), | I(10)] | or |
| [P, | L(2), | E(5)] |
5,001 ‐ 30,000 (18,931‐113,562 liters)
| P, | E(20) | |
| [P, | E(10), | I(20)] |
or [P, E(5), L(10)]
| [P, | E&L(5), | I(10)] | or |
| [P, | L(1), | E(5)] |
30,001 ‐ 50,000 (113,566‐189,271 liters)
P, E(20) P, E&L(5), I(15) P, E&L(5), I(10)
| P | – | Periodic | AST | inspection | ||||||||
| E | – | Formal | external | inspection | by | certified | inspector | |||||
| I | – | Formal | internal | inspection | by | certified | inspector | |||||
| L | – | Leak | test | by | owner | or | owner’s | designee | ||||
| ( | ) | indicates | maximum | inspection | interval | in | years. | For | example, | E(5) | indicates | formal |
| external | inspection | every | 5 | years. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| INSPECTION | DATE | ||||
| Inspection | Date: | 6 | December | 2017 | |
| Equipment | Used: | Ultrasonic | Thickness | Meter | |
| Manufacturer: | General | Electric | |||
| Model | Number: | DMS | II | ||
| Calibration | Method: | Two | Point | Calibration |
| STATE | REGULATIONS | |||||||
| State | Regulation | for | STI | In‐Service | Tank | Inspections | N/A | |
| State | Regulation | for | STI | Out‐of‐Service | Tank | Inspections | N/A |
| NOTE: | If | there | are | no | state | regulations | for | tank | inspections | then | N/A | shall | reside | in‐place | of | the |
| number | of | years | between | inspections. | If | state | regulations | reside, | the | recommended | future | |||||
| inspections | dates | shall | be | based | on | whichever | is | more | stringent | between | the | STI | inspector’s | |||
| calculations | and | the | State | regulations. |
| PREVIOUS | INSPECTION | DATES | ||
| Inspection | Date: | Unknown/Not | Provided |
| RECOMMENDED | FUTURE | INSPECTION | DATES | |||
| STI | Out‐of‐Service | (Internal) | Inspection | Date: | N/A | |
| STI | In‐Service | (External) | Inspection | Date: | December | 2022 |
Signature(s):
| Stephen | M. | Hollenzer, | STI | SP001# | 1607 |
| InterSpec, | LLC. |
Stephen M Hollenzer Steve Sig
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
GENERAL TANK INFORMATION
| ITEM | DESCRIPTION | ||||||
| Owner | U.S. | Army | |||||
| Location | A.A.S.F. | 1 | Lexington | ||||
| Facility | Number | LE401 | |||||
| Tank | Number | Tank | #1 | ||||
| State | / | Country | Oklahoma, | US | |||
| City | Lexington | ||||||
| Inspection | Date | December | 6, | 2017 | |||
| Tank | Manufacturer | Service | Welding | & | Machine | CO, | Inc. |
| Design | Standard | UL‐2085 | |||||
| Date | of | Construction | Circa | 2002 | |||
| Tank | Contents | F‐24 | Jet | Fuel | |||
| Tank | Serial | Number | 12360 | ||||
| Tank | Diameter | 10’ | 6” | ||||
| Tank | Length | 35’ | |||||
| Product | Height | 10,445 | gallons | ||||
| Tank | Capacity | 20,000 | gallons | ||||
| Tank | Foundation | Metallic | Saddles | ||||
| Tank | Construction | Horizontal | Cylinder, | Lap‐Welded | Courses | ||
| Interior | Coating | System | Unknown | ||||
| Exterior | Coating | System | Unknown |
| Level | Gauging | ||||
| Electronic | (Franklin | Fueling | Systems | TS‐550)/ | |
| Morrison | clock | gauge | with | audible | alarm |
Venting 10 in. primary emergency vent, 6 in. normal vent, 10 in. secondary emergency vent.
| Strapping | Charts | 1/8‐inch | Increments | ||||
| Piping | (Size | and | Material) | Receipt | 4‐inch | Stainless | Steel |
Issue 4‐inch Stainless Steel
Water Draw‐Off ¾‐inch Stainless Steel
Level Alarms Alarm
| Electronic (Franklin | Fueling | |
| systems | TS‐550) | Independent |
High‐ High
98% (10.29 ft.) None
| High | 95% | (9.975 | ft.) | None |
| Low | NA | None | ||
| Low‐Low | NA | None |
Secondary Containment Double‐Wall Tank
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
A. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
| 1. STI | SP001 | Inspection | ||||||||||||
| An | STI | SP001 | inspection | was | performed | on | the | tank | in | accordance | with | the | most | recent |
| version | of | STI | SP001. | Additional | consideration | is | given | to | federal, | state, | and | local | ||
| regulations, | as | well | as | any | applicable | military | criteria | and | general | industry | standards. |
| 2. Site | Information | ||||||
| A.A.S.F. | 1 | Lexington | is | located | in | Lexington, | OK. |
B. TANK INSPECTION COMMENTS
| 1. Tank | Construction | |||||||||||||
| Tank | 1 | (Facility | LE401) | is | a | nominal | 20,000 | gallon, | 10‐foot | 6‐inch | diameter | by | 35‐feet | |
| long, | aboveground | horizontal | cylindrical | fuel | tank | servicing | F‐24 | jet | fuel. | The | tank | is | ||
| constructed | to | the | UL‐2085 | standard. | Manufacturer | and | UL | data | plates | were | affixed | to | ||
| the | tank. | As‐built | drawings | of | the | original | construction | were | not | available | at | the | time | of |
| the | inspection. |
| 2. Tank | Foundation | |||||||||||||||
| The | tank | rests | on | two | steel | saddles | which | rest | on | a | concrete | pad. | The | steel | saddles | were |
| inspected | for | corrosion, | coating | failure, | and | adherence | to | the | STI | SP001 | and | UL‐2085 | ||||
| standards. | The | concrete | portion | of | the | foundation | was | inspected | for | broken | concrete, | |||||
| spalling, | cracks, | and | vegetation | growth | against | the | bottom | of | the | tank. |
3. Tank Appurtenances
a. Venting
| Normal | venting | allows | the | relief | of | excessive | internal | pressure | or | vacuum | ||||
| during | normal | storage | and | operations. | The | normal | vent | shall | be | at | least | as | ||
| large | as | the | largest | filling | or | withdrawal | connection | but | in | no | case, | shall | it | be |
| less | than | 1.25 | in. | (32 | mm) | nominal | inside | diameter. | The | tank | is | vented | for | |
| normal | operation | via | a | 6‐inch | vent | with | a | flame | arrestor. | The | tank | has | a | 4‐ |
| inch | receipt | line | from | the | truck | fill | stand. | The | vent | is | adequately | sized | in | |
| accordance | with | NFPA | 30 | and | API | Standard | 2000. |
| b. Emergency | Venting | ||||||||||||||
| The | tank | is | equipped | with | two | 10‐inch | Morrison | Bros. | 244 | series | emergency | ||||
| vents | (one | for | the | inner | tank | and | one | for | the | annular | space). | The | vent | has | a |
| listed | venting | capacity | of | 808,350 | CFM. | The | tank | manufacturer | requires | ||||||
| 498,600 | CFM | of | emergency | venting | capacity | on | the | inner | tank. | The | tank | ||||
| manufacturer | requires | 517,200 | CFM | of | emergency | venting | capacity | on | the | ||||||
| annular | space. | Therefore, | the | emergency | venting | capacity | is | satisfactory | for | ||||||
| this | tank. | The | emergency | vent | was | inspected | for | coating | failure | and | freedom | ||||
| of | movement. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
c. Manways The tank has two 36‐inch manholes located on the top of the tank.
| d. Water | Draw‐Off | ||||||||||
| The | tank | has | a | water | draw‐off | line | with | a | hand | crank | pump. |
| e. High | Level | Shut‐Off | Valve | ||||||||
| The | tank | has | a | solenoid | controlled | high | level | shut | off | valve | (Cla‐Valve |
model).
| f. Level | Alarms | |||||||||||
| The | tank | high, | high‐high, | low, | and | low‐low | level | alarms | are | provided | by | the |
| Franklin | Fueling | systems. |
g. Gauging
| The | tank | is | electronically | gauged | via | the | Franklin | Fueling | systems. | The | tank |
| has | a | Morrison | mechanical | fuel | level | gauge. |
h. Pumps
| Product | is | received | and | issued | via | trucks | and | to | dispensers. | The | centrifugal |
| pump | was | checked | for | leakage | and | proper | protection | from | moving | parts. |
| i. Stairs | and | Platforms | ||||||||||||
| A | ladder | is | located | adjacent | to | the | tank | to | access | the | top | of | the | tank. |
| Platforms, | grating, | and | railings | were | inspected | for | coating | failure | and | |||||
| adherence | to | OSHA | standards. | The | ladder | and | catwalk | are | in | satisfactory |
condition.
| j. Cathodic | Protection | ||||||||||||
| The | tank | is | not | in | contact | with | the | ground, | and | cathodic | protection | is | not |
required.
| k. Grounding | and | Bonding | ||||||||||
| The | tank | is | grounded | via | a | grounding | cable | and | is | in | satisfactory | condition. |
| 4. Tank | Coating | |||||||||||
| The | tank | shell | and | appurtenances | are | coated. | The | coating | was | evaluated | for | disbonding, |
| adhesion, | deterioration, | and | discoloration. | The | tank | shell | and | appurtenances | have | |||
| minor | coating | failure | present. |
| 5. Tank | Piping | System | |||||||||||||||
| The | tank | has | aboveground | 4‐inch | stainless | steel | receipt | piping | and | 4‐inch | aboveground | ||||||
| stainless | steel | issue | piping. | Tanks | 1, | 2, | 3, | and | 4 | share | the | same | issue | and | receipt | piping |
system.
| 6. Fire | Protection | System | |||
| The | fire | department | provides | fire | protection. |
| 7. Secondary | Containment | |||||||||||||
| 40 | CFR | 112.7(c) | states | that | the | entire | secondary | containment | system, | “including | walls | |||
| and | floor, | must | be | capable | of | containing | oil | and | must | be | constructed | so | that | any |
| discharge | from | a | primary | containment | system | ... | will | not | escape | containment | before | |||
| cleanup | occurs.” | 40 | CFR | 112.8(c)(2) | and | 40 | CFR | 112.12(c)(2) | state | that | diked | areas |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| must | be | “sufficiently | impervious | to | contain | oil.” | The | purpose | of | the | secondary | ||||
| containment | requirement | is | to | prevent | discharges, | as | described | in | 40 | CFR | 112.1(b); | ||||
| therefore, | effective | secondary | containment | methods | must | be | able | to | contain | oil | until | the | |||
| oil | is | cleaned | up. | The | tank | is | a | double‐walled | tank | which | is | a | fully | enclosed | metallic |
| secondary | containment | structure. | The | secondary | containment | is | of | sufficient | size | to | |||||
| contain | a | total | tank | loss | per | UFC | 3‐460‐1, | Section | 8‐14.2.1. | The | entire | tank | rests | on | |
| metallic | beams | on | a | concrete | pad | to | allow | water | to | drain | away | from | the | tank | in |
| accordance | with | NFPA | 30. | ||||||||||||
| The | tank | farm | has | a | truck | fill/offload | containment. | The | dimensions | are | 135 | feet | by | 150 | |
| feet. | It | is | equipped | with | a | sump | that | leads | to | a | remote | impounding | tank. | The | remote |
| impounding | tank | was | in | the | closed | position | during | the | inspection. | There | is | ||||
| approximately | 500 | feet | of | joint | seal | deterioration | and | 135 | feet | of | containment | cracking. |
| C. FINDINGS | AND | RECOMMENDATIONS | |||||||||
| The | following | information | identifies | the | significant | findings | found | during | the | tank | inspection: |
| 1. MANDATORY | REPAIRS | per | STI | SP001, | UFC | 3‐460‐01, | NFPA | 30, | or | NFPA | 30A | |
| Mandatory | repairs | represent | items | that | require | immediate | attention, | in | order | to | ||
| prevent | imminent | risk | to | system | operators, | equipment | integrity, | or | the | adjacent | ||
| environment. | The | tank | should | remain | out | of | service | until | these | repairs | are | completed. |
a. None.
2. REQUIRED REPAIRS to Fully Comply with STI SP001 or Federal, State, and Local Codes
| Recommended | repairs | represent | items | that | should | be | addressed | in | a | timely | manner, | in |
| order | to | prevent | future | potential | risks | to | system | operators, | equipment | integrity, | or | the |
| adjacent | environment. | These | items | may | be | required | by | federal, | state, | and | local | codes. |
| a. The | Catwalk | does | not | Allow | Safe | Access | to | All | Tank | Appurtenances | |
| OBSERVATION: | The | existing | catwalk | does | not | allow | safe | access | to | all | tank |
appurtenances.
| CODE | REFERENCE: | UFC | 3‐460‐01 | Table | 8.1 | (j). | ||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Extend | the | existing | catwalk | to | run | the | length | of | the | tank | to |
| allow | safe | access | to | all | tank | appurtenances. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| b. NFPA | Labeling | ||||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | tank | does | have | a | DOT | label, | but | the | tank | does | not | have | a | NFPA |
| label | affixed | to | the | tank. | |||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30 | and | NFPA | 704. | |||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | a | NFPA | 704 | diamond | label. |
| c. Appurtenance | Labeling | ||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | tank | does | not | have | proper | labeling | on | each | tank | appurtenance. | ||
| Some | of | the | labeling | has | been | painted | over | or | has | deteriorated | due | to | weather. |
| CODE | REFERENCE: | UL‐142(4.8.1.1). | |||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | labels | on | all | tank | appurtenances | in | accordance | with | UL‐ |
142.
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| d. Thread | Engagement | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | product | receipt | piping | system | and | issue | piping | system | have | ||
| improper | thread | engagement | and | several | loose | bolts | without | washers | on | flanged | ||
| connections | throughout | the | system. | |||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | ASME | B31 | (335.2.3). | ||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Check | and | refasten | hardware | and | install | washers | on | the | entire | ||
| product | receipt | piping | system | and | issue | piping | system | in | accordance | with | ASME | B31. |
| e. Vegetation | in | Facility | Containment | ||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | piping | containment | has | minor | vegetation | growth | coming | through |
| the | joint | seals | in | various | locations. | ||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 21.6.6.3. | ||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Remove | the | vegetation | in | accordance | with | NFPA | 30, | paragraph |
21.6.6.
| f. Facility | Containment | Expansion | Joint | Sealant | |||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | There | are | approximately | 500 | feet | of | joint | seal | deterioration. | ||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | 40 | CFR | 112.7(c) | states | that | the | entire | secondary | containment | |||
| system | “including | walls | and | floor, | must | be | capable | of | containing | oil | and | must | be |
| constructed | so | that | any | discharge | from | a | primary | containment | system | ... | will | not | |
| escape | containment | before | cleanup | occurs.” | 40 | CFR | 112.8(c)(2) | and | 40 | CFR | |||
| 112.12(c)(2) | state | that | diked | areas | must | be | “sufficiently | impervious | to | contain | oil.” | ||
| The | purpose | of | the | secondary | containment | requirement | is | to | prevent | discharges | as |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| described | in | 40 | CFR | 112.1(b); | therefore, | effective | secondary | containment | methods | |||||||
| must | be | able | to | contain | oil | until | the | oil | is | cleaned | up. | |||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Remove | the | damaged | joint | sealant | and | install | new | backer | rods | ||||||
| and | sealant | within | the | containment. | The | sealant | shall | be | adequate | to | accommodate | |||||
| joint | compression | equal | to | 50 | percent | of | the | width | of | the | joint. | The | backer | rod | shall | be |
| compressible | rod | stock | of | polyethylene | foam, | polyurethane | foam, | butyl | rubber | foam, | ||||||
| or | other | flexible, | non‐absorptive | material | as | recommended | by | the | sealant | |||||||
| manufacturer. | The | sealant | shall | conform | to | UFGS | 07 | 92 | 00 | Joint | Sealant | (Quantity: | ||||
| 500 | linear | feet). |
| g. Facility | Containment | Floor | Cracks | ||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | There | are | approximately | 135 | feet | of | cracks | on | the | facility | containment |
floor.
| CODE | REFERENCE: | 40 | CFR | 112.7(c) | states | that | the | entire | secondary | containment | ||||||
| system | “including | walls | and | floor, | must | be | capable | of | containing | oil | and | must | be | |||
| constructed | so | that | any | discharge | from | a | primary | containment | system | ... | will | not | ||||
| escape | containment | before | cleanup | occurs.” | 40 | CFR | 112.8(c)(2) | and | 40 | CFR | ||||||
| 112.12(c)(2) | state | that | diked | areas | must | be | “sufficiently | impervious | to | contain | oil.” | |||||
| The | purpose | of | the | secondary | containment | requirement | is | to | prevent | discharges | as | |||||
| described | in | 40 | CFR | 112.1(b); | therefore, | effective | secondary | containment | methods | |||||||
| must | be | able | to | contain | oil | until | the | oil | is | cleaned | up. | |||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Repair | all | exposed | cracks | in | the | containment | floor | by | grinding | in | a | ||||
| V‐shape | pattern, | with | at | least | ¼‐inch | width | at | the | surface | and | a | depth | of | at | least | ¼‐ |
| inch | and | sealing | with | flexible | urethane | (e.g. | Sikaflex | 1c) | or | a | similar | approved | sealant. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| h. | Leaking/Fuel | Dripping | at | Truck | Fill | Stand | |||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | Leaking/fuel | dripping | was | noted | on | the | 2‐inch | meter | control | valve | |||||
| near | Tank | 4 | issue. | The | 1‐inch | TRV | and | sight | glass | on | the | sight | flow | indicator | are |
| dripping | on | the | product | return | line | near | Tank | 4. | |||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 27.3.2. | ||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | All | sight | flow | indicators | within | pressure | relief | piping | shall | be | |||||
| removed | and | replaced | with | flanged | spool | pieces. |
| i. Pipe | Support | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | pipe | support | for | the | 1‐inch | pressure | relief | line | on | the | product |
| receipt | side | near | Tank | 4 | is | not | engaged | with | the | pipe. | ||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 27.6.1, | “Piping | systems | shall | be | substantially | ||
| supported | and | protected | against | physical | damage | and | excessive | stresses | arising | from | ||
| settlement, | vibration, | expansion, | or | contraction. | The | installation | of | nonmetallic | piping | |||
| shall | be | in | accordance | with | the | manufacturer’s | instructions.” | (Also, | see | API | 570‐7.5) | |
| RECOMMENDATION: | Repair | the | pipe | support | for | the | 1‐inch | pressure | relief | line | on | the |
| product | receipt | side | near | Tank | 4 | in | accordance | with | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 27.6.1. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| j. Product | Saver | Tank | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | product | saver | tank | has | a | brass | check | valve. | Brass | is | considered | a |
| low | melting | point | material. | ||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 27.4.3.2 | ||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Replace | the | brass | check | valve | in | accordance | with | NFPA | 30, | |||
| paragraph | 27.4.3.2. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| 3. RECOMMENDED | REPAIRS | to | Fully | Comply | with | UFC | 3‐460‐01 | and | AW | 78‐24‐27 | ||
| Standards | or | as | Part | of | Regular | Maintenance | ||||||
| Recommended | repairs | represent | items | that | should | be | addressed | in | a | timely | manner, | in |
| order | to | prevent | future | potential | risks | to | system | operators, | equipment | integrity, | or | the |
| adjacent | environment. |
| a. | Coating | Failures | on | Tank | |||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | Minor | coating | failure | was | noted | on | the | tank | shell, | appurtenances, | |||||||
| valves, | flanges | of | flex | connectors, | strainers, | filter | separators, | and | pumps. | ||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NA | |||||||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Abrasive | blast | and | recoat | areas | of | coating | failure | on | the | tank | shell, | |||||
| appurtenances, | valves, | flanges | of | flex | connectors, | strainers, | filter | separators, | and | ||||||||
| pumps.. | Repairs | should | be | accomplished | using | an | epoxy | based | coating | system | or |
equivalent.
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
APPENDIX A: ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS AND DATA
| 1. Remaining | Life | Calculation |
| 2. Ultrasonic | Thickness | Data |
InterSpec, LLC Rev.21505-2
12/6 2017
Tank #: 1 (LE 401) Plate Specification: Unknown T 55,000 Material: Y 30,000 Manufactured Date: 2002 Circa 23595
Horizontal 25960 Tank Specification Unit 0.80Y 0.429T Diameter (D) 10.500 feet Smaller of 24000 23595 Length (L) 35.000 feet Height (H) the two: 0.88Y 0.472T Volume (V) 20,073 gallon 26400 25960 S.G 0.88 N/A E 1 N/A *Smaller of Two specified minimum or 80,000(lb/in²) Y 15 years
Maximum Previous Current 2, 3 Minimum Next Next Product Allowable Measured Measured Acceptable Corrosion 1 Remaining VT UT Height Stress Joint Thickness Thickness Thickness Rate Life Inspection Inspection
Ft (psi) Efficiency (inches) (inches) (inches) (in./yr) (ca .) (years) (years) (feet) (S ) (E ) (t prev) (t act) (t min) (C r) (years) (I v) (I ut)
10.50 23,595 1 0.313 0.312 0.100 0.00001 >30 5 15
10.50 23,595 1 0.250 0.234 0.100 0.00107 >30 5 15
10.50 23,595 1 0.250 0.232 0.100 0.00120 >30 5 15
10.50 23,595 1 0.313 0.312 0.100 0.00001 >30 5 15
NOTE:
2 Acceptable roof thickness in any 100in. 2 shall not be less than 0.090 in 3 UL-142 Section 17.2.1 , 25.1, and 13.2.1 for Horz./Vertical and rectangular tanks <50,000 gal and >50,000 gal. API 653 Section 4.3.2.1, 4.3.4.1 and 4.4.1 VT and UT Intervals used are from API-653. See STI-SP001 Table 5.5 for inspection intervals for STI tanks.
Carbon Steel Specified minimum yield strength(lb/in ²)
North Head
Course Side
SConfiguration:
Specified minimum tensile strength *(lb/in²)
Shell Life Evaluation : Data Result
Owner/Operator: US Army AASF1 - Lexington; Lexington, OK
Inspection Date :
1 The engineering data used to calculate in-service period of operation (Remaining Life) assumes the tank remains in the same service and all corrosion rates remain constant.
All other
Maximum allowable stress, first and second (lb/in ²)
Maximum allowable stress, for all other (lb/in²)
Bottom and second course
Shell (West Face) South Head
Shell (East Face)
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.350
North Head Shell (East Face) Shell (West Face) South Head in ch es
Course #
Shell Life Evaluation tprev tact tmin
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 in ch es
Data Points
Shell (West Face)
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.350
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 in ch es
Data Points
South Head
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.350
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 in ch es
Data Points
North Head
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 in ch es
Data Points
Shell (East Face)
InterSpec,LLC Rev.21505-4 DATA Sheet: 1 Tank #:
1 0.322 1 0.240 1 0.236 1 0.326 2 0.326 2 0.240 2 0.240 2 0.328 3 0.325 3 0.241 3 0.237 3 0.328 4 0.328 4 0.240 4 0.234 4 0.325 5 0.326 5 0.242 5 0.232 5 0.324 6 0.325 6 0.239 6 0.241 6 0.326 7 0.327 7 0.243 7 0.244 7 0.323 8 0.325 8 0.241 8 0.241 8 0.326 9 0.327 9 0.242 9 0.242 9 0.327
10 0.323 10 0.240 10 0.243 10 0.326 11 0.325 11 0.239 11 0.243 11 0.325 12 0.326 12 0.241 12 0.243 12 0.326 13 0.326 13 0.242 13 0.239 13 0.324 14 0.326 14 0.245 14 0.242 14 0.325 15 0.325 15 0.244 15 0.242 15 0.324 16 0.326 16 0.240 16 0.241 16 0.324 17 0.326 17 0.242 17 0.241 17 0.324 18 0.325 18 0.237 18 0.241 18 0.324 19 0.326 19 0.237 19 0.239 19 0.321 20 0.327 20 0.238 20 0.237 20 0.322
Average 0.326 21 0.237 21 0.240 Average 0.325 Std.Dev. 0.001353358 22 0.234 22 0.234 Std.Dev. 0.001803505
23 0.244 23 0.238 24 0.247 24 0.232 25 0.247 25 0.242 26 0.237 26 0.234 27 0.238 27 0.247 28 0.241 28 0.237 29 0.238 29 0.237 30 0.235 30 0.244
Average 0.240 Average 0.239 Std.Dev. 0.003167544 Std.Dev. 0.00377545
1 (LE 401)
Owner/Operator:
North Head Shell (West Face) South HeadShell (East Face)
Tank Shell and Bottom/Roof/Heads UT Readings
US Army AASF1 - Lexington; Lexington, OK
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
APPENDIX B: ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
| 1. Tank | Layout | Drawing | |
| 2. Tank | Farm | Layout | Drawing |
Q - 3" PlugK - 4" Electronic A.T.G.
L - 2" Clock Gauge with Audible Alarm M - 3" Plug N - 4" to 2" Product Return O - 36" Manway P - 6" to 4" Product Issue
F - 3" Plug G - 36" Manway with 2" Product Return and 1" Water Draw H - 3" Manual Gauge Well I - 3" Plug J - 10" Emergency Vent
A - 2" Leak Detection B - 3" Plug C - 10" Emergency Vent D - 6" to 4" Product Receipt E - 6" Primary Vent
Tank 1 Layout Tank 1 (LE401)
A.A.S.F. #1 Lexington; Lexington, OK
InterSpec, LLC.
12/6/2017 N/A N/A
ER
-A
.A
.S.F. #1 LEX
IN
G
TO
N
-LEX
IN
G
TO
N , O
K
-TA
N K
1-D
EC
EM
B
ER
/2017Description:
Remarks/Legend:
Drawing Title:
Owner:
Drawn By:
Date: Rev. No.: Scale:
Modified By: InterSpec, LLC.
IN
TER
SPEC
, LLC
-PR
O
PR
IETA
RY
IN
FO
R
M
ATIO
N
-FO
R O
FFIC
IA
L U
SE O
N
LY
AB C D
E
F G H I J
K
LMN O
P Q
Head 1 Head 2
Tank Farm Layout Tank Farm
A.A.S.F. #1 Lexington; Lexington, OK
InterSpec, LLC.
12/6/2017 N/A N/A
ER
-A
.A
.S.F. #1 LEX
IN
G
TO
N
-LEX
IN
G
TO
N , O
K
-TA
N K
FA
R
M -D
EC
EM
B
ER
/2017Description:
Remarks/Legend:
Drawing Title:
Owner:
Drawn By:
Date: Rev. No.: Scale:
Modified By: InterSpec, LLC.
IN
TER
SPEC
, LLC
-PR
O
PR
IETA
RY
IN
FO
R
M
ATIO
N
-FO
R O
FFIC
IA
L U
SE O
N
LY
150'-0"
135'-0"
Cracks and Joint Sealant
Concrete Bollard
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
APPENDIX C: STI SP001 INSPECTION CHECKLIST
1. STI SP001 INSPECTION CHECKLIST
There is minor coating failure on the shell.
Improper thread engagement
Worn labels and painted signage
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
APPENDIX D: PHOTOGRAPHS
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.1: Tank Ground and Steel Saddle D.2: Steel Saddle
D.3: Head 1 D.4: Overall View
D.5: Nozzles A, B, and C D.6: Nozzles D and E
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.7: Flame Arrestor D.8: Flame Arrestor
D.9: Nozzles F, G, and H D.10: Water Draw
D.11: Water Draw Hand Pump D.12: Nozzle H
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.13: Nozzle I D.14: Nozzle J and K
D.15: Electronic ATG D.16: Nozzle L
D.17: Overfill Alarm D.18: Nozzle M
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.19: Nozzles M, N, and O D.20: Nozzles N, O, and P
D.21: Nozzles O, P, and Q D.22: Nozzles P and Q
D.23: Catwalk Access D.24: Catwalk
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.25: Catwalk Access D.26: Receipt Filter Separator
D.27: Receipt Piping D.28: Receipt Piping
D.29: Receipt Piping D.30: Receipt Piping
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.31: Receipt Piping D.32: Receipt Piping
D.33: Thread Engagement D.34: Overall View
D.35: Issue Piping D.36: Issue Piping
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.37: Issue Piping D.38: Issue Piping
D.39: Issue Piping D.40: Issue Piping
D.41: Issue Piping D.42: Issue Spill Bucket
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.43: Issue Piping D.44: Fuel Dripping
D.45: Leaking Sight Flow Indicator D.46: Electronic ATG House
D.47: Electronic ATG Alarm D.48: Electronic ATG Read Out
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.49: Electronic ATG Control Panel D.50: Facility Containment
D.51: Facility Containment D.52: Facility Containment
D.53: Facility Containment D.54: Facility Containment
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.55: Containment Sump D.56: Containment Sump
D.57: Remote Impounding D.58: Remote Impounding
D.59: Expansion Joint Deterioration D.60: Expansion Joint Deterioration
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.61: Vegetation D.62: Expansion Joint Deterioration
D.63: Expansion Joint Deterioration D.64: Containment Cracking
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .