Attachment J-LEX-FY18-FAC LE403-Tank 3-FINAL.PDF
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- SP-POL-CMP-INSPECT-FY24-LEXINGTON OKLAHOMA
- Solicitation number
- W9128F23Q0103
About this file
This document summarizes an inspection report for an aboveground storage tank (AST) located at the A.A.S.F. #1 Lexington fuel facility in Lexington, Oklahoma. The inspection was conducted in accordance with STI SP001 standards to evaluate tank integrity and establish a database for future inspections. Key findings included the need to extend the catwalk for safe appurtenance access, add NFPA and equipment labeling, address piping system thread engagement and leaks, and repair the secondary containment which showed 500 feet of joint seal deterioration and 135 feet of cracks. The report provides engineering data on tank specifications, ultrasonic thickness readings, and calculates remaining shell life is greater than 30 years if conditions remain unchanged. It also identifies mandatory, required and recommended repairs grouped by priority level and includes photographs documenting issues.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation for SP-POL-CMP-INSPECT-FY24-LEXINGTON OKLAHOMA to conduct inspections and repairs at the above facility, indicating the inspection report is being used to inform future work requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment J-LEX-FY18-FAC LE402-Tank 2-FINAL.PDF | ||
| Attachment C - Tank Data Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W9128F23Q0103_Draft Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attachment J -LEX-FY18-FAC LE401-Tank 1-FINAL.PDF | ||
| Attachment H - STI External Inspection Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment B.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment A - General Installation Security Requirements.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment D - Monthly Contractors Progress Management and Status Report.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment J-LEX-FY18-FAC LE404-Tank 4-FINAL.PDF |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| US | Army | Corps | of | Engineers |
| Omaha | District |
| STI | SP001 | Formal | External | Inspection |
| Inspection | Report |
| AASF | 1 | Lexington |
| Facility | LE403 |
Tank 3
| US | Army | Corps | of | Engineers | Center | of | Expertise | for | Petroleum, | Oils, | and | Lubricants |
| (USACE | POL‐MCX) |
12/6/2017
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| Table | of | Contents |
| ACRONYMS | AND | ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................ 3 |
GENERAL SUMMARY
STI SP001 INSPECTION DETERMINATION
INSPECTION DATE
STATE REGULATIONS
PREVIOUS INSPECTION DATES
RECOMMENDED FUTURE INSPECTION DATES
A. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
1. STI SP001 Inspection
2. Site Information
B. TANK INSPECTION COMMENTS
1. Tank Construction
2. Tank Foundation
3. Tank Appurtenances
4. Tank Coating
5. Tank Piping System
| The | tank | has | aboveground | 4‐inch | stainless | steel | receipt | piping | and | 4‐inch | aboveground | ||||||
| stainless | steel | issue | piping. | Tanks | 1, | 2, | 3, | and | 4 | share | the | same | issue | and | receipt | piping | system. |
6. Fire Protection System
7. Secondary Containment
C. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. MANDATORY REPAIRS per STI SP001, UFC 3‐460‐01, NFPA 30, or NFPA 30A
2. REQUIRED REPAIRS to Fully Comply with STI SP001 or Federal, State, and Local Codes . 12
| 3. RECOMMENDED | REPAIRS | to | Fully | Comply | with | UFC | 3‐460‐01 | and | AW | 78‐24‐27 |
| Standards | or | as | Part | of | Regular | Maintenance ................................................................................. 17 |
APPENDIX A: ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS AND DATA
APPENDIX B: ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
APPENDIX C: STI SP001 INSEPCTION CHECKLIST
APPENDIX D: PHOTOGRAPHS
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
API American Petroleum Institute
ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASNT American Society of Non‐Destructive Testing
ATG Automatic Tank Gauge
BBL Barrel
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CP Cathodic Protection
DFT Dry Film Thickness
HLA High Level Alarm
HLCS High Level Control Shut‐Off
HHLA High‐High Level Alarm
LLA Low Level Alarm
LLLA Low‐Low Level Alarm
MFL Magnetic Flux Leakage
MT Magnetic Particle Testing
NACE National Association of Corrosion Engineers
NDT Non‐Destructive Testing
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
PSI Pounds per Square Inch
PT Penetrant Testing
P/V Pressure/Vacuum
RP Recommended Practice
PST Product Saver Tank
RT Radiography Testing
STI Steel Tank Institute
TML Thickness Measurement Location
TRV Thermal Relief Valve
UFC Unified Facilities Criteria
UFGS Unified Facilities Guide Specifications
ULS Ultra Low Sulfur
UT Ultrasonic Testing
VT Visual Testing
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| GENERAL | SUMMARY | |||||||||||||||
| An | STI | SP001 | Formal | External | inspection | of | Tank | 3 | (Facility | LE403), | located | at | A.A.S.F. | 1 | Lexington, | |
| Oklahoma | was | completed | on | December | 6, | 2017 | to | evaluate | the | tank’s | integrity, | collect | data, | and | ||
| establish | a | database | for | future | inspections | and | evaluations. | A | service | life | evaluation | performed | on | |||
| the | tank | shows | it | as | having | greater | than | 30 | years | of | remaining | shell | life | under | current | conditions. |
| Significant | Findings: | ||||||||||
| The | existing | catwalk | does | not | allow | safe | access | to | all | tank | appurtenances. |
| There | is | no | NFPA | diamond | on | the | tank | or | entering | fuel | farm. |
| The | tank | appurtenances | are | not | labeled. | ||||||
| There | is | improper | thread | engagement | throughout | the | product | issue | and | receipt | piping |
system.
There is vegetation growing through deteriorated expansion joints in the fuel farm containment.
There are approximately 5oo feet of joint sealant deterioration in the facility containment
| expansion | joint. | |||||||||||||
| There | are | approximately | 135 | feet | of | cracks | on | the | facility | containment | floor. | |||
| Product | leaking/fuel | dripping | was | noted | on | the | 2‐inch | meter | control | valve | near | the | Tank | 4 |
| issue. | The | 1‐inch | TRV | and | sight | glass | on | the | sight | flow | indicator | are | dripping | on | the | product |
| return | line | near | Tank | 4. |
| The | pipe | support | for | the | 1‐inch | pressure | relief | line | on | the | product | receipt | side | near | Tank | 4 |
| is | not | engaged | with | the | pipe. |
| The | audible | alarm | for | the | Morrison | Bros. | clock | gauge | does | not | work. | ||
| The | product | saver | tank | has | a | brass | check | valve. | |||||
| Minor | coating | failure | was | noted | on | the | tank | shell, | appurtenances, | valves, | flanges | of | flex |
connectors, strainers, filter separators, and pumps.
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| STI | SP001 | INSPECTION | DETERMINATION | |||||||||||||||
| STI | SP001 | classifies | tanks | into | three | categories. | A | tank | is | ranked | as | a | Category | 1, | 2, | or | 3 | depending |
| on | the | risk | a | tank | poses | to | the | environment. | Category | 1 | tanks | pose | the | least | amount | of | risk | and |
| Category | 3 | the | highest. | The | inspection | types | and | inspection | intervals | are | based | on | the | tank | size | and | ||
| tank | category. | The | risk | factors | include | spill | control, | release | prevention | barrier | (RPB), | continuous | ||||||
| release | detection | method | (CRDM), | and | tank | design | and | configuration | (see | definitions | below). |
| SPILL | CONTROL | ‐ | a | means | of | preventing | a | release | of | liquid | into | the | environment, | including |
| adjoining | property | and | waterways. | Spill | control | methods | include: | 1) | Remote | impounding; | ||||
| 2) | Secondary | containment | dike/berm; | 3) | Secondary | containment | AST; | and | 4) | Secondary | ||||
| containment | system. |
| CONTINUOUS | RELEASE | DETECTION | METHOD | (CRDM) | – | a | means | of | detecting | a | release | of | |
| liquid | through | inherent | design. | CRDM | is | passive | because | it | does | not | require | sensors | or |
| power | to | operate. | Liquid | releases | are | visually | detected | by | facility | operators. | The | system | |
| shall | be | designed | in | accordance | with | good | engineering | practice. | Several | acceptable | and | ||
| commonly | used | CRDM | systems | are | as | follows: | 1) | Release | prevention | barrier | (RPB); | 2) | |
| Secondary | containment | AST, | including | double‐wall | AST | or | double‐bottom | AST; | and | 3) | |||
| Elevated | AST, | with | or | without | release | prevention | barrier. |
| RELEASE | PREVENTION | BARRIER | (RPB) | – | a | liquid | containment | barrier | that | is | installed | |||||
| under | the | AST. | Its | purpose | is | to | divert | leaks | toward | the | perimeter | of | the | AST, | where | they |
| can | be | easily | detected, | as | well | as | to | prevent | liquid | from | contaminating | the | environment. | |||
| RPBs | are | composed | of | materials | compatible | with | the | liquid | stored | in | the | AST | and | meet | ||
| appropriate | engineering | standards. | Examples | are | steel | (as | in | steel | double‐bottom | tanks), | ||||||
| concrete, | elastomeric | liners, | or | other | suitable | materials, | provided | the | above | criteria | are |
met.
| OVERFILL | PREVENTION | ‐ | systems, | procedures, | or | devices | used | to | prevent | liquid | in | ASTs | |||
| from | running | over | or | spilling | out | of | the | AST | during | the | filling | process. | Having | a | person |
| physically | present | and | in | control | of | a | shutoff | device | during | the | entire | tank | filling | process | is |
| an | acceptable | procedure | to | achieve | overfill | protection. |
| Category | 1 | tanks | are | ASTs | with | spill | control, | with | CRDM, | and | with | overfill | prevention. |
| Category | 2 | tanks | are | ASTs | with | spill | control, | without | CRDM, | and | with | overfill | prevention. |
| Category | 3 | tanks | are | ASTs | without | spill | control, | without | CRDM, | and/or | without | overfill |
prevention.
Note: Any tank not having overfill prevention is classified as a Category 3 tank.
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
Table 1 shows some typical tank types and their corresponding AST categories.
Table 1: Tank Configuration and AST Category
Tank Configuration Tank has
CRDM
| Tank | has |
| Spill | Control? |
AST
Category
| Single | wall | AST | in | contact | with | ground | no | no | 3 |
| Single | wall | AST | in | contact | with | ground | no | yes | 2 |
| Elevated | tank | yes | yes | 1 | |||||
| AST | with | RPB | yes | yes | 1 | ||||
| AST | with | double‐bottom | yes | yes | 1 | ||||
| Double‐wall | AST | with | overfill | prevention | yes | yes | 1 | ||
| Double‐wall | AST | without | overfill | prevention | yes | no | 3 | ||
| Vertical | tank | resting | on | concrete | (with | RPB) | yes | yes | 1 |
| Vertical | tank | resting | on | concrete | (with | RPB) | yes | no | 3 |
Table 2 shows the STI SP001 inspection guidance based on tank size and AST category.
Table 2: Table of Inspection Schedules
AST Type and Size (U.S. gallons) Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Shop‐ Fabricated ASTs
| 0 | – | 1100 | |||
| (0‐4164 | liters) | P | P | P, | E&L(10) |
| 1101 | ‐ | 5,000 | ||||||
| (4168‐18,927 | liters) | P | P, | E&L(10) | [P, | E&L(5), | I(10)] | or |
| [P, | L(2), | E(5)] |
| 5,001 | ‐ | 30,000 |
(18,931‐113,562 liters)
| P, | E(20) | |
| [P, | E(10), | I(20)] |
or [P, E(5), L(10)]
| [P, | E&L(5), | I(10)] | or |
| [P, | L(1), | E(5)] |
30,001 ‐ 50,000 (113,566‐189,271 liters)
P, E(20) P, E&L(5), I(15) P, E&L(5), I(10)
| P | – | Periodic | AST | inspection | ||||||||
| E | – | Formal | external | inspection | by | certified | inspector | |||||
| I | – | Formal | internal | inspection | by | certified | inspector | |||||
| L | – | Leak | test | by | owner | or | owner’s | designee | ||||
| ( | ) | indicates | maximum | inspection | interval | in | years. | For | example, | E(5) | indicates | formal |
| external | inspection | every | 5 | years. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| INSPECTION | DATE | ||||
| Inspection | Date: | 6 | December | 2017 | |
| Equipment | Used: | Ultrasonic | Thickness | Meter | |
| Manufacturer: | General | Electric | |||
| Model | Number: | DMS | II | ||
| Calibration | Method: | Two | Point | Calibration |
| STATE | REGULATIONS | |||||||
| State | Regulation | for | STI | In‐Service | Tank | Inspections | N/A | |
| State | Regulation | for | STI | Out‐of‐Service | Tank | Inspections | N/A |
| NOTE: | If | there | are | no | state | regulations | for | tank | inspections | then | N/A | shall | reside | in‐place | of | the |
| number | of | years | between | inspections. | If | state | regulations | reside, | the | recommended | future | |||||
| inspections | dates | shall | be | based | on | whichever | is | more | stringent | between | the | STI | inspector’s | |||
| calculations | and | the | State | regulations. |
| PREVIOUS | INSPECTION | DATES | ||
| Inspection | Date: | Unknown/Not | Provided |
| RECOMMENDED | FUTURE | INSPECTION | DATES | |||
| STI | Out‐of‐Service | (Internal) | Inspection | Date: | N/A | |
| STI | In‐Service | (External) | Inspection | Date: | December | 2022 |
Signature(s):
| Stephen | M. | Hollenzer, | STI | SP001# | 1607 |
| InterSpec, | LLC. |
Jack Steve
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
GENERAL TANK INFORMATION
| ITEM | DESCRIPTION | ||||||
| Owner | U.S. | Army | |||||
| Location | A.A.S.F. | 1 | Lexington | ||||
| Facility | Number | LE403 | |||||
| Tank | Number | Tank | #3 | ||||
| State | / | Country | Oklahoma, | US | |||
| City | Lexington | ||||||
| Inspection | Date | December | 6, | 2017 | |||
| Tank | Manufacturer | Service | Welding | & | Machine | CO, | Inc. |
| Design | Standard | UL‐2085 | |||||
| Date | of | Construction | Circa | 2002 | |||
| Tank | Contents | F‐24 | Jet | Fuel | |||
| Tank | Serial | Number | 12363 | ||||
| Tank | Diameter | 10’ | 6” | ||||
| Tank | Length | 35’ | |||||
| Product | Height | 10,445 | gallons | ||||
| Tank | Capacity | 20,000 | gallons | ||||
| Tank | Foundation | Metallic | Saddles | ||||
| Tank | Construction | Horizontal | Cylinder, | Lap‐Welded | Courses | ||
| Interior | Coating | System | Unknown | ||||
| Exterior | Coating | System | Unknown |
| Level | Gauging | ||||
| Electronic | (Franklin | Fueling | Systems | TS‐550)/ | |
| Morrison | clock | gauge | with | audible | alarm |
Venting 10 in. primary emergency vent, 6 in. normal vent, 10 in. secondary emergency vent.
| Strapping | Charts | 1/8‐inch | increments | ||||
| Piping | (Size | and | Material) | Receipt | 4‐inch | Stainless | Steel |
Issue 4‐inch Stainless Steel
Water Draw‐Off ¾‐inch Stainless Steel
Level Alarms Alarm
| Electronic | (Franklin | Fueling |
| systems | TS‐550) | Independent |
High‐ High 98% (10.29 ft.) None
| High | 95% | (9.975 | ft.) |
| Low | NA | None | |
| Low‐Low | NA | None |
Secondary Containment Double‐Wall Tank
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
A. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
| 1. STI | SP001 | Inspection | ||||||||||||
| An | STI | SP001 | inspection | was | performed | on | the | tank | in | accordance | with | the | most | recent |
| version | of | STI | SP001. | Additional | consideration | is | given | to | federal, | state, | and | local | ||
| regulations, | as | well | as | any | applicable | military | criteria | and | general | industry | standards. |
| 2. Site | Information | |||||
| A.A.S.F.1 | Lexington | is | located | in | Lexington, | OK. |
B. TANK INSPECTION COMMENTS
| 1. Tank | Construction | |||||||||||||
| Tank | 3 | (Facility | LE403) | is | a | nominal | 20,000 | gallon, | 10‐foot | 6‐inch | diameter | by | 35‐feet | |
| long, | aboveground | horizontal | cylindrical | fuel | tank | servicing | F‐24 | jet | fuel. | The | tank | is | ||
| constructed | to | the | UL‐2085 | standard. | Manufacturer | and | UL | data | plates | were | affixed | to | ||
| the | tank. | As‐built | drawings | of | the | original | construction | were | not | available | at | the | time | of |
| the | inspection. |
| 2. Tank | Foundation | |||||||||||||||
| The | tank | rests | on | two | steel | saddles | which | rest | on | a | concrete | pad. | The | steel | saddles | were |
| inspected | for | corrosion, | coating | failure, | and | adherence | to | the | STI | SP001 | and | UL‐142 | ||||
| standards. | The | concrete | portion | of | the | foundation | was | inspected | for | broken | concrete, | |||||
| spalling, | cracks, | and | vegetation | growth | against | the | bottom | of | the | tank. |
3. Tank Appurtenances
a. Venting
| Normal | venting | allows | the | relief | of | excessive | internal | pressure | or | vacuum | ||||
| during | normal | storage | and | operations. | The | normal | vent | shall | be | at | least | as | ||
| large | as | the | largest | filling | or | withdrawal | connection | but | in | no | case, | shall | it | be |
| less | than | 1.25 | in. | (32 | mm) | nominal | inside | diameter. | The | tank | is | vented | for | |
| normal | operation | via | a | 6‐inch | vent | with | a | flame | arrestor. | The | tank | has | a | 4‐ |
| inch | receipt | line | from | the | truck | fill | stand. | The | vent | is | adequately | sized | in | |
| accordance | with | NFPA | 30 | and | API | Standard | 2000. |
| b. Emergency | Venting | ||||||||||||||
| The | tank | is | equipped | with | two | 10‐inch | Morrison | Bros. | 244 | series | emergency | ||||
| vents | (one | for | the | inner | tank | and | one | for | the | annular | space). | The | vent | has | a |
| listed | venting | capacity | of | 808,350 | CFM. | The | tank | manufacturer | requires | ||||||
| 498,600 | CFM | of | emergency | venting | capacity | on | the | inner | tank. | The | tank | ||||
| manufacturer | requires | 517,200 | CFM | of | emergency | venting | capacity | on | the | ||||||
| annular | space. | Therefore, | the | emergency | venting | capacity | is | satisfactory | for | ||||||
| this | tank. | The | emergency | vent | was | inspected | for | coating | failure | and | freedom | ||||
| of | movement. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
c. Manways The tank has two 36‐inch manholes located on the top of the tank.
| d. Water | Draw‐Off | ||||||||||
| The | tank | has | a | water‐draw | off | line | with | a | hand | crank | pump. |
| e. High | Level | Shut‐Off | Valve | ||||||||
| The | tank | has | a | solenoid | controlled | high | level | shut | off | valve | (Cla‐Valve |
model).
| f. Level | Alarms | |||||||||||
| The | tank | high, | high‐high, | low, | and | low‐low | level | alarms | are | provided | by | the |
| Franklin | Fueling | systems. |
g. Gauging
| The | tank | is | electronically | gauged | via | the | Franklin | Fueling | systems. | The | tank |
| has | a | Morrison | mechanical | fuel | level | gauge. |
h. Pumps
| Product | is | received | and | issued | via | trucks | and | to | dispensers. | The | centrifugal |
| pump | was | checked | for | leakage | and | proper | protection | from | moving | parts. |
| i. Stairs | and | Platforms | ||||||||||||
| A | ladder | is | located | adjacent | to | the | tank | to | access | the | top | of | the | tank. |
| Platforms, | grating, | and | railings | were | inspected | for | coating | failure | and | |||||
| adherence | to | OSHA | standards. | The | ladder | and | catwalk | are | in | satisfactory |
condition.
| j. Cathodic | Protection | ||||||||||||
| The | tank | is | not | in | contact | with | the | ground, | and | cathodic | protection | is | not |
required.
| k. Grounding | and | Bonding | ||||||||||
| The | tank | is | grounded | via | a | grounding | cable | and | is | in | satisfactory | condition. |
| 4. Tank | Coating | |||||||||||
| The | tank | shell | and | appurtenances | are | coated. | The | coating | was | evaluated | for | disbonding, |
| adhesion, | deterioration, | and | discoloration. | The | tank | shell | and | appurtenances | have | |||
| minor | coating | failure | present. |
| 5. Tank | Piping | System | ||||||||||||||
| The | tank | has | aboveground | 4‐inch | stainless | steel | receipt | piping | and | 4‐inch | aboveground | |||||
| stainless | steel | issue | piping. | Tanks | 1, | 2, | 3, | and | 4 | share | the | same | issue | and | receipt | piping |
system.
| 6. Fire | Protection | System | |||
| The | fire | department | provides | fire | protection. |
| 7. Secondary | Containment | |||||||||||||
| 40 | CFR | 112.7(c) | states | that | the | entire | secondary | containment | system, | “including | walls | |||
| and | floor, | must | be | capable | of | containing | oil | and | must | be | constructed | so | that | any |
| discharge | from | a | primary | containment | system | ... | will | not | escape | containment | before |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| cleanup | occurs.” | 40 | CFR | 112.8(c)(2) | and | 40 | CFR | 112.12(c)(2) | state | that | diked | areas | ||||
| must | be | “sufficiently | impervious | to | contain | oil.” | The | purpose | of | the | secondary | |||||
| containment | requirement | is | to | prevent | discharges, | as | described | in | 40 | CFR | 112.1(b); | |||||
| therefore, | effective | secondary | containment | methods | must | be | able | to | contain | oil | until | the | ||||
| oil | is | cleaned | up. | The | tank | is | a | double‐walled | tank | which | is | a | fully | enclosed | metallic | |
| secondary | containment | structure. | The | secondary | containment | is | of | sufficient | size | to | ||||||
| contain | a | total | tank | loss | per | UFC | 3‐460‐1, | Section | 8‐14.2.1. | The | entire | tank | rests | on | ||
| metallic | beams | on | a | concrete | pad | to | allow | water | to | drain | away | from | the | tank | in | |
| accordance | with | NFPA | 30. | |||||||||||||
| The | tank | farm | has | a | truck | fill/offload | containment. | The | dimensions | are | 135 | feet | by | 150 | ||
| feet. | It | is | equipped | with | a | sump | that | leads | to | an | oily | water | separator. | The | oily | water |
| separator | was | in | the | closed | position | during | the | inspection. | There | is | approximately | 500 | ||||
| feet | of | joint | seal | deterioration | and | 135 | feet | of | containment | cracking. |
| C. FINDINGS | AND | RECOMMENDATIONS | |||||||||
| The | following | information | identifies | the | significant | findings | found | during | the | tank | inspection: |
| 1. MANDATORY | REPAIRS | per | STI | SP001, | UFC | 3‐460‐01, | NFPA | 30, | or | NFPA | 30A | |
| Mandatory | repairs | represent | items | that | require | immediate | attention, | in | order | to | ||
| prevent | imminent | risk | to | system | operators, | equipment | integrity, | or | the | adjacent | ||
| environment. | The | tank | should | remain | out | of | service | until | these | repairs | are | completed. |
a. None.
2. REQUIRED REPAIRS to Fully Comply with STI SP001 or Federal, State, and Local Codes
| Recommended | repairs | represent | items | that | should | be | addressed | in | a | timely | manner, | in |
| order | to | prevent | future | potential | risks | to | system | operators, | equipment | integrity, | or | the |
| adjacent | environment. | These | items | may | be | required | by | federal, | state, | and | local | codes. |
| a. The | Catwalk | does | not | Allow | Safe | Access | to | All | Tank | Appurtenances | |
| OBSERVATION: | The | existing | catwalk | does | not | allow | safe | access | to | all | tank |
appurtenances.
| CODE | REFERENCE: | UFC | 3‐460‐01 | Table | 8.1 | (j). | ||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Extend | the | existing | catwalk | to | run | the | length | of | the | tank | to |
| allow | safe | access | to | all | tank | appurtenances. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| b. NFPA | Labeling | ||||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | tank | does | have | a | DOT | label, | but | the | tank | does | not | have | a | NFPA |
| label | affixed | to | the | tank. | |||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30 | and | NFPA | 704. | |||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | a | NFPA | 704 | diamond | label. |
| c. Appurtenance | Labeling | ||||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | tank | does | not | have | proper | labeling | on | each | tank | appurtenance. | ||
| Some | of | the | labeling | has | been | painted | over | or | has | deteriorated | due | to | weather. |
| CODE | REFERENCE: | UL‐142(4.8.1.1). | |||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Install | labels | on | all | tank | appurtenances | in | accordance | with | UL‐ |
142.
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| d. Thread | Engagement | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | product | receipt | piping | system | and | issue | piping | system | have | ||
| improper | thread | engagement | and | several | loose | bolts | without | washers | on | flanged | ||
| connections | throughout | the | system. | |||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | ASME | B31 | (335.2.3). | ||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Check | and | refasten | the | hardware | and | install | washers | on | the | entire | |
| product | receipt | piping | system | and | issue | piping | system | in | accordance | with | ASME | B31. |
| e. Vegetation | in | Facility | Containment | ||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | piping | containment | has | minor | vegetation | growth | coming | through |
| the | joint | seals | in | various | locations. | ||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 21.6.6.3. | ||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Remove | the | vegetation | in | accordance | with | NFPA | 30, | paragraph |
21.6.6.
| f. Facility | Containment | Expansion | Joint | Sealant | |||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | There | is | approximately | 500 | feet | of | joint | seal | deterioration. | ||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | 40 | CFR | 112.7(c) | states | that | the | entire | secondary | containment | |||
| system | “including | walls | and | floor, | must | be | capable | of | containing | oil | and | must | be |
| constructed | so | that | any | discharge | from | a | primary | containment | system | ... | will | not | |
| escape | containment | before | cleanup | occurs.” | 40 | CFR | 112.8(c)(2) | and | 40 | CFR | |||
| 112.12(c)(2) | state | that | diked | areas | must | be | “sufficiently | impervious | to | contain | oil.” | ||
| The | purpose | of | the | secondary | containment | requirement | is | to | prevent | discharges | as | ||
| described | in | 40 | CFR | 112.1(b); | therefore, | effective | secondary | containment | methods | ||||
| must | be | able | to | contain | oil | until | the | oil | is | cleaned | up. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| RECOMMENDATION: | Remove | the | damaged | joint | sealant | and | install | new | backer | rods | ||||||
| and | sealant | within | the | containment. | The | sealant | shall | be | adequate | to | accommodate | |||||
| joint | compression | equal | to | 50 | percent | of | the | width | of | the | joint. | The | backer | rod | shall | be |
| compressible | rod | stock | of | polyethylene | foam, | polyurethane | foam, | butyl | rubber | foam, | ||||||
| or | other | flexible, | non‐absorptive | material | as | recommended | by | the | sealant | |||||||
| manufacturer. | The | sealant | shall | conform | to | UFGS | 07 | 92 | 00 | Joint | Sealant | (Quantity: | ||||
| 500 | linear | feet). |
| g. Facility | Containment | Floor | Cracks | ||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | There | is | approximately | 135 | feet | of | cracks | on | the | facility | containment |
floor.
| CODE | REFERENCE: | 40 | CFR | 112.7(c) | states | that | the | entire | secondary | containment | ||||||
| system | “including | walls | and | floor, | must | be | capable | of | containing | oil | and | must | be | |||
| constructed | so | that | any | discharge | from | a | primary | containment | system | ... | will | not | ||||
| escape | containment | before | cleanup | occurs.” | 40 | CFR | 112.8(c)(2) | and | 40 | CFR | ||||||
| 112.12(c)(2) | state | that | diked | areas | must | be | “sufficiently | impervious | to | contain | oil.” | |||||
| The | purpose | of | the | secondary | containment | requirement | is | to | prevent | discharges | as | |||||
| described | in | 40 | CFR | 112.1(b); | therefore, | effective | secondary | containment | methods | |||||||
| must | be | able | to | contain | oil | until | the | oil | is | cleaned | up. | |||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Repair | all | exposed | cracks | in | the | containment | floor | by | grinding | in | a | ||||
| V‐shape | pattern, | with | at | least | ¼‐inch | width | at | the | surface | and | a | depth | of | at | least | ¼‐ |
| inch | and | sealing | with | flexible | urethane | (e.g. | Sikaflex | 1c) | or | a | similar | approved | sealant. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| h. | Leaking/Fuel | Dripping | at | Truck | Fill | Stand | ||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | Leaking/fuel | dripping | was | noted | on | the | 2‐inch | meter | control | valve | ||||||
| near | the | Tank | 4 | issue. | The | 1‐inch | TRV | and | sight | glass | on | the | sight | flow | indicator | are |
| dripping | on | the | product | return | line | near | Tank | 4. | ||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 27.3.2. | |||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | All | sight | flow | indicators | within | pressure | relief | piping | shall | be | ||||||
| removed | and | replaced | with | flanged | spool | pieces. |
| i. Pipe | Support | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | pipe | support | for | the | 1‐inch | pressure | relief | line | on | the | product |
| receipt | side | near | Tank | 4 | is | not | engaged | with | the | pipe. | ||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 27.6.1, | “Piping | systems | shall | be | substantially | ||
| supported | and | protected | against | physical | damage | and | excessive | stresses | arising | from | ||
| settlement, | vibration, | expansion, | or | contraction. | The | installation | of | nonmetallic | piping | |||
| shall | be | in | accordance | with | the | manufacturer’s | instructions.” | (Also, | see | API | 570‐7.5) | |
| RECOMMENDATION: | Repair | the | pipe | support | for | the | 1‐inch | pressure | relief | line | on | the |
| product | receipt | side | near | Tank | 4 | in | accordance | with | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 27.6.1. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| j. Morrison | Bros. | Clock | Gauge | Overfill | Alarm | |||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | Morrison | Bros. | clock | gauge | is | equipped | with | an | audible | alarm. | The |
| alarm | battery | is | dead, | or | the | alarm | is | not | working | |||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 22.11.4.5 | |||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Repair | the | Morrison | Bros. | audible | alarm | in | accordance | with | NFPA | ||
| 30, | paragraph | 22.11.4.5. |
| k. Product | Saver | Tank | |||||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | The | product | saver | tank | has | a | brass | check | valve. | Brass | is | considered | a |
| low | melting | point | material. | ||||||||||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NFPA | 30, | paragraph | 27.4.3.2 | ||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Replace | the | brass | check | valve | in | accordance | with | NFPA | 30, | |||
| paragraph | 27.4.3.2. |
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
| 3. RECOMMENDED | REPAIRS | to | Fully | Comply | with | UFC | 3‐460‐01 | and | AW | 78‐24‐27 | ||
| Standards | or | as | Part | of | Regular | Maintenance | ||||||
| Recommended | repairs | represent | items | that | should | be | addressed | in | a | timely | manner, | in |
| order | to | prevent | future | potential | risks | to | system | operators, | equipment | integrity, | or | the |
| adjacent | environment. |
| a. Coating | Failures | on | Tank | |||||||||
| OBSERVATION: | Minor | coating | failure | was | noted | on | the | tank | shell, | appurtenances, | ||
| valves, | flanges | of | flex | connectors, | strainers, | filter | separators, | and | pumps. | |||
| CODE | REFERENCE: | NA | ||||||||||
| RECOMMENDATION: | Abrasive | blast | and | recoat | areas | of | coating | failure | on | the | tank | shell, |
| appurtenances, | valves, | flanges | of | flex | connectors, | strainers, | filter | separators, | and | |||
| pumps.. | Repairs | should | be | accomplished | using | an | epoxy | based | coating | system | or |
equivalent.
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
APPENDIX A: ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS AND DATA
| 1. Remaining | Life | Calculation |
| 2. Ultrasonic | Thickness | Data |
InterSpec, LLC Rev.21505-2
12/6 2017
Tank #: 4 (LE 403) Plate Specification: Unknown T 55,000 Material: Y 30,000 Manufactured Date: 2002 Circa 23595
Horizontal 25960 Tank Specification Unit 0.80Y 0.429T Diameter (D) 10.500 feet Smaller of 24000 23595 Length (L) 35.000 feet Height (H) the two: 0.88Y 0.472T Volume (V) 20,073 gallon 26400 25960 S.G 0.88 N/A E 1 N/A *Smaller of Two specified minimum or 80,000(lb/in²) Y 15 years
Maximum Previous Current 2, 3 Minimum Next Next Product Allowable Measured Measured Acceptable Corrosion 1 Remaining VT UT Height Stress Joint Thickness Thickness Thickness Rate Life Inspection Inspection
Ft (psi) Efficiency (inches) (inches) (inches) (in./yr) (ca .) (years) (years) (feet) (S ) (E ) (t prev) (t act) (t min) (C r) (years) (I v) (I ut)
10.50 23,595 1 0.313 0.312 0.100 0.00001 >30 5 15
10.50 23,595 1 0.250 0.233 0.100 0.00113 >30 5 15
10.50 23,595 1 0.250 0.233 0.100 0.00113 >30 5 15
10.50 23,595 1 0.313 0.312 0.100 0.00001 >30 5 15
NOTE:
2 Acceptable roof thickness in any 100in. 2 shall not be less than 0.090 in 3 UL-142 Section 17.2.1 , 25.1, and 13.2.1 for Horz./Vertical and rectangular tanks <50,000 gal and >50,000 gal. API 653 Section 4.3.2.1, 4.3.4.1 and 4.4.1 VT and UT Intervals used are from API-653. See STI-SP001 Table 5.5 for inspection intervals for STI tanks.
1 The engineering data used to calculate in-service period of operation (Remaining Life) assumes the tank remains in the same service and all corrosion rates remain constant.
All other
Maximum allowable stress, first and second (lb/in ²)
Maximum allowable stress, for all other (lb/in²)
Bottom and second course
Shell (West Face) South Head
Shell (East Face)
Specified minimum tensile strength *(lb/in²)
Shell Life Evaluation : Data Result
Owner/Operator: US Army AASF1 - Lexington; Lexington, OK
Inspection Date :
Carbon Steel Specified minimum yield strength(lb/in ²)
North Head
Course Side
SConfiguration:
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.350
North Head Shell (East Face) Shell (West Face) South Head in ch es
Course #
Shell Life Evaluation tprev tact tmin
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 in ch es
Data Points
Shell (West Face)
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.350
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 in ch es
Data Points
South Head
0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 0.300 0.350 0.400
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 in ch es
Data Points
North Head
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 in ch es
Data Points
Shell (East Face)
InterSpec,LLC Rev.21505-4 DATA Sheet: 1 Tank #:
1 0.340 1 0.241 1 0.241 1 0.330 2 0.342 2 0.242 2 0.242 2 0.328 3 0.340 3 0.241 3 0.239 3 0.332 4 0.342 4 0.241 4 0.236 4 0.330 5 0.341 5 0.243 5 0.241 5 0.330 6 0.340 6 0.239 6 0.240 6 0.330 7 0.341 7 0.240 7 0.239 7 0.330 8 0.341 8 0.236 8 0.243 8 0.333 9 0.341 9 0.240 9 0.242 9 0.330
10 0.342 10 0.239 10 0.240 10 0.332 11 0.343 11 0.241 11 0.240 11 0.330 12 0.343 12 0.241 12 0.243 12 0.332 13 0.341 13 0.241 13 0.244 13 0.331 14 0.343 14 0.240 14 0.245 14 0.332 15 0.343 15 0.241 15 0.245 15 0.332 16 0.343 16 0.233 16 0.244 16 0.331 17 0.341 17 0.241 17 0.243 17 0.331 18 0.341 18 0.242 18 0.242 18 0.327 19 0.340 19 0.244 19 0.249 19 0.331 20 0.340 20 0.246 20 0.243 20 0.332
Average 0.341 21 0.242 21 0.247 Average 0.331 Std.Dev. 0.001142481 22 0.243 22 0.243 Std.Dev. 0.001454575
23 0.244 23 0.240 24 0.239 24 0.241 25 0.243 25 0.247 26 0.241 26 0.236 27 0.241 27 0.246 28 0.240 28 0.238 29 0.239 29 0.236 30 0.238 30 0.233
Average 0.241 Average 0.242 Std.Dev. 0.002448551 Std.Dev. 0.003635078
4 (LE 403)
Owner/Operator:
North Head Shell (West Face) South HeadShell (East Face)
Tank Shell and Bottom/Roof/Heads UT Readings
US Army AASF1 - Lexington; Lexington, OK
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
APPENDIX B: ENGINEERING DRAWINGS
| 1. Tank | Layout | Drawing | |
| 2. Tank | Farm | Layout | Drawing |
Q - 3" PlugK - 4" Electronic A.T.G.
L - 2" Clock Gauge with Audible Alarm M - 3" Plug N - 4" to 2" Product Return O - 36" Manway P - 6" to 4" Product Issue
F - 3" Plug G - 36" Manway with 2" Product Return and 1" Water Draw H - 3" Manual Gauge Well I - 3" Plug J - 10" Emergency Vent
A - 2" Leak Detection B - 3" Plug C - 10" Emergency Vent D - 6" to 4" Product Receipt E - 6" Primary Vent
Tank 3 (LE403)
A.A.S.F. #1 Lexington; Lexington, OK
InterSpec, LLC.
12/6/2017 N/A N/A
ER
-A
.A
.S.F. #1 LEX
IN
G
TO
N
-LEX
IN
G
TO
N , O
K
-TA
N K
3-D
EC
EM
B
ER
/2017Description:
Remarks/Legend:
Drawing Title:
Owner:
Drawn By:
Date: Rev. No.: Scale:
Modified By: InterSpec, LLC.
IN
TER
SPEC
, LLC
-PR
O
PR
IETA
RY
IN
FO
R
M
ATIO
N
-FO
R O
FFIC
IA
L U
SE O
N
LY
AB C D
E
F G H I J
K
LMN O
P Q
Head 1 Head 2
Tank 3 Layout
Tank Farm Layout Tank Farm
A.A.S.F. #1 Lexington; Lexington, OK
InterSpec, LLC.
12/6/2017 N/A N/A
ER
-A
.A
.S.F. #1 LEX
IN
G
TO
N
-LEX
IN
G
TO
N , O
K
-TA
N K
FA
R
M -D
EC
EM
B
ER
/2017Description:
Remarks/Legend:
Drawing Title:
Owner:
Drawn By:
Date: Rev. No.: Scale:
Modified By: InterSpec, LLC.
IN
TER
SPEC
, LLC
-PR
O
PR
IETA
RY
IN
FO
R
M
ATIO
N
-FO
R O
FFIC
IA
L U
SE O
N
LY
150'-0"
135'-0"
Cracks and Joint Sealant
Concrete Bollard
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
APPENDIX C: STI SP001 INSPECTION CHECKLIST
1. STI SP001 INSPECTION CHECKLIST
STI SP001 Inspection Checklist
(*) designates an item in a non-conformance status. This indicates that action is required to address a problem.
The STI monthly, annular, and formal checklists were combined into one checklist.
Item/Task Status Comments
1.0 TANK CONTAINMENT
1.1 Containment Structure
a. Check for:
Holes or cracks in containment wall or floor Washout Liner degradation Corrosion Leakage Paint failure Tank settling Water Debris Fire hazards
☐ Yes* ☐ No ☐ N/A
1.2 Primary Tank
a. Check for water. ☐ Yes* ☐ No ☐ N/A
1.3 Containment Drain Valves
a. Operable and in a closed position ☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
1.4 Pathways and Entry
a. Clear and gates/doors operable ☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
2.0 LEAK DETECTION
2.1 Tank
a. Visible signs of leakage ☐ Yes* ☐ No ☐ N/A
2.2 Secondary Containment
a. Visible signs of leakage from tank into secondary containment ☐ Yes* ☐ No ☐ N/A
2.3 Surrounding Soil
2.4 Interstice
3.0 TANK FOUNDATION and SUPPORTS
3.1 Foundation
a. Settlement or foundation washout? ☐ Yes* ☐ No ☐ N/A
3.2 Concrete Pad or Ring Wall
a. Cracking or spalling? ☐ Yes* ☐ No ☐ N/A
3.3 Supports
a. Check for corrosion, paint failure, etc.
3.4 Water Drainage
a. Water drains away from tank? ☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
3.5 Tank Grounding
a. Strap secured and in good condition?
☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
4.0 CATHODIC PROTECTION
4.1 Gavlvanic Cathodic Protection System
a. Confirm system is functional, includes the wire connections for galvanic systems
☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
4.2 Impressed current system
a. Inspect the operational components
(power switch, meters, and alarms).
b. Record hour meter, ammeter and voltmeter readings.
5.0 TANK SHELL, HEADS, ROOF
5.1 Coating
a. Check for coating failure ☐ Yes* ☐ No ☐ N/A
5.2 Steel Condition
Check for:
Dents Buckling Bulging Corrosion Cracking
5.3 Roof Slope
a. Check for low points and standing water
6.0 TANK EQUIPMENT
6.1 Vents
a. Verify that components are moving freely and vent passageways are not obstructed for:
Emergency vent covers Pressure/vacuum vent poppets Other moving vent components
6.2 Valves
a. Check the condition of all valves for leaks, corrosion and damage.
b. Tank drain valves must be kept locked.
6.3.1 Anti-Siphon, Check and Gate Valves
a. Cycle the valve open and closed and check for proper operation.
6.3.2 Pressure Regulator Valve
a. Check for proper operation. (Note that there may be small, 1/4 inch drain plugs in the bottom of the valve that are not visible by looking from above only)
☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
6.3.3 Expansion Relief Valve
a. Check that the valve is in the proper orientation. (Note that fuel must be discharged back to the tank via a separate pipe or tubing.)
☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
6.3.4 Solenoid Valves
a. Cycle power to valve to check operation.
(Electrical solenoids can be verified by listening to the plunger opening and closing. If no audible confirmation, the valve should be inspected for the presence and operation of the plunger.)
☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
6.3.5 Fire and Shear Valves
a. Manually cycle the valve to ensure components are moving freely and that the valve handle or lever has clearance to allow valve to close completely.
☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
b. Valves must not be wired in open position.
c. Make sure fusible element is in place and correctly positioned.
d. Be sure test ports are sealed with plug after testing is complete and no temporary test fixture or component remains connected to valve.
☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
6.3 Interstitial Leak Detection Equipment
a. Check condition of equipment, including:
The window is clean and clear in sight leak gauges.
The wire connections of electronic gauges for tightness and corrosion
Activate the test button, if applicable.
☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
6.4 Spill Containment Boxes on Fill Pipe
a. Inspect for debris, residue, and water in the box and remove.
☐ Yes* ☐ No ☐ N/A
b. Drain valves must be operable and closed.
☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
c. If corrosion, damage, or wear has compromised the ability of the unit to perform spill containment functions, replace the unit.
☐ Yes* ☐ No ☐ N/A
d. Inspect the connections to the AST for tightness, as well as the bolts, nuts, washers for condition and replace if necessary.
☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
e. Drain valves must be operable and closed
6.5 Strainer
a. Check that the strainer is clean and in good condition.
b. Access strainer basket and check cap and gasket seal as well as bolts.
☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
6.6 Filter
a. Check that the filter is in good condition and is within the manufacturer’s expected service life.
Replace, if necessary.
☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
b. Check for leaks and decreased fuel flow
6.7 Flame Arrestors
a. Follow manufacturer’s instructions.
Check for corrosion and blockage of air passages.
6.8 Leak Detector for Submersible Pump Systems
a. Test according to manufacturer's instructions and authority having jurisdiction (AHJ). Verify leak detectors are suited and properly installed for aboveground use.
☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
6.9 Liquid Level Equipment
a. Both visual and mechanical devices must be inspected for physical damage.
b. Check that the device is easily readable
c. Has equipment been tested to ensure proper operation?
d. Does equipment operate as required?
e. Follow manufacturer’s instructions ☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
6.10 Overfill Equipment
a. If equipped with a "test" button, activate the audible horn or light to confirm operation. This could be battery powered. Replace the battery if needed
☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
b. If overfill valve is equipped with a mechanical test mechanism, actuate the mechanism to confirm operation.
c. Follow manufacturer’s instructions and regulatory requirements for inspection and functionality verification.
☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
d. Confirm device is suited for above ground use by the manufacturer
6.11 Piping Connections
a. Check for leaks, corrosion and damage
7.0 INSULATED TANKS
7.1 Insulation
a. Check condition of insulation for:
Missing sections Areas of moisture Mold Damage
☐ Yes* ☐ No ☐ N/A
7.2 Insulation Cover or Jacket
a. Check for damage that will allow water intrusion
8.0 MISCELANEOUS
8.1 Electrical Wiring and Boxes
a. Are they in good condition? ☐ Yes ☐ No* ☐ N/A
8.2 Labels and Tags
a. Ensure that all labels and tags are intact and readable.
8.3 Ladder and Platform Structure
a. Secure with no sign of severe corrosion or damage?
8.4 Other Conditions
a. Are there other conditions that should be addressed for continued safe operation or that may affect the site spill prevention plan?
☐ Yes* ☐ No
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
APPENDIX D: PHOTOGRAPHS
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.1: Tank Ground and Steel Saddle D.2: Steel Saddle
D.3: Head 1 D.4: Overall View
D.5: Nozzles A, B, and C D.6: Nozzles D and E
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.7: Flame Arrestor D.8: Flame Arrestor
D.9: Nozzles F, G, and H D.10: Water Draw
D.11: Water Draw Hand Pump D.12: Nozzle H
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.13: Nozzle I D.14: Nozzle J and K
D.15: Electronic ATG D.16: Nozzle L
D.17: Overfill Alarm D.18: Nozzle M
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.19: Nozzles N, and O D.20: Nozzles N, O, and P
D.21: Nozzles O, P, and Q D.22: Nozzles P and Q
D.23: Catwalk Access D.24: Catwalk
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.25: Catwalk Access D.26: Receipt Filter Separator
D.27: Receipt Piping D.28: Receipt Piping
D.29: Receipt Piping D.30: Receipt Piping
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.31: Receipt Piping D.32: Receipt Piping
D.33: Thread Engagement D.34: Overall View
D.35: Issue Piping D.36: Issue Piping
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.37: Issue Piping D.38: Issue Piping
D.39: Issue Piping D.40: Issue Piping
D.41: Issue Piping D.42: Issue Spill Bucket
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.43: Issue Piping D.44: Fuel Dripping
D.45: Leaking Sight Flow Indicator D.46: Electronic ATG House
D.47: Electronic ATG Alarm D.48: Electronic ATG Read Out
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.49: Electronic ATG Control Panel D.50: Facility Containment
D.51: Facility Containment D.52: Facility Containment
D.53: Facility Containment D.54: Facility Containment
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.55: Containment Sump D.56: Containment Sump
D.57: Remote Impounding D.58: Remote Impounding
D.59: Expansion Joint Deterioration D.60: Expansion Joint Deterioration
STI In‐Service Inspection Report A.A.S.F.1 Lexington, OK
D.61: Vegetation D.62: Expansion Joint Deterioration
D.63: Expansion Joint Deterioration D.64: Containment Cracking
| 10 TANK CONTAINMENT: |
| 11 Containment Structure: |
| undefined: No |
| Yes No NA: |
| 12 Primary Tank: |
| a Check for water: |
| undefined_2: No_2 |
| Yes No NA_2: |
| 13 Containment Drain Valves: |
| a Operable and in a closed position: |
| undefined_3: Yes_3 |
| Yes No NA_3: |
| 14 Pathways and Entry: |
| a Clear and gatesdoors operable: |
| undefined_4: Yes_4 |
| Yes No NA_4: |
| 20 LEAK DETECTION: |
| 21 Tank: |
| a Visible signs of leakage: |
| undefined_5: No_5 |
| Yes No NA_5: |
| 22 Secondary Containment: |
| undefined_6: No_6 |
| Yes No NA_6: |
| 23 Surrounding Soil: |
| a Visible signs of leakage_2: |
| undefined_7: No_7 |
| Yes No NA_7: |
| 24 Interstice: |
| a Visible signs of leakage_3: |
| undefined_8: No_8 |
| Yes No NA_8: |
| 30 TANK FOUNDATION and SUPPORTS: |
| 31 Foundation: |
| a Settlement or foundation washout: |
| undefined_9: No_9 |
| Yes No NA_9: |
| 32 Concrete Pad or Ring Wall: |
| a Cracking or spalling: |
| undefined_10: Yes_10 |
| Yes No NA_10: There is minor cracking and joint seal deterioration |
| ItemTask: |
| Status: |
| Comments: |
| 33 Supports: |
| undefined_11: No_11 |
| Yes No NA_11: |
| 34 Water Drainage: |
| a Water drains away from tank: |
| undefined_12: Yes_12 |
| Yes No NA_12: |
| 35 Tank Grounding: |
| undefined_13: Yes_13 |
| Yes No NA_13: |
| 40 CATHODIC PROTECTION: |
| 41 Gavlvanic Cathodic Protection System: |
| undefined_14: NA_14 |
| Yes No NA_14: |
| 42 Impressed current system: |
| undefined_15: NA_15 |
| Yes No NA_15: |
| undefined_16: NA_16 |
| Yes No NA_16: |
| 50 TANK SHELL HEADS ROOF: |
| 51 Coating: |
| a Check for coating failure: |
| undefined_17: Yes_17 |
| Yes No NA_17: There is minor coating failure on the shell. |
| 52 Steel Condition: |
| fill_28: |
| undefined_18: No_18 |
| Yes No NA_18: |
| 53 Roof Slope: |
| undefined_19: No_19 |
| Yes No NA_19: |
| 60 TANK EQUIPMENT: |
| 61 Vents: |
| undefined_20: Yes_20 |
| Yes No NA_20: |
| 62 Valves: |
| undefined_21: No_21 |
| Yes No NA_21: |
| undefined_22: Yes_22 |
| Yes No NA_22: |
| 631 AntiSiphon Check and Gate Valves: |
| undefined_23: NA_23 |
| Yes No NA_23: |
| ItemTask_2: |
| Status_2: |
| Comments_2: |
| 632 Pressure Regulator Valve: |
| undefined_24: NA_24 |
| Yes No NA_24: |
| 633 Expansion Relief Valve: |
| undefined_25: NA_25 |
| Yes No NA_25: |
| 634 Solenoid Valves: |
| undefined_26: NA_26 |
| Yes No NA_26: |
| 635 Fire and Shear Valves: |
| undefined_27: NA_27 |
| Yes No NA_27: |
| undefined_28: NA_28 |
| Yes No NA_28: |
| undefined_29: NA_29 |
| Yes No NA_29: |
| undefined_30: NA_30 |
| Yes No NA_30: |
| 63 Interstitial Leak Detection Equipment: |
| undefined_31: Yes_31 |
| Yes No NA_31: |
| 64 Spill Containment Boxes on Fill Pipe: |
| undefined_32: No_32 |
| Yes No NA_32: |
| undefined_33: Yes_33 |
| Yes No NA_33: |
| undefined_34: No_34 |
| Yes No NA_34: |
| undefined_35: Yes_35 |
| Yes No NA_35: |
| undefined_36: NA_36 |
| Yes No NA_36: |
| ItemTask_3: |
| Status_3: |
| Comments_3: |
| 65 Strainer: |
| undefined_37: NA_37 |
| Yes No NA_37: |
| undefined_38: NA_38 |
| Yes No NA_38: |
| 66 Filter: |
| undefined_39: NA_39 |
| Yes No NA_39: |
| undefined_40: NA_40 |
| Yes No NA_40: |
| 67 Flame Arrestors: |
| undefined_41: NA_41 |
| Yes No NA_41: |
| 68 Leak Detector for Submersible Pump Systems: |
| undefined_42: NA_42 |
| Yes No NA_42: |
| 69 Liquid Level Equipment: |
| undefined_43: No_43 |
| Yes No NA_43: |
| undefined_44: Yes_44 |
| Yes No NA_44: |
| undefined_45: Yes_45 |
| Yes No NA_45: |
| undefined_46: Yes_46 |
| Yes No NA_46: |
| e Follow manufacturers instructions: |
| undefined_47: Yes_47 |
| Yes No NA_47: |
| 610 Overfill Equipment: |
| undefined_48: Yes_48 |
| Yes No NA_48: |
| undefined_49: Yes_49 |
| Yes No NA_49: |
| undefined_50: Yes_50 |
| Yes No NA_50: |
| undefined_51: Yes_51 |
| Yes No NA_51: |
| 611 Piping Connections: |
| undefined_52: No_52 |
| Yes No NA_52: |
| ItemTask_4: |
| Status_4: |
| Comments_4: |
| 70 INSULATED TANKS: |
| 71 Insulation: |
| undefined_53: NA_53 |
| Yes No NA_53: |
| 72 Insulation Cover or Jacket: |
| undefined_54: NA_54 |
| Yes No NA_54: |
| 80 MISCELANEOUS: |
| 81 Electrical Wiring and Boxes: |
| a Are they in good condition: |
| undefined_55: Yes_55 |
| Yes No NA_55: |
| 82 Labels and Tags: |
| undefined_56: No_56 |
| Yes No NA_56: Labels are coated and painted over |
| 83 Ladder and Platform Structure: |
| undefined_57: Yes_57 |
| Yes No NA_57: |
| 84 Other Conditions: |
| undefined_58: No_58 |
| Yes No: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .